Technical Papers
Jan 5, 2016

Runoff Estimation Using the NRCS Slope-Adjusted Curve Number in Mountainous Watersheds

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 4

Abstract

In mountainous watersheds, rainfall generates runoff quickly because of the decreased depression storage, high downslope flow velocity, and smaller chance for rainwater infiltration. In order to obtain precise event-based runoff estimations in mountainous watersheds, a slope-adjusted curve number (CNIIα) with a smaller initial abstraction ratio (λ) is indispensable in the standard natural resources conservation service (NRCS) curve number (CN) model. Using measured rainfall-runoff data from 39 mountainous watersheds in South Korea, this study investigated two existing CNIIα approaches and suggested a new approach that was accompanied by a lower λ value. The new CNIIα equation was calibrated with 1,402 measured rainfall-runoff events from 31 watersheds and validated with 377 rainfall-runoff events from the remaining eight watersheds. Most of the runoff events, used for both calibration and validation, were underestimated using a CN without a slope-adjusting factor. By considering the combined effect of the proposed CNIIα and setting λ equal to 0.01, the performance measures based on the root mean squares error (in mm), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, and coefficient of determination were significantly improved from averages of 27.10, 0.64, and 0.75 to 18.69, 0.82, and 0.87, respectively, as compared to the standard NRCS model. The proposed modification exhibited superior results compared to the two existing CNIIα approaches. Findings from this study support the adjustment of both the CN and λ in the NRCS model to increase its runoff prediction capabilities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Construction Technology Innovation Program (11CTIPC06-Development of Korean Advanced Technology for Hydrologic Analysis) funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MLIT), Republic of Korea. Special thanks to the Hydrological Survey Center (HSC) of Korea for providing the measured streamflow data.

References

Ajmal, M., and Kim, T. W. (2015). “Quantifying excess stormwater using SCS-CN-based rainfall runoff models and different curve number determination methods.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 04014058.
Baltas, E. A., Dervos, N. A., and Mimikou, M. A. (2007). “Technical note: Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(6), 1825–1829.
Barros, A. P., Knapton, D., Wang, M. C., and Kuo, C. Y. (1999). “Runoff in shallow soils under laboratory conditions.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 28–37.
Beck, H. E., De Jeu, R. A. M., Schellekens, J., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., and Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2009). “Improving curve number based storm runoff estimates using soil moisture proxies.” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Appl. Earth Observ., 2(4), 250–259.
Bondelid, T. R., McCuen, R. H., and Jackson, T. J. (1982). “Sensitivity of SCS models to curve number variation.” Water Resour. Bull., 18(1), 111–116.
Buchanan, B. P., Easton, Z. M., Schneider, R. L., and Walter, M. T. (2012). “Incorporating variable source area hydrology into a spatially distributed storm runoff model.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 48(1), 43–60.
Chaplot, V. A. M., and Bissonnais, Y. L. (2003). “Runoff features for interrill erosion at different rainfall intensities, slope lengths, and gradients in an agricultural loessial hillslope.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67(3), 844–851.
Cheng, X., Shaw, S. B., Marjerison, R. D., Yearick, C. D., DeGloria, S. D., and Walter, M. T. (2014). “Improving risk estimates of runoff producing areas: Formulating variable source areas as a bivariate process.” J. Environ. Manage., 137, 146–156.
De Ploey, J., Savat, J., and Moeyersons, J. (1976). “The differential impact of some soil loss factors on flow, runoff creep and rainwash.” Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 1(2), 151–161.
Deshmukh, D. S., Chaube, U. C., Hailu, A. E., Gudeta, D. A., and Kassa, M. T. (2013). “Estimation and comparison of curve numbers based on dynamic land use land cover change, observed rainfall-runoff data and land slope.” J. Hydrol., 492, 89–101.
Dodds, W. K. (1997). “Distribution of runoff and rivers related to vegetative characteristics, latitude, and slope: A global perspective.” J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16(1), 162–168.
Ebrahimian, M., Nuruddin, A. A. B., Soom, M. A. B. M., Sood, A. M., and Neng, L. J. (2012). “Runoff estimation in steep slope watershed with standard and slope-adjusted curve number methods.” Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 21(5), 1191–1202.
El-Hassanin, A. S., Labib, T. M., and Gaber, E. I. (1993). “Effect of vegetation cover and land slope on runoff and soil losses from the watersheds of Burundi.” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 43(3–4), 301–308.
Evett, S. R., and Dutt, G. R. (1985). “Length and slope effects on runoff from sodium dispersed, compacted earth microcatchments.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49(3), 734–738.
Fang, H. Y., Cai, Q. G., Chen, H., and Li, Q. Y. (2008). “Effect of rainfall regime and slope on runoff in a Gullied Loess region on the Loess Plateau in China.” J. Environ. Manage., 42(3), 402–411.
Garg, V., Nikam, B. R., Thakur, P. K., and Aggarwal, S. P. (2013). “Assessment of the effect of slope on runoff potential of a watershed using NRCS-CN method.” Int. J. Hydrol. Sci. Technol., 3(2), 141–159.
Haggard, B. E., et al. (2002). “Effect of slope, grazing and aeration on pasture hydrology.” ASAE Annual Int. Meeting/CIGR XVth World Congress, Chicago.
Hawkins, R. H. (1975). “The importance of accurate curve numbers in the estimation of storm runoff.” Water Resour. Bull., 11(5), 887–890.
Hawkins, R. H. (1993). “Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data.” J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 334–345.
Hawkins, R. H., Ward, T. J., Woodward, D. E., and Van Mullem, J. A. (2009). Curve number hydrology-state of the practice, ASCE/EWRI, Reston, VA.
Huang, J., Zhao, X., and Wu, P. (2013). “Surface runoff volumes from vegetated slopes during simulated rainfall events.” J. Soil. Water. Conserv., 68(4), 283–295.
Huang, M. B., Gallichand, J., Wang, Z., and Goulet, M. (2006). “A modification to the soil conservation service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess Plateau of China.” Hydrol. Process., 20(3), 579–589.
Jiang, R. (2001). “Investigation of runoff curve number initial abstraction ratio.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
King, K. W., Arnold, J. G., and Bingner, R. L. (1999). “Comparison of Green-Ampt and curve number methods on Goodwin Creek watershed using SWAT.” ASAE Trans., 42(4), 919–926.
Mays, L. W. (2005). Water resources engineering, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
McCuen, R. H. (2002). “Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 43–48.
Miliani, F., Ravazzani, G., and Mancini, M. (2011). “Adaptation of precipitation index for the estimation of antecedent moisture condition in large mountainous basins.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 218–227 .
Mishra, S. K., Chaudhary, A., Shrestha, R. K., Pandey, A., and Lal, M. (2014). “Experimental verification of the effect of slope and land use on SCS runoff curve number.” Water Resour. Manage., 28(11), 3407–3416.
Mishra, S. K., Jain, M. K., Babu, P. S., Venugopal, K., and Kaliappan, S. (2008). “Comparison of AMC-dependent CN-conversion formulae.” Water Resour. Manage., 22(10), 1409–1420.
Mishra, S. K., Jain, M. K., Pandey, R. P., and Singh, V. P. (2005). “Catchment area-based evaluation of the AMC-dependent SCS-CN-inspired rainfall-runoff models.” Hydrol. Process., 19(14), 2701–2718.
Mishra, S. K., Jain, M. K., and Singh, V. P. (2004). “Evaluation of the SCS-CN-based model incorporating antecedent moisture.” Water Resour. Manage., 18(6), 567–589.
Mishra, S. K., Sahu, R. K., Eldho, T. I., and Jain, M. K. (2006). “An improved IaS relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology.” Water Resour. Manage., 20(5), 643–660.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). (2004). National engineering handbook: Hydrology, USDA, Washington, DC.
Philip, J. R. (1991). “Hillslope infiltration: Planar slopes.” Water Resour. Res., 27(1), 109–117.
Ponce, V. M., and Hawkins, R. H. (1996). “Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?” J. Hydrol. Eng., 11–19.
Ritter, A., and Muñoz-Carpena, R. (2013). “Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments.” J. Hydrol., 480, 33–45.
Sahu, R. K., Mishra, S. K., and Eldho, T. I. (2010). “An improved AMC-coupled runoff curve number model.” Hydrol. Process., 24(20), 2834–2839.
Shafiq, M., and Ahmad, B. (2001). “Surface runoff as affected by surface gradient and grass cover.” J. Eng. App. Sci., 20(1), 88–92.
Sharma, K., Singh, H., and Pareek, O. (1983). “Rain water infiltration into a bare loamy sand.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 28(3), 417–424.
Sharpley, A. N., and Williams, J. R. (1990). “EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation.”, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
Shaw, S. B., and Walter, M. T. (2009). “Improving runoff risk estimates: Formulating runoff as a bivariate process using the SCS curve number method.” Water Resour. Res., 45(3), W03404.
Shi, Z. H., Chen, L. D., Fang, N. F., Qin, D. F., and Cai, C. F. (2009). “Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall-runoff event analysis in the Three Gorges Area, China.” Catena, 77(1), 1–7.
Soulis, K. X., and Valiantzas, J. D. (2013). “Identification of the SCS-CN parameter spatial distribution using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds.” Water Resour. Manage., 27(6), 1737–1749.
StatSoft version 10 [Computer software]. STATISTICA, Tulsa, OK.
Van Mullem, J. A. (1991). “Runoff and peak discharges using Green-Ampt infiltration model.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 354–370.
Wang, X., Liu, T., and Yang, W. (2012). “Development of a robust runoff-prediction model by fusing the rational equation and a modified SCS-CN method.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 57(6), 1118–1140.
Woodward, D. E., Hawkins, R. H., Jiang, R., Hjelmfelt, A. T., van Mullem, J. A., and Quan, Q. D. (2003). “Runoff curve number method: Examination of the initial abstraction ratio.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10.
Yuan, Y., Nie, W., McCutcheon, S. C., and Taguas, E. V. (2014). “Initial abstraction and curve numbers for semiarid watersheds in southeastern Arizona.” Hydrol. Process., 28(3), 774–783.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 142Issue 4April 2016

History

Received: Dec 26, 2014
Accepted: Oct 22, 2015
Published online: Jan 5, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 5, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Muhammad Ajmal
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang Univ., Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea; Lecturer, Dept. of Agricultural Engineering, Univ. of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan.
Muhammad Waseem
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang Univ., Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Hyun Ahn
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Seokyeong Univ., Seoul 02713, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Woong Kim [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang Univ., Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share