Novel Data-Driven Approach for Development of Synthetic Hyetograph
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 10
Abstract
Simulation based flood risk or rainfall-runoff studies require multiple extreme rainfall sequences as input, for which synthetic hyetographs are generally employed. Temporal distribution for synthetic hyetograph can be generated by deterministic approaches (geometric shapes, standard temporal distribution) or stochastic approaches/weather generators. The pertinent limitations are the missing inherent randomness of rainfall, limited numbers (former), and/or complexity in implementation (latter). Addressing these limitations, a novel data-driven nonparametric approach is proposed in this article for extraction of a huge number of temporal patterns of rainfall from observations. When compared to stochastic approaches, generation of synthetic hyetographs is easier in the proposed approach. Synthetic hyetographs generated in this approach represented the observed storms better than other deterministic approaches from literature.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data used in the study are confidential in nature and were available to the author only for research purposes with restrictions. The author is not authorized to share the data.
Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges the agencies for providing the data for the study. The author sincerely appreciates the significant contribution from the unknown learned reviewers and editors for providing guidance and critical insightful observations/suggestions, which immensely helped in improving the technical content and clarity of this article.
References
Acharya, N., A. Frei, and J. Chen. 2017. “Evaluating stochastic precipitation generators for climate change impact studies of New York City’s primary water supply.” J. Hydrometeorol. 18: 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0169.1.
Breinl, K., G. DiBaldassarre, M. G. Lopez, M. Hagenlocher, G. Vico, and A. Rutgersson. 2017. “Can weather generation capture precipitation patterns across different climates, spatial scales and under data scarcity?” Sci. Rep. 7 (5449): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05822-y.
Candela, A., G. Brigandi, and G. T. Aronica. 2014. “Estimation of synthetic flood design hydrographs using a distributed rainfall-runoff model coupled with a copula-based single storm rainfall generator.” Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 14: 1819–1833. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-11819-2014.
Chow, V. T., D. R. Maidment, and L. W. Mays. 1988. Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dauji, S., P. K. Srivastava, and K. Bhargava. 2017. “Independence of monsoon rainstorms at western coastal site in India.” IWRA (India) J. 6 (2): 23–27.
Ellouze, M., H. Abida, and R. Safi. 2009. “A triangular model for the generation of synthetic hyetographs.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 54 (2): 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.54.2.287.
El-Sayed, E. A. H. 2017. “Development of synthetic rainfall distribution curves for Siani area.” Ain Shams Eng. J. 9 (4): 1949–1957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.01.010.
Green, P. J., and B. W. Silverman. 1993. Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: A roughness penalty approach. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
Guo, J., and K. Hargadin. 2009. “Conservative design rainfall distribution.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 14 (5): 528–530. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000013.
Huff, F. A. 1967. “Time distribution of rainfall in heavy storms.” Water Resour. Res. 3 (4): 1007–1019.https://doi.org/10.1029/WR003i004p01007.
Keifer, C. J., and H. H. Chu. 1957. “Synthetic storm pattern for drainage design.” J. Hydraul. Div. 83 (4): 1–25.
Koutsoyiannis, D. 1994. “A stochastic disaggregation method for design storm and flood synthesis.” J. Hydrol. 159 (1–4): 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90078-7.
Licznar, P., E. Burtszta-Adamiak, J. Lomotowski, and J. Stanczyk. 2017. “Modern proposal of methodology for retrieval of characteristic synthetic rainfall hyetographs.” In Vol. 22 of Proc., E3S Web of Conf., 1–7. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
Lohpaisankrit, W., G. Meon, and T. Tingsanchali. 2016. “A framework of integrated hydrological and hydrodynamic models using synthetic rainfall for flash flood mapping of ungauged catchments in tropical zones.” In Vol. 373 of Proc., Int. Association of Hydrological Sciences, 183–187. Germany: Copernicus Publications.
NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Washington, DC: USDA.
Prodanovic, P., and S. P. Simonovic. 2004. Generation of synthetic design storms for the Upper Thames River basin. London, ON, Canada: Univ. of Western Ontario.
USACE. 2000. Hydrologic modelling system. Davis, CA: USACE.
Veneziano, D., and P. Villani. 1999. “Best linear unbiased design hyetograph.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (9): 2725–2738. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900156.
Watt, W. E., K. C. A. Chow, and K. W. Latham. 1986. “A 1-h urban design storm for Canada.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 13 (3): 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1139/l86-041.
Yen, B. C., and V. T. Chow. 1980. “Design hyetographs for small drainage structures.” J. Hydraul. Div. 106 (6): 1055–1076.
Zarris, D., D. Koutsoyiannis, and G. Karavokiros. 1998. “A simple stochastic rainfall disaggregation scheme for urban drainage modeling.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Developments in Urban Drainage Modelling, edited by D. Butler and C. Maksimovic, 85–92. London: International Association of Hydraulic Research.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 3, 2018
Accepted: May 25, 2019
Published online: Aug 5, 2019
Published in print: Oct 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.