Addressing Climate Change Impacts and Resiliency in Contaminated Site Remediation
Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 24, Issue 4
Abstract
Climate change impacts and its resulting vulnerabilities are perhaps one of the most important and yet the most poorly understood issues in the world today. The contaminated sites, specifically those located by coastal and equatorial regions, are at great risk in facing the impacts of climate change and extreme weather events, since they are not designed considering those in mind. The climate change impacts that specifically affect site remediation may include sea-level rise, extreme temperatures, extreme precipitation, extreme wind, and wildfires. While the efforts toward incorporating sustainability in terms of the assessment of net environmental, economic, and social impacts and benefits in remediation design and implementation is increasing, the remediation approach must incorporate climate change resilience into planning, design, execution, operation, and maintenance of the remediation strategy. There are a few frameworks published in literature that address the incorporation of resiliency and climate change adaptation in contaminated site remediation design. This study presents an overview of some of these frameworks in the context of the United States and its current status quo regarding the environmental remediation to aid in resilient design of remediation strategies for the cleanup of contaminated sites. Further, a new quantitative approach to decision-making involving quantitative life cycle sustainability assessment and quantification of uncertainty in evaluating the feasibility of climate change adaptation measures for site-specific remedial designs is discussed. A few case studies demonstrating the current practice of resiliency in remediation design are discussed. Finally, challenges to assess and implement sustainable and resilient remediation are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AFCEE (Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence). 2010. Sustainable remediation tool (SRT) user guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Air Force.
ASTM. 2014a. Standard guide for greener cleanups. ASTM E2893-13e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014b. Standard guide for integrating sustainable objectives into cleanup. ASTM E2876-13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard guide for climate resiliency planning and strategy. ASTM E3032-15e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bhargava, M., and R. Sirabian. 2011. Sitewise™ version 2 user guide. Port Hueneme, CA: NAVFAC Engineering Service Center.
Blockley, D., and P. Godfrey. 2000. “Doing it differently – Systems for rethinking construction”, 336. London: Thomas Telfordp.
Bowden, R. A. 2004. “Building confidence in geological models.” In: Vol. 239 of Geological prior information: Informing science and engineering, edited by A. Curtis and R. Wood, 157–173. London: Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
CADTSC (California Department of Toxic Substances Control). 2019. “The Voluntary Cleanup Program.” Dept. of Toxic Substances Control. Accessed May 4, 2020. https://dtsc.ca.gov/green-remediation/.
Cui, W., and D. I. Blockley. 1990. “Interval probability theory for evidential support.” Int. J. Intell. Syst. 5: 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.4550050204.
Egan, M., A. Paulley, L. Lehman, J. Lowe, E. Rochette, and S. Baker. 2009. “Assessing confidence in performance assessments using an Evidence Support Logic methodology: an application of TESLA.” In Proc. of the Waste Management Symposium 2009, Waste Management for the Nuclear Renaissance. 963–977. Tucsan, Arizona: Waste Management Symposia, Inc.
Ellis, D. E., and P. W. Hadley. 2009. “Sustainable remediation white paper—Integrating sustainable principles, practices, and metrics into remediation projects.” Rem. J. 19 (3): 5–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.20210.
Florin, M. V., and I. Linkov, eds. 2016. IRGC resource guide on resilience. Lausanne, CH: EPFL International Risk Governance Center (IRGC).
Goedkoop, M., M. Oele, J. Leijting, T. Ponsioen, and E. Meijer. 2016. “Introduction to LCA with SimaPro. V5.2.” Pre-Consultants. Accessed May 4, 2020. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/SimaPro8IntroductionToLCA.pdf.
Hall, J., C. Twyman, and A. Kay. 2005. “Influence diagrams for representing uncertainty in climate-related propositions.” Clim. Change 69 (2–3): 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-2527-9.
Hiroyuki, U., S. Toshihiro, T. Hiroyuki, T. Hiroyasu, and R. Metcalfe. 2004. “Integration of geological information in a structured approach to development of a safety case.” In Proc., 1st AMIGO Workshop: Geological Disposal: Building Confidence Using Multiple Lines of Evidence, 169–174. Paris: OECD and Nuclear Energy Agency.
Hou, D., and A. Al-Tabbaa. 2014. “Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation.” Environ. Sci. Policy 39: 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.003.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2013. “Climate change 2013: The physical science basis.” In Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by T. F. Stocker, et al., 1535. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. “Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects.” In Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by C. B. Field, et al., 1132. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council). 2011a. Green and sustainable remediation: State of the science and practice. Washington, DC: ITRC and Green and Sustainable Remediation.
ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council). 2011b. Green and sustainable remediation: A practical framework. Washington, DC: ITRC and Green and Sustainable Remediation Team.
Maco, B., et al. 2018. “Resilient remediation: Addressing extreme weather and climate change, creating community value.” Rem. J. 29 (1): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21585.
Metcalfe, R., A. Paulley, P. M. Suckling, and C. E. Watson. 2013. “A tool for integrating and communicating performance-relevant information in CO2 storage projects: Description and application to In Salah.” Energy Procedia 37: 4741–4748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.383.
Metcalfe, R., H. Takase, M. Toida, Y. Suyama, K. Kawano, A. Bowden, and D. Savage. 2002. “Using evidence-based logic to design investigations for clay barrier systems.” In Proc., Int. Meeting on Clays in Natural and Engineered Barriers for Radioactive Waste Confinement, 281–282. France: Agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs (ANDRA).
MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency). 2010. “Greener practices for business, site development, and site cleanups: A toolkit.” Accessed May 4, 2020. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/quick-links/greener-practices-business-site-development-and-site-cleanups-toolkit.
NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2019. Environmental engineering for the 21st century: Addressing grand challenges. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NCEI (National Centers for Environmental Information). 2019. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/.
NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NRC (National Research Council). 2011. Sustainability and the U.S. EPA. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
O’Connell, S., and D. Hou. 2015. “Resilience: A new consideration for environmental remediation in an era of climate change.” Rem. J. 26 (1): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21449.
OSWER (Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response). 2014. Climate change adaptation implementation plan. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Paulley, A., R. Metcalfe, and M. Egan. 2012. “Geological disposal programme design and prioritization in the face of uncertainty: Use of structured evidence support logic techniques.” Mineral. Mag. 76 (8): 3497–3507. https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2012.076.8.64.
Quintessa. 2014. “Evidence support logic: User guide for TESLA. V2.2.” Accessed May 4, 2020. https://www.quintessa.org/evidence-support-logic-guide.pdf.
Reddy, K. R., and J. A. Adams. 2015. Sustainable remediation of contaminated sites. New York: Momentum Press.
Reddy, K. R., C. Cameselle, and J. A. Adams. 2019. Sustainable engineering: Drivers, metrics, tools, and applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Reddy, K. R., and G. Kumar. 2018a. “Addressing sustainable technologies in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering.” In Geotechnics for natural and engineered sustainable technologies. Developments in geotechnical engineering, edited by A. Murali Krishna, A. Dey, S. Sreedeep. 1–26. Singapore: Springer.
Reddy, K. R., and G. Kumar. 2018b. “Green and sustainable remediation of polluted sites: New concept, assessment tools, and challenges.” In XVI Danube-European Conference on Geotechnical Engineering. 83–92. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
Reddy, K. R., and G. Kumar. 2018c. “Role of geochemistry in sustainable geotechnics.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Environmental Geotechnology, Recycled Waste Materials, and Sustainable Engineering, edited by A. K. Agnihotri, K. R. Reddy, and A. Bansal, 1–15. Singapore: Springer.
Sharma, H. D., and K. R. Reddy. 2004. Geoenvironmental engineering: Site remediation, waste containment, and emerging waste management technologies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Trentin, A. D. S., K. R. Reddy, G. Kumar, J. K. Chetri, and A. Thomé. 2019. “Quantitative assessment of life cycle sustainability (QUALICS): Framework and its application to assess electrokinetic remediation.” Chemosphere 230: 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.200.
Tsuchi, H., et al. 2004. “Study on a decision making methodology with uncertainties in the selection process of preliminary investigation areas.” Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 807: 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-807-21.
USEPA. 2014. “Spreadsheets for environmental footprint analysis (SEFA).” Accessed May 4, 2020. https://clu-in.org/greenremediation/methodology/#SEFA.
USEPA. 2015. Climate change adaptation technical fact sheet: Contaminated sediment remedies. EPA 542-F-15-009. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2019. “Climate change adaptation resource center (ARC-X).” American Cyanamid superfund site reduces climate exposure. Accessed May 4, 2020. https://www.epa.gov/arc-x/american-cyanamid-superfund-site-reduces-climate-exposure.
Waltz, E. 1989. Multisensor data fusion. London: Artech House.
WSDOE (Washington State Department of Ecology). 2017. Adaptation strategies for resilient cleanup remedies: A guide for cleanup project managers to increase the resilience of toxic cleanup sites to the impacts from climate change. Publication No. 17-09-052. Olympia, WA: WSDOE.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 24 • Issue 4 • October 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 5, 2019
Accepted: Jan 7, 2020
Published online: May 18, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 18, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.