Evaluating the Performance of Ordinary Kriging in Mapping Soil Salinity
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 12
Abstract
The performance of ordinary kriging (OK) is impacted by different factors that characterize the data sets being interpolated. The following factors were investigated as part of this study to evaluate the performance of OK in mapping soil salinity: (1) sampling density (field scale, subbasin scale, and subbasin scale merged with field scale); (2) spatial point patterns (random, aggregated, and regular); (3) spatial and no spatial autocorrelations; (4) normal and skewed distributions; and (5) homogeneity and heterogeneity. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of the OK model against each of the aforementioned factors. To achieve this objective, 36 different data sets were selected from data collected from 1999 to 2008 in a study area in the Lower Arkansas River Valley in Colorado. These data sets were selected to represent the different factors used to evaluate the performance of OK, in which each factor is represented by three different data sets. Assessments of the OK model residuals and the cross-validation techniques were used to evaluate the performance of the model, both analytically and graphically. The results of this study show that the model performance is accurate when using the field-scale data sets and poor when using the subbasin-scale data sets. When the field-scale data sets are merged with the subbasin-scale data sets, the performance of the model improved significantly over the subbasin-scale data sets. The performance of the model is better when using random or aggregated data sets than when using regular data sets. The existence of spatial autocorrelation significantly improves the performance of the model as expected. When there is no spatial autocorrelation, the performance of the model is severely impacted. The model performs better using normally distributed rather than skewed data sets and also using homogeneous rather than heterogeneous data sets.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models. (1993). “Criteria for evaluation of watershed models.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 119(3), 429–442.
Cemek, B., Guler, M., KiliÇ, K., Demir, Y., and Arslan, H. (2007). “Assessment of spatial variability in some soil properties as related to soil salinity and alkalinity in Bafra plain in northern Turkey.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 124(1–3), 223–234.
Chu, T., and Shirmohammadi, A. (2004). “Evaluation of the SWAT model’s hydrology component in the Piedmont physiographic region of Maryland.” Trans. ASABE, 47(4), 1057–1073.
Clark, P. J., and Evans, F. C. (1954). “Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations.” Ecology, 35(4), 445–453.
Corwin, D., and Lesch, S. (2003). “Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: Theory, principles, and guidelines.” Agron. J., 95(3), 455–471.
Cressie, N. (1993). Statistics for spatial data, Wiley Interscience, New York.
Eldeiry, A., and Garcia, L. A. (2008a). “Detecting soil salinity in alfalfa fields using spatial modeling and remote sensing.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72(1), 201–211.
Eldeiry, A., and Garcia, L. A. (2008b). Spatial modeling of soil salinity using remote sensing, GIS, and field data, VDM Verlag, Saarbruken, Germany.
Eldeiry, A., and Garcia, L. A. (2010). “Comparison of ordinary kriging, regression kriging, and cokriging techniques to estimate soil salinity using LANDSAT images.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 136(6), 355–364.
Eldeiry, A., and Garcia, L. A. (2011). “Using indicator kriging technique for soil salinity and yield management.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 137(2), 82–93.
Eldeiry, A., and Garcia, L. A. (2012). “Using disjunctive kriging as a quantitative approach to manage soil salinity and crop yield.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 138(3), 211–224.
Eldeiry, A., Garcia, L. A., and Reich, R. M. (2008). “Soil salinity sampling strategy using spatial modeling techniques, remote sensing, and field data.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(6), 768–777.
Gates, T. K., Burkhalter, J. P., Labadie, J. W., Valliant, J. C., and Broner, I. (2002). “Monitoring and modeling flow and salt transport in a salinity-threatened irrigated valley.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 128(2), 87–99.
Gates, T. K., Garcia, J. C., and Labadie, J. W. (2006). “Toward optimal water management in Colorado’s Lower Arkansas River Valley: Monitoring and modeling to enhance agriculture and environment.”, Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, Fort Collins, CO.
Ghassemi, F., Jakeman, A. J., and Nix, H. A. (1995). Salinisation of land and water resources: Human causes, extent, management and case studies, Center for Agricultural Bioscience International, Cambridge, MA.
Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O. (1999). “Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 4(2), 135–143.
Hoffman, G. J., Evans, R. G., Jensen, M. E., Martin, D. L., and Elliott, R. L. (2007). Design and operation of farm irrigation systems, American Society of Agriculture, St. Joseph, MI.
Legates, D. R., and McCabe, G. J. Jr. (1999). “Evaluating the use of ‘goodness-of-fit’ measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.” Water Resour. Res., 35(1), 233–241.
Miles, D. L. (1977). Salinity in the Arkansas valley of Colorado, Region VIII, Environmental Protection Agency, Denver, CO.
Miller, J., Franklin, J., and Aspinall, R. (2007). “Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models.” Ecol. Model., 202(3–4), 225–242.
Morway, E. D., and Gates, T. K. (2012). “Regional assessment of soil water salinity across an intensively irrigated river valley.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 138(5), 393–405.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 10(3), 282–290.
Olea, R. A. (1991). Geostatistical glossary and multilingual dictionary, Oxford University Press, New York.
Phillips, J. D. (1986). “Measuring complexity of environmental gradients.” Plant Ecol., 64(2), 95–102.
Pielou, E. (1959). “The use of point-to-plant distances in the study of the pattern of plant populations.” J. Ecol., 47(3), 607–613.
Pozdnyakova, L., and Zhang, R. (1999). “Geostatistical analyses of soil salinity in a large field.” Precis. Agric., 1(2), 153–165.
Rhoades, J., Chanduvi, F., and Lesch, S. (1999). Soil salinity assessment: Methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements, Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Robertson, G. P. (1987). “Geostatistics in ecology: Interpolating with known variance.” Ecology, 68(3), 744–748.
Samra, J., and Gill, H. (1993). “Modeling of variation in a sodium-contaminated soil and associated tree growth.” Soil Sci., 155(2), 77–148.
Singh, J., Knapp, H. V., Arnold, J., and Demissie, M. (2005). “Hydrological modeling of the iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT1.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(2), 343–360.
Tanji, K. K., ed., (1990). Agricultural salinity assessment and management, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Triantafilis, J., Odeh, I., and McBratney, A. (2001). “Five geostatistical models to predict soil salinity from electromagnetic induction data across irrigated cotton.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65(3), 869–878.
Utset, A., Ruiz, M. E., Herrera, J., and Ponce de Leon, D. (1998). “A geostatistical method for soil salinity sample site spacing.” Geoderma, 86(1–2), 143–151.
Vazquez-Amabile, G., and Engel, B. (2005). “Use of SWAT to compute groundwater table depth and streamflow in the Muscatatuck River watershed.” Trans. ASABE, 48(3), 991–1003.
Wichelns, D. (1999). “An economic model of waterlogging and salinization in arid regions.” Ecol. Econ., 30(3), 475–491.
Wilding, L. P. (1985). “Spatial variability: Its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys.” Soil spatial variability: Proc., Workshop of the ISSS and SSSA, Nielsen, D. R., and Bouma, J., eds., Pudoc, Wageningen, Netherlands, 166–189.
Wittler, J. M., Cardon, G. E., Gates, T. K., Cooper, C. A., and Sutherland, P. L. (2006). “Calibration of electromagnetic induction for regional assessment of soil water salinity in an irrigated valley.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(5), 436–444.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 138 • Issue 12 • December 2012
Pages: 1046 - 1059
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 11, 2012
Accepted: Jun 13, 2012
Published online: Nov 15, 2012
Published in print: Dec 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.