Risk and Reliability Analysis of Multibarrier System for Near-Surface Disposal Facilities
Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 20, Issue 2
Abstract
The performance of near-surface disposal facilities (NSDFs) for low-level radioactive waste depends on the type of materials used in the construction of barrier system, the properties of geological formations around the facility, and the type of waste containment system. By taking into account the effect of the factors mentioned here, a mathematical model can be developed to evaluate the migration of contaminants and radionuclides (via the contaminant transport model) from NSDFs to the nearest geosphere and biosphere, and assess the performance of the whole system. The model for migration of contaminants in a multibarrier system is considered in this paper for the safety assessment of NSDFs. The model considers scenarios during dumping period, after the dumping period, and after the closure of the NSDF. The annual radiation dose due to a radionuclide through drinking water pathway (for the single dump mode and multiple dump mode) is evaluated with the model. In the present work, a comprehensive analysis is carried out to estimate the radiation dose of seven radionuclides (, , , , , , and ) for different modes of disposal. Among these radionuclides, radioactive carbon () delivered the maximum concentration in groundwater. To consider variability in the model parameters and quantify the uncertainties due to inherent variability, the presence of a heterogeneous medium, and variability associated with the long time scales of interest, a probabilistic method called the collocation-based stochastic response surface method (CSRSM) is used. In this method, a complex analytical equation is approximated by a higher-order polynomial [using polynomial chaos expansion (PCE)]. Radioactive carbon () is used for probabilistic analysis, considering groundwater velocity, thickness of unsaturated zone, dispersivity, and distribution coefficient as random variables. In all the scenarios, a third-order polynomial gave the best fit for the model and coefficient of determination () of 0.99 was obtained for a third-order polynomial. Reliability analysis was carried out, and the probability of failure of an annual radiation dose of exceeding the permissible limits was estimated for different scenarios. The results show that the probability of failure of system in all the scenarios is very low, confirming the adequacy of the system.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The work presented in this paper is part of research work carried out in the project “Development of probabilistic design and analysis procedures in radioactive waste disposal in NSDF and design of NSDF closure,” sponsored by the Board of Research in Nuclear Science (BRNS). Discussions with scientists of Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) and their financial assistance are gratefully acknowledged. We also thank the reviewers for their critical and valuable comments.
References
AERB (Atomic Energy Regulatory Board). (2011). “Classification of radioactive waste.”, Mumbai, India.
Ahmed, A., and Soubra, A.-H. (2012). “Extension of subset simulation approach for uncertainty propagation and global sensitivity analysis.” Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards, 6(3), 162–176.
Cadini, F., Avram, D., Pedroni, N., and Zio, E. (2012). “Subset simulation of a reliability model for radioactive waste repository performance assessment.” Reliab. Eng. Struct. Saf., 100, 75–83.
Das, P. K., and Zheng, Y. (2000). “Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 15(4), 309–315.
Datta, D., and Kushwaha, H. S. (2011). “Uncertainty quantification using stochastic response surface method case study—Transport of chemical contaminants through groundwater.” Int. J. Energy Inform. Commun., 2(3), 49–58.
Dubourg, V., Sudret, B., and Deheeger, F. (2013). “Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 33, 47–57.
Freeze, R. A., and Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater, Prentice Hall, NJ.
Hamed, M. M., and Bedient, P. B. (1999). “Reliability-based uncertainty analysis of groundwater contaminant transport and remediation.”, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.
Harter, T. (2000). “Application of stochastic theory in groundwater contamination risk analysis: Suggestions for the consulting geologist and/or engineer.” Geol. Soc. Am., 348, 43–52.
Huang, S. P., Liang, B., and Phoon, K. K. (2009). “Geotechnical probabilistic analysis by collocation-based stochastic response surface method: An Excel add-in implementation.” Georisk, Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards, 3(2), 75–86.
Isukapalli, S. S. (1999). “Uncertainty analysis of transport-tranformation models.” Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ.
Isukapalli, S. S., Roy, A., and Georgopoulos, P. G. (1998). “Stochastic response surface methods for uncertainty propagation: Application to environmental and biological systems.” Risk Anal., 18(3), 351–363.
Kim, S. H., and Na, S. W. (1997). “ Response surface method using vector projected sampling points.” Struct. Saf., 19(1), 3–19.
Kim, Y. N., Kim, J. K., and Kim, T. W. (1993). “Risk assessment for shallow land burial of low-level radioactive waste.” Waste Manage., 13(8), 589–598.
Kumar, S., Ali, S. S., Chander, M., Bansal, N. K., and Balu, K. (2013). “Integrated radioactive waste management from NPP, research reactor and back end of nuclear fuel cycle—An Indian experience.”, Waste Management Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai, India.
Li, D., Chen, Y., Lu, W., and Zhou, C. (2011). “Stochastic response surface method for reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated non-normal variables.” Comput. Geotech., 38(1), 58–68.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Nair, R. N., and Krishnamoorthy, T. M. (1999). “Probabilistic safety assessment model for near-surface radioactive waste disposal facilities.” Environ. Model. Software, 14(5), 447–460.
Ranade, A. K., Pandey, M., and Datta, D. (2010). “Stochastic response surface-based simulation of ground water modelling.” Int. Conf. on Modeling, Optimization, and Computing (ICMOS 20110), Vol. 1298, 213–218.
Rowe, R. K., and Booker, J. R. (1985). “Two-dimensional pollution migration in soils of finite depth.” Can. Geotech. J., 22(4), 429–436.
Tatang, M. A. (1995). “Direct incorporation of uncertainty in chemical and environmental engineering systems.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 7, 2015
Accepted: Mar 27, 2015
Published online: Jul 15, 2015
Discussion open until: Dec 15, 2015
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.