Abstract

Climate change is likely to increase the frequency and intensity of flooding. Transportation infrastructure is vulnerable to extreme precipitation because it was designed using frequency, duration, and intensity relationships that do not represent future climate. Therefore, there is a need for a better understanding of how future climate can disrupt roadways and bridges. This study proposes evaluating flood impacts on the transportation infrastructure with two novel metrics: the HFRR (roads) and HFRB (bridges). These metrics were based on the hydrological footprint residence (HFR), which represents the dynamics of the inundation area and its duration. The Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) and the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) one-dimensional/two-dimensional (1D/2D) models were used to calculate the HFR metrics. These metrics were estimated for the transportation infrastructure of San Antonio, Texas, for 24-h 100- and 500-year storms for representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. Results show that climate change will increase flood impacts in the city. The new metrics presented a larger relative increase with climate change when compared to traditional metrics, such as maximum flooded areas. This study highlights the importance of using duration components to evaluate flood impacts on transportation infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The following data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository or online: climate projections from the US Bureau of Reclamation (2013), available at https://gdo-dcp.ucllnl.org/downscaled_cmip_projections/dcpInterface.html; bridges and culverts data from SARA (2020), available at https://d2mr.sara-tx.org/; and georeferenced streets and channels from COSA (2019a), available at https://www.sanantonio.gov/GIS.
LIDAR DEM data was acquired in person from the San Antonio River Authority. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider, as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their thanks and appreciation to the Transportation Consortium of South-Central States (TRANSET) and the City of San Antonio for providing funding. We also thank the San Antonio River Authority for sharing valuable data. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for the CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups for producing and making available their model output. For the CMIP, the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support, and it also led the development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.

References

Aich, V., S. Liersch, T. Vetter, S. Fournet, J. C. M. Andersson, S. Calmanti, F. H. A. van Weert, F. F. Hattermann, and E. N. Paton. 2016. “Flood projections within the Niger River basin under future land use and climate change.” Sci. Total Environ. 562 (Aug): 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.021.
Arrighi, C., M. Pregnolato, R. Dawson, and F. Castelli. 2019. “Preparedness against mobility disruption by floods.” Sci. Total Environ. 654 (Mar): 1010–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.191.
Brunner, G. 2016. HEC-RAS river analysis system, 2D modeling user’s manual, version 5.0. Davis, CA: USACE.
Chang, H., M. Lafrenz, I. W. Jung, M. Figliozzi, D. Platman, and C. Pederson. 2010. “Potential impacts of climate change on flood-induced travel disruptions: A case study of Portland, Oregon, USA.” Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 100 (4): 938–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.497110.
Clavet-Gaumont, J., et al. 2017. “Probable maximum flood in a changing climate: An overview for Canadian basins.” J. Hydrol.: Reg. Stud. 13: 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.07.003.
COSA (City of San Antonio). 2019a. “GIS (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SERVICES).” Accessed September 10, 2019. https://www.sanantonio.gov/GIS.
COSA (City of San Antonio). 2019b. Storm water design criteria manual. San Antonio: COSA.
Council, N.R. 2009. Mapping the zone: Improving flood map accuracy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Coutu, S., S. Kramer, B. Bates, and P. Roudier. 2013. “Assessing dominant uncertainties in urban buildup/washoff processes under climate change: A case study in Western Switzerland.” Urban Clim. 5 (Oct): 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2013.06.002.
Cronshey, R. 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds (TR-55). Washington, DC: USDA.
DHI (Dansk Hydraulisk Institut). 2011. MiKE 1D-2D modelling—User manual. Hørsholm, Denmark: DHI Water & Environment.
Dibaba, W. T., K. Miegel, and T. A. Demissie. 2019. “Evaluation of the CORDEX regional climate models performance in simulating climate conditions of two catchments in Upper Blue Nile basin.” Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 87 (Sep): 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2019.101104.
Drobot, S. D., C. Benight, and E. C. Gruntfest. 2007. “Risk factors for driving into flooded roads.” Environ. Hazards 7 (3): 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.07.003.
EPA. 2007. “NLCD classification schemes.” Accessed January 28, 2020. http://www.epa.gov/mrlc/classification.html.
Evans, G. 2010. National elevation dataset. Washington, DC: USGS.
FEMA. 2018. Guidance for flood risk analysis and mapping—Flood depth and analysis grids. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gao, C., Z. He, S. Pan, W. Xuan, and Y. P. Xu. 2020. “Effects of climate change on peak runoff and flood levels in Qu River Basin, East China.” J. Hydro-environ. Res. 28 (Jan): 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2018.02.005.
Giacomoni, M. H., R. Gomez, and E. Z. Berglund. 2014. “Hydrologic impact assessment of land cover change and stormwater management using the hydrologic footprint residence.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 50 (5): 1242–1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12187.
Giacomoni, M. H., E. M. Zechman, and K. Brumbelow. 2012. “Hydrologic footprint residence: Environmentally friendly criteria for best management practices.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 17 (1): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000407.
Green, W. H., and G. Ampt. 1911. “Studies on soil physics.” J. Agric. Sci. 4 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600001441.
Hsu, C. H., F. Olivera, and J. L. Irish. 2018. “A hurricane surge risk assessment framework using the joint probability method and surge response functions.” Nat. Hazards 91 (1): 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3108-8.
Jin, S., C. Homer, J. Dewitz, P. Danielson, and D. Howard. 2019. National land cover database (NLCD) 2016 science research products. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Jonkman, S. N., and I. Kelman. 2005. “An analysis of the causes and circumstances of flood disaster deaths.” Disasters 29 (1): 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00275.x.
Krajzewicz, D., J. Erdmann, M. Behrisch, and L. Bieker. 2012. “Recent development and applications of SUMO-simulation of urban mobility.” Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas. 5 (Dec): 3–5.
Lawrence, J., A. Reisinger, B. Mullan, and B. Jackson. 2013. “Exploring climate change uncertainties to support adaptive management of changing flood-risk.” Environ. Sci. Policy 33 (Nov): 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.008.
Lin, Y. 2011. GCIP/EOP Surface: Precipitation NCEP/EMC 4KM gridded data (GRIB) stage IV Data. Boulder, CO: Earth Observing Laboratory.
Mallick, R. B., M. Tao, J. S. Daniel, J. Jacobs, and A. Veeraragavan. 2017. “Development of a methodology and a tool for the assessment of vulnerability of roadways to flood-induced damage.” J. Flood Risk Manage. 10 (3): 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12135.
Mearns, L. O., W. Gutowski, R. Jones, R. Leung, S. McGinnis, A. Nunes, and Y. Qian. 2009. “A regional climate change assessment program for North America.” Advancing Earth Space Sci. 90 (36): 311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009EO360002.
Miao, Q., M. K. Feeney, F. Zhang, E. W. Welch, and P. S. Sriraj. 2018. “Through the storm: Transit agency management in response to climate change.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 63 (Aug): 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.005.
Morsy, M. M., J. L. Goodall, G. L. O’Neil, J. M. Sadler, D. Voce, G. Hassan, and C. Huxley. 2018. “A cloud-based flood warning system for forecasting impacts to transportation infrastructure systems.” Environ. Modell. Software 107 (Sep): 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.007.
Mpelasoka, F. S., and F. H. S. Chiew. 2009. “Influence of rainfall scenario construction methods on runoff projections.” J. Hydrometeorol. 10 (5): 1168–1183. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JHM1045.1.
Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. “River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. 10 (3): 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2020. Climate data online. Washington, DC: NOAA.
Perica, S., S. Pavlovic, M. St Laurent, C. Trypaluk, D. Unruh, and O. Wilhite. 2018. Precipitation-frequency atlas of the United States. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Pyatkova, K., A. S. Chen, D. Butler, Z. Vojinović, and S. Djordjević. 2019. “Assessing the knock-on effects of flooding on road transportation.” J. Environ. Manage. 244 (Aug): 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.013.
Rossman, L. 2004. Storm water management model (SWMM version 5.0) user’s manual. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Samuel, P. 1990. “Cross-section location in 1-D models.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on River Flood Hydraulics. Wallingford, UK: Hydraulics Research.
SARA (San Antonio River Authority). 2020. “Digital data & modeling repository.” Accessed July 2, 2020. https://d2mr.sara-tx.org/.
Schmidli, J., C. M. Goodess, C. Frei, M. R. Haylock, Y. Hundecha, J. Ribalaygua, and T. Schmith. 2007. “Statistical and dynamical downscaling of precipitation: An evaluation and comparison of scenarios for the European Alps.” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 112 (Feb): 4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD007026.
SCS (Soil Conservation Services). 1972. National engineering handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. Washington, DC: Dept. of Agriculture.
Shand, T., G. Smith, R. Cox, and M. Blacka. 2011. Development of appropriate criteria for the safety and stability of persons and vehicles in floods. Barton, Australia: Engineers Australia.
Sharif, H. O., T. L. Jackson, M. M. Hossain, and D. Zane. 2015. “Analysis of flood fatalities in Texas.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 16 (1): 04014016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000145.
Shrestha, S., and W. Lohpaisankrit. 2017. “Flood hazard assessment under climate change scenarios in the Yang River Basin, Thailand.” Int. J. Sustainable Built Environ. 6 (2): 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.09.006.
Sillmann, J., V. V. Kharin, X. Zhang, F. Zwiers, and D. Bronaugh. 2013a. “Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate.” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 118 (4): 1716–1733. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50203.
Sillmann, J., V. V. Kharin, F. Zwiers, X. Zhang, and D. Bronaugh. 2013b. “Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections.” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 118 (6): 2473–2493. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50188.
Smith, A. B. 2018. “2017 US billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: A historic year in context.” Accessed June 28, 2019. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/beyond-data/2017-us-billion-dollar-weather-and-climate-disasters-historic-year.
Soil Survey Staff, NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2019. “Web soil survey.” Accessed September 15, 2019. https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.
Suarez, P., W. Anderson, V. Mahal, and T. R. Lakshmanan. 2005. “Impacts of flooding and climate change on urban transportation: A systemwide performance assessment of the Boston metro area.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 10 (3): 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.007.
Teng, J., A. J. Jakeman, J. Vaze, B. F. Croke, D. Dutta, and S. Kim. 2017. “Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis.” Environ. Modell. Software 90 (Apr): 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006.
Ten Veldhuis, J. 2011. “How the choice of flood damage metrics influences urban flood risk assessment.” J. Flood Risk Manage. 4 (4): 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01112.x.
Thieken, A. H., M. Müller, H. Kreibich, and B. Merz. 2005. “Flood damage and influencing factors: New insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany.” Water Resour. Res. 41 (Dec): 12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004177.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2013. Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate and hydrology projections: Release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs. Washington, DC: Dept. of the Interior.
USGS. 2020. Water data for the nation. Washington, DC: USDA.
Winsemius, H. C., J. C. Aerts, L. P. Van Beek, M. F. Bierkens, A. Bouwman, B. Jongman, J. C. Kwadijk, W. Ligtvoet, P. L. Lucas, and D. P. Van Vuuren. 2016. “Global drivers of future river flood risk.” Nat. Clim. Change 6 (4): 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2893.
Yin, J., S. Guo, S. He, J. Guo, X. Hong, and Z. Liu. 2018. “A copula-based analysis of projected climate changes to bivariate flood quantiles.” J. Hydrol. 566 (Nov): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.053.
Yin, J., D. Yu, Z. Yin, M. Liu, and Q. He. 2016. “Evaluating the impact and risk of pluvial flash flood on intra-urban road network: A case study in the city center of Shanghai, China.” J. Hydrol. 537 (Jun): 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.037.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 26Issue 5May 2021

History

Received: Jul 28, 2020
Accepted: Dec 14, 2020
Published online: Mar 12, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 12, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

César Ambrogi Ferreira do Lago [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio, One Univ. of Texas at San Antonio Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Marcio Hofheinz Giacomoni, A.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7027-4128 [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio, One Univ. of Texas at San Antonio Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7027-4128. Email: [email protected]
Francisco Olivera, F.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3127 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3127. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Sao Carlos School of Engineering, Univ. of Sao Paulo, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense, 400 - Parque Arnold Schimidt, São Carlos CEP 13566-590, SP, Brazil. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2319-2773. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share