Technical Papers
Oct 7, 2022

Optimization of Removal of Cr(VI) from Wastewater by Electrocoagulation Process Using Response Surface Methodology

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 27, Issue 1

Abstract

This study investigated the removal of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] from a simulated industrial effluent that used electrocoagulation (EC) technology. Experimental runs were conducted in a laboratory-scale batch EC cell with vertically rotating cylindrical aluminum (Al) electrodes, which imparted the required velocity to avoid a concentration gradient within the treatment unit. The independent variables, current, influent pH, rotational speed (rpm), and initial Cr(VI) concentration [Cr(VI)i], that affected Cr removal efficiency were optimized through a central composite design (CCD) that was initiated by the response surface methodology (RSM). The ANOVA factor of the CCD indicated that the investigated independent variables had a significant impact on the responses, such as Cr(VI) removal and specific electrical energy consumption (SEEC). Four factors, which each had three levels were considered: (1) Cr(VI)i (15–35 mg/L); (2) applied current (1–3 A); (3) initial pH (4–6); and (4) rotational speed of the electrode (40–100 rpm). High R2 values were observed for Cr(VI) (98.12%) and SEEC (98.09%), which validated the regression equations that were generated in this study. Optimizing the performance factors for the treatment process was targeted to achieve maximum Cr(VI) removal and minimum SEEC. Under the optimum condition, the Cr(VI) removal efficiency, SEEC, and operating cost were 89.808%, 0.14 kW · h/g Cr(VI) removed, and USD 0.728/m3, respectively. The optimum values that were obtained for the selected input variables were Cr(VI)i of 4.99 mg/L, current of 2.189 A, initial pH 4.5, and a rotational speed of 72.46 rpm.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the TEQIP grant for the design and fabrication of the experimental setup. for all the support in conducting the study and the Department of Civil Engineering, MNNIT Allahabad.

References

Aitbara, A., M. Cherifi, S. Hazourli, and J. P. Lecler. 2016. “Continuous treatment of industrial dairy effluent by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes.” Desalin. Water Treat. 57 (8): 3395–3404. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.989411.
Akbal, F., and S. Camcı. 2011. “Copper, chromium and nickel removal from metal plating wastewater by electrocoagulation.” Desalination 269 (1–3): 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.001.
Aoudj, S., A. Khelifa, and N. Drouiche. 2017. “Removal of fluoride, SDS, ammonia and turbidity from semiconductor wastewater by combined electrocoagulation–electroflotation.” Chemosphere 180: 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.045.
APHA (American Public Health Association). 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington, DC: APHA.
Baral, A., and R. D. Engelken. 2002. “Chromium-based regulations and greening in metal finishing industries in the USA.” Environ. Sci. Policy 5 (2): 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00028-X.
Bezerra, M. A., R. E. Santelli, E. P. Oliveira, L. S. Villar, and L. A. Escaleira. 2008. “Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry.” Talanta 76 (5): 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019.
Choudhary, A., and S. Mathur. 2017. “Performance evaluation of 3D rotating anode in electro coagulation reactor: Part I: Effect of impeller.” J. Water Process Eng. 19: 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.08.020.
Costa, M. 2003. “Potential hazards of hexavalent chromate in our drinking water.” Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 188 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-008X(03)00011-5.
Das, D., and B. K. Nandi. 2020. “Removal of hexavalent chromium from wastewater by electrocoagulation (EC): Parametric evaluation, kinetic study and operating cost.” Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 73 (8): 2053–2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-01962-4.
Deng, X., Y. Chen, J. Wen, Y. Xu, J. Zhu, and Z. Bian. 2020. “Polyaniline-TiO2 composite photocatalysts for light-driven hexavalent chromium ions reduction.” Sci. Bull. 65 (2): 105–112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.10.020.
Dermentzis, K., A. Christoforidis, and E. Valsamidou. 2011. “Removal of nickel, copper, zinc and chromium from synthetic and industrial wastewater by electrocoagulation.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. 1 (5): 697–710.
Garg, K. K., and B. Prasad. 2015. “Removal of para-toulic acid (p-TA) from purified terephthalic acid (PTA) waste water by electrocoagulation process.” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 3 (3): 1731–1739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.05.029.
Golder, A. K., A. K. Chanda, A. N. Samanta, and S. Ray. 2007a. “Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution: Electrocoagulation vs chemical coagulation.” Sep. Sci. Technol. 42 (10): 2177–2193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390701446464.
Heidmann, I., and W. Calmano. 2008b. “Removal of Zn(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Ag(I) and Cr(VI) present in aqueous solutions by aluminium electrocoagulation.” J. Hazard. Mater. 152 (3): 934–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.068.
Holt, P. K., G. W. Barton, M. Wark, and C. A. Mitchell. 2002. “A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation.” Colloids Surf., A 211 (2–3): 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00285-6.
Kaprara, E. A., A. I. Zouboulis, K. T. Simeonidis, and M. G. Mitrakas. 2015. “Potential application of inorganic sulfur reductants for Cr(VI) removal at sub-ppb level.” Desalin. Water Treat. 54 (8): 2067–2074. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.934104.
Keshmirizadeh, E., S. Yousefi, and M. K. Rofouei. 2011. “An investigation on the new operational parameter effective in Cr(VI) removal efficiency: A study on electrocoagulation by alternating pulse current.” J. Hazard. Mater. 190 (1–3): 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.010.
Khayet, M., A. Y. Zahrim, and N. Hilal. 2011. “Modelling and optimization of coagulation of highly concentrated industrial grade leather dye by response surface methodology.” Chem. Eng. J. 167 (1): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.108.
Korak, J. A., R. Huggins, and M. Arias-paic. 2017. “Regeneration of pilot-scale ion exchange columns for hexavalent chromium removal.” Water Res. 118: 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.018.
Kushwaha, J. P., V. C. Shrivastava, and I. D. Mall. 2010. “Organics removal from dairy wastewater by electrochemical treatment and residue disposal.” Sep. Purif. Technol. 76 (2): 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.10.008.
Le Man, H., S. K. Behera, and H. S. Park. 2010. “Optimization of operational parameters for ethanol production from Korean food waste leachate.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 7 (1): 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326127.
Mohammed-Ridha, M. J., A. S. Ahmed, and N. N. Raoof. 2017. “Investigation of the thermodynamic, kinetic and equilibrium parameters of batch biosorption of Pb(II), Cu(II) and Ni(II) from aqueous phase using low cost biosorbent.” Al-Nahrain J. Eng. Sci. (NJES) 201: 298–310.
Mollah, M. Y. A., P. Morkovsky, J. A. G. Gomes, M. Kesmez, J. Parga, and D. L. Cocke. 2004. “Fundamentals, present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation.” J. Hazard. Mater. 114 (1–3): 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.009.
Mouedhen, G., M. Feki, M. de Petris-Wery, and H. F. Ayedi. 2009. “Electrochemical removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous media using iron and aluminum as electrode materials: Towards a better understanding of the involved phenomena.” J. Hazard. Mater. 168 (2–3): 983–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.117.
Muthumareeswaran, M. R., M. Alhoshan, and G. P. Agarwal. 2017. “Ultrafiltration membrane for effective removal of chromium ions from potable water.” Sci. Rep. 7: 41423. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41423.
Owolabi, R. U., M. A. Usman, and A. J. Kehinde. 2018. “Modelling and optimization of process variables for the solution polymerization of styrene using response surface methodology.” J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 30 (1): 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2015.12.005.
Rezaei, H. 2016. “Biosorption of chromium by using Spirulina sp.” Arab. J. Chem. 9 (6): 846–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.11.008.
Sinha, R., and S. Mathur. 2016. “Use of activated silica sol as a coagulant aid to remove aluminium from water defluoridated by electrocoagulation.” Desalin. Water Treat. 57 (36): 16790–16799. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1084536.
Sinha, R., A. Singh, and S. Mathur. 2016. “Multi-objective optimization for minimum residual fluoride and specific energy in electrocoagulation process.” Desalin. Water Treat. 57 (9): 4194–4204. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.990929.
Tyagi, N., S. Mathur, and D. Kumar. 2014. “Electrocoagulation process for textile wastewater treatment in continuous upflow reactor.” J. Sci. Ind. Res. 73: 195–198.
Vasudevan, S., and J. Lakshmi. 2011. “Studies relating to an electrochemically assisted coagulation for the removal of chromium from water using zinc anode.” Water Sci. Technol. 11 (2): 142–150.
Vik, E. A., D. A. Carlson, A. S. Eikum, and E. T. Gjessing. 1984. “Electrocoagulation of potable water.” Water Res. 18 (11): 1355–1360.
Witek-Krowiak, A., K. Chojnacka, D. Podstawczyk, A. Dawiec, and K. Pokomeda. 2014. “Application of response surface methodology and artificial neural network methods in modelling and optimization of biosorption process.” Bioresour. Technol. 160: 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.021.
Zhang, X., W. Fu, Y. Yin, Z. Chen, R. Qiu, M. O. Simonnot, and X. Wang. 2018. “Adsorption-reduction removal of Cr(VI) by tobacco petiole pyrolytic biochar: Batch experiment, kinetic and mechanism studies.” Bioresour. Technol. 268: 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.125.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 27Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Feb 24, 2022
Accepted: Jun 9, 2022
Published online: Oct 7, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 7, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj 211004, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Debolina Basu [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj 211004, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Hexavalent Chromium Removal from Water and Wastewaters by Electrochemical Processes: Review, Molecules, 10.3390/molecules28052411, 28, 5, (2411), (2023).
  • Nitrate pollution and its solutions with special emphasis on electrochemical reduction removal, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 10.1007/s11356-022-24450-2, 30, 4, (9290-9310), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share