Runoff Estimation Using the NRCS Slope-Adjusted Curve Number in Mountainous Watersheds
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 4
Abstract
In mountainous watersheds, rainfall generates runoff quickly because of the decreased depression storage, high downslope flow velocity, and smaller chance for rainwater infiltration. In order to obtain precise event-based runoff estimations in mountainous watersheds, a slope-adjusted curve number () with a smaller initial abstraction ratio () is indispensable in the standard natural resources conservation service (NRCS) curve number (CN) model. Using measured rainfall-runoff data from 39 mountainous watersheds in South Korea, this study investigated two existing approaches and suggested a new approach that was accompanied by a lower value. The new equation was calibrated with 1,402 measured rainfall-runoff events from 31 watersheds and validated with 377 rainfall-runoff events from the remaining eight watersheds. Most of the runoff events, used for both calibration and validation, were underestimated using a CN without a slope-adjusting factor. By considering the combined effect of the proposed and setting equal to 0.01, the performance measures based on the root mean squares error (in mm), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, and coefficient of determination were significantly improved from averages of 27.10, 0.64, and 0.75 to 18.69, 0.82, and 0.87, respectively, as compared to the standard NRCS model. The proposed modification exhibited superior results compared to the two existing approaches. Findings from this study support the adjustment of both the CN and in the NRCS model to increase its runoff prediction capabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant from the Construction Technology Innovation Program (11CTIPC06-Development of Korean Advanced Technology for Hydrologic Analysis) funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MLIT), Republic of Korea. Special thanks to the Hydrological Survey Center (HSC) of Korea for providing the measured streamflow data.
References
Ajmal, M., and Kim, T. W. (2015). “Quantifying excess stormwater using SCS-CN-based rainfall runoff models and different curve number determination methods.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 04014058.
Baltas, E. A., Dervos, N. A., and Mimikou, M. A. (2007). “Technical note: Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(6), 1825–1829.
Barros, A. P., Knapton, D., Wang, M. C., and Kuo, C. Y. (1999). “Runoff in shallow soils under laboratory conditions.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 28–37.
Beck, H. E., De Jeu, R. A. M., Schellekens, J., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., and Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2009). “Improving curve number based storm runoff estimates using soil moisture proxies.” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Appl. Earth Observ., 2(4), 250–259.
Bondelid, T. R., McCuen, R. H., and Jackson, T. J. (1982). “Sensitivity of SCS models to curve number variation.” Water Resour. Bull., 18(1), 111–116.
Buchanan, B. P., Easton, Z. M., Schneider, R. L., and Walter, M. T. (2012). “Incorporating variable source area hydrology into a spatially distributed storm runoff model.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 48(1), 43–60.
Chaplot, V. A. M., and Bissonnais, Y. L. (2003). “Runoff features for interrill erosion at different rainfall intensities, slope lengths, and gradients in an agricultural loessial hillslope.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67(3), 844–851.
Cheng, X., Shaw, S. B., Marjerison, R. D., Yearick, C. D., DeGloria, S. D., and Walter, M. T. (2014). “Improving risk estimates of runoff producing areas: Formulating variable source areas as a bivariate process.” J. Environ. Manage., 137, 146–156.
De Ploey, J., Savat, J., and Moeyersons, J. (1976). “The differential impact of some soil loss factors on flow, runoff creep and rainwash.” Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 1(2), 151–161.
Deshmukh, D. S., Chaube, U. C., Hailu, A. E., Gudeta, D. A., and Kassa, M. T. (2013). “Estimation and comparison of curve numbers based on dynamic land use land cover change, observed rainfall-runoff data and land slope.” J. Hydrol., 492, 89–101.
Dodds, W. K. (1997). “Distribution of runoff and rivers related to vegetative characteristics, latitude, and slope: A global perspective.” J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16(1), 162–168.
Ebrahimian, M., Nuruddin, A. A. B., Soom, M. A. B. M., Sood, A. M., and Neng, L. J. (2012). “Runoff estimation in steep slope watershed with standard and slope-adjusted curve number methods.” Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 21(5), 1191–1202.
El-Hassanin, A. S., Labib, T. M., and Gaber, E. I. (1993). “Effect of vegetation cover and land slope on runoff and soil losses from the watersheds of Burundi.” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 43(3–4), 301–308.
Evett, S. R., and Dutt, G. R. (1985). “Length and slope effects on runoff from sodium dispersed, compacted earth microcatchments.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49(3), 734–738.
Fang, H. Y., Cai, Q. G., Chen, H., and Li, Q. Y. (2008). “Effect of rainfall regime and slope on runoff in a Gullied Loess region on the Loess Plateau in China.” J. Environ. Manage., 42(3), 402–411.
Garg, V., Nikam, B. R., Thakur, P. K., and Aggarwal, S. P. (2013). “Assessment of the effect of slope on runoff potential of a watershed using NRCS-CN method.” Int. J. Hydrol. Sci. Technol., 3(2), 141–159.
Haggard, B. E., et al. (2002). “Effect of slope, grazing and aeration on pasture hydrology.” ASAE Annual Int. Meeting/CIGR XVth World Congress, Chicago.
Hawkins, R. H. (1975). “The importance of accurate curve numbers in the estimation of storm runoff.” Water Resour. Bull., 11(5), 887–890.
Hawkins, R. H. (1993). “Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data.” J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 334–345.
Hawkins, R. H., Ward, T. J., Woodward, D. E., and Van Mullem, J. A. (2009). Curve number hydrology-state of the practice, ASCE/EWRI, Reston, VA.
Huang, J., Zhao, X., and Wu, P. (2013). “Surface runoff volumes from vegetated slopes during simulated rainfall events.” J. Soil. Water. Conserv., 68(4), 283–295.
Huang, M. B., Gallichand, J., Wang, Z., and Goulet, M. (2006). “A modification to the soil conservation service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess Plateau of China.” Hydrol. Process., 20(3), 579–589.
Jiang, R. (2001). “Investigation of runoff curve number initial abstraction ratio.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
King, K. W., Arnold, J. G., and Bingner, R. L. (1999). “Comparison of Green-Ampt and curve number methods on Goodwin Creek watershed using SWAT.” ASAE Trans., 42(4), 919–926.
Mays, L. W. (2005). Water resources engineering, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
McCuen, R. H. (2002). “Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 43–48.
Miliani, F., Ravazzani, G., and Mancini, M. (2011). “Adaptation of precipitation index for the estimation of antecedent moisture condition in large mountainous basins.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 218–227 .
Mishra, S. K., Chaudhary, A., Shrestha, R. K., Pandey, A., and Lal, M. (2014). “Experimental verification of the effect of slope and land use on SCS runoff curve number.” Water Resour. Manage., 28(11), 3407–3416.
Mishra, S. K., Jain, M. K., Babu, P. S., Venugopal, K., and Kaliappan, S. (2008). “Comparison of AMC-dependent CN-conversion formulae.” Water Resour. Manage., 22(10), 1409–1420.
Mishra, S. K., Jain, M. K., Pandey, R. P., and Singh, V. P. (2005). “Catchment area-based evaluation of the AMC-dependent SCS-CN-inspired rainfall-runoff models.” Hydrol. Process., 19(14), 2701–2718.
Mishra, S. K., Jain, M. K., and Singh, V. P. (2004). “Evaluation of the SCS-CN-based model incorporating antecedent moisture.” Water Resour. Manage., 18(6), 567–589.
Mishra, S. K., Sahu, R. K., Eldho, T. I., and Jain, M. K. (2006). “An improved relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology.” Water Resour. Manage., 20(5), 643–660.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). (2004). National engineering handbook: Hydrology, USDA, Washington, DC.
Philip, J. R. (1991). “Hillslope infiltration: Planar slopes.” Water Resour. Res., 27(1), 109–117.
Ponce, V. M., and Hawkins, R. H. (1996). “Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?” J. Hydrol. Eng., 11–19.
Ritter, A., and Muñoz-Carpena, R. (2013). “Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments.” J. Hydrol., 480, 33–45.
Sahu, R. K., Mishra, S. K., and Eldho, T. I. (2010). “An improved AMC-coupled runoff curve number model.” Hydrol. Process., 24(20), 2834–2839.
Shafiq, M., and Ahmad, B. (2001). “Surface runoff as affected by surface gradient and grass cover.” J. Eng. App. Sci., 20(1), 88–92.
Sharma, K., Singh, H., and Pareek, O. (1983). “Rain water infiltration into a bare loamy sand.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 28(3), 417–424.
Sharpley, A. N., and Williams, J. R. (1990). “EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation.”, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
Shaw, S. B., and Walter, M. T. (2009). “Improving runoff risk estimates: Formulating runoff as a bivariate process using the SCS curve number method.” Water Resour. Res., 45(3), W03404.
Shi, Z. H., Chen, L. D., Fang, N. F., Qin, D. F., and Cai, C. F. (2009). “Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall-runoff event analysis in the Three Gorges Area, China.” Catena, 77(1), 1–7.
Soulis, K. X., and Valiantzas, J. D. (2013). “Identification of the SCS-CN parameter spatial distribution using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds.” Water Resour. Manage., 27(6), 1737–1749.
StatSoft version 10 [Computer software]. STATISTICA, Tulsa, OK.
Van Mullem, J. A. (1991). “Runoff and peak discharges using Green-Ampt infiltration model.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 354–370.
Wang, X., Liu, T., and Yang, W. (2012). “Development of a robust runoff-prediction model by fusing the rational equation and a modified SCS-CN method.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 57(6), 1118–1140.
Woodward, D. E., Hawkins, R. H., Jiang, R., Hjelmfelt, A. T., van Mullem, J. A., and Quan, Q. D. (2003). “Runoff curve number method: Examination of the initial abstraction ratio.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10.
Yuan, Y., Nie, W., McCutcheon, S. C., and Taguas, E. V. (2014). “Initial abstraction and curve numbers for semiarid watersheds in southeastern Arizona.” Hydrol. Process., 28(3), 774–783.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 26, 2014
Accepted: Oct 22, 2015
Published online: Jan 5, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 5, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.