Analysis of Bridge Construction as a Restoration Technique for Everglades National Park, FL, USA, Using Hydrological Numerical Modeling
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 4
Abstract
Since the construction of the Tamiami Trail in the 1920s, overland flow to the Florida Everglades has decreased significantly, affecting ecosystems from the wetlands to the estuary. As part of the effort to return flows to historical levels, several changes to the existing water management infrastructure have been implemented or are in the design phase. These changes include the construction of two bridges [a 1.6-km (1-mi) and a 4.2-km (2.6-mi) bridge] and the removal of the Tamiami Trail roadway, as well as increasing canal water levels to increase head elevations north of Everglades National Park (ENP). A numerical model of ENP hydrology was developed using MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 software to review the effects of these structure changes and evaluate the potential impact of bridge construction. Model simulations show that the newly constructed 1.6-km bridge along the Tamiami Trail could increase water delivery to the Northeast Shark Slough (NESS) by about 6%. The 1.6-km bridge, plus the proposed 4.2-km bridge, could increase flows by about 10% from the baseline. These simulations also show an increase of flow to the eastern canals by less than 1% for each scenario, demonstrating that bridge implementation along the Tamiami Trail will have a minimal impact on eastern canal operations and flood management. The percent probability of water levels exceeding baseline conditions was determined for the simulation period. This analysis showed that the length of time of inundation, or the hydroperiod, would increase for large areas of the park with the introduction of each bridge. Additional simulations were conducted to demonstrate the effect of proposed water-level increases for canals north of the park. Raising water levels in the canal by up to 0.3 m (1 ft) increased overland water levels up to 21 cm in some areas within ENP. These simulations demonstrate that a general increase in water levels and hydroperiods within ENP will be achieved by adding bridges to the Tamiami Trail roadway and by increasing water levels in the canal.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work is a collaborative effort between the National Park Service and Florida International University’s Applied Research Center (Cooperative Agreement P06AC00039-MOD 0003). We would like to thank the Everglades research community at large for their tireless data collection and willingness to extend access to that data to their fellow researchers. Funding support for this investigation was provided through the NASA WaterSCAPES University Research Center (Cooperative Agreement NNX10AQ13A).
References
Abtew, W. (1996). “Evapotranspiration measurements and modeling for three wetland systems in south Florida.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 32(3), 465–473.
Armentano, T., Sah, J., Ross, M., Jones, D., Cooley, H., and Smith, C. (2006). “Rapid responses of vegetation to hydrological changes in Taylor Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida, USA.” Hydrobiologia, 569(1), 293–309.
Boler, R. B., and Sikkema, D. A. (2010). “Tamiami Trail modifications: Next steps project. Summary of findings and draft environmental impact statement.”, South Florida Natural Resources Center, Everglades National Park, Homestead, FL.
Bolster, C., and Saiers, J. (2002). “Development and evaluation of a mathematical model for surface-water flow within the Shark River Slough of the Florida Everglades.” J. Hydrol., 259(1–4), 221–235.
Chiang, C., Craft, C., Rogers, D., and Richardson, C. (2000). “Effects of 4 years of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on Everglades plant communities.” Aquat. Botany, 68(1), 61–78.
Chimney, M., and Goforth, G. (2006). “History and description of the Everglades nutrient removal project, a subtropical constructed wetland in south Florida (USA).” Ecol. Eng., 27(4), 268–278.
Christiaens, K., and Feyen, J. (2002). “Use of sensitivity and uncertainty measures in distributed hydrological modeling with an application to the MIKE SHE model.” Water Resour. Res., 38(9), 1169.
Chui, T., Low, S., and Liong, S.-Y. (2011). “An ecohydrological model for studying groundwater-vegetation interactions in wetlands.” J. Hydrol., 409(1–2), 291–304.
Cook, A. (2012). “Development of an integrated surface and subsurface model of Everglades National Park.” FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertation.
Doummar, J., Sauter, M., and Geyer, T. (2012). “Simulation of flow processes in a large scale karst system with and integrated catchment model (MIKE SHE)—Identification of relevant parameters influencing spring discharge.” J. Hydrol., 426–427, 112–123.
Fish, J., and Stewart, M. (1991). “Hydrogeology of the surficial aquifer system, Dade County, Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 90-4108.” U.S. Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL.
Havnø, K., Madsen, M., and Dørge, J. (1995). Computer models of watershed hydrology, Water Resources, Highlands Ranch, CO, 733–782.
Kristensen, K. J., and Jensen, S. (1975). “A model for estimating actual evapotranspiration from potential evapotranspiration.” Nordic Hydrol., 6, 170–188.
Langevin, C., Swain, E., and Wolfert, M. (2005). “Simulation of integrated surface-water/ground-water flow and salinity for a coastal wetland and adjacent estuary.” J. Hydrol., 314(1–4), 212–234.
Long, S. (2014). “Simulating Everglades National Park hydrology and phosphorus transport under existing and future scenarios using numerical modeling.” FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
Long, S. A., Tachiev, G. I., Fennema, R., Cook, A. M., Sukop, M. C., and Miralles-Wilhelm, F. (2015). “Modeling the impact of restoration efforts on phosphorus loading and transport through Everglades National Park, FL, USA.” Sci. Total Environ., 520, 81–95.
Michot, B., Meselhe, E., Rivera-Monroy, V., Coronado-Molina, C., and Twilley, R. (2011). “A tidal creek water budget: Estimation of groundwater discharge and overland flow using hydrologic modeling in the southern Everglades.” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 93(4), 438–448.
Min, J.-H., Paudel, R., and Jawitz, J. (2010). “Spatially distributed modeling of surface water flow dynamics in the Everglades ridge and slough landscape.” J. Hydrol., 390(1–2), 1–12.
NRC (National Research Council). (2012). Progress toward restoring the Everglades: The fourth biennial review, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Rahim, B., Yusoff, I., Jafri, A., Othman, Z., and Ghani, A. (2012). “Application of MIKE SHE modelling system to set up a detailed water balance computation.” Water Environ. J., 26(4), 490–503.
Refsgaard, J., and Storm, B. (1995). Computer models of watershed hydrology, Water Resources, Highlands Ranch, CO, 809–846.
SFWMD (South Florida Water Management District). (2005). “Documentation of the South Florida Water Management Model, version 5.5.” West Palm Beach, FL.
Stone, J., and Legg, D. (2001). “Agriculture and the Everglades.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 47(3), 207–215.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). (2013). “Central Everglades Planning Project: Draft integrated project implementation report and environmental impact statement.” Jacksonville, FL.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 142 • Issue 4 • April 2016
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 8, 2014
Accepted: Jul 2, 2015
Published online: Nov 19, 2015
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Apr 19, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.