Case Studies
Jan 27, 2020

Hydraulic Model Calibration Using Water Levels Derived from Time Series High-Resolution SAR Images

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 4

Abstract

Hydraulic models require water extents (WE) and water levels (WL) for their calibration and validation. The synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been readily used in the past to delineate water bodies and extract WL from the digital terrain model (DTM). However, studies using SAR data to calibrate hydraulic models have been carried out with a limited number of images. This study aims to use WL derived from a time series of high-resolution (5 m) Radarsat-2 SAR images to calibrate a one-dimensional model (HEC-RAS) using an automated algorithm on a 40-km reach of the Athabasca River in Alberta, Canada. Eighteen images, spanning 2012–2016, were processed to extract WL using a high-resolution (2 m) DTM that combined light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and bathymetry acquired by boat surveying. The impact of the number of images used for the calibration has been assessed. The best root mean square error in validation between the SAR-derived and simulated WL was 0.28 m using seven images. Finally, a critical success index (CSI) was performed to compare the SAR-derived and simulated WE. No significant change in CSI was observed because of riverbank steepness.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

1.
Some or all of the data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in an online repository in accordance with funder data retention policies.
2.
Some or all of the data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider, as indicated in the Acknowledgments.
a.
RADARSAT-2
b.
Lidar DTM
3.
Some or all of the data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions (e.g., anonymized data).
a.
In situ water levels
b.
Bathymetry

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) for providing the RADARSAT-2 images used in this study. The LiDAR DTM data were provided by Environment and Climate Change Canada. Further thanks go to Water Survey Canada for making accessible the water level data. The authors would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments.

References

AAFM (Alberta Agriculture and Forestry Ministry). 2017. “Current and historical Alberta weather station data viewer.” Accessed September 16, 2017. https://agriculture.alberta.ca/acis/alberta-weather-data-viewer.jsp?stations=imcin.
Andrishak, R. 2012. “Winter ecology in the delta hydrology and hydraulics 2012 open water study.” Report Prepared for the Cumulative Environmental Management Association (CEMA) by AMEC Consultants. Accessed December 10, 2019. http://library.cemaonline.ca/ckan/dataset/2012-0011.
Aronica, G., B. Hankin, and K. Beven. 1998. “Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data.” Adv. Water Resour. 22 (4): 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00017-7.
Bates, P. D., F. Pappenberger, and R. J. Romanowicz. 2014. “Uncertainty in flood inundation modelling.” In Applied uncertainty analysis for flood risk management, 232–269. London: Imperial College Press.
Biancamaria, S., D. P. Lettenmaier, and T. M. Pavelsky. 2016. “The SWOT mission and its capabilities for land hydrology.” Surv. Geophys. 37 (2): 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-015-9346-y.
Boni, G., et al. 2016. “A prototype system for flood monitoring based on flood forecast combined with COSMO-SkyMed and Sentinel-1 data.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 9 (6): 2794–2805. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2514402.
Brakenridge, G. R., B. T. Tracy, and J. C. Knox. 1998. “Orbital SAR remote sensing of a river flood wave.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 19 (7): 1439–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698215559.
Brunner, G. W. 2016. HEC-RAS river analysis system hydraulic reference manual. Washington, DC: USACE.
Carlson, T. N., and D. A. Ripley. 1997. “On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index.” Remote Sens. Environ. 62 (3): 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1.
Cian, F., M. Marconcini, P. Ceccato, and C. Giupponi. 2018. “Flood depth estimation by means of high-resolution SAR images and lidar data.” Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 18 (11): 3063–3084. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3063-2018.
Crate, S. A., and M. Nuttall, eds. 2016. Anthropology and climate change: From encounters to actions. London: Routledge.
Di Baldassarre, G., G. Schumann, and P. D. Bates. 2009. “A technique for the calibration of hydraulic models using uncertain satellite observations of flood extent.” J. Hydrol. 367 (3–4): 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.020.
Di Baldassarre, G., G. Schumann, L. Brandimarte, and P. Bates. 2011. “Timely low resolution SAR imagery to support floodplain modelling: A case study review.” Surv. Geophys. 32 (3): 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-011-9111-9.
Dilley, M., R. S. Chen, U. Deicmann, A. L. Lerner-Lam, M. Arnold, J. Agwe, P. Buys, O. Kjevstad, B. Lyon, and G. Yetman. 2005. Vol. 5 of Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. Gupta. 1992. “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res. 28 (4): 1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985.
Dung, N. V., B. Merz, A. Bárdossy, T. D. Thang, and H. Apel. 2011. “Multi-objective automatic calibration of hydrodynamic models utilizing inundation maps and gauge data.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (4): 1339–1354. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1339-2011.
Dysarz, T. 2018. “Application of python scripting techniques for control and automation of HEC-RAS simulations.” Water 10 (10): 1382. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101382.
ECCC (Environment and Climate Change Canada). 2017. “HYDAT hydrometric database.” Accessed June 14, 2017. https://ec.gc.ca/rhc-wsc/default.asp?n=9018B5EC-1.
ESA (European Space Agency). 2017. “Copernicus open access hub.” Accessed August 2, 2017. https://scihub.copernicus.eu/dhus/#/home.
García-Pintado, J., D. C. Mason, S. L. Dance, H. L. Cloke, J. C. Neal, J. Freer, and P. D. Bates. 2015. “Satellite-supported flood forecasting in river networks: A real case study.” J. Hydrol. 523 (Apr): 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.084.
García-Pintado, J., J. C. Neal, D. C. Mason, S. L. Dance, and P. D. Bates. 2013. “Scheduling satellite-based SAR acquisition for sequential assimilation of water level observations into flood modelling.” J. Hydrol. 495 (Jul): 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.050.
Gobeyn, S., et al. 2017. “Impact of the timing of a SAR image acquisition on the calibration of a flood inundation model.” Adv. Water Resour. 100 (Feb): 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.12.005.
Grimaldi, S., Y. Li, V. R. Pauwels, and J. P. Walker. 2016. “Remote sensing-derived water extent and level to constrain hydraulic flood forecasting models: Opportunities and challenges.” Surv. Geophys. 37 (5): 977–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9378-y.
Henderson, F. M., and A. J. Lewis. 2008. “Radar detection of wetland ecosystems: A review.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 29 (20): 5809–5835. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160801958405.
Henry, J. B., P. Chastanet, K. Fellah, and Y. L. Desnos. 2007. “Envisat multi-polarized ASAR data for flood mapping.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 27 (10): 1921–1929. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500486724.
Horritt, M. S. 2006. “A methodology for the validation of uncertain flood inundation models.” J. Hydrol. 326 (1–4): 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.027.
Horritt, M. S., and P. D. Bates. 2001. “Predicting floodplain inundation: Raster-based modelling versus the finite-element approach.” Hydrol. Processes 15 (5): 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.188.
Hostache, R., P. Matgen, G. Schumann, C. Puech, L. Hoffmann, and L. Pfister. 2009. “Water level estimation and reduction of hydraulic model calibration uncertainties using satellite SAR images of floods.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 47 (2): 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2008718.
Landuyt, L., A. Van Wesemael, G. J. P. Schumann, R. Hostache, N. E. Verhoest, and F. M. Van Coillie. 2018. “Flood mapping based on synthetic aperture radar: An assessment of established approaches.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 57 (2): 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2860054.
Lee, J. S., and I. Jurkevich. 1994. “Speckle filtering of synthetic aperture radar images: A review.” Remote Sens. Rev. 8 (4): 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757259409532206.
Martinis, S., J. Kersten, and A. Twele. 2015. “A fully automated TerraSAR-X based flood service.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 104 (Jun): 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.07.014.
Mason, D. C., P. D. Bates, and J. T. Dall’Amico. 2009. “Calibration of uncertain flood inundation models using remotely sensed water levels.” J. Hydrol. 368 (1–4): 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.034.
Mason, D. C., I. J. Davenport, J. C. Neal, G. J. P. Schumann, and P. D. Bates. 2012a. “Near real-time flood detection in urban and rural areas using high-resolution synthetic aperture radar images.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 50 (8): 3041–3052. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2178030.
Mason, D. C., G. P. Schumann, J. C. Neal, J. Garcia-Pintado, and P. D. Bates. 2012b. “Automatic near real-time selection of flood water levels from high resolution synthetic aperture radar images for assimilation into hydraulic models: A case study.” Remote Sens. Environ. 124 (Sep): 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.017.
Matgen, P., J. B. Henry, F. Pappenberger, L. Pfister, P. de Fraipont, and L. Hoffmann. 2004. “Uncertainty in calibrating flood propagation models with flood boundaries derived from synthetic aperture radar imagery.” In Proc., 20th Congress of the Int. Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 352–358. Heipke, Germany: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
Matgen, P., G. Schumann, J. B. Henry, L. Hoffmann, and L. Pfister. 2007. “Integration of SAR-derived river inundation areas, high-precision topographic data and a river flow model toward near real-time flood management.” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 9 (3): 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.03.003.
Merwade, V. M., D. R. Maidment, and J. A. Goff. 2006. “Anisotropic considerations while interpolating river channel bathymetry.” J. Hydrol. 331 (3–4): 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.018.
Moser, L., A. Schmitt, A. Wendleder, and A. Roth. 2016. “Monitoring of the Lac Bam wetland extent using dual-polarized X-band SAR data.” Remote Sens. 8 (4): 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040302.
Mtamba, J., R. van der Velde, P. Ndomba, V. Zoltán, and F. Mtalo. 2015. “Use of Radarsat-2 and Landsat TM images for spatial parameterization of Manning’s roughness coefficient in hydraulic modeling.” Remote Sens. 7 (1): 836–864. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70100836.
Natural Regions Committee. 2006. Natural regions and subregions of Alberta. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Government of Alberta.
Otsu, N. 1979. “A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 9 (1): 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076.
Pachauri, R. K., et al. 2014. “Climate change 2014: Synthesis report.” In Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 151. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Peters, D. L., D. Atkinson, W. A. Monk, D. E. Tenenbaum, and D. J. Baird. 2013. “A multi-scale hydroclimatic analysis of runoff generation in the Athabasca River, Western Canada.” Hydrol. Processes 27 (13): 1915–1934. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9699.
Peters, D. L., T. D. Prowse, P. Marsh, P. M. Lafleur, and J. M. Buttle. 2006. “Persistence of water within perched basins of the Peace-Athabasca Delta, Northern Canada.” Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 14 (3): 221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-005-1114-1.
Pôssa, É. M., and P. Maillard. 2018. “Precise delineation of small water bodies from sentinel-1 data using support vector machine classification.” Can. J. Remote Sens. 44 (3): 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2018.1478723.
Pulvirenti, L., N. Pierdicca, G. Boni, M. Fiorini, and R. Rudari. 2014. “Flood damage assessment through multitemporal COSMO-SkyMed data and hydrodynamic models: The Albania 2010 case study.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 7 (7): 2848–2855. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2328012.
Scarpino, S., R. Albano, A. Cantisani, L. Mancusi, A. Sole, and G. Milillo. 2018. “Multitemporal SAR data and 2D hydrodynamic model flood scenario dynamics assessment.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 7 (3): 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7030105.
Schumann, G., P. D. Bates, M. S. Horritt, P. Matgen, and F. Pappenberger. 2009. “Progress in integration of remote sensing-derived flood extent and stage data and hydraulic models.” Rev. Geophys. 47 (4): RG4001. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000274.
Schumann, G., G. Di Baldassarre, D. Alsdorf, and P. D. Bates. 2010. “Near real-time flood wave approximation on large rivers from space: Application to the River Po, Italy.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (5): W05601. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007672.
Schumann, G., P. Matgen, M. E. J. Cutler, A. Black, L. Hoffmann, and L. Pfister. 2008. “Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 63 (3): 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.09.004.
Schumann, G., P. Matgen, L. Hoffmann, R. Hostache, F. Pappenberger, and L. Pfister. 2007. “Deriving distributed roughness values from satellite radar data for flood inundation modelling.” J. Hydrol. 344 (1–2): 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.024.
Stephens, E., G. Schumann, and P. Bates. 2014. “Problems with binary pattern measures for flood model evaluation.” Hydrol. Processes 28 (18): 4928–4937. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9979.
Thompson, A. A. 2015. “Overview of the RADARSAT constellation mission.” Can. J. Remote Sens. 41 (5): 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2015.1104633.
Uhlenbrook, S. 2009. “Climate and man-made changes and their impacts on catchments.” In Proc. of the Water Policy, Water as a Vulnerable and Exhaustible Resource: Joint Conf. of APLU and ICA, edited by P. Kovar, P. Maca, and J. Redinova, 81–87. Prague, Czech Republic.
White, L., B. Brisco, M. Pregitzer, B. Tedford, and L. Boychuk. 2014. “RADARSAT-2 beam mode selection for surface water and flooded vegetation mapping.” Can. J. Remote Sens. 40 (2): 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2014.943393.
Wood, M., R. Hostache, J. Neal, T. Wagener, L. Giustarini, M. Chini, G. Corato, P. Matgen, and P. Bates. 2016. “Calibration of channel depth and friction parameters in the LISFLOOD-FP hydraulic model using medium-resolution SAR data and identifiability techniques.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20 (12): 4983–4997. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4983-2016.
Yan, K., G. Di Baldassarre, D. P. Solomatine, and G. J. P. Schumann. 2015. “A review of low-cost space-borne data for flood modelling: Topography, flood extent and water level.” Hydrol. Processes 29 (15): 3368–3387. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10449.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 146Issue 4April 2020

History

Received: Sep 5, 2018
Accepted: Jul 11, 2019
Published online: Jan 27, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 27, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nicolas M. Desrochers [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, 2500 Blvd. de l’Université, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, 2500 Blvd. de l’Université, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7937-9281
Daniel L. Peters, Ph.D.
Watershed Hydrology and Ecology Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Univ. of Victoria, P.O. Box 3060 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3R4.
Gabriela Siles, Ph.D.
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, 2500 Blvd. de l’Université, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1.
Robert Leconte, Ph.D.
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, 2500 Blvd. de l’Université, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share