Technical Papers
Mar 19, 2012

Game Theory–Based Multistakeholder Planning for Electronic Waste Management

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 17, Issue 1

Abstract

Stakeholder decision making is needed for implementing policies that affect both initial purchase decisions of electronic gadgets and ultimate decisions about land disposal/recycling or storage of electronic waste. In consumer electronics, a long-term relationship between manufacturer and consumer might lead to contracts that create incentives for consumers to return used electronic gadgets. The result could be more effective economically and environmentally for involved stakeholders like manufacturers, consumers, and society as a whole. If a stakeholder can further obtain more profit through collaborating with others in some coalition, it will be preferred to collaborate rather than participating individually. This paper discusses the noncooperation as well as cooperation of stakeholders and gives a formulation for the calculation of their profits. After that, based on game theory, a scheme to decide which strategy is better suited, gaining the maximum profit, to a stakeholder and also the profit allocation of each stakeholder in the coalitions rationally and impartially is proposed. Results for stakeholders verified the principle that cooperation is better than competition.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ahluwalia, P. K., and Nema, A. K. (2007). “A life cycle based multi-objective optimization model for computer waste management.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 51(4), 792–826.
Barari, S., Agarwal, G., Zhang, W. J., Mahanty, B., and Tiwari, M. K. (2012). “A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts: An evolutionary game approach.” Expert Syst. Appl., 39(3), 2965–2976.
Borocz, P., and Foldesi, P. (2008). “The application of the game theory onto the analysis of decision theory of logistic packagings.” Acta Tech. Jaurinensis Series Logistica, 1(2), 259–268.
Brams, S. J. (1992). “Theory of moves.” Am. Sci., 81, 562–570.
Casey, H. G. G., Seager, P., Theis, T. L., and Powers, S. E. (2007). “A game theory framework for cooperative management of refillable and disposable bottle lifecycles.” J. Cleaner Prod., 15(17), 1618–1627.
Dixit, A., and Skeath, S. (1999). Games of strategy, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
Garfì, M., Tondelli, S., and Bonoli, A. (2009). “Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps.” Waste Manage., 29(10), 2729–2739.
Gao, J., and Jin, C. (2011). “Pricing strategies with recycled products in reverse supply chain.” 18th Int. Conf. on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&EM), IEEE, New York, NY, 3, 1478–1482.
Gibbons, R. (2001). “Trust in social structures: Hobes and coase meet repeated games.” Trust in society, Cook, K. ed., Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Hämäläinen, R. P., Kettunen, E., Marttunen, M., and Ehtamo, H. (1999). “Towards decision and negotiation support in multi-stakeholder development of lake regulation policy.” Proc., 32nd Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, HICSS-32, IEEE Computer Society Press, Hawaii.
Hai-bo, L., Bang-yi, L., and Yuan-yuan, L. (2009). “To study on price decision and benefit allocation of reverse supply chain based on game.” J. Value Eng., 4(9), 1–4.
Jia, N. X., and Yokoyama, R. (2003). “Profit allocation of independent power producers based on cooperative game theory.” J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 25(8), 633–641.
Kodikara, P. N., Perera, B. J. C., and Kularathna, M. D. U. P. (2010). “Stakeholder preference elicitation and modelling in multi-criteria decision analysis—A case study on urban water supply.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 206(1), 209–220.
Liu, J., Liu, N., and Li, Y. (2011). “The construction of the green supply system based on game theory.” Int. Conf. on Social Science and Humanity, IPEDR, Singapore, Vol. 5, IACSIT Press, Singapore, V1-341–V1-346.
Mandal, P. (2011). “India gets first e-waste management rules.” Business Standard, New Delhi, June 9.
Mingang, Z., and Yanting, Z. (2009). “Multi-game model of reverse logistics in the manufacturing industry.” Int. Conf. on Management and Service Science, IEEE, New York, NY.
Myerson, R. B. (1991). Game theory: Analysis of conflict, Harvard University Press, London.
Petrosjan, L., and Zaccour, G. (2003). “Time-consistent Shapley value allocation of pollution cost reduction.” J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 27(3), 381–398.
Qiao-lun, G. U., Gao, T., and Shi, L. (2005). “Price decision analysis for reverse supply chain based on game theory.” Syst. Eng. Theory Pract., 3, 21–25.
Thabrew, L., Wiek, A., and Ries, R. (2009). “Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: Applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation.” J. Cleaner Prod., 17(1), 67–76.
Times News Network (TNN). (2011). “Better management of e-waste needed.” Times of India, April 23.
Vego, G., Dragicevic, S. K., and Koprivanac, N. (2008). “Application of multi-criteria decision making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia.” Waste Manage., 28(11), 2192–2201.
Wang, W., Ye, D., and Sun, M. (2010). “A development of manufacturer-supplier game model for hazardous substances risk control in electronics industry.” IEEE 17th Int. Conf. on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&EM), IEEE, New York, NY.
Xin-jun, L., and Qingli, D. A. (2008). “Benefit analysis of closed-loop supply chain under remanufacturing condition.” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 44(5), 170–174.
Ying-ying, H., Gen-gui, Z., and Jian, C. A. O. (2009). “Study on price and incentive mechanism of three level reverse supply chain for electronic products.” J. Ind. Eng. Manage., 3, 88–97.
Zhang, X., and Jin, C. (2011). “The pricing model construction of reverse supply chain based on game theory.” Int. Conf. on Electronic and Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology (EMEIT), Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, Vol. 4, IEEE, New York, NY, 1880–1883.
Zhong, H., Schiller, S., and Ma, Z. (2011). “Explanatory proposal for e-waste recycling deposit system under EPR.” Proc. of the Third Int. Conf. on Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 3171–3176.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 17Issue 1January 2013
Pages: 21 - 30

History

Received: Jun 13, 2011
Accepted: Mar 15, 2012
Published online: Mar 19, 2012
Discussion open until: Aug 19, 2012
Published in print: Jan 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rajendra Kumar Kaushal [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110 016, India; and Assistant Professor, Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering & Technology, Jhansi, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Arvind K. Nema [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110 016, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share