Technical Papers
Aug 25, 2021

Flood-Induced Hydrodynamic and Debris Impact Forces on Single-Span Masonry Arch Bridge

Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

This paper explores flood-induced hydrodynamic and debris impact forces on masonry arch bridges using the numerical method smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Masonry arch bridges make up a significant proportion of the bridge stock in many parts of the world, including the UK and US. Although the masonry arch is a durable bridge form, those spanning watercourses can be vulnerable to the effects of flooding. Where fast flood flows impinge on the bridge superstructure, highly transient behavior is observed, which can lead to violent interactions, especially where debris is carried by the flow. This paper investigates flood-induced impact pressures on a typical single-span masonry arch bridge subject to hydrodynamic action and discrete floating debris. Different debris orientations relative to the bridge span are considered. Results revealed that the presence of the debris can lead to impact pressures an order of magnitude greater than the hydrodynamic conditions alone. Furthermore, the influence of debris orientation at impact was significant, with the 90° orientation resulting in higher peak impact pressures with shorter impact duration compared with the 0°.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study (e.g., input/output XML files and output VTK files) are available from the corresponding author by reasonable request. Also, the open source DualSPHysics code used in this study is available at dual.sphysics.org.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Ministry of National Education of the Republic of Turkey for the funding of this research and Janet Emily Richards for her permission to use the photo of Worcester Bridge.

References

Adami, S., X. Y. Hu, and N. A. Adams. 2012. “A generalized wall boundary condition for smoothed particle hydrodynamics.” J. Comput. Phys. 231 (21): 7057–7075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.05.005.
Al-Faesly, T. Q., I. Nistor, D. Palermo, and A. Cornett. 2013. “Experimental study of structures subjected to hydrodynamic and debris impact forces.” Can. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1 (Jan): 118–127.
Altomare, C., A. J. C. Crespo, J. M. Domínguez, M. Gómez-Gesteira, T. Suzuki, and T. Verwaest. 2015. “Applicability of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for estimation of sea wave impact on coastal structures.” Coastal Eng. 96 (Feb): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.11.001.
Barreiro, A., A. J. C. Crespo, J. M. Domínguez, and M. Gómez-Gesteira. 2013. “Smoothed particle hydrodynamics for coastal engineering problems.” Comput. Struct. 120 (Apr): 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.02.010.
Barták, J., and Z. Slížková. 2010. “Performance of a retrofitted medieval stone bridge under a severe flood.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (5): 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000084.
BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). 2019. “Yorkshire Dales flash flooding: Roads shut and bridge collapses.” Accessed July 31, 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-49164275.
Boothby, T. E. 2001. “Load rating of masonry arch bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (2): 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:2(79).
Bouscasse, B., A. Colagrossi, S. Marrone, and A. Souto-Iglesias. 2017. “SPH modelling of viscous flow past a circular cylinder interacting with a free surface.” Comput. Fluids 146 (Mar): 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.01.011.
Brito, M., R. B. Canelas, O. García-Feal, J. M. Domínguez, A. J. C. Crespo, R. M. L. Ferreira, M. G. Neves, and L. Teixeira. 2020. “A numerical tool for modelling oscillating wave surge converter with nonlinear mechanical constraints.” Renewable Energy 146 (Feb): 2024–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.034.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2016. Structural timber—Strength classes. BS EN 338. London: BSI.
Cercos-Pita, J. L. 2015. “AQUAgpusph, a new free 3D SPH solver accelerated with OpenCL.” Comput. Phys. Commun. 192 (Jul): 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.026.
Chow, A. D., B. D. Rogers, S. J. Lind, and P. K. Stansby. 2018. “Incompressible SPH (ISPH) with fast Poisson solver on a GPU.” Comput. Phys. Commun. 226 (May): 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.005.
Chu, C.-R., C.-H. Chung, T.-R. Wu, and C.-Y. Wang. 2016. “Numerical analysis of free surface flow over a submerged rectangular bridge deck.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 142 (12): 04016060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001177.
Comiti, F., A. Andreoli, M. A. Lenzi, and L. Mao. 2006. “Spatial density and characteristics of woody debris in five mountain rivers of the Dolomites (Italian Alps).” Geomorphology 78 (1–2): 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.021.
Crespo, A. J. C., J. M. Domínguez, B. D. Rogers, M. Gómez-Gesteira, S. Longshaw, R. Canelas, R. Vacondio, A. Barreiro, and O. García-Feal. 2015. “DualSPHysics: Open-source parallel CFD solver based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH).” Comput. Phys. Commun. 187 (Feb): 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.10.004.
Crespo, A. J. C., M. Gómez-Gesteira, and R. A. Dalrymple. 2007. “Boundary conditions generated by dynamic particles in SPH methods.” CMC-Comput. Mater. Continua 5 (3): 173–184. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmc.2007.005.173.
Cumbria County Council. 2016. Flooding in Cumbria December 2015. Cumbria, UK: Cumbria County Council.
Dalrymple, R., and B. Rogers. 2006. “Numerical modeling of water waves with the SPH method.” Coastal Eng. 53 (2–3): 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.10.004.
Deng, L., W. Wang, and Y. Yu. 2016. “State-of-the-art review on the causes and mechanisms of bridge collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (2): 04015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000731.
DfI (Department for Infrastructure), TEO (The Executive Office) and DCSDC (Derry City and Strabane District Council). 2018. North west flooding review. Londonderry, UK: DfI, TEO, and DCSDC.
Di Mascio, A., M. Antuono, A. Colagrossi, and S. Marrone. 2017. “Smoothed particle hydrodynamics method from a large eddy simulation perspective.” Phys. Fluids 29 (3): 035102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978274.
Drdácký, M. F. 2010. “Flood damage to historic buildings and structures.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (5): 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000065.
Ducrocq, T., L. Cassan, J. Chorda, and H. Roux. 2017. “Flow and drag force around a free surface piercing cylinder for environmental applications.” Environ. Fluid Mech. 17 (4): 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-016-9505-9.
Ebrahimi, M., P. Kripakaran, S. Djordjevic, G. Tabor, R. Kahraman, D. Prodanović, and S. Arthur. 2016. “Hydrodynamic effects of debris blockage and scour on masonry bridges: Towards experimental modelling.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Scour and Erosion. Oxford, UK: HR Wallingford. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315375045-93.
Ebrahimi, M., P. Kripakaran, D. M. Prodanović, R. Kahraman, M. Riella, G. Tabor, S. Arthur, and S. Djordjević. 2018. “Experimental study on scour at a sharp-nose bridge pier with debris blockage.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 144 (12): 04018071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001516.
Environment Agency and Cumbria County Council. 2016. Pooley Bridge flood investigation report. Cumbria, UK: Environment Agency and Cumbria County Council.
Environment Agency and Cumbria County Council. 2017. Braithwaite flood investigation report. Cumbria, UK: Environment Agency and Cumbria County Council.
Ettema, R., R. Arndt, P. Roberts, and T. Wahl. 2000. Hydraulic modeling: Concepts and practice. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ficker, T., and D. Martišek. 2015. “3D image reconstructions and the Nyquist–Shannon theorem.” 3D Res. 6 (3): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13319-015-0057-4.
Gomez-Gesteira, M., A. J. C. Crespo, B. D. Rogers, R. A. Dalrymple, J. M. Dominguez, and A. Barreiro. 2012b. “SPHysics—Development of a free-surface fluid solver—Part 2: Efficiency and test cases.” Comput. Geosci. 48 (Nov): 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.028.
Gomez-Gesteira, M., B. D. Rogers, A. J. C. Crespo, R. A. Dalrymple, M. Narayanaswamy, and J. M. Domínguez. 2012a. “SPHysics—Development of a free-surface fluid solver—Part 1: Theory and formulations.” Comput. Geosci. 48 (Nov): 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.029.
Gomez-Gesteira, M., B. D. Rogers, R. A. Dalrymple, and A. J. C. Crespo. 2010. “State-of-the-art of classical SPH for free-surface flows.” Supplement, J. Hydraul. Res. 48 (S1): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2010.9641242.
Heller, V., M. Bruggemann, J. Spinneken, and B. D. Rogers. 2016. “Composite modelling of subaerial landslide-tsunamis in different water body geometries and novel insight into slide and wave kinematics.” Coastal Eng. 109 (Mar): 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.12.004.
HR (Hydraulics Research) Wallingford. 2005. Flooding in Boscastle and North Cornwall, August 2004. Wallingford, UK: HR Wallingford.
JBA Trust. 2014. Flood and scour related failure incidents at railway assets between 1846 and 2013. Broughton, UK: JBA Trust.
JBA Trust. 2015. Flooding in Cumbria after Storm Desmond. Broughton, UK: JBA Trust.
Jecock, M., and L. Jessop. 2016. Tadcaster Bridge, Tadcaster, North Yorkshire: Assessment of significance. Portsmouth, UK: Historic England.
Jonkman, S. 2014. “Loss of life due to floods: General overview.” In Drowning, 957–965. Berlin: Springer.
Kahraman, R., M. Riella, G. R. Tabor, M. Ebrahimi, S. Djordjević, and P. Kripakaran. 2020. “Prediction of flow around a sharp-nosed bridge pier: Influence of the Froude number and free-surface variation on the flow field.” J. Hydraul. Res. 58 (4): 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2019.1631223.
Kamie˘ski, T. 2010. “Tests to collapse of masonry arch bridges simulated by means of FEM.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Life-Cycle Performance and Cost (IABMAS 2010), 1431–1438. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4381.2649.
Kattel, P., J. Kafle, J.-T. Fischer, M. Mergili, B. M. Tuladhar, and S. P. Pudasaini. 2018. “Interaction of two-phase debris flow with obstacles.” Eng. Geol. 242 (Aug): 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.05.023.
Khayyer, A., H. Gotoh, H. Falahaty, and Y. Shimizu. 2018. “An enhanced ISPH–SPH coupled method for simulation of incompressible fluid–elastic structure interactions.” Comput. Phys. Commun. 232 (Nov): 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.012.
Lee, E.-S., C. Moulinec, R. Xu, D. Violeau, D. Laurence, and P. Stansby. 2008. “Comparisons of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for the SPH mesh free particle method.” J. Comput. Phys. 227 (18): 8417–8436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.06.005.
Liu, M. B., and G. R. Liu. 2006. “Restoring particle consistency in smoothed particle hydrodynamics.” Appl. Numer. Math. 56 (1): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2005.02.012.
Magilligan, F. J., K. H. Nislow, G. B. Fisher, J. Wright, G. Mackey, and M. Laser. 2008. “The geomorphic function and characteristics of large woody debris in low gradient rivers, coastal Maine, USA.” Geomorphology 97 (3–4): 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.08.016.
Marrone, S., M. Antuono, A. Colagrossi, G. Colicchio, D. Le Touzé, and G. Graziani. 2011. “δ-SPH model for simulating violent impact flows.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200 (13–16): 1526–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.016.
Mathews, R., and M. Hardman. 2017. “Lessons learnt from the December 2015 flood event in Cumbria, UK.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Forensic Eng. 170 (4): 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.17.00009.
Monaghan, J. J. 1992. “Smoothed particle hydrodynamics.” Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 30 (1): 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551.
Mott Macdonald and Cumbria County Council. 2018. Bridge by bridge. Cumbria, UK: Mott Macdonald and Cumbria County Council.
North Yorkshire County Council. 2016. Flood investigation report-Tadcaster. North Yorkshire, UK: North Yorkshire County Council.
Oliveira, D. V., P. B. Lourenço, and C. Lemos. 2010. “Geometric issues and ultimate load capacity of masonry arch bridges from the northwest Iberian Peninsula.” Eng. Struct. 32 (12): 3955–3965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.09.006.
Padgett, J., R. Desroches, B. Nielson, M. Yashinsky, O.-S. Kwon, N. Burdette, and E. Tavera. 2008. “Bridge damage and repair costs from Hurricane Katrina.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (1): 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:1(6).
Piche, S., I. Nistor, and T. Murty. 2014. “Numerical modeling of debris impacts using the SPH method.” Coastal Eng. Proc. 1 (34): 19. https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v34.structures.19.
Pringgana, G., L. S. Cunningham, and B. D. Rogers. 2016. “Modelling of tsunami-induced bore and structure interaction.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Comput. Mech. 169 (3): 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1680/jencm.15.00020.
Proske, D. 2018. Bridge collapse frequencies versus failure probabilities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Proske, D., and J. Hubl. 2006. “Historical arch bridges under horizontal loads.” In Proc., ARCH’07, 5th Int. Conf. on Arch Bridges. Graz, Austria: Graz Univ. of Technology.
Pudasaini, S. P., and J. T. Fischer. 2020. “A mechanical model for phase separation in debris flow.” Int. J. Multiphase Flow 129 (Aug): 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103292.
Robertson, I. N., H. R. Riggs, S. C. Yim, and Y. L. Young. 2007. “Lessons from Hurricane Katrina storm surge on bridges and buildings.” J. Waterway, Portal, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 133 (6): 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2007)133:6(463).
Rowson, J., and A. Wynne. 2009. “Cumbrian bridges ripped.New Civil Engineer, June 6, 2020.
Sarfaraz, M., and A. Pak. 2017. “SPH numerical simulation of tsunami wave forces impinged on bridge superstructures.” Coastal Eng. 121 (Mar): 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.12.005.
Sarhosis, V., S. De Santis, and G. de Felice. 2016. “A review of experimental investigations and assessment methods for masonry arch bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (11): 1439–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1136655.
Solan, B., R. Ettema, D. Ryan, and G. A. Hamill. 2020. “Scour concerns for short-span masonry arch bridges.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 146 (2): 06019019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001675.
Sun, P., F. Ming, and A. Zhang. 2015. “Numerical simulation of interactions between free surface and rigid body using a robust SPH method.” Ocean Eng. 98 (Apr): 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.019.
Sun, P.-N., M. Luo, D. Le Touzé, and A.-M. Zhang. 2019. “The suction effect during freak wave slamming on a fixed platform deck: Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation and experimental study.” Phys. Fluids 31 (11): 117108. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5124613.
Tafuni, A., J. M. Domínguez, R. Vacondio, and A. J. C. Crespo. 2018. “A versatile algorithm for the treatment of open boundary conditions in Smoothed particle hydrodynamics GPU models.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 342 (Dec): 604–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.08.004.
Vacondio, R., B. D. Rogers, P. K. Stansby, and P. Mignosa. 2012. “SPH modeling of shallow flow with open boundaries for practical flood simulation.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 138 (6): 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000543.
Wang, Y., X. Liu, C. Yao, and Y. Li. 2020. “Debris-flow impact on piers with different cross-sectional shapes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 146 (1): 04019045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001656.
Witzany, J., T. Cejka, and R. Zigler. 2008. “Failure resistance of historic stone bridge structure of Charles Bridge. II: Susceptibility to floods.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 22 (2): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:2(83).
Xu, G., Q. Chen, L. Zhu, and A. Chakrabarti. 2018. “Characteristics of the wave loads on coastal low-lying twin-deck bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (1): 04017132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001128.
Zevenbergen, L. W., P. F. Lagasse, and P. E. Clopper. 2007. “Effects of debris on bridge pier scour.” In Proc., Restoring Our Natural Habitat—Proc. of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Nov 6, 2020
Accepted: Jun 7, 2021
Published online: Aug 25, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 25, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering Manchester, Univ. of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5623-3263. Email: [email protected]
Lee S. Cunningham, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7686-7490
CEng.
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering Manchester, Univ. of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7686-7490
Benedict D. Rogers, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-7979
Professor, Dept. of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering Manchester, Univ. of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-7979

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Structural Resilience of Pole-Mounted Substations Subjected to Flooding: Generalized Framework and a Malaysian Case Study, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1143, 10, 2, (2024).
  • Confirmation of vehicle stability criteria through a combination of smoothed particle hydrodynamics and laboratory measurements, Journal of Flood Risk Management, 10.1111/jfr3.12885, (2023).
  • Numerical study on the structural response of a masonry arch bridge subject to flood flow and debris impact, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.12.100, 48, (782-797), (2023).
  • Brief communication: Critical infrastructure impacts of the 2021 mid-July western European flood event, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10.5194/nhess-22-3831-2022, 22, 12, (3831-3838), (2022).
  • Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Floating Large Woody Debris Impact on a Masonry Arch Bridge, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10.3390/jmse10070911, 10, 7, (911), (2022).
  • Hydraulic Safety Evaluation and Dynamic Investigations of Baghetto Bridge in Italy, Infrastructures, 10.3390/infrastructures7040053, 7, 4, (53), (2022).
  • Assessing and mitigating risks to bridges from large wood using satellite imagery, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering, 10.1680/jbren.21.00059, (1-11), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share