Effect of Channel Restoration on Flood Wave Attenuation
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 2
Abstract
Stream channel restoration can increase flow storage and energy dissipation of passing flood waves. Elements of restoration design that can enhance attenuation include remeandering, which reduces channel slope and increases channel length relative to the floodplain; restoring channel-floodplain connectivity; and revegetating banks and the floodplain. Reestablishment of floodplain hydraulic function is increasingly a goal of restoration programs, yet the approximate magnitude of possible change to attenuation due to reach-scale restoration remains poorly quantified. We examined the efficacy of channel restoration on flood attenuation using restored reaches and synthetic reaches representing median dimensions of channel restoration projects in North Carolina (e.g., in length). We applied an industry standard dynamic flood routing model (UNET in HEC-RAS) to route floods in impaired and restored reach models. Floods routed through field-based reach models either exhibited very small increases in attenuation, largely due to assumed increases in floodplain roughness, or a decrease in attenuation. Analysis demonstrated that attenuation of peak discharge is overall most sensitive to channel and valley slope, channel and floodplain roughness, and channel and valley length in decreasing order, but is dependent on flood magnitude. Restoration most impacted floods of intermediate magnitude (between 2- and 50-year return interval), particularly those confined to the channel under the impaired morphology but able to access the floodplain under the restored morphology. Restoration may rehabilitate a channel’s ability to attenuate small to intermediate floods by augmenting flood access to the floodplain, changing channel geometry, and enhancing channel and floodplain roughness over time. However, our study shows that the predominantly small scale of current channel restoration will provide minimally quantifiable enhancement to flood attenuation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The technical analysis and writing of this manuscript benefited from the comments of three anonymous reviewers. Kari Sholtes provided support in the field and throughout the writing and revision of this manuscript. Greg Melia and Zack Mondry of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) provided feedback in framing research objectives, assistance in identifying field sites, and access to restoration project documentation. Consulting firms Arcadis and Michael Baker Engineering (formerly, Buck) provided preconstruction survey data and restoration design reports. Will Harman was a wealth of information on the Smith Creek site and restoration design in North Carolina. Field assistance by Sally Whisler, Jeff Muehlbauer, Daisy Small, and Ben Bogardus is greatly appreciated. Larry Band and Brian White reviewed earlier versions of this work. J. S. Sholtes was supported by a fellowship from the UNC Institute for the Environment, and M. W. Doyle was supported by an Early Career Award from the National Science Foundation (Award No. NSFBCS-CAREER-0441504).
References
Acreman, M. C., Riddington, R., and Booker, D. J. (2003). “Hydrological impacts of floodplain restoration: A case study of the River Cherwell, U.K.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 7(1), 75–85.
Anderson, B. G., Rutherford, I. D., and Western, A. W. (2006). “An analysis of the influence of riparian vegetation on the propagation of flood waves.” Environ. Modell. Software, 21(9), 1290–1296.
Arcadis G&M of North Carolina, Inc. (2002). “Restoration design report.” Unnamed Tributary to South Fork Creek, Alamance County, North Carolina, No. NC602013.0000, Raleigh, N.C., 1–20.
Barkau, R. L. (1996). UNET, one-dimensional unsteady flow through a full network of open channels, User's manual, version 3.1 CPD-66 USACE Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif. 1–288.
BenDor, T., Sholtes, J. S., and Doyle, M. W. (2009). “Landscape characteristics of a stream and wetland mitigation banking program.” Ecol. Appl., 19(8), 2078–2092.
Bernhardt, E. S., et al. (2007). “Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a national survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners.” Restor. Ecol., 15(3), 482–493.
Booth, D. B. (1990). “Stream-channel incision following drainage-basin urbanization.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 26(3), 407–417.
Buck Engineering. (2001). Smith and Austin Creeks restoration plan and design, Wake Forest, North Carolina, Cary, N.C., 1–75.
Buck Engineering. (2003). Smith and Austin Creeks mitigation plan, Wake Forest, North Carolina, Cary, N.C., 1–61.
Campbell, K. L., Kumar, S., and Johnson, H. P. (1972). “Stream straightening effects on flood-runoff characteristics.” Trans. Am. Soc. Agr. Egr., 15(1), 94–98.
Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 98–115.
Doll, B. A., et al. (2002). “Hydraulic geometry relationships for urban streams throughout the Piedmont of North Carolina.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38(3), 641–651.
Doyle, M. W., and Shields, F. D., Jr. (1998). “Perturbations of stage hydrographs caused by channelization and incision.” Proc., Water Resources Engineering, ASCE, Reston, Va., 736–741.
Dunne, T., and Leopold, L. B. (1978). Water in environmental planning, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
Emerson, C. H., Welty, C., and Traver, R. G. (2005). “Watershed-scale evaluation of a system of storm water detention basins.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 10(3), 237–242.
Fares, Y. R. (2000). “Calculation of transverse energy regime in curved channels.” Comput. Geosci., 26(3), 267–276.
Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISWRG). (1998). Stream corridor restoration: Principles, processes, and practices, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1–637.
Fread, D. L. (1975). “Computation of stage-discharge relationships affected by unsteady flow.” Water Resour. Bull., 11(2), 213–228.
Ghavasieh, A., Poulard, C., and Paquier, A. (2006). “Effect of roughened strips on flood propagation: Assessment on representative virtual cases and validation.” J. Hydrol., 318(1–4), 121–137.
Harrelson, C. C., Rawlins, C. L., and Potyondy, J. P. (1994). “Stream channel reference sites: an illustrated guide to field technique” Gen. Tech. Rep., RM-245 Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Stations, 61.
Henderson, F. M. (1966). Open channel flow, Macmillan, New York, 363–381.
Knight, D. W. (2005). “River flood hydraulics: Validation issues in one-dimensional flood routing models.” River basin modeling for flood risk mitigation, D. W. Knight and A. Shamseldin, eds., Taylor and Francis, Oxford, U.K., 335–385.
Knight, D. W., and Shiono, K. (1996). “River channel and floodplain hydraulics.” Floodplain processes, M. G. Anderson, D. E. Walling, and P. D. Bates, eds., Wiley, Chichester, U.K., 139–182.
Ladson, A. R., Walsh, C. J., and Fletcher, T. D. (2006). “Improving stream health in urban areas by reducing runoff frequency from impervious surfaces.” Aust. Water Resour., 10(1), 23–34.
Leopold, L. B. (1968). “Hydrology for urban land planning. A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use.” Geological Survey Circular 554, USGS, Washington, D.C., 1–18.
Liggett, J. A., and Cunge, J. A. (1975). “Numerical methods of solution of the unsteady flow equations.” K. Mahmood, V. Yevjevich, and U. F. I. O. Channels, eds., Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colo., 142–179.
Liu, Y. B., Gebremeskel, S., De Smedt, F., Hoffman, L., and Pfister, L. (2004). “Simulation of flood reduction by natural river rehabilitation using a distributed hydrological model.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8(6), 1129–1140.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2006). Precipitation exceedence probability maps: Ohio River Basin and surrounding states No. 2, National Weather Service, Office of Hydrologic Development, Hydromet. Design Studies Center, Silver Springs, Md.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.” No. Tr-55, Conservation Engineering Div., USDA, Washington D.C., 1–160.
Ponce, V. M. (1989). Engineering hydrology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Robbins, J. C., and Pope, B. F. (1996). “Estimation of flood-frequency characteristics of small urban streams in North Carolina.” Water Resources Investigations Rep. 96-4084, USGS Water Science Center, Raleigh, N.C., 1–21.
Rosgen, D. L. (1997). “A geomorphological approach to restoration of incised rivers.” Proc., Conf. on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision, Univ. of Miss., Oxford, 12–22.
Shankman, D., and Pugh, T. B. (1992). “Discharge response to channelization of a coastal plain stream.” Wetlands, 12(3), 157–162.
Shields, F. D., Jr., and Gippel, C. J. (1995). “Prediction of effects of woody debris removal on flow resistance.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 121(4), 341–354.
Shiono, K. (1999). “Energy losses due to secondary flow and turbulence in meandering channels with overbank flows.” J. Hydraul. Res., 37(5), 641–664.
Sholtes, J. S. (2009). “Hydraulic analysis of stream restoration on flood wave propagation.” M.A. thesis, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.
Sturm, T. W. (2001). Open channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass., 345–348.
Turner-Gillespie, D. F., Smith, J. A., and Bates, P. D. (2003). “Attenuating reaches and the regional flood response of an urbanizing drainage basin.” Adv. Water Resour., 26(6), 673–684.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2008). River analysis system (HEC-RAS), version 4.0, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif.
Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., and Ladson, A. R. (2005). “Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: Looking to the catchment to save the stream.” J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24(3), 690–705.
Wolff, C. G., and Burges, S. J. (1994). “An analysis of the influence of river channel properties on flood frequency.” J. Hydrol., 153(1–4), 317–337.
Woltemade, C. J., and Potter, K. W. (1994). “A watershed modeling analysis of fluvial geomorphologic influences on flood peak attenuation.” Water Resour. Res., 30(6), 1933–1942.
Wyzga, B. (1996). “Changes in the magnitude and transformation of flood waves subsequent to the channelization of the Raba River, Polish Carpathians.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 21(8), 749–763.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 137 • Issue 2 • February 2011
Pages: 196 - 208
Copyright
© 2011 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 31, 2009
Accepted: Jun 21, 2010
Published online: Jun 23, 2010
Published in print: Feb 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.