Analysis and Synthesis of Transmission Loss Hydrographs
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 9
Abstract
Accounting for transmission losses properly is critical in hydrologic analyses in arid and semiarid climates. The objective of this research was to develop a model that could account for the spatial and temporal variations of transmission losses while routing the flow hydrograph through the channel reach. This model was based on Hortonian infiltration methods and hydrologic channel routing. While most transmission loss models predict flow volumes, the model developed herein uses hydrographs of individual storm events. A numerical optimization procedure was used to identify optimum parameter values for each of Horton’s parameters and the routing coefficient, which were then used in modeling transmission losses. Flow gauge data were obtained from the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed, which is located near Tucson, Ariz. Testing of this model indicates that it is able to account for transmission losses and predict downstreamflow with reasonable accuracy. To provide a measure of verification, the model was compared to predictions from Lane’s model, which is a commonly used method of accounting for transmission losses based on upstreamflow and downstreamflow volumes. Overall the two methods were found to agree fairly well though differing assumptions in the methods influence the results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Cornish, J. H. (1961). “Flow losses in dry sandy channels.” J. Geophys. Res., 66(6), 1845–1853.
Jordan, P. R. (1977). “Streamflow transmission losses in Western Kansas.” J. Hydr. Div., 103(HY8), 905–919.
Keppel, R. V., and Renard, K. G. (1962). “Transmission losses in ephemeral stream beds.” J. Hydr. Div., 8(HY3), 59–68.
Lane, L. J., et al. (2007). “Transmission losses.” National engineering handbook, NRCS, USDA, Washington, D.C., Chap. 19.
Legates, D. R., and McCabe, G. J., Jr. (1999). “Evaluating the use of ‘goodness-of-fit’ measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.” Water Resour. Res., 35(1), 233–241.
Linsley, R., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H. (1975). Hydrology for engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.
McCuen, R. H. (2005a). Hydrologic analysis and design, 3rd Ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
McCuen, R. H. (2005b). “Accuracy assessment of peak discharge models.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 10(1), 16–22.
Moench, A. F., Sauer, V. B., and Jennings, M. E. (1974). “Modification of routed streamflow by channel loss and base flow.” Water Resour. Res., 10(5), 963–968.
Peebles, R. W., Smith, R. E., and Yakowitz, S. J. (1981). “A leaky reservoir model for ephemeral flow recession.” Water Resour. Res., 17(3), 628–636.
Rao, C. X., and Maurer, E. P. (1996). “A simplified model for predicting daily transmission losses in a stream channel.” Water Resour. Bull., 32(6), 1139–1146.
Walters, M. O. (1990). “Transmission losses in arid region.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 116(1), 129–138.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 136 • Issue 9 • September 2010
Pages: 637 - 645
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 12, 2009
Accepted: Jan 27, 2010
Published online: Jan 29, 2010
Published in print: Sep 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.