Case Studies
Dec 4, 2019

Predicting Channel Conveyance in the Obion River Watershed Using SAMBLE Method

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 2

Abstract

Digital elevation models (DEMs) are widely used for hydraulic modeling, but one of the challenges in using a DEM for hydraulic modeling is its limitations in accurately representing the channel conveyance. This limitation is usually disregarded because the collection of bathymetry data is time and resource intensive, and it is often unavailable for well-gauged watersheds as well. Thus, a DEM-based hydraulic model may lead to less accurate conclusions even if detailed hydrologic data are available. The situation is more challenging in large and morphologically active river systems because DEMs only represent the river condition of their acquisition time. Therefore, the objectives of this research are to (1) develop a DEM correction method for predicting channel conveyance at the watershed scale and (2) demonstrate the significance of riverbed-level change for flood risk assessment in the Obion River. The proposed DEM correction method is called Slope Adjusted Mean Bed Level Elevation (SAMBLE) and utilizes the hydrologic data of a watershed to predict average riverbed level and thus channel conveyance at a watershed scale. It is tested on the Obion River watershed in northwest Tennessee. Analysis of the results showed that the SAMBLE method can predict average riverbed level with less than 1 m error that is more accurate than the best available Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) DEM for the Obion River watershed. Additionally, it can predict riverbed-level changes using time series of hydrologic data. The significance of riverbed-level change on flood risk is also demonstrated by estimating aggradation-degradation (via SAMBLE) in a morphologically active segment of the Obion River.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Center for the Management, Utilization, and Protection of Water Resources at TTU through the USDA-AFRI project (Award No. 2015-68007-23212). The authors acknowledge Dr. Shawn A. Hawkins of the University of Tennessee, USACE (Memphis District), West Tennessee River Basin Authority, USGS (Tennessee Water Science Center), and Ms. Amy Hill for technical and editorial support.

References

Bhuyian, M., A. Kalyanapu, and F. Nardi. 2014. “Approach to digital elevation model correction by improving channel conveyance.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (5): 04014062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001020.
Bhuyian, M. N., and A. Kalyanapu. 2018. “Accounting digital elevation uncertainty for flood consequence assessment.” J. Flood Risk Manage. 11 (S2): S1051–S1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12293.
Bhuyian, M. N., A. Kalyanapu, and F. Hossain. 2017. “Evaluating conveyance-based DEM correction technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for flood impact assessment of the 2010 Cumberland River flood.” Geosciences 7 (4): 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7040132.
Biancamaria, S., D. P. Lettenmaier, and T. M. Pavelsky. 2016. “The SWOT mission and its capabilities for land hydrology.” In Remote sensing and water resources, 117–147. New York: Springer.
Bizzi, S., L. Demarchi, R. C. Grabowski, C. J. Weissteiner, and W. Van de Bund. 2016. “The use of remote sensing to characterise hydromorphological properties of European rivers.” Aquat. Sci. 78 (1): 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-015-0430-7.
Chow, V. T. 1959. Open-channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
FISRWG (Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group). 1998. Stream corridor restoration: Principles, processes, and practices. Washington, DC: FISRWG.
Fonstad, M. A., and W. A. Marcus. 2005. “Remote sensing of stream depths with hydraulically assisted bathymetry (HAB) models.” Geomorphology 72 (1): 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.06.005.
Franklin, S. B., J. A. Kupfer, S. R. Pezeshki, R. Gentry, and R. D. Smith. 2009. “Complex effects of channelization and levee construction on western Tennessee floodplain forest function.” Wetlands 29 (2): 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1672/08-59.1.
Gichamo, T. Z., I. Popescu, A. Jonoski, and D. Solomatine. 2012. “River cross-section extraction from the ASTER global DEM for flood modeling.” Environ. Modell. Software 31 (May): 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.12.003.
Haile, A. T., and T. Rientjes. 2005. “Effects of LiDAR DEM resolution in flood modelling: A model sensitivity study for the city of Tegucigalpa, Honduras.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., ISPRS WG III/3, III/4, V/3 Workshop “Laser scanning 2005,” 12–14. Washington, DC: Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence.
Kalyanapu, A. J., S. Burian, and T. McPherson. 2009. “Effect of land use-based surface roughness on hydrologic model output.” J. Spatial Hydrol. 9 (2): 51–71.
Legleiter, C. 2013. “Mapping river depth from publicly available aerial images.” River Res. Appl. 29 (6): 760–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2560.
Legleiter, C. J. 2012. “Remote measurement of river morphology via fusion of LiDAR topography and spectrally based bathymetry.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 37 (5): 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2262.
Legleiter, C. J. 2015. “Calibrating remotely sensed river bathymetry in the absence of field measurements: Flow resistance equation-based imaging of river depths (FREEBIRD).” Water Resour. Res. 51 (4): 2865–2884. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016624.
Legleiter, C. J., D. A. Roberts, and R. L. Lawrence. 2009. “Spectrally based remote sensing of river bathymetry.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 34 (8): 1039–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1787.
Leopold, L. B., and T. Maddock. 1953. The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels and some Physiographic Implications. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Marks, K., and P. Bates. 2000. “Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models.” Hydrol. Processes 14 (11–12): 2109–2122. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12%3C2109::AID-HYP58%3E3.0.CO;2-1.
Maswood, M., and F. Hossain. 2015. “Advancing river modelling in ungauged basins using satellite remote sensing: The case of the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna basin.” Int. J. River Basin Manage. 14 (1): 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2015.1089250.
Merwade, V. M., and D. Maidment. 2004. A GIS framework for describing river channel bathymetry. Austin, TX: Texas Water Development Board.
MRLC (Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium). 2018. “National land cover database 2011 (NLCD 2011).” Accessed August 5, 2019. https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/national-land-cover-database-2011-nlcd-2011.
Pan, Z., C. L. Glennie, J. C. Fernandez-Diaz, C. J. Legleiter, and B. Overstreet. 2016. “Fusion of LiDAR orthowaveforms and hyperspectral imagery for shallow river bathymetry and turbidity estimation.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 54 (7): 4165–4177. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2538089.
Price, R. K. 2009. “An optimized routing model for flood forecasting.” Water Resour. Res. 45 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007103.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. “A classification of natural rivers.” Catena 22 (3): 169–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(94)90001-9.
Sampson, C. C., A. M. Smith, P. D. Bates, J. C. Neal, and M. A. Trigg. 2016. “Perspectives on open access high resolution digital elevation models to produce global flood hazard layers.” Front. Earth Sci. 3 (Jan): 85. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2015.00085.
Shankman, D., and S. A. Samson. 1991. “Channelization effects on Obion River flooding, western Tennessee.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 27 (2): 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1991.tb03129.x.
Shankman, D., and L. J. Smith. 2004. “Stream channelization and swamp formation in the US coastal plain.” Phys. Geogr. 25 (1): 22–38. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.25.1.22.
StreamStats. 2019. “United States Geological Survey StreamStats.” Accessed January 15, 2019. https://streamstatsags.cr.usgs.gov/gagepages/html/07026000.htm.
Yamazaki, D., C. A. Baugh, P. D. Bates, S. Kanae, D. E. Alsdorf, and T. Oki. 2012. “Adjustment of a spaceborne DEM for use in floodplain hydrodynamic modeling.” J. Hydrol. 436 (May): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.045.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 25Issue 2February 2020

History

Received: Sep 13, 2018
Accepted: Aug 29, 2019
Published online: Dec 4, 2019
Published in print: Feb 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 4, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Environmental Consultant 3, West Tennessee River Basin Authority, 3628 East End Dr., Humboldt, TN 38343. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8101-8453. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tennessee Tech Univ., 1020 Stadium Dr., Box 5015, Cookeville, TN 38505 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-3121. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share