Technical Papers
Jul 15, 2015

Risk and Reliability Analysis of Multibarrier System for Near-Surface Disposal Facilities

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 20, Issue 2

Abstract

The performance of near-surface disposal facilities (NSDFs) for low-level radioactive waste depends on the type of materials used in the construction of barrier system, the properties of geological formations around the facility, and the type of waste containment system. By taking into account the effect of the factors mentioned here, a mathematical model can be developed to evaluate the migration of contaminants and radionuclides (via the contaminant transport model) from NSDFs to the nearest geosphere and biosphere, and assess the performance of the whole system. The model for migration of contaminants in a multibarrier system is considered in this paper for the safety assessment of NSDFs. The model considers scenarios during dumping period, after the dumping period, and after the closure of the NSDF. The annual radiation dose due to a radionuclide through drinking water pathway (for the single dump mode and multiple dump mode) is evaluated with the model. In the present work, a comprehensive analysis is carried out to estimate the radiation dose of seven radionuclides (H3, C14, Ni59, Tc99, I129, Np237, and Pu239) for different modes of disposal. Among these radionuclides, radioactive carbon (C14) delivered the maximum concentration in groundwater. To consider variability in the model parameters and quantify the uncertainties due to inherent variability, the presence of a heterogeneous medium, and variability associated with the long time scales of interest, a probabilistic method called the collocation-based stochastic response surface method (CSRSM) is used. In this method, a complex analytical equation is approximated by a higher-order polynomial [using polynomial chaos expansion (PCE)]. Radioactive carbon (C14) is used for probabilistic analysis, considering groundwater velocity, thickness of unsaturated zone, dispersivity, and distribution coefficient as random variables. In all the scenarios, a third-order polynomial gave the best fit for the model and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.99 was obtained for a third-order polynomial. Reliability analysis was carried out, and the probability of failure of an annual radiation dose of C14 exceeding the permissible limits was estimated for different scenarios. The results show that the probability of failure of system in all the scenarios is very low, confirming the adequacy of the system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper is part of research work carried out in the project “Development of probabilistic design and analysis procedures in radioactive waste disposal in NSDF and design of NSDF closure,” sponsored by the Board of Research in Nuclear Science (BRNS). Discussions with scientists of Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) and their financial assistance are gratefully acknowledged. We also thank the reviewers for their critical and valuable comments.

References

AERB (Atomic Energy Regulatory Board). (2011). “Classification of radioactive waste.”, Mumbai, India.
Ahmed, A., and Soubra, A.-H. (2012). “Extension of subset simulation approach for uncertainty propagation and global sensitivity analysis.” Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards, 6(3), 162–176.
Cadini, F., Avram, D., Pedroni, N., and Zio, E. (2012). “Subset simulation of a reliability model for radioactive waste repository performance assessment.” Reliab. Eng. Struct. Saf., 100, 75–83.
Das, P. K., and Zheng, Y. (2000). “Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 15(4), 309–315.
Datta, D., and Kushwaha, H. S. (2011). “Uncertainty quantification using stochastic response surface method case study—Transport of chemical contaminants through groundwater.” Int. J. Energy Inform. Commun., 2(3), 49–58.
Dubourg, V., Sudret, B., and Deheeger, F. (2013). “Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 33, 47–57.
Freeze, R. A., and Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater, Prentice Hall, NJ.
Hamed, M. M., and Bedient, P. B. (1999). “Reliability-based uncertainty analysis of groundwater contaminant transport and remediation.”, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.
Harter, T. (2000). “Application of stochastic theory in groundwater contamination risk analysis: Suggestions for the consulting geologist and/or engineer.” Geol. Soc. Am., 348, 43–52.
Huang, S. P., Liang, B., and Phoon, K. K. (2009). “Geotechnical probabilistic analysis by collocation-based stochastic response surface method: An Excel add-in implementation.” Georisk, Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards, 3(2), 75–86.
Isukapalli, S. S. (1999). “Uncertainty analysis of transport-tranformation models.” Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ.
Isukapalli, S. S., Roy, A., and Georgopoulos, P. G. (1998). “Stochastic response surface methods for uncertainty propagation: Application to environmental and biological systems.” Risk Anal., 18(3), 351–363.
Kim, S. H., and Na, S. W. (1997). “ Response surface method using vector projected sampling points.” Struct. Saf., 19(1), 3–19.
Kim, Y. N., Kim, J. K., and Kim, T. W. (1993). “Risk assessment for shallow land burial of low-level radioactive waste.” Waste Manage., 13(8), 589–598.
Kumar, S., Ali, S. S., Chander, M., Bansal, N. K., and Balu, K. (2013). “Integrated radioactive waste management from NPP, research reactor and back end of nuclear fuel cycle—An Indian experience.”, Waste Management Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai, India.
Li, D., Chen, Y., Lu, W., and Zhou, C. (2011). “Stochastic response surface method for reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated non-normal variables.” Comput. Geotech., 38(1), 58–68.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Nair, R. N., and Krishnamoorthy, T. M. (1999). “Probabilistic safety assessment model for near-surface radioactive waste disposal facilities.” Environ. Model. Software, 14(5), 447–460.
Ranade, A. K., Pandey, M., and Datta, D. (2010). “Stochastic response surface-based simulation of ground water modelling.” Int. Conf. on Modeling, Optimization, and Computing (ICMOS 20110), Vol. 1298, 213–218.
Rowe, R. K., and Booker, J. R. (1985). “Two-dimensional pollution migration in soils of finite depth.” Can. Geotech. J., 22(4), 429–436.
Tatang, M. A. (1995). “Direct incorporation of uncertainty in chemical and environmental engineering systems.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 20Issue 2April 2016

History

Received: Jan 7, 2015
Accepted: Mar 27, 2015
Published online: Jul 15, 2015
Discussion open until: Dec 15, 2015
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India. E-mail: [email protected]
K. Geetha Manjari [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Sampurna Datta [email protected]
Senior Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India. E-mail: [email protected]
G. L. Sivakumar Babu, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share