Technical Papers
Feb 4, 2021

Removal of Turbidity and Assessment of Groundwater Contribution during Riverbank Filtration

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 25, Issue 2

Abstract

Indian rivers carry large sediment loads. During monsoon season when river discharge is high, rivers carry suspended particles, silt, clay, and organic substances, causing river water turbidity that is not suitable for drinking. Riverbank filtration (RBF) is a natural process in which one can abstract good quality water from a highly polluted river through abstraction wells. As RBF water is a mixture of riverbank filtered water and groundwater, assuming no turbidity was picked up by the river water as it travelled through the soil matrix to reach the pumping well. A strategy-A was developed in which flow of groundwater contribution toward pumping well was neglected, while simultaneously measuring source water and abstracted water quality; it was observed that the variation of K, the kinetic coefficient, captured the variation in ln(C0), natural logarithm of influent quality, with R2 equal to 0.974. The kinetic coefficient, K, also captured the variation with ln(C0) of turbidity after travel times of 14 days and 21 days, having R2 equal to 0.991 and 0.989, respectively. A strategy-B was developed using the mass balance relationship, wherein the flow of groundwater contribution toward pumping well was utilized in refining the abstracted water quality. It was observed that K, the kinetic coefficient, of strategy-B captured the variation with ln(C0), the natural logarithm of the influent quality of turbidity with R2 equal to 0.972. If both the strategies were to be compared, strategy-B was found to be superior to strategy-A. However, one additional data of measurement on the groundwater turbidity was required for strategy-B. Further, strategy-C was developed with the assumption that there was no turbidity in groundwater, as a low value of turbidity was observed in groundwater. The variation of K, the kinetic coefficient, with ln(C0), the natural logarithm of influent quality of turbidity in strategy-C, showed that when the groundwater turbidity was ignored, the agreement between observed and computed turbidity was adversely affected. The average contribution of groundwater toward pumping well was observed nearly 12.43% and the average contribution of river water toward the pumping well was observed nearly 87.57%, considering the depth of river water. In strategy-C also, the agreement between simulated and observed values of turbidity was satisfactory.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bourg, A. C., and C. Bertin. 1993. “Biogeochemical processes during the infiltration of river water into an alluvial aquifer.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 27: 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00041a009.
Ćosović, B., D. Hršak, V. Vojvodić, and D. Krznarić. 1996. “Transformation of organic matter and bank filtration from a polluted stream.” Water Res. 30 (12): 2921–2928. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00185-6.
Jekel, M., and T. Grischek. 2003. “Riverbank filtration: The European experience.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Riverbank Filtration Conf., 105–109. Fountain Valley, CA: NWRI.
Kim, S.-B., M. Y. Corapcioglu, and D.-J. Kim. 2003. “Effect of dissolved organic matter and bacteria on contaminant transport in riverbank filtration.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 66 (1–2): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00025-1.
Kuehn, W., and U. Mueller. 2000. “Riverbank filtration: An overview.” J. Am. Water Works Assn. 92 (12): 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2000.tb09071.x.
Ojha, C. S. P. 2012. “Simulating turbidity removal at a river bank filtration site in India using SCS-CN approach.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 17 (11): 1240–1244. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000498.
Ojha, C. S. P., and N. J. D. Graham. 1994. “Computer-aided simulation of slow sand filter performance.” Water Res. 28 (5): 1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)90187-2.
Ojha, C. S. P., and A. K. Thakur. 2010. “River Bank filtration in North India.” World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change, edited by R. N. Palme, 782–791. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ojha, C. S. P., and A. K. Thakur. 2011a. “Turbidity removal during a subsurface movement of source water: Case study from Haridwar, India.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 16 (1): 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000253.
Ojha, C. S. P., and A. K. Thakur. 2011b. “Evaluating a probabilistic approach for simulating pathogen removal at a riverbank filtration site in India.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 15 (2): 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.1944-8376.0000059.
Ojha, C. S. P., A. K. Thakur, and V. P. Singh. 2013. “Modeling of River Bank Filtration: Experience from RBF site in India.” J. Groundwater Res. 2 (1): 46–55.
Ray, C. 2004. “Modeling RBF efficacy for mitigating chemical shock loads.” J. Am. Water Works Assn. 96 (5): 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2004.tb10633.x.
Thakur, A. K., and C. S. P. Ojha. 2010. “Variation of turbidity during subsurface abstraction of river water: A case study.” Int. J. Sediment Res. 25 (4): 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(11)60003-6.
Thakur, A. K., C. S. P. Ojha, V. P. Singh, and B. B. Chaudhar. 2017. “Potential for river bank filtration in arsenic-affected region in India: Case study.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 21 (4): 04017015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000363.
Thakur, A. K., C. S. P. Ojha, V. P. Singh, R. B. Gurjar, and C. Sandhu. 2013. “Removal of Pathogens by river bank filtration at Haridwar, India.” Hydrol. Process. 27 (11): 1535–1542. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9301.
Walpole, R. E., R. H. Myers, S. L. Myers, and K. Ye. 2011. Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists, 1–791. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall Publishers.
Weiss, W. J., E. J. Bouwer, W. P. Ball, C. R. O'Melia, H. Arora, and T. F. Speth. 2002. “Reduction in disinfection byproduct precursors and pathogens during riverbank filtration at three Midwestern United States drinking-water utilities.” In Vol. 43 of Riverbank Filtration. Water Science and Technology Library, edited by C. Ray, G. Melin, and R. B. Linsky, 147–173. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 25Issue 2April 2021

History

Received: Aug 4, 2020
Accepted: Nov 6, 2020
Published online: Feb 4, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jul 4, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Aseem K. Thakur [email protected]
Principal, Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Dept. of Civil Engineering, G.P. Bhagalpur, Barari, Bhagalpur, Bihar 812003, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Chandra Shekhar P. Ojha, F.ASCE [email protected]
Chair Professor, Civil Engineering, I.I.T. Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. Email: [email protected]
Vijay P. Singh, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Caroline and William N. Lehrer Distinguished Chair in Water Engineering, Regents Professor and Distinguished Professor, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering and Zachry Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., Scoates Hall, 2117 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2117; Distinguished Scholar, National Water Center, UAE Univ., Al Ain, UAE. Email: [email protected]
B. B. Chaudhur [email protected]
Lecturer (Senior Scale), Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Govt. Women’s Polytechnic Muzaffarpur, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 842005, India. Email: [email protected]
Vidisha Kashyap [email protected]
Vidisha Kashyap, Former M.Tech. Student, Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Dept. of Civil Engineering, VIT Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632014, India; Former Intern, Univ. of Utah. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share