Technical Papers
Dec 28, 2021

Soil Property and Subsurface Heterogeneity Control on Groundwater Recharge of Vadose Zone Injection Wells

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 3

Abstract

Vadose zone well (VZW) injection is an effective method of managed aquifer recharge (MAR), and it plays an important role in semiarid and arid regions. Accurate estimation of the recharge of VZW injection remains a challenge in the field of hydrology due to the nonlinear nature of the process in the vadose zone. To improve knowledge of VZW injection, a finite-element numerical model was developed by COMSOL Multiphysics to evaluate the soil property and subsurface heterogeneity control on the recharge of VZWs. Several numerical experiments were conducted to estimate the characteristic arrival time and cumulative recharge volume of injected water for different subsurface conditions. Simulation results indicate that soil properties have a profound influence on the recharge of VZWs and saturated hydraulic conductivity plays a more important role than the Van Genuchten –Mualem soil constitutive model parameters α and n in the influences on the recharge. Subsurface heterogeneity has large impacts on the recharge of VZWs as well. The presence of a low permeable layer in the aquifer hinders the infiltration of injected water and reduces recharge rate Qwt and cumulative recharge volume Vwt. These influences are affected by depth Dc, lateral extension Rc, thickness Bc, and hydraulic conductivity Ks of the low permeable layer. Whether the well screen cuts through the low permeable layer is a factor that influences the effects of these parameters in two forms. When the well screen cuts through the low permeable layer, Qwt and Vwt decrease substantially as Dc increases, and the change of Bc has a greater impact on recharge than Ks; when the low permeable layer is below the well screen, the change of Dc only has slight influence on recharge, and the cases with the same hydraulic conductance value of Ks/Bc have similar Qwt and Vwt. For the low permeable lens, when the well screen cuts through it, the increase of Rc leads to slight decrease of Qwt and Vwt, which are more obvious in the later stage of VZW injection. When the low permeable lens is below the well screen, the increase of Rc makes Qwt decrease in the early stage of VZW injection, and then Qwt for different values of Rc reach similar asymptotic values in the later stage. Understanding the influences of soil properties and subsurface heterogeneity on the recharge of VZWs provides physically based guidance for the design and management of VZWs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the finding of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editors and reviewers for the valuable suggestions to help reorganize and improve the quality of our manuscript.

References

Bear, J. 2013. Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.
Bouwer, H. 2002. “Artificial recharge of groundwater: Hydrogeology and engineering.” Hydrogeol. J. 10 (1): 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0182-4.
Bouwer, H., R. Pyne, J. Brown, D. St. Germain, T. M. Morris, C. J. Brown, P. Dillon, and M. J. Rycus. 2008. Design, operation and maintenance for sustainable underground storage facilities. Denver, CO: American Water Works Association Research Foundation.
Bouwer, H., and R. Rice. 1976. “A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells.” Water Resour. Res. 12 (3): 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00423.
Carsel, R. F., and R. S. Parrish. 1988. “Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics.” Water Resour. Res. 24 (5): 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i005p00755.
Dillon, P. 2005. “Future management of aquifer recharge.” Hydrogeol. J. 13 (1): 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0413-6.
Dillon, P., S. Toze, D. Page, J. Vanderzalm, E. Bekele, J. Sidhu, and S. Rinck-Pfeiffer. 2010. “Managed aquifer recharge: Rediscovering nature as a leading edge technology.” Water Sci. Technol. 62 (10): 2338–2345. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.444.
Farthing, M. W., and F. L. Ogden. 2017. “Numerical solution of Richards’ equation: A review of advances and challenges.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 81 (6): 1257–1269. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.02.0058.
Gao, Y., S. Pu, C. Zheng, and S. Yi. 2019. “An improved method for the calculation of unsaturated–saturated water flow by coupling the FEM and FDM.” Sci. Rep. 9 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51405-4.
García-Menéndez, O., B. J. Ballesteros, A. Renau-Pruñonosa, I. Morell, T. Mochales, P. I. Ibarra, and F. M. Rubio. 2018. “Using electrical resistivity tomography to assess the effectiveness of managed aquifer recharge in a salinized coastal aquifer.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 190 (2): 100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6446-9.
Gardner, W. 1958. “Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table.” Soil Sci. 85 (4): 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195804000-00006.
Ghayoumian, J., M. M. Saravi, S. Feiznia, B. Nouri, and A. Malekian. 2007. “Application of GIS techniques to determine areas most suitable for artificial groundwater recharge in a coastal aquifer in southern Iran.” J. Asian Earth Sci. 30 (2): 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.11.002.
Gude, V. G. 2017. “Desalination and water reuse to address global water scarcity.” Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 16 (4): 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-017-9449-7.
Guo, W., K. Coulibaly, and R. G. Maliva. 2015. “Simulated effects of aquifer heterogeneity on ASR system performance.” Environ. Earth Sci. 73 (12): 7803–7809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3822-4.
Händel, F., G. Liu, P. Dietrich, R. Liedl, and J. J. Butler Jr. 2014. “Numerical assessment of ASR recharge using small-diameter wells and surface basins.” J. Hydrol. 517 (Sep): 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.003.
Händel, F., G. Liu, J. Fank, F. Friedl, R. Liedl, and P. Dietrich. 2016. “Assessment of small-diameter shallow wells for managed aquifer recharge at a site in southern Styria, Austria.” Hydrogeol. J. 24 (8): 2079–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1442-7.
Hanson, R., and T. Nishikawa. 1996. “Combined use of flowmeter and time-drawdown data to estimate hydraulic conductivities in layered aquifer systems.” Ground Water 34 (1): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1996.tb01868.x.
Hao, Q., J. Shao, Y. Cui, and Z. Xie. 2014. “Applicability of artificial recharge of groundwater in the Yongding River alluvial fan in Beijing through numerical simulation.” J. Earth Sci. 25 (3): 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-014-0442-6.
Heilweil, V. M., J. Benoit, and R. W. Healy. 2015. “Variably saturated groundwater modelling for optimizing managed aquifer recharge using trench infiltration.” Hydrol. Process. 29 (13): 3010–3019. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10413.
Holloway, O. G., and J. P. Waddell. 2008. Design and operation of a borehole straddle packer for ground-water sampling and hydraulic testing of discrete intervals at US Air Force plant 6, 2331. Washington, DC: USGS.
Jansen, H., M. Stenstrom, and J. De Koning. 2007. “Development of indirect potable reuse in impacted areas of the United States.” Water Sci. Technol. 55 (1–2): 357–366. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.001.
Jeong, H. Y., S.-C. Jun, J.-Y. Cheon, and M. Park. 2018. “A review on clogging mechanisms and managements in aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) applications.” Geosci. J. 22 (4): 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0073-x.
Jokela, P., and E. Kallio. 2015. “Sprinkling and well infiltration in managed aquifer recharge for drinking water quality improvement in Finland.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (3): B4014002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000975.
Karlsen, R. H., F. Smits, P. Stuyfzand, T. Olsthoorn, and B. Van Breukelen. 2012. “A post audit and inverse modeling in reactive transport: 50 years of artificial recharge in the Amsterdam Water Supply Dunes.” J. Hydrol. 454 (Aug): 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.019.
Kroszynski, U. I., and G. Dagan. 1975. “Well pumping in unconfined aquifers: The influence of the unsaturated zone.” Water Resour. Res. 11 (3): 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR011i003p00479.
Kuster, M., S. Díaz-Cruz, M. Rosell, M. L. de Alda, and D. Barceló. 2010. “Fate of selected pesticides, estrogens, progestogens and volatile organic compounds during artificial aquifer recharge using surface waters.” Chemosphere 79 (8): 880–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.02.026.
Lacher, L., D. Turner, B. Gungle, B. Bushman, and H. Richter. 2014. “Application of hydrologic tools and monitoring to support managed aquifer recharge decision making in the upper San Pedro River, Arizona, USA.” Water 6 (11): 3495–3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6113495.
Liang, X., H. Zhan, and Y. K. Zhang. 2018. “Aquifer recharge using a vadose zone infiltration well.” Water Resour. Res. 54 (11): 8847–8863. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023409.
Liu, G., S. Knobbe, E. C. Reboulet, D. O. Whittemore, F. Händel, and J. J. Butler Jr. 2016. “Field investigation of a new recharge approach for ASR projects in near-surface aquifers.” Ground Water 54 (3): 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12363.
Liu, J., H. Yang, S. N. Gosling, M. Kummu, M. Flörke, S. Pfister, N. Hanasaki, Y. Wada, X. Zhang, and C. Zheng. 2017. “Water scarcity assessments in the past, present, and future.” Earth’s Future 5 (6): 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000518.
Lluria, M. R. 2009. “Successful application of Managed Aquifer Recharge in the improvement of the water resources management of semi-arid regions: Examples from Arizona and the Southwestern USA.” Boletín Geológico y Minero 120 (2): 111–120.
Maliva, R. G. 2019. Anthropogenic aquifer recharge: WSP methods in water resources evaluation series no. 5. New York: Springer.
Maples, S. R., G. E. Fogg, and R. M. Maxwell. 2019. “Modeling managed aquifer recharge processes in a highly heterogeneous, semi-confined aquifer system.” Hydrogeol. J. 27 (8): 2869–2888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-02033-9.
Martin, R., ed. 2013. “Clogging issues associated with managed aquifer recharge methods.” In IAH Commission on managing aquifer recharge. Reading, UK: International Association of Hydrogeologists.
Mualem, Y. 1976. “A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res. 12 (3): 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513.
Nimmo, J., and G. Likens. 2009. Vadose water. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Qi, C., H. Zhan, X. Liang, and C. Ma. 2020. “Influence of time-dependent ground surface flux on aquifer recharge with a vadose zone injection well.” J. Hydrol. 584 (May): 124739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124739.
Qi, T., L. Shu, H. Li, X. Wang, Y. Men, and P. A. Opoku. 2021. “Water distribution from artificial recharge via infiltration basin under constant head conditions.” Water 13 (8): 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081052.
Ringleb, J., J. Sallwey, and C. Stefan. 2016. “Assessment of managed aquifer recharge through modeling—A review.” Water 8 (12): 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8120579.
San-Sebastián-Sauto, J., E. Fernández-Escalante, R. Calero-Gil, T. Carvalho, and P. Rodríguez-Escales. 2018. “Characterization and benchmarking of seven managed aquifer recharge systems in south-western Europe.” Sustainable Water Resour. Manag. 4 (2): 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0232-x.
Sasidharan, S., S. A. Bradford, J. Šimůnek, B. DeJong, and S. R. Kraemer. 2018. “Evaluating drywells for stormwater management and enhanced aquifer recharge.” Adv. Water Resour. 116 (Jun): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.04.003.
Sasidharan, S., S. A. Bradford, J. Šimůnek, and S. R. Kraemer. 2019. “Drywell infiltration and hydraulic properties in heterogeneous soil profiles.” J. Hydrol. 570 (Mar): 598–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.073.
Sasidharan, S., S. A. Bradford, J. Šimůnek, and S. R. Kraemer. 2020. “Groundwater recharge from drywells under constant head conditions.” J. Hydrol. 583 (Apr): 124569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124569.
Scanlon, B. R., K. E. Keese, A. L. Flint, L. E. Flint, C. B. Gaye, W. M. Edmunds, and I. Simmers. 2006. “Global synthesis of groundwater recharge in semiarid and arid regions.” Hydrol. Process. Int. J. 20 (15): 3335–3370. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6335.
Shammas, M. I. 2008. “The effectiveness of artificial recharge in combating seawater intrusion in Salalah coastal aquifer, Oman.” Environ. Geol. 55 (1): 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0975-4.
Sharma, S. K., and M. D. Kennedy. 2017. “Soil aquifer treatment for wastewater treatment and reuse.” Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 119 (Apr): 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.013.
Shi, X., S. Jiang, H. Xu, F. Jiang, Z. He, and J. Wu. 2016. “The effects of artificial recharge of groundwater on controlling land subsidence and its influence on groundwater quality and aquifer energy storage in Shanghai, China.” Environ. Earth Sci. 75 (3): 195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5019-x.
Sprenger, C., N. Hartog, M. Hernández, E. Vilanova, G. Grützmacher, F. Scheibler, and S. Hannappel. 2017. “Inventory of managed aquifer recharge sites in Europe: Historical development, current situation and perspectives.” Hydrogeol. J. 25 (6): 1909–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1554-8.
ToddGroundwater. 2019. M1W Final Title 22 Engineering Report. Alameda, CA: ToddGroundwater.
Tzanakakis, V. A., N. V. Paranychianakis, and A. N. Angelakis. 2020. Water supply and water scarcity. Basel, Switzerland: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
Vacher, H. L., W. C. Hutchings, and D. A. Budd. 2006. “Metaphors and models: The ASR bubble in the Floridan aquifer.” Ground Water 44 (2): 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00114.x.
Van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils 1.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (5): 892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.
Wang, T., T. E. Franz, W. Yue, J. Szilagyi, V. A. Zlotnik, J. You, X. Chen, M. D. Shulski, and A. Young. 2016. “Feasibility analysis of using inverse modeling for estimating natural groundwater recharge from a large-scale soil moisture monitoring network.” J. Hydrol. 533 (Feb): 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.019.
Wang, W., X. Sun, and Y. Xu. 2010. “Recent advances in managed aquifer recharge in China.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Challenges in Environmental Science and Computer Engineering, 516–519. New York: IEEE.
Ward, J. D., C. T. Simmons, and P. J. Dillon. 2008. “Variable-density modelling of multiple-cycle aquifer storage and recovery (ASR): Importance of anisotropy and layered heterogeneity in brackish aquifers.” J. Hydrol. 356 (1–2): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.012.
WEF (World Economic Forum). 2019. “Global risks report 2019.” Accessed January 15, 2019. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2019.
Westfall, P. H., and A. L. Arias. 2020. Understanding regression analysis: A conditional distribution approach. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003025764.
Xian, Y., M. Jin, H. Zhan, and Y. Liu. 2019. “Reactive transport of nutrients and bioclogging during dynamic disconnection process of stream and groundwater.” Water Resour. Res. 55 (5): 3882–3903. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024826.
Zha, Y., J. Yang, J. Zeng, C.-H. M. Tso, W. Zeng, and L. Shi. 2019. “Review of numerical solution of Richardson–Richards equation for variably saturated flow in soils.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 6 (5): e1364. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1364.
Zhang, H., Y. Xu, and T. Kanyerere. 2020. “A review of the managed aquifer recharge: Historical development, current situation and perspectives.” Phys. Chem. Earth A/B/C 118 (Oct): 102887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102887.
Zhang, Y., M. Zhang, J. Niu, and H. Zheng. 2016. “The preferential flow of soil: A widespread phenomenon in pedological perspectives.” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49 (6): 661–672. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316060120.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 27Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: Jul 26, 2021
Accepted: Oct 29, 2021
Published online: Dec 28, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 28, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cuiting Qi
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3115.
Hongbin Zhan [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3115 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Controls on flood managed aquifer recharge through a heterogeneous vadose zone: hydrologic modeling at a site characterized with surface geophysics, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10.5194/hess-27-969-2023, 27, 5, (969-990), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share