Technical Papers
Jul 29, 2019

Effect of Different Conduit-Network Recharge Ways on Karst Spring Simulation

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 10

Abstract

Two recharge ways, point inflow and lateral inflow, exist on the conduit network in karst aquifers. Point inflow is commonly included in pipe-flow models, but lateral inflow along the conduit network is often ignored. Few studies have paid attention to the potential influence of different recharge mechanisms on model simulation results. In this study, three models with different ways of recharging the conduit network were established based on a reservoir model and two analytical solutions. These models were applied to a karst spring to investigate the impact of different ways of recharge on simulation results. It is shown that the three models had very similar simulation results for both high and low flows after calibration. A series of synthetic experiments also indicated the model difference caused by the different ways of recharge of the conduit network could always be masked by the adjustment of other parameters in the model during the calibration process. These results imply that spring discharge as a model target alone may not help to identify the recharge way of the conduit network.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41730856, U1503282, and 41602242) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0402809).

References

Bai, Y., T. Wagener, and P. Reed. 2009. “A top-down framework for watershed model evaluation and selection under uncertainty.” Environ. Modell. Software 24 (8): 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.12.012.
Bailly-Comte, V., V. Borrell-Estupina, H. Jourde, and S. Pistre. 2012. “A conceptual semidistributed model of the Coulazou River as a tool for assessing surface water–karst groundwater interactions during flood in Mediterranean ephemeral rivers.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (9): W09534. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010072.
Bailly-Comte, V., J. B. Martin, H. S. Jourde, J. Elizabeth, S. Pistre, and A. Langston. 2010. “Water exchange and pressure transfer between conduits and matrix and their influence on hydrodynamics of two karst aquifers with sinking streams.” J. Hydrol. 386 (1–4): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.005.
Campbell, C. W., and S. M. Sullivan. 2002. “Simulating time-varying cave flow and water levels using the storm water management model.” Eng. Geol. 65 (2–3): 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00120-X.
Chang, Y., J. Wu, and G. Jiang. 2015. “Modeling the hydrological behavior of a karst spring using a nonlinear reservoir-pipe model.” Hydrogeol. J. 23 (5): 901–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1241-6.
Chang, Y., J. Wu, G. Jiang, and Z. Kang. 2017. “Identification of the dominant hydrological process and appropriate model structure of a karst catchment through stepwise simplification of a complex conceptual model.” J. Hydrol. 548: 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.050.
Charlier, J.-B., R. Moussa, V. Bailly-Comte, L. Danneville, J. Desprats, B. Ladouche, and A. Marchandise. 2015. “Use of a flood-routing model to assess lateral flows in a karstic stream: Implications to the hydrogeological functioning of the Grands Causses area (Tarn River, southern France).” Environ. Earth Sci. 74 (12): 7605–7616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4704-0.
Chen, Z., and N. Goldscheider. 2014. “Modeling spatially and temporally varied hydraulic behavior of a folded karst system with dominant conduit drainage at catchment scale, Hochifen–Gottesacker, Alps.” J. Hydrol. 514: 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.005.
Chiew, F., and T. McMahon. 1994. “Application of daily rainfall-runoff model MODHYDROLOG to 28 Australian catchments.” J. Hydrol. 153 (1–4): 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90200-3.
Cholet, C., J. B. Charlier, R. Moussa, M. Steinmann, and S. Denimal. 2017. “Assessing lateral flows and solute transport during floods in a conduit-flow-dominated karst system using the inverse problem for the advection–diffusion equation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (7): 3635–3653. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3635-2017.
Clark, M. P., H. K. McMillan, D. B. G. Collins, D. Kavetski, and R. A. Woods. 2011. “Hydrological field data from a modeller’s perspective: Part 2: Process-based evaluation of model hypotheses.” Hydrol. Processes 25 (4): 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7902.
de Rooij, R., P. Perrochet, and W. Graham. 2013. “From rainfall to spring discharge: Coupling conduit flow, subsurface matrix flow and surface flow in karst systems using a discrete–continuum model.” Adv. Water Resour. 61: 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.08.009.
Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. Gupta. 1992. “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res. 28 (4): 1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985.
Eagleman, J. R. 1967. “Pan evaporation, potential and actual evapotranspiration.” J. Appl. Meteorol. 6 (3): 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1967)006%3C0482:PEPAAE%3E2.0.CO;2.
Fenicia, F., D. Kavetski, and H. H. G. Savenije. 2011. “Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Motivation and theoretical development.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (11): W11510. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010174.
Fenicia, F., D. Kavetski, H. H. G. Savenije, M. P. Clark, G. Schoups, L. Pfister, and J. Freer. 2014. “Catchment properties, function, and conceptual model representation: Is there a correspondence?” Hydrol. Processes 28 (4): 2451–2467. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9726.
Field, M. S., and S. G. Nash. 1997. “Risk assessment methodology for karst aquifers: (1) Estimating karst conduit-flow parameters.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 47 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005753919403.
Ford, D. C., and P. Williams. 2007. Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Goldscheider, N., and D. P. Drew. 2007. Methods in karst hydrogeology. London: Taylor & Francis.
Halihan, T., and C. M. Wicks. 1998. “Modeling of storm responses in conduit flow aquifers with reservoirs.” J. Hydrol. 208 (1–2): 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00149-8.
Halihan, T., C. M. Wicks, and J. F. Engeln. 1998. “Physical response of a karst drainage basin to flood pulses: Example of the Devil’s Icebox cave system (Missouri, USA).” J. Hydrol. 204 (1–4): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00104-2.
Hartmann, A., et al. 2013a. “Process-based karst modelling to relate hydrodynamic and hydrochemical characteristics to system properties.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (8): 3305–3321. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3305-2013.
Hartmann, A., T. Wagener, A. Rimmer, J. Lange, H. Brielmann, and M. Weiler. 2013b. “Testing the realism of model structures to identify karst system processes using water quality and quantity signatures.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (6): 3345–3358. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20229.
Hayami, S. 1951. On the propagation of flood waves, 1–16. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto Univ.
Jeannin, P-Y. 2001. “Modeling flow in phreatic and epiphreatic karst conduits in the Hölloch Cave (Muotatal, Switzerland).” Water Resour. Res. 37 (2): 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900257.
Jiang, G. H., and Q. Zhang. 2011. “Change of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in karst peak cluster during natural restoration: A case study in Yaji Station.” [In Chinese.] Carsologica Sinica 30 (4): 397–402.
Jukić, D., and V. Denić-Jukić. 2009. “Groundwater balance estimation in karst by using a conceptual rainfall–runoff model.” J. Hydrol. 373 (3–4): 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.035.
Klimchouk, A. B. 2004. “Towards defining, delimiting and classifying epikarst: Its origin, processes and variants of geomorphic evolution.” In Epikarst, edited by W. K. Jones, D. C. Culver, and J. S. Herman, 23–35. Charles Town, WV: Karst Waters Institute.
Le Moine, N. 2008. “Le bassin versant de surface vu par le souterrain: Une voie d’amélioration des performance et du réalisme des modéles pluie–débit? Ph.D. thesis, Cemagref, Université Pierre et Marie Curie.
Lerat, J., C. Perrin, V. Andreassian, C. Loumagne, and P. Ribstein. 2012. “Towards robust methods to couple lumped rainfall-runoff models and hydraulic models: A sensitivity analysis on the Illinois River.” J. Hydrol. 418: 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.019.
Liu, Z., C. Groves, D. Yuan, and J. Meiman. 2004. “South China karst aquifer storm-scale hydrochemistry.” Ground Water 42 (4): 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02617.x.
Mangin, A. 1975. “Contribution à l’étude hydrodynamique des aquifères karstique.” Ph.D. thesis, Laboratoire souterrain du Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Univ. of Dijon.
Martin, J. B., and R. W. Dean. 2001. “Exchange of water between conduits and matrix in the Floridan aquifer.” Chem. Geol. 179 (1–4): 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00320-5.
McMillan, H. K., M. P. Clark, W. B. Bowden, M. Duncan, and R. A. Woods. 2011. “Hydrological field data from a modeller’s perspective. Part I: Diagnostic tests for model structure.” Hydrol. Processes 25 (4): 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7841.
Montanari, L., M. Sivapalan, and A. Montanari. 2006. “Investigation of dominant hydrological processes in a tropical catchment in a monsoonal climate via the downward approach.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 10 (5): 769–782.
Moramarco, T., F. Melone, and V. P. Singh. 2005. “Assessment of flooding in urbanized ungauged basins: A case study in the Upper Tiber area Italy.” Hydrol. Processes 19 (10): 1909–1924.
Moussa, R. 1996. “Analytical Hayami solution for the diffusive wave flood routing problem with lateral inflow.” Hydrol. Processes 10 (9): 1209–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199609)10:9%3C1209::AID-HYP380%3E3.0.CO;2-2.
Moussa, R., and N. Chahinian. 2009. “Comparison of different multi-objective calibration criteria using a conceptual rainfall-runoff model of flood events.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (4): 519–535. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-519-2009.
Moussa, R., M. Voltz, and P. Andrieux. 2002. “Effects of the spatial organization of agricultural management on the hydrological behaviour of a farmed catchment during flood events.” Hydrol. Processes 16 (2): 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.333.
Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. 10 (3): 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
Oudin, L., V. Andreassian, T. Mathevet, C. Perrin, and C. Michel. 2006. “Dynamic averaging of rainfall-runoff model simulations from complementary model parameterizations.” Water Resour. Res. 42 (7): 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004636.
Peterson, E. W., and C. M. Wicks. 2006. “Assessing the importance of conduit geometry and physical parameters in karst systems using the storm water management model (SWMM).” J. Hydrol. 329 (1–2): 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.017.
Pushpalatha, R., C. Perrin, N. L. Moine, and V. Andréassian. 2012. “A review of efficiency criteria suitable for evaluating low-flow simulations.” J. Hydrol. 420–421 (Feb): 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.055.
Reimann, T., et al. 2011. “Effects of dynamically variable saturation and matrix-conduit coupling of flow in karst aquifers.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (11): W11503. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010446.
Reimann, T., and M. E. Hill. 2009. “MODFLOW-CFP: A new conduit flow process for MODFLOW-2005.” Ground Water 47 (3): 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00561.x.
Tritz, S., V. Guinot, and H. Jourde. 2011. “Modelling the behaviour of a karst system catchment using non-linear hysteretic conceptual model.” J. Hydrol. 397 (3–4): 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.001.
Williams, P. W. 2008. “The role of the epikarst in karst and cave hydrogeology: A review.” Int. J. Speleology 37 (1): 1–10.
Wu, Y., Y. Jiang, D. Yuan, and L. Li. 2008. “Modeling hydrological responses of karst spring to storm events: Example of the Shuifang spring (Jinfo Mt., Chongqing, China).” Environ. Geol. 55 (7): 1545–1553.
Yuan, D. X., A. D. Dai, W. T. Cai, Z. H. Liu, S. Y. He, X. P. Mo, S. Y. Zhou, and W. K. Lao. 1996. Karst water system of a peak cluster catchment in south china’s bare karst region and its mathematic model. Guilin, China: Guangxi Normal University Publishing House.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24Issue 10October 2019

History

Received: Nov 26, 2018
Accepted: May 20, 2019
Published online: Jul 29, 2019
Published in print: Oct 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Dec 29, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Assistant, Key Laboratory of Surficial Geochemistry, Ministry of Education, Dept. of Hydrosciences, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing Univ., Nanjing 210023, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Surficial Geochemistry, Ministry of Education, Dept. of Hydrosciences, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing Univ., Nanjing 210023, China. Email: [email protected]
Guanghui Jiang [email protected]
Researcher, Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Land and Resources and Guangxi, Institute of Karst Geology, Guilin 541004, China; International Karst Research Center Auspices of UNESCO, Guilin 541004, China. Email: [email protected]
Research Assistant, Key Laboratory of Surficial Geochemistry, Ministry of Education, Dept. of Hydrosciences, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing Univ., Nanjing 210023, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-0676. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai Univ., Nanjing 210098, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share