Case Studies
Mar 8, 2019

Water Quality–Based Environmental Flow under Plausible Temperature and Pollution Scenarios

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 5

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate water quality–based minimum environmental flow (Eflow) of a river under the impact of different plausible scenarios. The water quality model QUAL2K was deployed to simulate levels of dissolved oxygen (DO) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in a river during the dry season. Hypothetical scenarios of pollution were generated by varying BOD in contributing drains, and climate change scenarios were generated by altering air temperature over the study region. DO and BOD levels were simulated under the impact of various scenarios. Corresponding to each scenario, minimum Eflow throughout the river stretch—that is, the headwaters flow (quantity and quality) meeting desirable river water quality standards (as proposed by the Indian Central Pollution Control Board)—was explored. Water quality charts were developed for direct and user-friendly estimation of Eflows. The proposed approach was applied to the Yamuna and Bhadra rivers in India. The results reveal the inefficiency of existing river flow conditions in maintaining permissible water quality standards. Adverse effects of pollution load, upstream diversions, and climate change are highlighted.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Department of Science and Technology (India) for partly supporting this study through Grant No. SB/S3/CEE/045/2014 to Dr. C. T. Dhanya. The authors sincerely thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for reviewing the manuscript and providing insightful comments. The authors also express thanks to the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, for supporting this work.

References

Acreman, M. C., I. C. Overton, J. King, P. J. Wood, I. G. Cowx, M. J. Dunbar, E. Kendy, and W. J. Young. 2014. “The changing role of ecohydrological science in guiding environmental flows.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 59 (3–4): 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.886019.
Arthington, A., S. Brizga, M. Kennard, S. Mackay, R. McCosker, S. Choy, and J. Ruffini. 1999. “Development of a flow restoration methodology (FLOWRESM) for determining environmental flow requirements in regulated rivers using the Brisbane River as a case study.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Water Resources and Environment Research, 449–454. Australia: Institution of Engineers.
Babu, K. L., and B. H. Kumara. 2009. “Environmental flows in river basins: A case study of River Bhadra.” Curr. Sci. 96 (4): 475–479.
Basha, G., P. Kishore, M. V. Ratnam, A. Jayaraman, A. A. Kouchak, T. B. Ouarda, and I. Velicogna. 2017. “Historical and projected surface temperature over India during the 20th and 21st century.” Sci. Rep. 7 (1): 2987. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02130-3.
Brisbane Declaration. 2007. “The Brisbane Declaration: Environmental flows are essential for freshwater ecosystem health and human well-being.” In Proc., 10th Int. River Symp., 3–6. Brisbane, Australia: Brisbane Declaration.
Chapra, S. C., G. J. Pelletier, and H. Tao. 2006. “QUAL2K: A modeling framework for simulating River and stream water quality.” In Version 2.04: Documentation and user manual. Medford, MA: Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Tufts Univ.
Chaudhary, S., C. T. Dhanya, and A. Kumar. 2018. “Sequential calibration of a water quality model using reach-specific parameter estimates.” Hydrol. Res. 49 (4): 1042–1055. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2017.246.
Cox, T. J., D. F. Turner, G. J. Pelletier, and A. Navato. 2015. “Stochastic water quality modeling of an impaired river impacted by climate change.” J. Environ. Eng. 141 (11): 04015035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000971.
CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board). 2005. Status of sewage and sewage treatment plants in Delhi. CUPS/57/2005. Delhi, India: CPCB.
CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board). 2006. Water quality status of Yamuna River 1999–2005. Delhi, India: CPCB.
CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board). 2008. Guidelines for water quality management. Delhi, India: CPCB.
CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board). 2011. Polluted River stretches in India: Criteria and status. Delhi, India: CPCB.
CWC (Central Water Commission). 2007. Report of working group to advise WQAA on the minimum flows in the rivers. New Delhi: CWC.
Delhi Jal Board. 2005. Delhi water supply and sewerage project. Final report—Project preparation study, Part C: Sewerage. Delhi, India: Delhi Jal Board.
Delpla, I., A. V. Jung, E. Baures, M. Clement, and O. Thomas. 2009. “Impacts of climate change on surface water quality in relation to drinking water production.” Environ. Int. 35 (8): 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.001.
Dhanya, C. T., and A. Kumar. 2015. “Making a case for estimating environmental flow under climate change.” Curr. Sci. 109 (6): 1019–1020.
Dyer, F., S. El Sawah, B. Croke, R. Griffiths, E. Harrison, P. Lucena-Moya, and A. Jakeman. 2014. “The effects of climate change on ecologically-relevant flow regime and water quality attributes.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 28 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0744-8.
Gül, G. O., D. Rosbjerg, A. Gül, M. Ondracek, and K. Dikgola. 2010. “Assessing climate change impacts on river flows and environmental flow requirements at catchment scale.” Ecohydrology 3 (1): 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.92.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2012. “Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation.” In A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by C. B. Field, et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. “Summary for policymakers. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.” In Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects, edited by C. B. Field, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jha, R., C. S. P. Ojha, and K. K. S. Bhatia. 2007. “Development of refined BOD and DO models for highly polluted Kali River in India.” J. Environ. Eng. 133 (8): 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2007)133:8(839).
King, J., C. Brown, and H. Sabet. 2003. “A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers.” River Res. Appl. 19 (5–6): 619–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.709.
King, J. M., R. E. Tharme, and M. S. de Villiers, eds. 2008. Environmental flow assessments for rivers: Manual for the building block methodology. Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., and D. Gerten. 2014. “Grand challenges related to the assessment of climate change impacts on freshwater resources.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (1): A4014011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001012.
Lokgariwar, C., R. Chopra, V. Smakhtin, L. Bharati, and J. O’Keeffe. 2013. “Including cultural water requirements in environmental flow assessment: An example from the upper Ganga River, India.” Water Int. 39 (1): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2013.863684.
Malan, H. L., and J. A. Day. 2004. “Linking flow, water quality and potential effects on aquatic biota within the reserve determination process.” Water SA 29 (3): 297–304. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v29i3.4931.
McCabe, G. J., and L. E. Hay. 1995. “Hydrological effects of hypothetical climate change in the East River basin, Colorado, USA.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 40 (3): 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669509491417.
Mimikou, M. A., E. Baltas, E. Varanou, and K. Pantazis. 2000. “Regional impacts of climate change on water resources quantity and quality indicators.” J. Hydrol. 234 (1): 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00244-4.
O’Keeffe, J., N. Kaushal, L. Bharati, and S. Vladimir. 2012. Assessment of environmental flows for the upper Ganga Basin. New Delhi, India: WWF-India.
Opdyke, D. R., E. L. Oborny, S. K. Vaugh, and K. B. Mayes. 2014. “Texas environmental flow standards and the hydrology-based environmental flow regime methodology.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 59 (3–4): 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.892600.
Ostroumov, S. A. 2005. “On some issues of maintaining water quality and self-purification.” Water Resour. 32 (3): 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11268-005-0039-7.
Overton, I. C., D. M. Smith, J. Dalton, S. Barchiesi, M. C. Acreman, J. C. Stromberg, and J. M. Kirby. 2014. “Implementing environmental flows in integrated water resources management & the ecosystem approach.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 59 (3–4): 860–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.897408.
Palmer, C. G., N. Rossouw, W. J. Muller, and P. A. Scherman. 2005. “The development of water quality methods within ecological reserve assessments, and links to environmental flows.” Water SA 31 (2): 161–170. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v31i2.5198.
Paredes-Arquiola, J., A. Solera, F. Martínez-Capel, A. Momblanch, and J. Andreu. 2014. “Integrating water management, habitat modelling and water quality at the basin scale and environmental flow assessment: Case study of the Tormes River, Spain.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 59 (3–4): 878–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.821573.
Parmar, D. L., and A. K. Keshari. 2012. “Sensitivity analysis of water quality of the River Yamuna, India.” Environ. Monitor. Assess. 184 (3): 1487–1508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2055-1.
Rehana, S., and P. P. Mujumdar. 2011. “River water quality response under hypothetical climate change scenarios in Tunga-Bhadra River, India.” Hydrol. Process. 25 (22): 3373–3386. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8057.
Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, R. Wigington, and D. P. Braun. 1997. “How much water does a river need?” Freshwater Biol. 37 (1): 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00153.x.
Smakhtin, V. Y. 2006. Vol. 107 of An assessment of environmental flow requirements of Indian River basins. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI.
Soni, V., S. Shekhar, and D. Singh. 2014. “Environmental flow for the Yamuna River in Delhi as an example of monsoon rivers in India.” Curr. Sci. 106 (4): 558–564.
Stewardson, M. J., and P. Cottingham. 2002. “A demonstration of the flow events method: Environmental flow requirements of the Broken River.” Aust. J. Water Resour. 5 (1): 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2002.11465191.
Sumithra, S., and J. Narayana. 2003. “Municipal and industrial waste characteristics and management in Bhadravathi City.” In Aquatic ecosystems. New Delhi, India: APH Publishing Corporation.
Tare, V. 2011. Environmental flows state-of-the-art with special reference to rivers in the Ganga River Basin. Kanpur, India: IIT Kanpur.
Tennant, D. L. 1976. “Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources.” Fisheries 1 (4): 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1976)001%3C0006:IFRFFW%3E2.0.CO;2.
Tessmann, S. 1980. Environmental assessment, technical appendix E in environmental use sector reconnaissance elements of the Western Dakotas region of South Dakota study. Brookings, SD: Water Resources Research Institute.
Tharme, R. E. 2003. “A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers.” River Res. Appl. 19 (5–6): 397–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.736.
The Environment (Protection) Rules. 1986. Ministry of environment and forests. Delhi, India: Dept. of Environment, Forest and Wildlife.
Thomann, R. V., and J. A. Mueller. 1987. Principles of surface water quality modeling and control. New York: Harper-Collins.
Thompson, J. R., C. L. R. Laizé, A. J. Green, M. C. Acreman, and D. G. Kingston. 2014. “Climate change uncertainty in environmental flows for the Mekong River.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 59 (3–4): 935–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.842074.
Walling, B., S. Chaudhary, C. T. Dhanya, and A. Kumar. 2017. “Estimation of environmental flow incorporating water quality and hypothetical climate change scenarios.” Environ. Monitor. Assess. 189 (5): 225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5942-2.
Whitehead, P. G., R. L. Wilby, R. W. Battarbee, M. Kernan, and A. J. Wade. 2009. “A review of the potential impacts of climate change on surface water quality.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 54 (1): 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.54.1.101.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 24Issue 5May 2019

History

Received: Jul 14, 2017
Accepted: Dec 3, 2018
Published online: Mar 8, 2019
Published in print: May 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Aug 8, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shushobhit Chaudhary
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.
C. T. Dhanya [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Arun Kumar
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.
Rehana Shaik
Assistant Professor, Laboratory for Spatial Informatics, International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500032, India.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share