TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 16, 2010

Evaluating the Impact of Daily Net Radiation Models on Grass and Alfalfa-Reference Evapotranspiration Using the Penman-Monteith Equation in a Subhumid and Semiarid Climate

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 2

Abstract

Net radiation (Rn) is the main driving force of evapotranspiration (ET) and is a key input variable to the Penman-type combination and energy balance equations. However, Rn is not commonly measured. This paper analyzes the impact of 19 net radiation models that differ in model structure and intricacy on estimated grass and alfalfa-reference ET ( ETo and ETr , respectively) and investigates how climate, season and cloud cover influence the impact of the Rn models on ETo and ETr . Datasets from two locations (Clay Center, Nebraska, subhumid; and Davis, California, a Mediterranean-type semiarid climate) were used. Rn values computed from the 19 models were used in the standardized ASCE-EWRI Penman-Monteith equation to estimate ETo and ETr on a daily time step. The influence of seasons on the estimation of Rn and on estimated ETo and ETr was investigated in winter (November–March) and summer (May–September) months. To analyze the influence of clouds on the impact of Rn models, relative shortwave radiation (Rrs) was used as a means to express the cloudiness of the days as: 0Rrs0.35 for completely cloudy days; 0.35<Rrs0.70 for partially cloudy days; and 0.70<Rrs1.0 for clear sky days. The performances of Rn models showed variations at the same location and between the locations for the same model based on methods used to calculate various model parameters. The most significant impact of Rn on estimated ETo and ETr was related to the methods used to calculate atmospheric emissivity (ε) rather than methods used to calculate clear sky solar radiation (Rso) or cloud adjustment factor (f) . Rn models that used average air temperature to compute ε and an estimated f resulted in good performances at both locations. Empirical models that assumed f=1.0 showed poor to average performances at both locations. While model performances varied based on methods used to calculate Rso , f , and ε , there were significant seasonal variations in performances of models that calculated ε as a function of actual vapor pressure of the air (ea) . The seasonal variations in performances of these models were greater under subhumid climate at Clay Center than in semiarid climate at Davis, Calif. The models that calculated ε as a function of ea performed better under completely cloudy days than on other days, more so at Clay Center. Methods used to calculate ε have a significant impact on the Rn model performance, especially in unstable climatic conditions such as at Clay Center where there are frequent and rapid changes in climatic variables in a given day and throughout the year. The results of this study can be used as a reference tool to provide practical information on which method to select based on the data availability for reliable estimates of daily Rn relative to the ASCE-EWRI Rn method in subhumid and semiarid climates similar to Clay Center, Neb. and Davis, Calif.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Allen, R. G. (1997). “Self-calibrating method for estimating solar radiation from air temperature.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 2(2), 56–67.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper no. 56, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
ASCE Environmental and Water Resources Institute (ASCE-EWRI). (2005). “The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation.” Rep. of the Task Committee on Standardization of Reference Evapotranspiration, Reston, Va.
Batchelor, C. H. (1984). “The accuracy of evapotranspiration estimated with the FAO modified Penman equation.” Irrig. Sci., 5, 223–233.
Brunt, D. (1932). “Notes on radiation in the atmosphere.” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 58, 389–420.
Dong, A., Grattan, S. R., Carrol, J. J., and Prashar, C. R. K. (1992). “Estimation of daytime net radiation over well-watered grass.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 118(3), 466–479.
Doorenbos, J., and Pruitt, W. O. (1977). “Guidelines for prediction of crop water requirements.” FAO irrig. and drain. paper no. 24, 2nd Ed., F. A. O., Rome.
Field, R. T., Fritschen, L., Kanemasu, E. T., Smith, E. A., Stewart, J., Verma, S., and Kustas, W. (1992). “Calibration, comparison, and correction of net radiation instruments used during FIFE.” J. Geophys. Res., 97, 18681–18695.
Hargreaves, G. H., and Samani, Z. A. 1982. “Estimating potential evapotranspiration.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 108(3), 223–230.
Heermann, D. F., Harrington, G. J., and Stahl, K. M. (1985). “Empirical estimation of daily clear sky solar radiation.” J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 24, 206–214.
Hupet, F., and Vanclooster, M. (2001). “Effect of the sampling frequency of meteorological variables on estimation of the reference evapotranspiration.” J. Hydrol., 243, 192–204.
Idso, S. B. (1969). “Atmospheric attenuation of solar radiation.” J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 1088–1095.
Idso, S. B., and Jackson, R. D. (1969). “Thermal radiation from the atmosphere.” J. Geophys. Res., 74, 5397–5403.
Irmak, S., Irmak, A., Jones, J. W., Howell, T. A., Jacobs, J. M., Allen, R. G., and Hoogenboom, G. (2003). “Predicting daily net radiation using minimum climatological data.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 129(4), 256–269.
Irmak, S., Mutiibwa, D., and Payero, J. O. (2010). “Net radiation dynamics: Performance of 20 daily net radiation models as related to model structure and intricacy in two climates.” Trans. ASABE, 53(4), 1059–1076.
Irmak, S., Payero, J. O., Martin, D. L., Irmak, A., and Howell, T. A. (2006). “Sensitivity analyses and sensitivity coefficients of the standardized ASCE-Penman-Monteith equation to climate variables.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(6), 564–578.
Jensen, M. E., Burman, R. D., and Allen, R. G. (1990). “Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements.” ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice No. 70, ASCE, New York.
Ley, T. W., Hill, R. W., and Jensen, D. T. (1994). “Errors in Penman-Wright alfalfa reference evapotranspiration estimates. I: Model sensitivity analyses.” Trans. ASAE, 37(6), 1853–1861.
Meyer, S. J., Hubbard, K. G., and Wilhite, D. A. (1989). “Estimating potential evapotranspiration: Effect of random and systematic errors.” Agric. Forest Meteorol., 46, 285–296.
Ortega-Farias, S., Antonioletti, R., and Olioso, A. (2000). “Net radiation model evaluation at an hourly time step for Mediterranean conditions.” Agronomie, 20, 157–164.
Penman, H. L. (1948). “Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 193, 120–145.
Reddy, S. J. (1971). “An empirical method for the estimation of net radiation intensity.” Sol. Energy, 13, 291–292.
Samani, Z., Nolin, S., Bleiweiss, M., and Skaggs, R. (2005). “Discussion of predicting daily net radiation using minimum climatological data.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(4), 388–389.
Saxton, K. E. (1975). “Sensitivity analysis of the combination evapotranspiration equation.” Agric. Forest Meteorol., 15, 343–353.
Snyder, R. L., and Pruitt, W. O. 1985. “Chapter VII: Estimating reference evapotranspiration with hourly data, Vol. I: California irrigation management information system final rep., land, air and water resources paper no. 10013-A, Univ. of California, Davis, Davis, Calif.
Snyder, R. L., and Pruitt, W. O. 1992. “Evapotranspiration data management in California.” Irrigation and drainage: Saving a theoretical resource—In search of solutions, T. Engman, ed., ASCE, New York, 128–133.
Wright, J. L. (1982). “New evapotranspiration crop coefficients.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 108(1), 57–74.
Wright, J. L., and Jensen, M. E. (1972). “Peak water requirements of crops in southern Idaho.” J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., 96, 193–201.
Yoder, R. E., Odhiambo, L. O., and Wright, C. W. (2005). “Effects of vapor-pressure deficit and net-irradiance calculation methods on accuracy of standardized Penman-Monteith equation in a humid climate.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(3), 228–237.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 137Issue 2February 2011
Pages: 59 - 72

History

Received: Mar 23, 2010
Accepted: Jul 13, 2010
Published online: Jul 16, 2010
Published in print: Feb 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Suat Irmak, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Biological Systems Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln, 241 L.W. Chase Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Lameck O. Odhiambo
Research Assistant Professor, Dept. of Biological Systems Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
Denis Mutiibwa, M.ASCE
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Biological Systems Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share