Recommendations for Teaching a Successful Design-Based Course: Hydraulic Structure Design
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 2
Abstract
Design-based courses often have more latitude with respect to implementing interesting and unique teaching styles and curricula; they can also provide opportunities for broader-context problem solving, thereby improving student learning. Deductive teaching methods are used extensively throughout math, science, and engineering curricula [i.e., students are taught the “how” (fundamental principles), and the “why” is learned by applying those principles through solving problems]. When students successfully grasp why something is important, they often become more engaged in developing and understanding the fundamentals underlying the solution (inductive teaching style). With some creativity and planning, design-based classes can offer a positive alternative learning environment that utilizes both deductive and inductive learning processes. Four keys for enhancing student-learning experiences in a design-based course are discussed. The recommendations and techniques presented herein come from the authors’ first-hand experiences developing and teaching a hydraulic structures design course at Utah State University.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Chanson, H. 2001. “Teaching hydraulic design in an Australian undergraduate civil engineering curriculum.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (12): 1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:12(1002).
Finnie, J. 2001. “Hydraulic design example—Canal and pipeline inlet.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (12): 1028–1035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:12(1028).
Fosnot, C. T. 2005. Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Heyder, W. E. 2001. “New engineer training at bureau of reclamation.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (12): 996–1001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:12(996).
Hotchkiss, R. H. 2001. “Flow over a ‘killer’ weir.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (12): 1022–1027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:12(1022).
Mestre, J. P. 2005. Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Prince, M. J., and R. M. Felder. 2006. “Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases.” J. Eng. Educators 95 (2): 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.
Tullis, B. P., and S. L. Barfuss. 2007. Teaching hydraulic structure design: Some keys to a successful design-based course. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Tullis, B. P., and J. P. Tullis. 2001. “Real-world projects reinforce fundamentals in the classroom.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (12): 992–995. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:12(992).
Tullis, J. P. 1989. Hydraulics of pipelines: Pumps, valves, cavitation, transients. New York: Wiley.
Weiss, P. T., and J. S. Gulliver. 2001. “What students need in hydraulic design projects?” J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (12): 984–991. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:12(984).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 28, 2019
Accepted: Jul 12, 2019
Published online: Dec 10, 2019
Published in print: Feb 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 10, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.