Pressure-Flow Scour Due to Vertical Contraction: A Review
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 12
Abstract
Climate and land-use/land-cover changes are amplifying hydrological uncertainties, which are increasing the probability of flood magnitudes exceeding their design values. Consequently, bridges are more likely to get submerged. The vertical contraction of flow during a submergence event causes the flow beneath the bridge to accelerate and transit from atmospheric flow to pressure flow. The pressure flow increases the velocity gradient and bed-shear stresses, thereby increasing the scouring potential of the flow and the risk of bridge failure. Laboratory and numerical experiments have been performed to relate the magnitude of pressure-flow scour to the flow geometry and flow, bed, and fluid properties. These developed prediction equations have found a place in design manuals. Nevertheless, many aspects of the pressure-flow scouring are confounding and are still unknown after 3 decades of research. In this article, an overview of the pressure-flow scour phenomenon is presented. The focus is on the important but special case of pressure flow with no pier that has received maximum attention in the literature. The experimental studies on pressure-flow scour are summarized, and inconsistencies and gaps in the reported results are highlighted. A compendium of data compiled from all existing data sets is used for evaluating the design equations and investigating their relative strengths and shortcomings. Based on the anomalies identified in the literature, the article questions the applicability of empirical and semitheoretical models for the pressure-flow scour phenomenon and suggests directions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere thanks to the associate editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions on the earlier draft of the paper. The support provided by the Science and Engineering Research Board (File No. YSS/2015/000574-SERB) to the second author is also duly acknowledged.
References
Abed, L. M. 1992. “Local scour around bridge piers in pressure flow.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Colorado State Univ.
Arneson, L. A. 1997. “The effect of pressure-flow on local scour in bridge openings.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Colorado State Univ.
Arneson, L. A., and S. R. Abt. 1998. “Vertical contraction scour at bridges with water flowing under pressure conditions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1647 (1): 10–17. https://doi.org/10.3141/1647-02.
Arneson, L. A., L. W. Zevenbergen, P. F. Lagasse, and P. E. Clopper. 2012. Evaluating scour at bridges. Washington, DC: USDOT.
Carnacina, I., N. Leonardi, and S. Pagliara. 2019a. “Characteristics of flow structure around cylindrical bridge piers in pressure-flow conditions.” Water 11 (11): 2240. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112240.
Carnacina, I., S. Pagliara, and N. Leonardi. 2019b. “Bridge pier scour under pressure flow conditions.” River Res. Appl. 35 (7): 844–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3451.
Coleman, S. E., and V. I. Nikora. 2009. “Exner equation: A continuum approximation of a discrete granular system.” Water Resour. Res. 45 (9): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007604.
Dey, S. 2011. Fluvial hydrodynamics. New York: Wiley.
Dey, S., and K. Debnath. 2001. “Sediment pickup on streamwise sloping beds.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 127 (1): 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2001)127:1(39).
Dey, S., and R. V. Raikar. 2005. “Scour in long contractions.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 131 (12): 1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:12(1036).
Ettema, R., G. Constantinescu, and B. Melville. 2011. Evaluation of bridge scour research: Pier scour processes and predictions. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Gaudio, R., A. Tafarojnoruz, and F. Calomino. 2012. “Combined flow-altering countermeasures against bridge pier scour.” J. Hydraul. Res. 50 (1): 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2011.649548.
Guo, J., K. Kerenyi, J. E. Pagan-Ortiz, and K. Flora. 2009. “Bridge pressure flow scour at clear water threshold condition.” Trans. Tianjin Univ. 15 (2): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-009-0016-3.
Hahn, E. 2005. “Clear-water scour at vertically or laterally contracted bridge sections.” M.S. thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ.
Hahn, E. M., and D. A. Lyn. 2010. “Anomalous contraction scour? Vertical-contraction case.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 136 (2): 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2010)136:2(137).
Transportation Research Board. 2008. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on U.S. Transportation: Special Report 290. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Jones, J. S., D. A. Bertoldi, and E. R. Umbrell. 1993. “Preliminary studies of pressure flow scour.” In Proc., National Conf. on Hydraulic Engineering, 916–921. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kara, S., M. C. Kara, T. Stoesser, and T. W. Sturm. 2015. “Free-surface versus rigid-lid LES computations for bridge-abutment flow.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 141 (9): 04015019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001028.
Kocyigit, M. B., and O. Karakurt. 2019. “Pressure flow and weir scour beneath a bridge deck.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 46 (6): 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2017-0469.
Kumcu, S. Y. 2016. “Steady and unsteady pressure scour under bridges at clear-water conditions.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 43 (4): 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0385.
Ettema, R., B. W. Melville, and B. Barkdoll. 1998. “Scale effect in pier-scour experiments.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 124 (6): 639–642. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:6(639).
Lee, C. H., C. Xu, and Z. Huang. 2019. “A three-phase flow simulation of local scour caused by a submerged wall jet with a water-air interface.” Adv. Water Resour. 129: 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.07.017.
Lyn, D. A. 2008. “Pressure-flow scour: A reexamination of the HEC-18 equation.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 134 (Jul): 1015–1020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:7(1015).
Madsen, O. S. 1991. “Mechanics of cohesionless sediment transport in coastal waters.” In Proc., Coastal Sediments ’91, 15–27. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mathieu, A., J. Chauchat, C. Bonamy, and T. Nagel. 2019. “Two-phase flow simulation of tunnel and lee-wake erosion of scour below a submarine pipeline.” Water 11 (8): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081727.
Melville, B. 2008. “The physics of local scour at bridge piers.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Scour and Erosion (ICSE-4), 28–40. Tokyo: Japanese Geotechnical Society.
Melville, B. W. 2014. “Scour at various hydraulic structures: Sluice gates, submerged bridges, low weirs.” Aust. J. Water Resour. 18 (2): 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2014.11465444.
Melville, B. W., and Y. M. Chiew. 1999. “Time scale for local scour at bridge piers.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 125 (1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:1(59).
Melville, B. W., and S. Y. Lim. 2014. “Scour caused by 2D horizontal jets.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 140 (2): 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000807.
Meyer-Peter, E., and R. Müller. 1948. “Formulas for bed-load transport.” In Proc., 2nd Meeting of the Int. Association of Hydraulic Research. Beijing: International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research.
Richardson, E. V., and S. R. Davis. 2001. Evaluating scour at bridges: Hydraulic engineering circular. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Richardson, E. V., L. J. Harrison, J. R. Richardson, and S. R. Davis. 1993. Evaluating scour at bridges HEC 18: Hydraulic engineering circular. 2nd ed., 5–53. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Richardson, J. R., and E. V. Richardson. 2008. “Bridge scour evaluation.” In Sedimentation engineering: Processes, measurements, modeling, and practice, edited by M. H. Garcia, 505–542. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784408148.ch10.
Seber, G. A. F., and C. J. Wild. 2003. Nonlinear regression. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
Shan, H., C. B. Zhaoding Xie, O. Suaznabar, J. S. Steven Lottes, and K. Kerenyi. 2012. Submerged flow bridge scour under clear water conditions. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Umbrell, E. R., G. K. Young, S. M. Stein, and J. S. Jones. 1998. “Clear-water contraction scour under bridges in pressure flow.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 124 (2): 236–240. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:2(236).
van Rijn, L. C. 1984. “Sediment transport, Part I: Bed load transport.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 110 (10): 1431–1456. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1984)110:10(1431).
Verma, D. V. S., B. Setia, and U. Bhatia. 2004. “Constriction scour in pressurized flow condition.” Int. J. Eng. Trans. B 17 (3): 237–246.
Yoon, K. S., S. O. Lee, and S. H. Hong. 2019. “Time-averaged turbulent velocity flow field through the various bridge contractions during large flooding.” Water 11 (1): 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010143.
Zhai, Y. 2010. “Time-dependent scour depth under bridge-submerged flow.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 147 • Issue 12 • December 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Oct 9, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 9, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Fahmy Salah Abdelhaleem, Ibrahim M. Mohamed, Ibrahim G. Shaaban, Atiyeh Ardakanian, Wael Fahmy, Amir Ibrahim, Pressure-Flow Scour under a Bridge Deck in Clear Water Conditions, Water, 10.3390/w15030404, 15, 3, (404), (2023).
- Sofi Aamir Majid, Shivam Tripathi, Debopam Das, Experimental Study of Pressure Flow due to Vertical Contraction Using Particle Image Velocimetry, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-13397, 149, 7, (2023).
- Mostafa Koushki, Mohammad R. Chamani, Mohammad N. Moghim, Assessment of equilibrium pressure-flow scour depth using jet flow theory, International Journal of Sediment Research, 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2022.09.001, 38, 1, (141-151), (2023).
- Enrico Tubaldi, Christopher J. White, Edoardo Patelli, Stergios Aristoteles Mitoulis, Gustavo de Almeida, Jim Brown, Michael Cranston, Martin Hardman, Eftychia Koursari, Rob Lamb, Hazel McDonald, Richard Mathews, Richard Newell, Alonso Pizarro, Marta Roca, Daniele Zonta, Invited perspectives: Challenges and future directions in improving bridge flood resilience, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10.5194/nhess-22-795-2022, 22, 3, (795-812), (2022).
- Ming Zhao, A Review on Recent Development of Numerical Modelling of Local Scour around Hydraulic and Marine Structures, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10.3390/jmse10081139, 10, 8, (1139), (2022).
- Maria Pregnolato, Pier Francesco Giordano, Diego Panici, Luke J. Prendergast, Maria Pina Limongelli, A comparison of the UK and Italian national risk-based guidelines for assessing hydraulic actions on bridges, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10.1080/15732479.2022.2081709, (1-14), (2022).