Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. I: NAPL Mobility Testing of MGP-Impacted Sediments
Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 19, Issue 1
Abstract
The Gowanus Canal superfund site is located in Brooklyn, New York. The site is impacted by nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) from historic manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites and other sources. One of the primary objectives for the selected remedy included eliminating the migration of NAPL into the canal. Accordingly, the amount of NAPL present in sediment samples was quantified and physical testing was conducted to determine a threshold amount of NAPL that could be potentially mobilized into the canal as a result of upwelling groundwater. Undisturbed core samples of native sediment were collected and analyzed for NAPL, water, and air pore fluid saturation (PFS) using the Dean-Stark extraction method, and the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) content. Sediment samples were found to contain NAPL saturations ranging from nondetectable () to 52%. A relatively good correlation () was observed between the Dean-Stark and TPH results when compared on an equivalent mass basis. The NAPL mobility was evaluated for induced groundwater fluxes ranging from average existing site conditions to a factor of 10 higher (). Consistent NAPL mobility was observed when the NAPL saturation exceeded 21%. However, when the NAPL saturation results were converted to TPH on a mass basis (milligrams of NAPL per kilogram of sediment), the results were a poor indicator of NAPL mobility.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
CH2M HILL completed the research reported in this paper for U.S. EPA Region 2 under its AES10 Contract No. 68-S7-04-01 with U.S. EPA Region 9. Sediment coring and field sample collection was facilitated by Boart-Longyear and Geotechnical Engineers, Inc. (GEI), under contract to National Grid Public Limited Company (PLC) with oversight provided by CH2M HILL. All materials testing was completed by CH2M HILL Applied Sciences Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in the research reported in this paper are those of the writers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of CH2M HILL, U.S. EPA, or National Grid.
References
American Petroleum Institute (API). (1998). “Recommended practices for core analysis.” Recommended practice 40, 2nd Ed., Washington, DC.
ASTM. (2006). “Standard guide for development of conceptual site models and remediation strategies for light nonaqueous-phase liquids released to the subsurface.” E2531-06, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2007). “Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils.” D422-07, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2008). “Standard practice for thin-walled tube sampling of soils for geotechnical purposes.” D1587-08, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard test method for density and relative density (specific gravity) of liquids by Bingham Pycnometer.” D1217-12, West Conshohocken, PA.
Brost, E. J., and DeVaull, G. E. (2000). “Non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) mobility limits in soil.”, Washington, DC.
Chown, J. C., Kuepen, B. H., and McWhorter, D. B. (1997). “The use of upward hydraulic gradients to arrest downward DNAPL migration in rock fractures.” Groundwater, 35(3), 483–491.
Cohen, R. M., and Mercer, J. W. (1993). “DNAPL site evaluation.”, U.S. EPA, Sterling, VA.
Fetter, C. W. (1993). Contaminant hydrogeology, Macmillan, New York.
Gentry, J., Tsiamis, C., Niemet, M. R., Grubb, D. G., Bruno, M., and Berggren, D. R. V. (2014). “Gowanus Canal superfund site. 2: Stabilization/solidification of MGP-impacted sediments.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact.Waste, C4014004.
Geotechnical Engineers, Inc. (GEI). (2011). Groundwater model report, Gowanus Canal superfund site, New York.
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC). (2003). An introduction to characterizing sites contaminated with DNAPLs, Washington, DC.
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC). (2009). Evaluating LNAPL remedial technologies for achieving project goals.
Kuepen, B. H., and McWhorter, D. B. (1991). “The behavior of dense nonaqueous phase liquids in fractured clay and rock.” Ground Water, 29(5), 716–728.
Office of Geographic Information Systems (OGIS) of New Jersey. (2013). 〈https://njgin.state.nj.us/NJ_NJGINExplorer/ShowMetadata.jsp?docId=E134A805-F306-440E-B393-F40A1C7E6294〉 (Sep. 30, 2014).
Reitman, V., Stone, T., Trudell, M., and Andriashek, L. (1992). “A study of the upward movement of creosote into the bow river.” Ground Water Manage., 3, 553–570.
U.S. EPA. (2011a). Draft Gowanus Canal remedial investigation report, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2011b). Feasibility study: Gowanus Canal, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2013a). Bench-scale testing report, pre-design investigations, Gowanus Canal Brooklyn, New York, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2013b). Record of decision: Gowanus Canal superfund site; Brooklyn, Kings County, New York, Washington, DC.
Wu, W., Delshad, M., Oolman, T., and Pope, G. A. (2000). “Remedial options for creosote-contaminated sites.” Groundwater Monit. Rem., 20(2), 78–86.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 19 • Issue 1 • January 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 25, 2014
Accepted: Sep 16, 2014
Published online: Nov 4, 2014
Published in print: Jan 1, 2015
Discussion open until: Apr 4, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.