Technical Papers
Mar 26, 2022

Complex Adaptive System Approach for Studying the Impact of Externalities on the Success of Restoring Stream Functions

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 6

Abstract

The overarching goal of stream restoration projects is to foster the adaptive capacities of stream functions while maintaining their resilience to excessive stresses. This paper introduces a methodology for evaluating the impact of stream restoration design strategies on multiple stream functions. The proposed method implements a functions-based, conceptual model of stream restoration based on the theory of complex adaptive system and agent-based modeling. The model illustrates the variable responses and stream functions recovery under different sets of initial conditions and stresses imposed on the system. For purposes of illustration, a systematic procedure is outlined to demonstrate the model application for quantitative risk assessment of stream functions. The results showed that the stream functions respond and adapt based on the removal of stressors and externalities and type of management intervention. However, some of these functions undergo these changes at slower rate and may take decades to recover. A balanced investment in watershed management with reach-scale restoration is recommended to reduce, to the maximum extent practicable, stressors impacting stream health and achieve desired goals and outcomes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Allen, P. 2001. “What is complexity science: Knowledge of the limits to knowledge.” Emergence 3 (1): 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327000EM0301_03.
Barrett, K. J., J. B. Cannon, A. M. Schuetter, and A. S. Cheng. 2021. “Effects of collaborative monitoring and adaptive management on restoration outcomes in dry conifer forests.” For. Ecol. Manage. 488 (May): 119018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119018.
Bennet, S. J., A. Simon, J. F. Atkinson, C. E. Bronner, S. S. Blersch, and A. J. Rabideau. 2012. The evoloving science of stream restoration: Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems: Scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Bernhardt, E. S., and M. A. Palmer. 2011. “River restoration—The fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse watershed sclae degradiation.” Ecol. Appl. 21 (6): 1926–1931. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1574.1.
Bukaveckas, P. 2007. “Effects of channel restoration on water velocity, transient storage, and nutrient uptake in a channelized stream.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (5): 1570–1576. https://doi.org/10.1021/es061618x.
Castro, J. M., and C. R. Throne. 2019. The stream evolution triangle: Integrating geology, hydrology, and biology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Fanelli, R. M., K. L. Prestegaard, and M. A. Palmer. 2019. “Urban legacies: Aquatic stressors and low aquatic biodiversity persist despite implementation of regenerative stormwater conveyance systems.” Freshwater Sci. 38 (4): 818–833. https://doi.org/10.1086/706072.
Filoso, S., and M. A. Palmer. 2011. “Assessing stream restoration effectiveness at reducing nitrogen export to downstream waters.” Ecol. Appl. 21 (6): 1989–2006. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0854.1.
Fischenich, J. C. 2006. Functional objectives for stream restoration. Vicksburg, MS: USACE Research and Development Center.
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, and C. Miller. 2012. A function-based framework for stream assessment and restoration projects. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Hasselquist, E. M., C. Nilsson, J. Hjältén, D. Jørgensen, L. Lind, and L. E. Polvi. 2015. “Time for recovery of riparian plants in restored northern Swedish streams: A chronosequence study.” Ecol. Appl. 25 (5): 1373. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1102.1.
Hilderbrand, R. H., and J. Acord. 2019. Quantifying the ecological uplift and effectiveness of differing stream restoration approaches in Maryland—Final report submitted to the Chesapeake Bay Trust. College Park, MD: Univ. of Maryland.
Holling, C. S. 2011. “Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems.” Ecosystems 4 (5): 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5.
Ibrahim, Y. A. 2019. “Managing stormwater as a complex adaptive system.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (10): 04019040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001837.
Ibrahim, Y. A. 2020. “Real-time control algorithm for enhancing operation of network of stormwater management facilities.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 25 (2): 04019065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001881.
Ibrahim, Y. A., and S. Islam. 2017. Water diplomacy in action: Contingent approaches to managing complex water problems. London: Anthem Press.
Islam, S., and L. Susskind. 2012. “Water diplomacy: Negotiated approach to managing complex water networks.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 81 (1): 17–37.
Klocker, C. A., S. S. Kushal, P. M. Groffman, P. M. Mayer, and R. P. Morgan. 2009. “Nitrogen uptake and denitrification in restored and unrestored streams in urban Maryland, USA.” Aquat. Sci. 71 (4): 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-009-0118-y.
Kondolf, G. M. 1995. “Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration.” Restor. Ecol. 3 (2): 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1995.tb00086.x.
Kushal, S. S., P. M. Groffman, P. M. Mayer, E. Striz, and A. J. Gold. 2008. “Effects of stream restoration on denitrification in an urbanizing watershed.” Ecol. Appl. 18 (3): 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1159.1.
Mahoney, K., C. Mccoll, D. Hultstrand, W. Kappel, B. McCormick, and G. Compo. 2021. “Blasts from the past: Reimagining historical storms with model simulations to modernize dam safety and flood risk assessment.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 103 (2): 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0133.1.
Newcomer Johnson, T. A., S. S. Kaushal, P. M. Mayer, R. M. Smith, and G. M. Sivirichi. 2016. “Nutrient retention in restored streams and rivers: A global review and synthesis.” Water 8 (4): 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040116.
Palmer, M. A., K. L. Hondula, and B. J. Koch. 2014. “Ecological restoration of streams and rivers: Shifting strategies and shifting goals.” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45 (Nov): 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091935.
Palmer, M. A., H. L. Menninger, and E. Bernhardt. 2010. “River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: A failure of theory or practice?” Freshwater Biol. 55 (Jan): 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x.
Rosgen, D. 1998. Applied stream geomorphology. Pagoda Spring, CO: Wildland Hydrology.
Schirmer, M., et al. 2014. “Morphological, hydrological, biogeochemical and ecological changes and challenges in river restoration—The Thur River case study.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18 (6): 2449–2462. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2449-2014.
Shields, F. D., S. S. Knight, R. Lizotte, and D. G. Wren. 2011. Connectivity and variability: Metrics for riverine floodplain backwater rehabilitation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GM000985.
Simon, A., M. Doyle, M. Kondolf, F. D. B. ShieldsRhoads, B. Rhoads, and M. McPhillips. 2007. “Critical evaluation of how the Rosgen classification and associated natural channel design method fails to integrate and quantify fluvial processes and channel response.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 43 (5): 1117–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00091.x.
Wohl, E., P. L. Angermeier, B. Bledsoe, G. M. Kondolf, L. MacDonnell, D. M. Merritt, M. A. Palmer, N. L. Poff, and D. Tarboton. 2005. “River restoration.” Water Resour. Res. 41 (Oct): 10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003985.
Wohl, E., S. N. Lane, and A. C. Wilcox. 2015. “The science and practice of river restoration.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (8): 5974–5997. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016874.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Jul 19, 2021
Accepted: Jan 20, 2022
Published online: Mar 26, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 26, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yosif A. Ibrahim, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Chief Engineer, Dept. of Land Development Services, Fairfax County Government, 12055 Government Center Pkwy., Fairfax, VA 22035. Email: [email protected]
Behzad Amir-Faryar, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Chief Engineer, Dept. of Land Development Services, Fairfax County Government, 12055 Government Center Pkwy., Fairfax, VA 22035; Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, 1173 Glenn L. Martin Hall, College Park, MD 20742-3021 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Water Resource Project Manager, Dept. of Public Works and Environmental Services, Fairfax County Government, Stormwater Planning Division, 12000 Government Center Pkwy., Suite 449, Fairfax, VA 22035. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2871-4414. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share