Technical Papers
Apr 8, 2019

Evaluating Riparian Vegetation Roughness Computation Methods Integrated within HEC-RAS

Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 6

Abstract

Determining the roughness of riparian vegetation is often a challenge in river hydraulic modeling. A large number of quantitative methods have been developed, but none of them have been integrated into any one-dimensional (1D) hydraulic model for directly computing dynamic vegetation roughness. In this study, we evaluated the performance and applicability of eleven vegetation roughness computation methods by integrating them into a widely used 1D Hydrologic Engineering Center-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). The enhanced HEC-RAS was applied to predict river stages of the San Joaquin River reach with dense and diverse riparian vegetation. Among the eleven vegetation roughness methods, the method of Freeman et al. clearly overestimates Manning’s roughness coefficient (n) values for flow depth greater than its original experimental flow depth (1.5 m). The method of Whittaker et al. considers the reconfiguration of flexible vegetation and uses measured vegetation projected area, resulting in a slightly more accurate prediction of river stages than all other methods. The methods that model vegetation as a rigid cylinder produce identical and reasonable river stage predictions. The Järvelä method includes the impact of velocity on vegetation roughness and uses an indirect metric leaf area index to represent the vegetation projected area, which produces a river stage prediction that is similar to other methods based on a rigid cylinder analogy. Compared with the original model with manually calibrated Manning’s n, the San Joaquin River HEC-RAS model integrated with dynamically computed roughness methods is able to predict observed river stages and performs notably better for flood flows exceeding the maximum calibration flow. The present study also demonstrates that methods that model vegetation as a rigid cylinder are applicable for computing dynamic n values in 1D hydraulic simulation for the areas in which most riparian vegetation is not fully submerged and dominated by trees and shrubs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The study was partially funded by the US Army Corps of Engineers Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program. The authors would like to thank Mr. Steve Piper and Mr. Mark Jensen for updating the HEC-RAS software. The authors also thank Dr. Blair Greimann for providing San Joaquin River’s vegetation and topography dataset. Comments by two anonymous reviewers significantly improved the manuscript.

References

Aberle, J., and J. Järvelä. 2013. “Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible floodplain vegetation.” J. Hydraul. Res. 51 (1): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.754795.
Abu-Aly, T., G. Pasternack, J. Wyrick, R. Barker, D. Massa, and T. Johnson. 2014. “Effects of LiDAR-derived, spatially distributed vegetation roughness on two-dimensional hydraulics in a gravel-cobble river at flows of 0.2 to 20 times bankfull.” Geomorphology 206: 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.10.017.
Arcement, G. J., and V. R. Schneider. 1989. Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. Denver: USGS.
Augustijn, D. C. M., F. Huthoff, and E. H. V. Velzen. 2008. “Comparison of vegetation roughness descriptions.” In Proc., River Flow 2008—4th Int. Conf. on Fluvial Hydraulics, edited by M. S. Altinakar, M. A. Kokpinar, I. Aydin, S. Cokgor, and S. Kirkgoz, 343–350. Çe¿me, Turkey: Kubaba Congress Dept. and Travel Services.
Baptist, M. J., V. Babovic, J. Rodríguez, M. Keijzer, R. Uittenbogaard, A. Mynett, and A. Verwey. 2007. “On inducing equations for vegetation resistance.” J. Hydraul. Res. 45 (4): 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521778.
Casas, A., S. N. Lane, D. Yu, and G. Benito. 2010. “A method for parameterising roughness and topographic sub-grid scale effects in hydraulic modelling from LiDAR data.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (8): 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1567-2010.
Cheng, N. S. 2011. “Representative roughness height of submerged vegetation.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (8): W08517. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010590.
Chow, V. T. 1959. Open channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
De Doncker, L., P. Troch, R. Verhoeven, K. Bal, P. Meire, and J. Quintelier. 2009. “Determination of the Manning roughness coefficient influenced by vegetation in the river Aa and Biebrza river.” Environ. Fluid Mech. 9 (5): 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-009-9149-0.
Dombroski, D., and B. P. Greimann. 2014. A deterministic spatially-distributed ecohydraulic model for lmproved riverine system management. Denver: Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Genter, Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group.
Fischenich, J. C. 2000. Resistance due to vegetation. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory.
Forzieri, G., G. Moser, E. R. Vivoni, F. Castelli, and F. Canovaro. 2010. “Riparian vegetation mapping for hydraulic roughness estimation using very high resolution remote sensing data fusion.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 136 (11): 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000254.
Freeman, G. E., W. J. Rahmeyer, and R. R. Copeland. 2000. Determination of resistance due to shrubs and woody vegetation. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Corps of Engineers Research and Development Center.
Gillihan, T. 2013. “Dynamic vegetation roughness in the riparian zone.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of New Mexico.
Hession, W. C., and J. C. Curran. 2013. “The impacts of vegetation on roughness in fluvial systems.” Vol. 12 of Treatise on geomorphology, edited by J. F. Schroder, D. R. Butler, and C. R. Hupp, 75–93. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hink, V., and R. Ohmart. 1984. Middle Rio Grande biological survey. Tempe, AZ: Center for Environmental Studies, Arizona State Univ.
Holland, R. F. 1986. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Resources Agency, Dept. of Fish and Game.
Huthoff, F., D. Augustijn, and S. J. Hulscher. 2007. “Analytical solution of the depth-averaged flow velocity in case of submerged rigid cylindrical vegetation.” Water Resour. Res. 43 (6): W06413. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005625.
Jalonen, J., J. Järvelä, and J. Aberle. 2013. “Leaf area index as vegetation density measure for hydraulic analyses.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 139 (5): 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000700.
Järvelä, J. 2004. “Determination of flow resistance caused by non-submerged woody vegetation.” Int. J. River Basin Manage. 2 (1): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2004.9635222.
Kouwen, N. 1988. “Field estimation of the biomechanical properties of grass.” J. Hydraul. Res. 26 (5): 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688809499193.
Kouwen, N., and M. Fathi-Moghadam. 2000. “Friction factors for coniferous trees along rivers.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 126 (10): 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2000)126:10(732).
Kouwen, N., and R. M. Li. 1980. “Biomechanics of vegetative channel linings.” J. Hydraul. Div. 106 (6): 1085–1103.
Luhar, M., and H. M. Nepf. 2013. “From the blade scale to the reach scale: A characterization of aquatic vegetative drag.” Adv. Water Resour. 51: 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.002.
Mason, D. C., D. M. Cobby, M. S. Horritt, and P. D. Bates. 2003. “Floodplain friction parameterization in two-dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry.” Hydrol. Process. 17 (9): 1711–1732. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1270.
McKay, S. K., and J. C. Fischenich. 2011. Robust prediction of hydraulic roughness. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulic Laboratory.
Moise, G. W., and B. Hendrickson. 2002. Riparian vegetation of the San Joaquin River. Fresno, CA: Dept. of Water Resources, Environmental Services Section.
Naiman, R. J., H. Decamps, and M. E. McClain. 2005. Riparia: Ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities. London: Academic Press.
Orr, B., Z. Diggory, G. Coffman, W. Sears, T. Dudley, and A. Merrill. 2009. “Riparian vegetation classification and mapping: Important tools for large-scale river corridor restoration in a semi-arid landscape.” In Proc., CNPS Conservation Conf., 212–232. Sacramento, CA: California Native Plant Society.
Palmer, V. J. 1945. “A method for designing vegetated waterways.” Agric. Eng. 26 (12): 516–520.
Ree, W. 1954. Handbook of channel design for soil and water conservation: Soil conservation service. Washington, DC: USDA.
Shields, F. D., Jr., K. G. Coulton, and H. Nepf. 2017. “Representation of vegetation in two-dimensional hydrodynamic models.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 143 (8): 02517002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001320.
Speck, O., and H.-C. Spatz. 2003. “Mechanical properties of the rhizome of Arundo donax L.” Plant Biol. 5 (6): 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-44714.
Stone, M. C., L. Chen, K. S. McKay, J. Goreham, K. Acharya, J. C. Fischenich, and A. B. Stone. 2013. “Bending of submerged woody riparian vegetation as a function of hydraulic flow conditions.” River Res. Appl. 29 (2): 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1592.
Tetra Tech. 2013. San Joaquin River and bypass system 1-D steady state HEC-RAS model documentation. Fort Collins, CO: Tetra Tech.
Vargas-Luna, A., A. Crosato, and W. S. Uijttewaal. 2015. “Effects of vegetation on flow and sediment transport: Comparative analyses and validation of predicting models.” Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 40 (2): 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3633.
Västilä, K., and J. Järvelä. 2014. “Modeling the flow resistance of woody vegetation using physically based properties of the foliage and stem.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (1): 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013819.
Verschoren, V., D. Meire, J. Schoelynck, K. Buis, K. D. Bal, P. Troch, P. Meire, and S. Temmerman. 2016. “Resistance and reconfiguration of natural flexible submerged vegetation in hydrodynamic river modelling.” Environ. Fluid Mech. 16 (1): 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-015-9432-1.
Whittaker, P., C. A. Wilson, and J. Aberle. 2015. “An improved Cauchy number approach for predicting the drag and reconfiguration of flexible vegetation.” Adv. Water Resour. 83: 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.005.
Wu, W. 2007. Computational river dynamics. London: CRC Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 145Issue 6June 2019

History

Received: Jan 20, 2018
Accepted: Nov 5, 2018
Published online: Apr 8, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Sep 8, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Junna Wang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. Email: [email protected]
Zhonglong Zhang, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
PE
Senior Scientist, Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, LimnoTech, Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share