Technical Papers
Jul 12, 2013

Economic Assessment of Water Resources Management Strategies

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper presents an economic framework of all potential benefits and costs arising from present activities and implementation of policies; including crop production costs, capital and operating costs of development projects, environmental costs, pumping costs, and costs imposed by reduced crop production. The methodology was applied for a water resource system of Rafsanjan Plain, in the central part of Iran. The water supply and demand system of the region was simulated into two different models. The former was a decision support system (DSS)-based model, and the latter was a system dynamics-based model. Despite some minor differences, the principal characteristics of the region was similarly simulated in both models. Then, management scenarios were generated considering different strategies including the interbasin water transfer, improvements in irrigation techniques, limiting future expansion of cultivated area, and restricting withdrawal from groundwater. By combining these strategies, various scenarios could be generated. To evaluate the scenarios, the net present value (NPV) factor, and a multi criteria decision making (MCDM) model are used to evaluate the scenarios. The entropy information theory is also used to calculate the weights of different criteria in ranking different scenarios. This study demonstrates how combining multiple tools and techniques along with an economic framework could effectively assist decision makers to understand the consequences of a taken strategy in a specific region. The results show that despite the shortage of water resources in this area, interbasin water transfer is not viable.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ahmad, S., and Simonovic, S. P. (2000). “System dynamics modeling of reservoir operations for flood management.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 190–198.
Ahmadi, A., Karamouz, M., Moridi, A., and Han, D. (2012). “Integrated planning of land use and water allocation on a watershed scale considering social and water quality issues.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 671–681.
Barthel, R., Nickel, D., Meleg, A., Trifkovic, A., and Braun, J. (2005). “Linking the physical and the socio-economic compartments of an integrated water and land use management model on a river basin scale using an object-oriented water supply model.” Phys. Chem. Earth, 30(6–7), 389–397.
Brumbelow, K., and Georgakakos, A. (2007). “Optimization and assessment of agricultural water-sharing scenarios under multiple socioeconomic objectives.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 264–274.
Cai, X., McKinney, D. C., and Lasdon, L. S. (2003). “An integrated hydrologic-agronomiceconomic model for river basin management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 4–17.
Castelletti, A., Pianosi, F., and Soncini-Sessa, R. (2008). “Water reservoir control under economic, social and environmental constraints.” Automatica, 44(6), 1595–1607.
Close, A., et al. (2003). A strategic review of CALSIM II and its uses for water planning, management, and operations in central California, California Bay Delta Authority Science Program, Association of Bay Governments, Oakland, CA.
Davies, E. G. R., and Simonovic, S. P. (2011). “Global water resources modeling with an integrated model of the social–economic–environmental system.” Adv. Water Resour., 34(6), 684–700.
Delden, H. V., Luja, P., and Engelen, G. (2007). “Integration of multi-scale dynamic spatial models of socio-economic and physical processes for river basin management.” Environ. Model. Software, 22(2), 223–238.
Doorenbos, J., and Pruitt, W. O. (1984). “Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements.”, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Douglas, A. J. (2009). “Social, political, and institutional setting: Water management problems of the Rio Grande.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 493–501.
Draper, A. J., Jenkins, M. W., Kirby, K. W., Lund, J. R., and Howitt, R. E. (2003). “Economic engineering optimization for California water management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 155–164.
Droubi, A., et al. (2008). “A decision support system (DSS) for water resources management—Design and results from a pilot study in Syria.” Climatic changes and water resources in the Middle East and North Africa, Springer, Berlin, 199–225.
Ezzatabadi, M., and Soltani, G. R. (2000). “Calculating external costs of groundwater overdrafting: A case study of Rafsanjan.” Iran. J. Agric. Res., 30(1), 35–44, (in Farsi).
Ghahraman, B., and Sepaskhah, A. R. (2004). “Linear and non-linear optimization models for allocation of a limited water supply.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 138–149.
Höllermann, B., Giertz, S., and Diekkrüger, B. (2010). “Benin 2025—Balancing future water availability and demand using the WEAP ‘water evaluation and planning’ system.” Water Resour. Manage., 24(13), 3591–3613.
Jessel, B., and Jacobs, J. (2005). “Land use scenario development and stakeholder involvement as tools for watershed management within the Havel River Basin.” Limnologica, 35(3), 220–233.
Karamouz, M., Akhbari, M., Moridi, A., and Kerachian, R. (2006). “A system dynamics-based conflict resolution model for river water quality management, Iran.” J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 3(3), 147–160.
Krol, M., Jaeger, A., Bronstert, A., and Güntner, A. (2006). “Integrated modelling of climate, water, soil, agricultural and socio-economic processes: A general introduction of the methodology and some exemplary results from the semi-arid north-east of Brazil.” J. Hydrol., 328(3–4), 417–431.
Lange, W. J. D., Wise, R. M., Forsyth, G. G., and Nahman, A. (2010). “Integrating socio-economic and biophysical data to support water allocations within river basins: An example from the Inkomati water management area in South Africa.” Environ. Model. Software, 25(1), 43–50.
Larson, K. (2009). “Social acceptability of water resource management: A conceptual approach and empirical findings from Portland, Oregon.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(4), 879–893.
Nandalal, K. D. W., and Simonovic, S. P. (2003). “Resolving conflicts in water sharing: A systemic approach.” Water Resour. Res., 39(12), 1362.
Pereira, L. S., Cordery, I., and Iacovides, I. (2002). “Coping with water scarcity.”, UNESCO, Paris, 272.
Purkey, D. R., et al. (2008). “Robust analysis of future climate change impacts on water for agriculture and other sectors: A case study in the Sacramento Valley.” Clim. Change., 87(S1), 109–122.
Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI). (2001). “WEAP: Water evaluation and planning system.” 〈http://www.sei-international.org/weap-the-water-evaluation-and-planning-system〉 (May 2011).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 140Issue 1January 2014

History

Received: Sep 10, 2012
Accepted: Jul 10, 2013
Published online: Jul 12, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Mar 17, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad Karamouz [email protected]
F.ASCE
Director, Environmental Engineering and Science Programs, Polytechnic Institute of New York Univ., Brooklyn, NY 11201 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Azadeh Ahmadi
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Isfahan Univ. of Technology, P.O. Box 84156-83111, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Saleh Semsar Yazdi
Project Manager, Tamadone Karizi Consulting Engineers, P.O. Box 89195-319, Yazd, Iran; formerly, Research Associate, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Behzad Ahmadi
Research Associate, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, P.O. Box 11365-4563, Tehran, Iran.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share