Erratum for “Water Quality–Based Environmental Flow under Plausible Temperature and Pollution Scenarios” by Shushobhit Chaudhary, C. T. Dhanya, Arun Kumar, and Rehana Shaik

In the sentence beginning with “Hydrological Eflow recommendations for maintaining good health over the Yamuna River were estimated to lie between 986.4 and $\mathrm{2,959.3}{\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s}$,” “986.4 and $\mathrm{2,959.3}{\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s}$” should be replaced with “$27.9{\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s}$ ($986.4{\mathrm{ft}}^3/\mathrm{s}$) and $83.8{\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s}$ ($\mathrm{2,959.3}{\mathrm{ft}}^3/\mathrm{s}$).”

In the sentence published as, “The minimum Eflow to be maintained in the river during the dry season is $\mathrm{3,945.7}{\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s}$ for the Yamuna and $5.8{\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s}$ for the Bhadra,” “$\mathrm{3,945.7}{\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s}$” should be replaced with “$111.7{\mathrm{m}}^3/\mathrm{s}$ ($\mathrm{3,945.7}{\mathrm{ft}}^3/\mathrm{s}$).”

In Table S3, the values in the columns under “Eflow of Yamuna River (${\mathrm{m}}^3/\text{s}$)” are updated. The published paper contained values in ${\mathrm{ft}}^3/\mathrm{s}$, which are retained in brackets. The values of Eflow are converted to ${\mathrm{m}}^3/\text{s}$ as shown in the revised Table S3.

In Table S5, the “Yamuna” column under “Recommended Eflow (${\mathrm{m}}^3/\text{s}$)” contains values in ${\mathrm{ft}}^3/\mathrm{s}$ in the published paper. The values of flow are converted in ${\mathrm{m}}^3/\text{s}$ as shown in the revised Table S5. The values in ${\mathrm{ft}}^3/\mathrm{s}$ are retained in brackets.

In Fig. S2(a), the $y$-axis label of “Discharge (cumecs)” should be replaced with “Discharge (cusecs).” The corrected Fig. S2 is provided in the Supplemental Data.