Case Studies
Jul 11, 2020

Screening and Optimizing the Sensitive Parameters of BTOPMC Model Based on UQ-PyL Software: Case Study of a Flood Event in the Fuji River Basin, Japan

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 9

Abstract

Block-wise use of TOPMODEL with the Muskingum–Cunge method (BTOPMC) is a physically based distributed hydrological model with five parameters that quantitatively reflect basin physical features, including soil type, vegetation, and land use of each grid-cell. In order to determine the sensitive model parameters and related variables more reasonably and efficiently, and to improve the model’s practical applicability and simulation accuracy, BTOPMC was integrated with the Uncertainty Quantification Python Laboratory (UQ-PyL) and used in the Fuji River Basin of Japan, by which qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis (SA) of variables related to the BTOPMC parameters was performed, and the sensitive ones were optimized by shuffled complex evolution (SCE-UA). The results showed that optimizing only the sensitive variables related to the three sensitive parameters of BTOPMC can ensure simulation accuracy with higher optimization efficiency, which indicates that the BTOPMC model could be applied more simply while guaranteeing the reliability of modeling.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository online in accordance with funder data retention policies. All the data used in this study are as follows: (1) The flood in September 1991 was used as a study case in this paper; (2) the DEM of the basin was taken from CD-ROM GLOBE (version 0.5) of NGDC (1997) and the spatial resolution is 30×30 (roughly 0.74×0.94  km); (3) hourly precipitation data were obtained from the AMeDAS (Automated Meteorological Data Acquisition System), and the average annual precipitation for 1991 was 1,550 mm; and (4) the annual potential evapotranspiration was estimated by the Penman-Monteith method at about 1,800 mm.

Acknowledgments

It is very appreciated, the valuable suggestions and comments from all the reviewers, and for all the contributors of the references cited in this paper. Author contributions: conceptualization, Ling-xue Liu, Tian-qi Ao and Xiao-dong Li; data curation, formal analysis, and software, Ling-xue Liu and Li Zhou; funding acquisition, Tian-qi Ao; methodology, Ling-xue Liu, Tian-qi Ao, Li Zhou and Xiao-dong Li; writing (original draft), Ling-xue Liu; Writing (review and editing), Ling-xue Liu, Li Zhou, Ting Chen, and Tian-qi Ao. This research is supported by: (1) the international cooperation project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2012DFG21780), (2) the international cooperation project of the Sichuan Province of China (Grant No. 2010HH0005), and (3) China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201806240035).

References

Ao, T. Q. 2001. “Development of a distributed hydrological model for large river basins and its application to Southeast Asian rivers.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental and Engineering, Yamanashi Univ.
Ao, T. Q., H. Ishidaira, K. Takeuchi, A. S. Kiem, J. Yoshitari, K. Fukami, and J. Magome. 2006. “Relating BTOPMC model parameters to physical features of MOPEX basins.” J. Hydrol. 320 (1–2): 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.006.
Ao, T. Q., K. Takeuchi, and H. Ishidaira. 2000. “On problems and solutions of the Muskingum-Cunge routing method applied to a distributed rainfall runoff model.” [In Japanese.] Proc. Hydraul. Eng. 44: 139–144. https://doi.org/10.2208/prohe.44.139.
Ao, T. Q., K. Takeuchi, H. Ishidaira, J. Yoshitani, K. Fukami, and T. Mutsuura. 2003a. “Development and application of a new algorithm for automated pits removal for grid DEMs.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 48 (6): 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.6.985.51423.
Ao, T. Q., J. Yoshitani, K. Takeuchi, K. Fukami, T. Mutsuura, and H. Ishidaira. 2003b. “Effects of sub-basin scale on runoff simulation in distributed hydrological model: BTOPMC.” Public Works 282: 1–7.
Beck, M. B. 1987. “Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res. 23 (8): 1393–1442. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023i008p01393.
Beven, K. 1993. “Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling.” Adv. Water Resour. 16 (1): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E.
Beven, K. 2006. “A manifesto for the equifinality thesis.” J. Hydrol. 320 (1): 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007.
Beven, K., and A. Binley. 1992. “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Processes 6 (3): 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305.
Borgonovo, E. 2007. “A new uncertainty importance measure.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 (6): 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015.
Box, G. E., and D. Behnken. 1960. “Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables.” Technometrics 2 (4): 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912.
Box, G. E., J. S. Hunter, and W. G. Hunter. 2006. “Statistics for experimenters: Design, innovation, and discovery.” Technometrics 101 (476): 1720–1721. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2006.s139.
Campolongo, F., J. Cariboni, and A. Saltelli. 2007. “An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models.” Environ. Modell. Software 22 (10): 1509–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004.
Campolongo, F., and A. Saltelli. 1997. “Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model: An application of different analysis methods.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 57 (1): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00021-5.
Collins, D. C., and R. Avissar. 1994. “An evaluation with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) of which land-surface parameters are of greatest importance in atmospheric modeling.” J. Clim. 7 (5): 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1994)007%3C0681:AEWTFA%3E2.0.CO;2.
Cunge, J. A. 1969. “On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method).” J. Hydraul. Res. 7 (2): 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686909500264.
De Pauw, D. J. W., K. Steppr, and B. D. Baets. 2008. “Unravelling the output uncertainty of a tree water flow and storage model using several global sensitivity analysis methods.” Biosyst. Eng. 101 (1): 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.05.011.
Duan, Q. Y., V. K. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 1993. “Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization.” J. Optim. Theory Appl. 76 (3): 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939380.
Friedman, J. H. 1991. “Multivariate adaptive regression splines.” Ann. Stat. 19 (1): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347963.
Gan, Y. I., Q. Y. Duan, W. Gong, C. Tong, Y. W. Sun, W. Chu, A. Z. Ye, C. Y. Miao, and Z. H. Di. 2014. “A comprehensive evaluation of various sensitivity analysis methods: A case study with a hydrological model.” Environ. Modell. Software 51 (1): 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.031.
Geyer, C. J. 1992. “Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo.” Stat. Sci. 7: 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011137.
Goldberg, D. E. 1989. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Gong, W., Q. Y. Duan, J. D. Li, and C. Wang. 2015. “An intercomparison of sampling methods for uncertainty quantification of environmental dynamic models.” J. Environ. Inf. 28 (1): 11–24. https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.201500310.
Griensven, A. V., T. Meixner, S. Grunwald, T. F. Bishop, M. Diluzio, and R. Srinivasan. 2006. “A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models.” J. Hydrol. 324 (1): 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008.
Hall, J. W., S. A. Boyce, Y. L. Wang, and R. J. Dawson. 2009. “Sensitivity analysis for hydraulic models.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 135 (11): 959–969. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000098.
Jayawardena, A. W., K. Takeuchi, and B. Machbub. 1997. Vol. 2 of Catalogue of rivers for Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Jakarta, Indonesia: IHP Regional Steering Committee for Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
Jeon, J. H., C. G. Park, and B. A. Engel. 2014. “Comparison of performance between genetic algorithm and SCE-UA for calibration of SCS-CN surface runoff simulation.” Water 6 (11): 3433–3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6113433.
Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. “Optimization by simulated annealing.” Science 220 (4598): 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671.
Koussis, A. D., M. A. Saenz, and I. G. Tollis. 1983. “Pollution routing in streams.” J. Hydraul. Div. 109 (H12): 1636–1651. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:12(1636).
Krykova, I. 2004. “Evaluating of path-dependent securities with low discrepancy methods.” Master’s theses, Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Kucherenko, S., and S. Song. 2016. “Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices.” Math. Comput. Simul. 79 (10): 3009–3017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33507-0_23.
Li, J., Q. Y. Duan, W. Gong, A. Z. Ye, Y. J. Dai, C. Y. Miao, Z. H. Di, C. Tong, and Y. W. Sun. 2013. “Assessing parameter importance of the common land model based on qualitative and quantitative sensitivity analysis.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 10 (2): 3279–3293. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3279-2013.
Liu, Y., and F. Sun. 2010. “Sensitivity analysis and automatic calibration of a rainfall–runoff model using multi-objectives.” Ecol. Inf. 5 (4): 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.04.006.
Maier, H. R., and G. C. Dandy. 2000. “Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modelling issues and applications.” Environ. Modell. Software 15 (1): 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00007-9.
Mateus, M., and G. Franz. 2015. “Sensitivity analysis in a complex marine ecological model.” Water 7 (5): 2060–2081. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052060.
Mckay, M. D., R. Beckman, and W. Conover. 1979. “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics 42 (1): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755.
Meteopolis, N., and S. Ulam. 1949. “The Monte Carlo method.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 44 (247): 335–341.
Morris, M. D. 1991. “Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments.” Technometrics 33 (2): 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804.
Myers, R. H. 1971. Response surface methodology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
NGDC (National Geophysical Data Center). 1997. Prototype data for GLOBE (global land one-km base elevation) CD-ROM, version 0.5, Vol. 3: Discrete 30-second elevation grids. Boulder, CO: NGDC, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Plackett, R. L., and J. P. Burman. 1946. “The design of optimum multifactorial experiments.” Biometrika 33 (4): 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/33.4.305.
Ratto, M., P. C. Young, R. Romanowicz, F. Pappenberger, A. Saltelli, and A. Pagano. 2007. “Uncertainty, sensitivity analysis and the role of data based mechanistic modeling in hydrology.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11 (4): 1249–1266. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1249-2007.
Richard, H. M. 1989. Hydrologic analysis and design, 525–532. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Saltelli, A. 2002. “Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices.” Comput. Phys. Commun. 145 (2): 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00280-1.
Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo, and M. Ratto. 1989. “Sensitivity analysis in practice.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101 (473): 398–399. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2006.s80.
Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, and K. P. S. Chan. 1999. “A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output.” Technometrics 41 (1): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594.
Seong, C., Y. Her, and B. L. Benham. 2015. “Automatic calibration tool for hydrologic simulation program-FORTRAN using a shuffled complex evolution algorithm.” Water 7 (2): 503–527. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7020503.
Shahsavani, D., and A. Grimvall. 2011. “Variance-based sensitivity analysis of model outputs using surrogate models.” Environ. Modell. Software 26 (6): 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.01.002.
Shrestha, S., and F. Kazama. 2006. “An export coefficient modeling approach to estimate organic matter and nutrient loadings from point and non-point sources into the Fuji river, Japan.” In Vol. 14 of Proc., Symp. on Global Environment, 21–26. Tokyo: Japan Society of Civil Engineers.
Singh, V. P., and D. A. Woolhiser. 2002. “Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 7 (4): 270–292. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:4(270).
Sobol’, I. M. 2001. “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates.” Math. Comput. Simul. 55 (1–3): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6.
Song, X. M., C. S. Zhan, F. Kong, and J. Xia. 2011. “A review on uncertainty analysis of large-scale hydrological cycle modeling system.” Acta Geog. Sin. 66 (3): 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-011-0881-2.
Spearman, C. 1904. “The proof and measurement of association between two things.” Am. J. Psychol. 15 (1): 72–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159.
Storlie, C. B., L. P. Swiler, J. C. Helton, and C. J. Sallaberry. 2009. “Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 (11): 1735–1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.007.
Takeuchi, K., T. Q. Ao, and H. Ishidaira. 1999. “Introduction of block-wise use of TOPMODEL and Muskingum-Cunge method for the hydroenvironmental simulation of a large ungauged basin.” Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Bull. 44 (4): 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669909492258.
Tolson, B. A., and C. A. Shoemaker. 2007. “Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration.” Water Resour. Res. 43 (1): W01413. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004723.
Tong, C., and F. Graziani. 2008. “A practical global sensitivity analysis methodology for multi-physics applications.” In Vol. 62 of Lecture notes in computational science and engineering, 277–299. Berlin: Springer.
Wan, Y. A. 2008. BTOPMC 2006 user’s manual (use inside only). Chengdu, China: Sichuan Univ.
Wang, C., and Q. Y. Duan. 2016. UQ-PyL user manual (version 1.1). Beijing: Beijing Normal Univ.
Wang, C., Q. Y. Duan, W. Gong, A. Z. Ye, Z. H. Di, and C. Y. Miao. 2014. “An evaluation of adaptive surrogate modeling-based optimization with two benchmark problems.” Environ. Modell. Software 60 (Oct): 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.026.
Wang, C., Q. Y. Duan, C. Tong, Z. H. Di, and W. Gong. 2016. “A GUI platform for uncertainty quantification of complex dynamical models.” Environ. Modell. Software 76 (Feb): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.004.
Wang, Z. G., J. Xia, C. M. Liu, C. P. Ou, and Y. Y. Zhang. 2007. “Comments on sensitivity analysis, calibration of distributed hydrological model.” J. Nat. Resour. 22 (4): 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-007-0500-4.
Werkhoven, K. V., T. Wagener, P. Reed, and Y. Tang. 2008. “Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (1): 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006271.
Werkhoven, K. V., T. Wagener, P. Reed, and Y. Tang. 2009. “Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models.” Adv. Water Resour. 32 (8): 1154–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.03.002.
Yamwong, W., and T. Achalakul. 2012. “Yield improvement analysis with parameter-screening factorials.” Appl. Soft. Comput. 12 (3): 1021–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.11.021.
Yatheendradas, S., T. Wagener, H. Gupta, C. Unkrich, D. Goodrich, M. Schaffner, and A. Stewart. 2008. “Understanding uncertainty in distributed flash flood forecasting for semiarid regions.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (5): 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005940.
Ye, K., W. Li, and A. Sudjianto. 2000. “Algorithmic construction of optimal symmetric Latin hypercube designs.” J. Stat. Plann. Inference 90 (1): 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00105-1.
Ye, S. Z., and J. Xia. 2002. “Century’s retrospect and looking into the future of hydrological science.” Adv. Water Sci. 13 (1): 93–104. https://doi.org/10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2002.01.017.
Zhan, C. S., X. M. Song, J. Xia, and C. Tong. 2013. “An efficient integrated approach for global sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters.” Environ. Modell. Software 41 (41): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.009.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25Issue 9September 2020

History

Received: Sep 25, 2019
Accepted: Apr 7, 2020
Published online: Jul 11, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lingxue Liu [email protected]
Doctoral Student, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan Univ.-Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Chengdu 610065, China; State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China. Email: [email protected]
Doctoral Student, State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China; State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China; International Centre for Water Hazard and Risk Management, Public Works Research Institute, Tsukuba 305-8516, Japan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4063-728X. Email: [email protected]
Xiaodong Li [email protected]
University Lecturer, State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China. Email: [email protected]
Doctoral Student, State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China; Sichuan Meteorological Service Center, Heavy Rain and Drought-Flood Disasters in Plateau and Basin Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610072, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1244-7240. Email: [email protected]
Tianqi Ao, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan Univ.-Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Chengdu 610065, China; State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share