Case Studies
Apr 23, 2018

Space-Time Cokriging Approach for Groundwater-Level Prediction with Multiattribute Multiresolution Satellite Data

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 7

Abstract

The availability of complete, continuous, and reliable groundwater data is essential for preparing a regional-scale groundwater model. Poor sampling of groundwater level is often encountered. Satellite-derived data can provide possible solution to such a problem. Better coverage and timely sampled data can be easily obtained from satellite-derived data. However, getting direct and exact groundwater-level measurements from satellite data is not possible. Satellite data, hence, are used as latent variables (or secondary attributes) to predict groundwater level. A geostatistical approach (cokriging) was brought into use to predict groundwater level by using the available secondary attributes. The study was carried out in the Indo-Gangetic Basin by using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) anomaly data and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation data as secondary attributes. The study was carried out at the finest resolution available. Groundwater-level measurements measurements are available at seasonal scale at point support, and the analyses were performed for the premonsoon season of 2005 and 2008. Four performance indicators—mean absolute error (MAE), bias, root-mean-square error (RMSE), and coefficient of variation of root-mean-square variation [CV(RMSE)]—determined the best result obtained from the analyses. The cokriging analyses were carried out for different neighborhood search radii. Four different neighborhood search radii were chosen for the present study on the basis of range of variogram of the primary attribute: (1) less than the range of variogram; (2) range of variogram; (3) more than the range of variogram; and (4) infinite radius. Different neighborhood radii were chosen to visualize any changes in predictability of the different models prepared. The best prediction was obtained for the premonsoon of 2005 with very low error values at infinite neighborhood search radius [bias=1.61  m; MAE=1.77  m; RMSE=2.35  m; and CV(RMSE)=0.32]. With a neighborhood search radius of less than the range of semivariogram, missing values were obtained for the premonsoon of both 2005 and 2008. The overall prediction was found to be satisfactory, suggesting very good predictability of the geostatistical approach.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. Ashok Mishra and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

Ahmadi, S. H., and A. Sedghamiz. 2008. “Application and evaluation of kriging and cokriging methods on groundwater depth mapping.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 138 (1–3): 357–368.
Ahmed, M., M. Sultan, J. Wahr, and E. Yan. 2014. “The use of GRACE data to monitor natural and anthropogenic induced variations in water availability across Africa.” Earth Sci. Rev. 136: 289–300.
Awange, J. L., M. Gebremichael, E. Forootan, G. Wakbulcho, R. Anyah, V. G. Ferreira, and T. Alemayehu. 2014. “Characterization of Ethiopian mega hydrogeological regimes using GRACE, TRMM and GLDAS datasets.” Adv. Water Resour. 74: 64–67.
Bhanja, S. N., A. Mukherjee, D. Saha, I. Velicogna, and J. S. Famiglietti. 2016. “Validation of GRACE based groundwater storage anomaly using in-situ groundwater level measurements in India.” J. Hydrol. 543: 729–738.
CWC (Central Water Commission). 2014. Ganga basin report. R. K. Puram, New Delhi, India: Ministry of Water Resources, Sewa Bhawan.
Daliakopoulos, I. N., P. Coulibaly, and I. K. Tsanis. 2005. “Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks.” J. Hydrol. 309 (1–4): 229–240.
Dhar, A., S. Sahoo, S. Dey, and M. Sahoo. 2014. “Evaluation of recharge and groundwater dynamics of a shallow alluvial aquifer in central Ganga Basin, Kanpur (India).” Nat. Resour. Res. 23 (4): 409–422.
Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press.
GRACE-TELLUS. 2016. “Gravity recovery and climate experiment Tellus.” Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Accessed March 30, 2016. http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov.
Hoeksema, R. J., R. B. Clapp, A. L. Thomas, A. E. Hunley, N. D. Farrow, and K. C. Dearstone. 1989. “Cokriging model for estimation of water table elevation.” Water Resour. Res. 25 (3): 429–438.
India-WRIS (India-Water Resources Information System). 2016. “Groundwater level data.” Accessed April 12, 2016. http://india-wris.nrsc.gov.in.
Isaaks, E. H., and R. M. Srivastava. 1989. Applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kholghi, M., and S. M. Hosseini. 2009. “Comparison of groundwater level estimation using neuro-fuzzy and ordinary kriging.” Environ. Model. Assess. 14 (6): 729–737.
Long, D., B. R. Scanlon, L. Longuevergne, A. Y. Sun, D. N. Fernando, and H. Save. 2013. “GRACE satellite monitoring of large depletion in water storage in response to the 2011 drought in Texas.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 40 (13): 3395–3401.
Ma, T-S., M. Sophocleous, and Y-S. Yu. 1999. “Geostatistical applications in groundwater modeling in south-central Kansas.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 4 (1): 57–64.
Moore, S., and J. B. Fisher. 2012. “Challenges and opportunities in GRACE-based groundwater storage assessment and management: An example from Yemen.” Water Resour. Manage. 26 (6): 1425–1453.
Morrow, E., J. X. Mitrovica, and G. Fotopoulos. 2011. “Water storage, net precipitation, and evapotranspiration in the Mackenzie River Basin from October 2002 to September 2009 inferred from GRACE satellite gravity data.” J. Hydrometeorol. 12 (3): 467–473.
Nourani, V., A. A Mogaddam, and A. O. Nadiri 2008. “An ANN-based model for spatiotemporal groundwater level forecasting.” Hydrol. Processes 22 (26): 5054–5066.
Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., and P. M. Atkinson. 2007. “Modelling the semivariograms and cross-semivariograms required in downscaling cokriging by numerical convolution-deconvolution.” Comput. Geosci. 33 (10): 1273–1284.
R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Sahoo, S., and M. K. Jha. 2013. “Groundwater-level prediction using multiple linear regression and artificial neural network techniques: A comparative assessment.” Hydrogeol. J. 21 (8): 1865–1887.
SAS Institute. 2011. SAS/STAT 9.3 user’s guide: The mixed procedure. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Scanlon, B. R., L. Longuevergne, and D. Long. 2012. “Ground referencing GRACE satellite estimates of groundwater storage changes in the California Central Valley, USA.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (4): 1–9.
Shiri, J., O. Kisi, H. Yoon, K. K. Lee, and A. H. Nazemi. 2013. “Predicting groundwater level fluctuations with meteorological effect implications: A comparative study among soft computing techniques.” Comput. Geosci. 56: 32–44.
Stein, M. L. 1999. Interpolation of spatial data. New York: Springer.
Strassberg, G., B. R. Scanlon, and M. Rodell. 2007. “Comparison of seasonal terrestrial water storage variations from GRACE with groundwater-level measurements from the High Plains Aquifer (USA).” Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 (14): 1–5.
Sun, A. Y. 2013. “Predicting groundwater level changes using GRACE data.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (1): 1–6.
Tapoglou, E., G. P. Karatzas, I. C. Trichakis, and E. A. Varouchakis. 2014. “A spatio-temporal hybrid neural network-kriging model for groundwater level simulation.” J. Hydrol. 519: 3193–3203.
TRMM-NASA. 2016. “Tropical rainfall measuring mission.” Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Centre, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Accessed March 30, 2016. https://mirador.gsfc.nasa.gov/.
Yeh, P. J., S. C. Swenson, J. S. Famiglietti, and M. Rodell. 2006. “Remote sensing of groundwater storage changes in Illinois using the gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE).” Water Resour. Res. 42 (12): 1–7.
Yoon, H., S.-C. Jun, Y. Hyun, G.-O. Bae, and K.-K. Lee. 2011. “A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer.” J. Hydrol. 396 (1–2): 128–138.
Zelelew, M., and K. Alfredsen. 2014. “Use of cokriging and map correlation to study hydrological response patterns and select reference stream gauges for ungauged catchments.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 19 (2): 388–406.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23Issue 7July 2018

History

Received: Apr 24, 2017
Accepted: Jan 11, 2018
Published online: Apr 23, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 23, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, School of Water Resources, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3552-4691. Email: [email protected]
Anirban Dhar
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India.
Aman Kasot
B. Tech. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India.
Amlanjyoti Kar
Superintending Hydrologist, Central Ground Water Board, Bhujal Bhawan, NH-IV, Faridabad, Haryana 121001, India.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share