Technical Papers
Mar 29, 2018

Modified Channel-Routing Scheme for SWAT Model

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 6

Abstract

Because of its relatively easy quantification in comparison with the variables of other hydrological components, streamflow is an important and primary component for modeling in a watershed study. This study attempts to enhance one of the channel routing tools, the Muskingum routing method (MRM) used in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model. This study advocates its replacement by a well-tested alternative physically based model known as the variable parameter McCarthy-Muskingum (VPMM), capable of varying the routing parameters at every routing interval, and thereby accounting the nonlinear characteristics of flood wave method movement in steep, intermediate, and small slope channels and rivers. However, the routing capability of the VPMM model is subject to the limitation of the inflow hydrograph being characterized by the criterion (1/So)y/x<0.5, where y/x denotes the slope of the longitudinal water surface gradient. A small watershed of approximately 986.9  km2 in the Vansadhara basin of the Odisha state in India with upstream and downstream sites at Gunupur and Kashinagar, respectively, is studied to demonstrate the routing capability of the VPMM scheme in comparison with the MRM, and variable storage routing method (VSRM) routing schemes used in the SWAT model. The routing simulations carried out using these three schemes are evaluated using measures like the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and mean absolute percent error (MAPE). The NSE estimates for VPMM, MRM, and VSRM routing schemes for the calibration and validation period were estimated to be 0.89, 0.92 and 0.91, and 0.72, 0.71, and 0.63, respectively; similarly, the R2 estimates for VPMM, MRM, and VSRM routing schemes for the calibration and validation period were estimated to be 0.89, 0.93 and 0.92, and 0.71, 0.70, and 0.63, respectively. As the performance of the VPMM model is at par with the the MRM routing module of the SWAT model and has a sound physical basis than the MRM routing scheme, it can be recommended that the VPMM routing scheme can be incorporated in the SWAT model for enhancing its routing capability. The added advantage of the VPMM scheme is that it also estimates the stage hydrograph corresponding to the routed discharge hydrograph and thereby increasing the utility of the SWAT model for sediment transport, in-stream nutrient, and operational purposes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The first author of this paper is supported by a fellowship grant from the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), India, for his Master’s dissertation work. All authors are thankful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

Abbaspour, K. C., et al. (2007). “Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT.” J. Hydrol., 333(2), 413–430.
Abbaspour, K. C. (2013). SWAT-CUP 2012: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs: A user manual, Dept. of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modeling (SIAM), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf, Switzerland, 95.
Abbaspour, K. C., Johnson, C. A., and Van Genuchten, M. T. (2004). “Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure.” Vadose Zone J., 3(4), 1340–1352.
Arnold, J. G., et al. (2012). “SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation.” Transactions of the ASABE, 55(4), 1491–1508.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., and Engel, B. A. (1993). Flexible watershed configurations for simulation models, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, TX.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
Cunge, J. A. (1969). “On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method).” J. Hydraul. Res., 7(2), 205–230.
CWC (Central Water Commission). (2017). “East flowing rivers between Mahanadi and Pennar basin, version 2.” ⟨http://www.india-wris.nrsc.gov.in/Publications/BasinReports/East%20Flowing%20Rivers%20between%20Mahanadi%20and%20Pennar%20Basin.pdf⟩ (Jul. 30, 2017).
Gessesse, B., Bewket, W., and Bräuning, A. (2015). “Model-based characterization and monitoring of runoff and soil erosion in response to land use/land cover changes in the Modjo watershed, Ethiopia.” Land Degrad. Dev., 26(7), 711–724.
Guo, H., Hu, Q., and Jiang, T. (2008). “Annual and seasonal streamflows responses to climate and land-cover changes in the Poyang Lake basin, China.” J. Hydrol., 355(1), 106–122.
Isik, S., Kalin, L., Schoonover, J. E., Srivastava, P., and Lockaby, B. G. (2013). “Modeling effects of changing land use/cover on daily stream flow: An artificial neural network and curve number based hybrid approach.” J. Hydrol., 485, 103–112.
Kim, N. W., and Lee, J. (2010). “Enhancement of the channel routing module in SWAT.” Hydrol. Processes, 24(1), 96–107.
NCEP (National Centers for Environmental Prediction). (2017). “Climate forecast system reanalysis.” ⟨http://globalweather.tamu.edu/⟩ (Jul. 30, 2017).
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R. (2011). Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009, Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, TX.
NRSA (National Remote Sensing Agency). (2017). “Cartosat1, version 3R1.” ⟨http://bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/data/download/index.php⟩ (Jul. 30, 2017).
Perumal, M., Moramarco, T., Sahoo, B., and Barbetta, S. (2010). “On the practical applicability of the VPMS routing method for rating curve development at ungauged river sites.” Water Resour. Res., 46(3), W03522.
Perumal, M., and Price, R. K. (2013). “A fully mass conservative variable parameter McCarthy–Muskingum method: Theory and verification.” J. Hydrol., 502, 89–102.
Sajikumar, N., and Remya, R. S. (2015). “Impact of land cover and land use change on runoff characteristics.” J. Environ. Manage., 161, 460–468.
Sen, S., Srivastava, P., Vadas, P. A., and Kalin, L. (2012). “Watershed-level comparison of predictability and sensitivity of two phosphorus models.” J. Environ. Qual., 41(5), 1642–1652.
Srinivasan, R., Tharacad, S. R., Jeffrey, G. A., and Steven, T. B. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part II: Model application.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 91–101.
Swain, R., and Sahoo, B. (2015). “Variable parameter McCarthy-Muskingum flow transport model for compound channels accounting for distributed non-uniform lateral flow.” J. Hydrol., 530, 698–715.
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). (2017). “Landsat L7 ETM+.” ⟨https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/⟩ (Jul. 30, 2017).
Williams, J. R. (1969). “Flood routing with variable travel time or variable storage coefficients.” Transactions of the ASAE, 12(1), 100–103.
WRIS (Water Resources Information System). (2017). ⟨http://www.india-wris.nrsc.gov.in/⟩ (Jul. 30, 2017).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23Issue 6June 2018

History

Received: Mar 4, 2017
Accepted: Nov 21, 2017
Published online: Mar 29, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ashutosh Pati
Research Scholar, School of Water Resources, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Muthiah Perumal
Professor, Dept. of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share