TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 14, 2010

Comparison of Ordinary Kriging, Regression Kriging, and Cokriging Techniques to Estimate Soil Salinity Using LANDSAT Images

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 6

Abstract

The objectives of this study are: (1) to evaluate the LANDSAT best band combinations to estimate soil salinity with different crop types; (2) to compare ordinary kriging, regression kriging, and cokriging techniques to generate accurate soil salinity maps when applied to LANDSAT images; and (3) to compare the performance of different crop types: alfalfa, cantaloupe, corn, and wheat as indicators of soil salinity. This study was conducted in an area in the southern part of the Arkansas River Basin in Colorado. Six LANDSAT images acquired during the years: 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 in conjunction with field data were used to estimate soil salinity in the study area. The optimal subsets of band combinations from the LANDSAT images that correlate best with the soil salinity data sets were selected. Ordinary kriging, regression kriging, and cokriging were applied to 2,914 soil salinity data points collected in alfalfa, cantaloupe, corn, and wheat fields in conjunction with the selected LANDSAT image band combination subsets. Ordinary least-squares (OLSs) were used to regress the correlated band combinations to generate a soil salinity surface. The residuals of the OLS multiple regression model were kriged and combined with the soil salinity surface generated using the OLS multiple regression model to produce the final soil salinity surface of the regression kriging model. The same LANDSAT band combinations used with the regression kriging technique were used as secondary data variables with the cokriging technique, while the soil salinity data was used as a primary variable. The results show that the best band combinations for estimating soil salinity with different crops are as follows: alfalfa [red, near infrared, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)]; cantaloupe (blue and green); corn (near, thermal, and NDVI); and wheat (blue and thermal). The performance of the different geostatistical models used in this study is: (1) ordinary kriging; (2) regression kriging; and (3) cokriging. Estimation of soil salinity works best for corn, then wheat, cantaloupe, and alfalfa.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Agterberg, F. P. (1984). “Trend surface analysis.” Spatial statistics and models, G. L. Gaile and C. J. Willmott, eds., Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 147–171.
Akaike, H. (1977). “On entropy maximization principle.” Applications of statistics, P. R. Krishnaiah, ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 27–41.
Brockwell, P. J., and Davis, R. A. (1991). Time series: Theory and methods, Springer, New York.
Douaik, A., Van Meirvenne, M., and Toth, T. (2003). “Spatio-temporal kriging of soil salinity rescaled from bulk soil electrical conductivity.” Proc., Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, GeoEnv IV: 4th European Conf. on Geostatistics for Enironmental Applications, X. Sanchez-Vila, J. Carrera, and J. Gomez-Hernandez, eds., Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands, 413–424.
Dwivedi, R. S., and Rao, B. R. M. (1992). “The selection of the best possible LANDSAT TM band combination for delineating salt-affected soils.” Int. J. Remote Sens., 13(11), 2051–2058.
Eldeiry, A., and Garcia, L. A. (2008a). “Detecting soil salinity in alfalfa fields using spatial modeling and remote sensing.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72(1), 201–211.
Eldeiry, A., and Garcia, L. A. (2008b). Spatial modeling of soil salinity using remote sensing, GIS, and field data, VDM Verlag, Saarbruken, Germany.
Eldeiry, A., Garcia, L. A., and Reich, R. M. (2008). “Soil salinity sampling strategy using spatial modeling techniques, remote sensing, and field data.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(6), 768–777.
ERDAS Imagine. (2006). ERDAS Inc., Leica Geosystems, Atlanta.
Farifteh, J., Farshad, A., and George, R. J. (2006). “Assessing salt affected soils using remote sensing, solute modeling, and geophysics.” Geoderma, 130, 191–206.
Fernández-Buces, N., Siebe, C., Cram, S., and Palacio, J. L. (2006). “Mapping soil salinity using a combined spectral response index for bare soil and vegetation: A case study in the former Lake Texcoco, Mexico.” J. Arid Environ., 65(4), 644–667.
Gates, T. K., Burkhalter, J. P., Labadie, J. W., Valliant, J. C., and Broner, I. (2002). “Monitoring and modeling flow and salt transport in a salinity-threatened irrigated valley.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 128(2), 87–99.
Gates, T. K., Garcia, J. C., and Labadie, J. W. (2006). “Toward optimal water management in Colorado’s Lower Arkansas River Valley: Monitoring and modeling to enhance agriculture and environment.” Completion Rep. No. 205, Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, Fort Collins, Colo.
Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics for natural resource evaluation, Oxford University Press, New York.
Greenway, H., and Munns, R. (1980). “Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes.” Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 31, 149–190.
Guisan, A., and Zimmermann, N. E. (2000). “Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology.” Ecol. Modell., 135(2–3), 147–186.
Gumpertz, M. L., Graham, J. M., and Ristaino, J. B. (1997). “Autologistic model of spatial pattern of Phytophthora epidemic in bell pepper: Effects of soil variables on disease presence.” J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat., 2(2), 131–156.
Haining, R. (1990). Spatial data analysis in the social and environmental sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Howari, F. M. (2003). “The use of remote sensing data to extract information from agricultural land with emphasis on soil salinity.” Austral. J. Soil Res., 41(7), 1243–1253.
Isaaks, H. E., and Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics, Oxford University Press, New York.
Istok, J. D., Smyth, J. D., and Flint, A. L. (1993). “Multivariate geostatistical analysis of ground-water contaminant: A case history.” Ground Water, 31, 63–74.
Journel, A. G. (1984). “mAD and conditional estimators.” Geostatistics for natural resources characterization, Part 1, G. Verly et al., eds., Dordrecht, Boston, D. Reidel Pub. Co., Hingham, Mass.
Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, C. J. (1978). Mining geostatistics, Academic Press, New York.
Kravchenko, A., and Bullock, D. G. (1999). “A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties.” Agron. J., 91, 393–400.
Legendre, P. (1993). “Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm?” Ecology, 74(6), 1659–1673.
Li, B., and Yeh, T. C. J. (1999). “Cokriging estimation of the conductivity field under variably saturated flow conditions.” Water Resour. Res., 35(12), 3663–3674.
Lichstein, J. W., Simons, T. R., and Franzreb, K. E. (2002). “Landscape effects on breeding songbird abundance in managed forests.” Ecol. Appl., 12(3), 836–857.
Martinez-Cob, C. A. (1996). “Multivariate geostatistical analysis of evapotranspiration and precipitation in mountainous terrain.” J. Hydrol., 174, 19–35.
Miles, D. L. (1977). “Salinity in the Arkansas Valley of Colorado.” Interagency Agreement Rep. No. EPA-IAG-D4-0544, EPA, Denver.
Miller, J., Franklin, J., and Aspinall, R. (2007). “Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models.” Ecol. Modell., 202(3–4), 225–242.
Odeh, I. O. A., McBratney, A. B., and Chittleborough, D. J. (1995). “Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: Heterotopic cokriging and regression-kriging.” Geoderma, 67(3–4), 215–226.
Phillips, J. D. (1986). “Measuring complexity of environmental gradients.” Vegetatio, 64, 95–102.
Ripley, B. D. (1981). Spatial statistics, Wiley, New York.
Robbins, C. W., and Wiegand, C. L. (1990). “Field and laboratory measurements.” Agric. salinity assess. and manage, K. K. Tanji, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va., 203–219.
Robertson, G. P. (1987). “Geostatistics in ecology: Interpolating with known variance.” Ecology, 68(3), 744–748.
Schloeder, C. A., Zimmermann, N. E., and Jacobs, M. J. (2001). “Comparison of methods for interpolating soil properties using limited data.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 470–479.
Shouse, P. J., Gerik, T. J., Russell, W. B., and Cassel, D. K. (1990). “Spatial distribution of soil particle size and aggregate stability index in a clay soil.” Soil Sci., 149, 351–360.
Song, C., Woodcock, C. E., Seto, K. C., Lenney, M. P., and Macomber, S. A. (2001). “Classification and change detection using LANDSAT TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects?” Remote Sens. Environ., 75, 230–244.
Stein, A., and Corsten, L. C. A. (1991). “Universal kriging and cokriging as a regression procedure.” Biometrics, 47, 575–588.
Stein, A., van Dooremolen, W., Bouma, J., and Bregt, A. K. (1988). “Cokriging point data on moisture deficit.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 1418–1423.
Tanji, K. K. (1990). Agricultural salinity assessment and management, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Trangmar, B. B., Yost, R. S., Wade, M. K., Uehara, G., and Sudjadi, M. (1987). “Spatial variation of soil properties and rice yield on recently cleared land.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 668–674.
Triantafilis, J., Odeh, I. O. A., and McBratney, A. B. (2001). “Five geostatistical models to predict soil salinity from electromagnetic induction data across irrigated cotton.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65(3), 869–878.
Vauclin, M., Vieira, S. R., Vachaud, G., and Nielsen, D. R. (1983). “The use of cokriging with limited field observations.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 47, 175–184.
Yates, S. R., and Warrick, A. W. (1987). “Estimating soil water content using cokriging.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 23–30.
Zhang, R., Myers, D. E., and Warrick, A. W. (1992). “Estimation of the spatial distribution of the soil chemicals using pseudo cross-variograms.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 1444–1452.
Zhang, R., Shouse, P., and Yates, S. (1997). “Use of pseudo-crossvariograms and cokriging to improve estimates of soil solute concentrations.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61, 1342–1347.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 136Issue 6June 2010
Pages: 355 - 364

History

Received: Feb 23, 2009
Accepted: Dec 10, 2009
Published online: May 14, 2010
Published in print: Jun 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ahmed A. Eldeiry [email protected]
Ph.D. Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Integrated Decision Support Group, Colorado State Univ., CO 80523. E-mail: [email protected]
Luis A. Garcia [email protected]
Director and Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Integrated Decision Support Group, Colorado State Univ., CO 80523 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share