Technical Papers
Aug 19, 2019

Performance Enhancement of a Conceptual Hydrological Model by Integrating Artificial Intelligence

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 11

Abstract

A daily rainfall-runoff model has been improved by the integration of artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA). The integrations are carried out on the daily rainfall-runoff model Génie rural à 4 paramètres journalier (GR4J). GR4J consists of production and routing storages. The production storage has only one process parameter and the routing storage has three. The ANN integration eliminates the three routing parameters. Automatic calibration capability has been added to the new hybrid model by integrating GA. The new hybrid model, which uses antecedent rainfall and temperature series, is applied to the Gediz River Basin in western Turkey. The results reveal that the hybrid model has better prediction performance than the original GR4J as well as the single ANN–based runoff prediction model.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abrahat, R. J., F. Anctil, P. Coulibaly, C. W. Dawson, N. J. Mount, L. M. See, A. Y. Shamseldin, D. P. Solomatine, E. Toth, and R. L. Wilby. 2012. “Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting.” Prog. Phys. Geogr. 36 (4): 480–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312444943.
Adeloye, A. J., and A. D. Munari. 2006. “Artificial neural network based generalized storage-yield-reliability models using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm.” J. Hydrol. 326 (1–4): 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.033.
Anctil, F., C. Michel, C. Perrin, and V. Andreassian. 2004a. “A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting.” J. Hydrol. 286 (1–4): 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.006.
Anctil, F., C. Perrin, and V. Andreassian. 2004b. “Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models.” Environ. Modell. Software 19 (4): 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00135-X.
Asadi, S., J. Shahrabi, P. Abbaszadeh, and S. Tabanmehr. 2013. “A new hybrid artificial neural network for rainfall-runoff process modeling.” Neurocomputing 121 (Dec): 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2013.05.023.
ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. 2000a. “Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: Preliminary concepts.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 5 (2): 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(115).
ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. 2000b. “Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 5 (2): 124–137 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(124).
Badrzadeh, H., R. Sarukkalige, and A. W. Jayawardena. 2015. “Hourly runoff forecasting for flood risk management.” J. Hydrol. 529 (Oct): 1633–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.057.
Boughton, W. C. 2005. “Catchment water balance modelling in Australia 1960-2004.” Agric. Water Manage. 71 (2): 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.10.012.
Chandwani, V., S. K. Vyas, V. Agrawal, and G. Sharma. 2015. “Soft computing approach for rainfall-runoff modelling: A review.” Aquat. Procedia 4 (Jan): 1054–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.133.
Chang, T. K., A. Talei, S. Alaghmand, and M. P. L. Ooi. 2017. “Choice of rainfall inputs for event-based rainfall-runoff modelling in a catchment with multiple rainfall stations using data-driven techniques.” J. Hydrol. 545 (Feb): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.024.
Chen, J., and B. Adams. 2006. “Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol. 318 (1–4): 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.017.
Dorum, A., A. Yarar, M. F. Sevimli, and M. Onüçyıldız. 2010. “Modelling the rainfall-runoff data of Susurluk Basin.” Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (9): 6587–6593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.127.
Fernando, M., M. Mine, E. Kaviski, and H. Fill. 2011. “Monthly rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks.” Hydrol. Sci.–J. des Sciences Hydrologiques 56 (3): 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.559949.
Franchini, M. 1996. “Use of a genetic algorithm combined with a local search method for the automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Hydrol. Sci.–J. des Sciences Hydrologiques 41 (1): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669609491476.
Franchini, M., G. Galeati, and S. Berra. 1998. “Global optimization techniques for calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Hydrol. Sci.–J. des Sciences Hydrologiques 43 (3): 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669809492137.
Gan, T. Y., E. M. Dlamini, and G. F. Biftu. 1997. “Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality and objective function on hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol. 192 (1–4): 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03114-9.
Ghumman, A. R., Y. M. Ghazaw, A. R. Sohail, and K. Watanabe. 2011. “Runoff forecasting by artificial neural network and conventional model.” Alexandria Eng. J. 50 (4): 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.01.005.
Govindaraju, R. S., and A. R. Rao. 2000. Artificial neural network in hydrology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Hagan, M. T., and M. B. Menhaj. 1994. “Training feed forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm.” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 5 (6): 989–993. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.329697.
Hosseini, S. M., and N. Mahjouri. 2016. “Integrating support vector regression and a geomorphologic artificial neural network for daily rainfall-runoff modeling.” Appl. Soft Comput. 38 (Jan): 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.09.049.
Kerh, T., and C. S. Lee. 2006. “Neural networks forecasting of flood discharge at an unmeasured station using river upstream information.” Adv. Eng. Software 37 (8): 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.11.002.
Kokkonen, T. S., and A. J. Jakeman. 2001. “A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall-runoff modeling and its implications.” Water Resour. Res. 37 (9): 2345–2352. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000299.
Lagos-Avid, M. P., and C. A. Bonilla. 2017. “Predicting the particle size distribution of eroded sediment using artificial neural networks.” Sci. Total Environ. 581–582 (Mar): 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.020.
Lee, H., and Y. Moon. 2007. “Analysis and development of conceptual rainfall-runoff model structures for regionalization purpose.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 11 (1): 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823373.
Liden, R., and J. Harlin. 2000. “Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling performance in different climates.” J. Hydrol. 238 (3–4): 231–247.
Moore, R. J., V. A. Bell, and D. A. Jones. 2005. “Forecasting for flood warning.” C. R. Geosci. 337 (1–2): 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2004.10.017.
Najafi, M. R. 2003. “Watershed modeling of rainfall excess transformation into runoff.” J. Hydrol. 270 (3–4): 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00285-8.
Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. 10 (3): 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
Nourani, V. 2017. “An emotional ANN (EANN) approach to modelling rainfall-runoff process.” J. Hydrol. 544 (Jan): 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.033.
Perrin, C. 2000. Vers une amélioration d’un modèle global pluie-débit au travers d’une approche comparative, 530. Grenoble: Institut National Polytechnique De Grenoble.
Perrin, C., C. Michel, and V. Andreassian. 2001. “Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments.” J. Hydrol. 242 (3–4): 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00393-0.
Reddy, J. M., and B. M. Wilamowski. 2000. “Adaptive neural networks in regulation of river flows.” In Artificial neural network in hydrology, edited by R. S. Govindraju and A. R. Rao, 153–177. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Rico, M., G. Benito, and A. Barnolas. 2001. “Combined paleoflood and rainfall-runoff assessment of mountain floods (Spanish Pyrenees).” J. Hydrol. 245 (1–4): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00339-0.
Seibert, J. 2000. “Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm.” Hydrol. Earth Sci. 4 (2): 215–224. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-215-2000.
Stojkovic, M., S. Kostic, J. Plavsic, and S. Prohaska. 2017. “A joint stochastic-deterministic approach for long-term and short-term modelling of monthly flow rates.” J. Hydrol. 544 (Jan): 555–566.
Supharatid, S. 2003. “Application of a neural network model in establishing a stage-discharge relationship for a tidal river.” Hydrol. Processes 17 (15): 3085–3099. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1278.
Tayfur, G. 2012. Soft computing in water resources engineering. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Uysal, G., A. A. Şorman, and A. Şensoy. 2016. “Streamflow forecasting using different neural models with satellite data for a snow dominate region in Turkey.” Proc. Eng. 154 (Jan): 1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.526.
Wang, Q. J. 1997. “Using genetic algorithms to optimize model parameters.” Environ. Modell. Software 12 (1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(96)00030-8.
Wei, C. C. 2016. “Comparing single- and two-segment statistical models with a conceptual rainfall-runoff model for river streamflow prediction during typhoons.” Environ. Modell. Software 85 (Nov): 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.013.
Wilby, R. L., R. J. Abrahat, and C. W. Dawson. 2003. “Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff process inside an artificial neural network.” Hydrol. Sci.–J. des Sciences Hydrologiques 48 (2): 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.2.163.44699.
Wolfs, V., P. Meert, and P. Willems. 2015. “Modular conceptual modelling approach and software for river hydraulic simulations.” Environ. Modell. Software 71 (Sep): 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.010.
Wu, C. L., and K. W. Chau. 2011. “Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis.” J. Hydrol. 399 (3–4): 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.017.
Wu, S. J., H. C. Lien, and C. H. Chang. 2012. “Calibration of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model using a genetic algorithm integrated with runoff estimation sensitivity to parameters.” J. Hydroinf. 14 (2): 497–511. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2011.010.
Young, C. C., W. C. Liu, and M. C. Wu. 2017. “A physically based and machine learning hybrid approach for accurate rainfall-runoff modeling during extreme typhoon events.” Appl. Soft Comput. 53 (Apr): 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.052.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24Issue 11November 2019

History

Received: Nov 19, 2018
Accepted: Jun 13, 2019
Published online: Aug 19, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jan 19, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Manisa Celal Bayar Univ., 45140 Manisa, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7073-0322. Email: [email protected]
Okan Fistikoglu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Dokuz Eylul Univ., 35160 İzmir, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share