Flood Routing Simulation and System Customization for a High-Leakage River Channel in China
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 6
Abstract
Leakage is a major factor impacting the evolution of flood in a highly permeable river. By integrating a mathematical model with data provided by a monitoring database, a flood routing system was developed for the Dagu River in China. The aim of this study was to calculate the leakage discharge and to discuss the effect of leakage for flood modeling within a high-leakage riverbed. This system was implemented for application of a flood-diversion experiment in 2003, which accessed data automatically and used estimated coefficients to calculate leakage discharge. The results showed that simulated discharge values fit well with the measured values, with an average relative error less than 10%, and the leakage average relative error was approximately 2%. The infiltration experiments showed that the leakage coefficient could be treated as a constant when the dynamics in the initial phase of a short flood event was stimulated. The initial water level and leakage and roughness coefficients were the main factors required to accurately determine the discharge of river seepage.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The project was financially supported by the 100 Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Municipal Bureau of Water Resources of Qingdao.
References
Ahmad, S., and Simonovic, S. P. (2006). “An intelligent decision support system for management of floods.” Water Resour. Manage., 20(3), 391–410.
Alfredsen, K., and Sæther, B. (2000). “An object-oriented application framework for building water resource information and planning tools applied to the design of a flood analysis system.” Environ. Model. Software, 15(3), 215–224.
Aly, I. E.-K., and Eric, Y. (2007). “Modeling streamflows and flood delineation of the 2004 flood disaster, Mānoa, O’ahu, Hawai’i.” Pac. Sci., 61(2), 235–255.
Anderson, E. (2005). “Modeling groundwater-surface water interactions using the Dupuit approximation.” Adv. Water Resour., 28(4), 315–327.
Blaschke, A. P., Steiner, K.-H., Schmalfuss, R., Gutknecht, D., and Sengschmitt, D. (2003). “Clogging processes in hyporheic interstices of an impounded river, the Danube at Vienna, Austria.” Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 88(3–4), 397–413.
Clemmens, A. J., Bautista, E., Wahlin, B. T., and Strand, R. J. (2005). “Simulation of automatic canal control systems.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(4), 324–335.
DHI MIKE 11. (2007). “DHI MIKE 11 user and reference manual.” Danish Hydraulic Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Doppler, T., Franssen, H.-J. H., Kaiser, H.-P., Kuhlman, U., and Stauffer, F. (2007). “Field evidence of a dynamic leakage coefficient for modelling river–aquifer interactions.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam, Neth.), 347(1–2), 177–187.
Henrik, M., and Clus, S. (2005). “Adaptive state updating in real-time river flow forecasting—a combined filtering and error forecasting procedure.” J. Hydrol., 308(1–4), 302–312.
Kaleris, V. (1998). “Quantifying the exchange rate between groundwater and small streams.” J. Hydraul. Res., 36(6), 913–932.
Kralisch, S., Krause, P., and David, O. (2005). “Using the object modeling system for hydrological model development and application.” Adv. Geosci., 4, 75–81.
Li, S. (2005). Sand mining planning in the Dagu River, Water Conservancy Bureau of Qingdao, Qingdao, China (in Chinese).
Liberty, J. (2005). “Programming C#: Building .NET Applications with C#.” O'Reilly Media, Incorporated.
Liu, C., Zheng, H., Zhang, L., and Wu, X. (2008). “Development of hydro-informatic modelling system and its application.” Sci. China Ser. E: Technol. Sci., 51(4), 456–466.
Monninkhoff, B. L., and Zhijia, L. (2009). “Coupling FEFLOW and MIKE11 to optimise the flooding system of the Lower Havel polders in Germany.” Int. J. Water, 5(2), 163–180.
Montz, B. E., and Gruntfest, E. (2002). “Flash flood mitigation: Recommendations for research and applications.” Environ. Hazards, 4(1), 15–22.
Panda, R. K., Pramanik, N., and Bala, B. (2010). “Simulation of river stage using artificial neural network and MIKE 11 hydrodynamic model.” Comput. Geosci., 36(6), 735–745.
Pedregal, D. J., Rivas, R., Feliu, V., Sa′nchez, L., and Linares, A. (2009). “A non-linear forecasting system for the Ebro River at Zaragoza, Spain.” Environ. Model. Software, 24(4), 502–509.
Rabuffetti, D., and Barbero, S. (2005). “Operational hydro meteorological warning and real-time flood forecasting: The Piemonte Region case study.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9(4), 457–466.
Rodríguez, L. B., Cello, P. A., and Vionnet, C. A. (2006). “Modeling stream-aquifer interactions in a shallow aquifer, Choele Choel Island, Patagonia, Argentina.” Hydrogeol. J., 14(4), 591–602.
Romanowicz, R. J., Young, P. C., Beven, K. J., and Pappenberger, F. (2008). “A data based mechanistic approach to nonlinear flood routing and adaptive flood level forecasting.” Adv. Water Resour., 31(8), 1048–1056.
Turan, N. N., and Burak, U. A. E. (2006). “Flood forecasting and analysis within the Ulus Basin, Turkey, using geographic information systems.” Nat. Hazards, 39(2), 213–229.
Yu, W. C., Fu, R. H., Chu, Y. B., and Sun, W. Y. (2003). Monitoring report of water diversion in the Dagu River watershed, Water Conservancy Bureau of Qingdao, Qingdao, China (in Chinese).
Zechner, E., and Frielingsdorf, W. (2004). “Evaluating the use of canal seepage and solute concentration observations for aquifer parameter estimation.” J. Hydrol., 289(1–4), 62–77.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 25, 2011
Accepted: Nov 16, 2012
Published online: Nov 20, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.