Two-Dimensional Numerical Investigation for Short- and Long-Term Effects of Spur Dikes on Weighted Usable Area of Rhinogobius candidianus (Goby)
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 12
Abstract
The weighted usable area (WUA) is one of the popular metrics to quantify the stream physical habitat and the effects of instream structures. However, most habitat studies only considered existing or proposed channel geometries in their WUA computations and not how the channel will evolve over time. This study reports a numerical investigation for the effects of spur dikes on WUA along the Juanchiao levee, Touchien River, Taiwan. Seven virtual dikes were placed along the outer bend in the study reach and the Rhinogobius candidianus was selected for target species. The horizontal two-dimensional (2D) flow fields at various flows and the corresponding WUAs for R. candidianus were computed under four channel bathymetry configurations, including: (1) existing; (2) immediately after dikes are implemented; (3) after 10-year channel migration without dikes; and (4) 10 years after dikes are implemented. The WUA obtained from the first two bathymetry configurations aimed to investigate the short-term spur dikes effect, whereas the last two examined the long-term effect. The channel geometry after 10 years channel migration under the conditions of both with and without spur dikes were simulated through a 2D mobile bed model. The analyses of short-term effect showed the WUA of R. candidianus, shortly after the virtual dikes were placed, increases due to increased water depth near the dikes, especially in low-flow conditions. As for long-term effects, however, the WUA in the case with spur dikes are lower than the case without spur dikes, especially in relatively high-flow conditions. The adverse effects of spur dikes on WUA appeared in the long-term investigation and resulted from the ever-increasing water depth and flow velocity around the tip of spur dikes and the main channel. This study showed that the habitat quality and availability might be overestimated if the channel bed changes over time. When using the WUA approach to evaluate the effects of instream structure on physical habitat prior to actually placing them in the river, quantitative predictions of the long-term variation of channel geometry and the associated physical habitat conditions are important.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Boavida, I., Santos, J. M., Cortes, R. V., Pinheiro, A. N., and Ferreira, M. T. (2011). “Assessment of instream structures for habitat improvement for two critically endangered fish species.” Aquat. Ecol., 45(1), 113–124.
Bovee, K. D., Lamb, B. L., Bartholow, J. M., Stalnaker, C. B., Taylor, J., and Henriksen, J. (1998). “Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology.”, Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Information and Technology, Fort Collins, CO, 1–131.
Chou, W. C., and Chuang, M. D. (2011). “Habitat evaluation using suitability index and habitat type diversity: A case study involving a shallow forest stream in central Taiwan.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 172(1–4), 689–704.
de Jalon, D. G., and Gortazar, J. (2007). “Evaluation of instream habitat enhancement options using fish habitat simulations: Case-studies in the river Pas (Spain).” Aquat. Ecol., 41(3), 461–474.
Hsieh, T. Y., and Yang, J. C. (2003). “Investigation on the suitability of two-dimensional depth-averaged models for bend-flow simulation.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 597–612.
Hung, M. C., Hsieh, T. Y., Wu, C. H., and Yang, J. C. (2009). “A two-dimensional nonequilibrium non-cohesive and cohesive sediment transport model.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 369–382.
Milhous, R. T., Updike, M., and Schneider, D. (1989). “Physical habitat simulation system reference manual—version II.” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, Washington, DC, 89(16), 1–403.
Peters, R. J., Missildine, B. R., and Low, D. L. (1998). “Seasonal fish densities near river banks stabilized with various stabilization methods.” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, North Pacific Coast Ecoregion, Western Washington Office, Aquatic Resources Div., Lacey, WA.
Remshardt, W. J., and Fisher, W. L. (2009). “Effects of variation in streamflow and channel structure on smallmouth bass habitat in an alluvial stream.” River Res. Appl., 25(6), 661–674.
Shields, F. D., Knight, S. S., and Cooper, C. M. (1998). “Addition of spurs to stone toe protection for warmwater fish habitat rehabilitation.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(6), 1427–1436.
Shih, S. S., Lee, H. Y., and Chen, C. C. (2008). “Model-based evaluations of spur dikes for fish habitat improvement: A case study of endemic species Varicorhinus barbatulus (Cyprinidae) and Hemimyzon formosanum (Homalopteridae) in Lanyang River, Taiwan.” Ecol. Eng., 34(2), 127–136.
Water Resources Agency. (2008a). “The application of 2-dimensional river habitat model (River 2D).”, Water Resources Planning Institute, Water Resources Agency, MOEA, Taichung County, Taiwan (in Chinese).
Water Resources Agency. (2008b). “The study for sediment transport and river stability of Touchien River basin.”, The 2nd River Management Office, Water Resources Agency, MOEA, Hsinchu, Taiwan (in Chinese).
Yang, C. T., and Simões, F. J. M. (2002). “User’s manual for GSTARS 3 (generalized stream tube model for alluvial river simulation, ver. 3.0).” U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, Denver.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 16, 2012
Accepted: Jun 10, 2013
Published online: Jun 13, 2013
Discussion open until: Nov 13, 2013
Published in print: Dec 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.