Technical Papers
Jul 12, 2019

Discretization of the Generalized Nash Model for Flood Routing

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 9

Abstract

The discretization of the generalized Nash model (GNM) has been made in such a way that it can be applied easily to the sample-data system for flood routing. First, the variable Sn-curve was introduced to simplify the GNM. Under a commonly used assumption that the streamflow changes linearly between any two measurements, the simplified GNM was further discretized to a linear expression of the inflows and outflows. Then, the discrete generalized Nash model (DGNM), as well as its multistep-ahead form, that is, m-DGNM, was obtained, by which the outflow was produced by the old water stored in the river reach and new water from the upstream inflows. The weight coefficients of the old and new water were expressed in explicit functions of the Sn-curve, which makes the DGNM and m-DGNM easy to compute and more intuitive than the GNM. To test the predictive ability of the DGNM, a comparison with the widely used Muskingum method and dynamic wave model was made. Results showed that with some historical information included, the DGNM is more adaptive and accurate than the Muskingum method. Compared to the complicated dynamic wave model, the DGNM is relatively simple to implement and reasonably accurate. Then, the DGNM and m-DGNM were further applied to the Qingjiang River for flood routing. Reasonable results obtained suggest that they are highly suitable for practical flood routing applications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study is financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0402708), the National Natural Science Foundation (51109085, 41401018), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HUST: 2017KFYXJJ195, 2016YXZD048).

References

Barati, R., S. Rahimi, and G. H. Akbari. 2012. “Analysis of dynamic wave model for flood routing in natural rivers.” Water Sci. Eng. 5 (3): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2012.03.001.
Becker, A., and Z. W. Kundzewicz. 1987. “Nonlinear flood routing with multilinear models.” Water Resour. Res. 23 (6): 1043–1048. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023i006p01043.
Bhunya, P. K., P. K. Singh, S. K. Mishra, and N. Panigrahy. 2008. “A variable storage coefficient model for rainfall-runoff computation.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 53 (2): 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.2.338.
Camacho, L. A., and M. J. Lees. 1999. “Multilinear discrete lag-cascade model for channel routing.” J. Hydrol. 226 (1): 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00162-6.
Chaudhry, M. H. 2007. Open-channel flow. New York: Springer.
Choudhury, P., R. K. Shrivastava, and S. M. Narulkar. 2002. “Flood routing in river networks using equivalent Muskingum inflow.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 7 (6): 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:6(413).
Cimorelli, L., L. Cozzolino, R. Della Morte, D. Pianese, and V. P. Singh. 2015. “A new frequency domain analytical solution of a cascade of diffusive channels for flood routing.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (4): 2393–2411. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016192.
Dooge, J. C. I. 1959. “A general theory of the unit hydrograph theory.” J. Geophys. Res. 64 (2): 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ064i002p00241.
Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. K. Gupta. 1994. “Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models.” J. Hydrol. 158 (3-4): 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4.
Gasiorowski, D., and R. Szymkiewicz. 2018. “Dimensionally consistent nonlinear Muskingum equation.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 23 (9): 04018039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001691.
Gill, M. A. 1978. “Flood routing by the Muskingum method.” J. Hydrol. 36 (3–4): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(78)90153-1.
Jeng, R. I., and G. C. Coon. 2003. “True form of instantaneous unit hydrograph of linear reservoirs.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 129 (1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(11).
Kalinin, J. P., and B. I. Milyukov. 1957. “On the computation of unsteady flow in open channels.” Meteor. Gidrol. Z. 12: 12–18.
Li, C., S. Guo, W. Zhang, and J. Zhang. 2008. “Use of Nash’s IUH and DEMs to identify the parameters of an unequal-reservoir cascade IUH model.” Hydrol. Processes 22 (20): 4073–4082. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7009.
Moramarco, T., Y. Fan, and R. L. Bras. 1999. “Analytical solution for channel routing with uniform lateral inflow.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 125 (7): 707–713. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:7(707).
Nash, J. E. 1957. “The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph.” IAHS Publ. 45 (3): 114–121.
Nourani, V., V. P. Singh, and H. Delafrouz. 2009. “Three geomorphological rainfall-runoff models based on the linear reservoir concept.” Catena 76 (3): 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.008.
O’Donnell, T. 1985. “A direct three-parameter Muskingum procedure incorporating lateral inflow.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 30 (4): 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668509491013.
Perumal, M. 1994. “Multilinear discrete cascade model for channel routing.” J. Hydrol. 158 (1): 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90050-7.
Shaw, E. M. 1994. Hydrology in practice. Cornwall, UK: TJ Press.
Singh, K. P. 1964. “Nonlinear instantaneous unit-hydrograph theory.” J. Hydraul. Div. Proc. 90 (HY2): 313–347.
Singh, V. P. 1977. “Estimation of parameters of a uniformly nonlinear surface runoff model.” Hydrol. Res. 8 (1): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1977.0003.
Singh, V. P., G. T. Wang, and D. D. Adrian. 1997. “Flood routing based on diffusion wave equation using mixing cell method.” Hydrol. Process. 11 (14): 1881–1894. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199711)11:14%3C1881::AID-HYP536%3E3.0.CO;2-K.
Stephenson, D. 1979. “Direct optimization of Muskingum routing coefficients.” J. Hydrol. 41 (1): 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(79)90115-X.
Szilagyi, J. 2003. “State-space discretization of the KMN-cascade in a sample-data system framework for streamflow forecasting.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 8 (6): 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:6(339).
Szilagyi, J. 2006. “Discrete state-space approximation of the continuous Kalinin–Milyukov–Nash cascade of noninteger storage elements.” J. Hydrol. 328 (1): 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.015.
Szilagyi, J., and P. Laurinyecz. 2014. “Accounting for backwater effects in flow routing by the discrete linear cascade model.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 19 (1): 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000771.
Szollosi-Nagy, A. 1982. “The discretization of the continuous linear cascade by means of state-space analysis.” J. Hydrol. 58 (3): 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90036-1.
Wang, G. T., Y. S. Yu, and K. Wu. 1987. “Improved flood routing by ARMA modelling and the Kalman filter technique.” J. Hydrol. 93 (1): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90036-1.
Wilson, E. M. 1983. Engineering hydrology. London: Macmillan.
Wu, S. J., H. C. Lien, and C. H. Chang. 2012. “Calibration of conceptual rainfall–runoff model using genetic algorithm integrated with runoff estimation sensitivity to parameters.” J. Hydroinf. 14 (2): 497–511. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2011.010.
Yan, B., S. Guo, J. Liang, and H. Sun. 2015. “The generalized Nash model for river flow routing.” J. Hydrol. 530 (10): 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.055.
Yang, G., and L. C. Bowling. 2014. “Detection of changes in hydrologic system memory associated with urbanization in the Great Lakes region.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (5): 3750–3763. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015339.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24Issue 9September 2019

History

Received: Mar 9, 2018
Accepted: Apr 19, 2019
Published online: Jul 12, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Dec 12, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, School of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Postgraduate, School of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Researcher, School of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China. Email: [email protected]
Professorate Senior Engineer, Bureau of Hydrology, Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan, Hubei 430010 China. Email: [email protected]
Senior Engineer, Bureau of Hydrology, Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan, Hubei 430010 China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share