Technical Papers
Feb 16, 2018

GIS-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Watershed Vulnerability in Bernalillo County, New Mexico

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 5

Abstract

Using a semiquantitative analytic hierarchy process (AHP), watershed vulnerability was assessed for Bernalillo County, New Mexico, an area that is characterized by intermittent precipitation events and limited water availability. The model was designed using a multicriteria decision support (MCDS) methodology implemented in a geographic information system (GIS). A vulnerability map was produced by means of a weighted overlay analysis that combined soil erosion and infiltration maps derived from the AHP. Model results were categorized into five vulnerability classes: not vulnerable (N), slightly vulnerable (SV), moderately vulnerable (MV), highly vulnerable (HV), and extremely vulnerable (EV). The results indicate that approximately 83% of the study area is SV to MV, and less than 4% of the area is HV or EV. Shrub land-use classes were identified to experience the most vulnerability. Model output compared similarly with the results predicted by the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) model with the exception of the N class. The eastern portion of the county was identified as most vulnerable because of its high slope and high precipitation. In this large area scenario, structural stormwater control measures (SCMs) may be viable for managing runoff and sediment transport offsite. This MCDS/GIS approach can provide useful information to guide local governments and decision makers in selection of suitable structural and nonstructural SCMs for the arid Southwest.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Agarwal, E., Agarwal, R., Garg, R., and Garg, P. (2013). “Delineation of groundwater potential zone: An AHP/ANP approach.” Earth Syst. Sci., 122(3), 887–898.
Ahamed, T. N., Rao, K. G., and Murthy, J. (2000). “Fuzzy class membership approach to soil erosion modelling.” Agric. Syst., 63(2), 97–110.
Al-Abadi, A., and Al-Shamma’a, A. (2014). “Groundwater potential mapping of the major aquifer in northeastern Missan Governorate, south of Iraq by using analytical hierarchy process and GIS.” J. Environ. Earth Sci., 4(10), 125–149.
Alhassoun, R. (2009). “Studies on factors affecting the infiltration capacity of agricultural soils.” Ph.D. dissertation, Braunschweig Univ. of Technology, Braunschweig, Germany.
Amankwatia, K. (2015). “A GIS-based multi-criteria decision support approach to stormwater best management practices (SCMS): Identifying potential SCM vulnerable sites for effective water conservation and water reuse in Bernalillo County, New Mexico.” M.S. thesis, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM.
ArcGIS version 10.4 [Computer software]. ESRI, Redlands, CA.
Baartman, J. E. M., Jetten, V. G., Ritseman, C. J., and de Vente, J. (2012). “Exploring effects of rainfall intensity and duration on soil erosion at the catchment scale using openLISEM: Prada catchment, SE Spain.” Hydrol. Processes, 26(7), 1034–1049.
Banuelas, R., and Antony, J. (2004). “Modified analytic hierarchy process to incorporate uncertainty and managerial aspects.” Int. J. Production Res. 42(18), 3851–3872.
Black, C. W. (2005). “A geographic information system-based fuzzy logic approach to modeling non-point source pollution critical areas in the Verde watershed, Arizona.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Bulut, G., Cal, M., Richardson, C., and Gallegos, J. (2012). “A GIS-based soil erosion risk map for New Mexico.” World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 3754–3763.
Dicken, L. C. (2011). “An expert system approach to best management practice selection for nominal scale low-impact redevelopments.” Master thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH.
Dlugolecki, L. (2012). Economic benefits of protecting healthy watersheds: A literature review, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Fernandez, D., and Lutz, M. (2010). “Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis.” Eng. Geol., 111, 90–98.
Gautam, M. R., Acharya, K., and Stone, M. (2010). “Best management practices for stormwater management in the desert Southwest.” J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ., 146(1), 39–49.
Glass, J. S., and Todd, M. K. (2010). Polychlorinated biphenyls in stormwater sediments at Bernalillo County, New Mexico, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Ishizaka, A., and Labib, A. (2011). “A review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process.” Expert Syst. Appl., 38(11), 14336–14345.
Kachouri, S., Achour, H., Abida, H., and Bouaziz, S. (2014). “Soil erosion hazard mapping using Analytic Hierarchy Process and logistic regression: A case study of Haffouz watershed, central Tunisia.” Arab. J. Sci., 8(6), 4257–4268.
Kainz, W. (2010). The mathematics of GIS, Univ. of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Krois, J., and Schulte, A. (2014). “GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation to identify potential sites for soil and water conservation techniques in the Ronquillo watershed, northern Peru.” Appl.Geogr., 51, 131–142.
Langbein, W. B., and Schumm, S. A. (1958). “Yield of sediment in relation to mean annual precipitation.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 39(6), 1076–1084.
Lee, J. G., et al. (2012). “A watershed-scale design optimization model for stormwater best management practices.” Environ. Modell. Software, 37, 6–18.
Lun, L., and Leng, P. K. (2010). Does “fuzzifying” AHP improve the quality of multi-attribute decision making? National Univ. of Singapore, Singapore.
Mitra, B., Scott, H., Dixon, J., and McKimmey, J. (1998). “Applications of fuzzy logic to the prediction of soil erosion in a large watershed.” Geoderma, 86, 183–209.
Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., and Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). “Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 49, 54–65.
Nasiri, M. (2013). “GIS modelling for locating the risk zone of soil erosion in deciduous forest.” J. Forest Sci., 59(2), 87–91.
NLCD (National Land Cover Database). (2012). “NLCD 1992 land cover class definitions.” ⟨http://landcover.usgs.gov/classes.php⟩ (Jul. 1, 2015).
Ouma, Y., and Tateishi, R. (2014). “Urban flood vulnerability and risk mapping using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: Methodological overview and case study assessment.” Water, 6(6), 1515–1545.
Qin, H., Burian, S. J., and Edwards, F. G. (2004). Development of a GIS-based stormwater quality management planning tool, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.
Rahman, M. R., Shi, Z. H., and Chongfa, C. (2009). “Soil erosion hazard evaluation: An integrated use of remote sensing, GIS and statistical approaches with biophysical parameters towards management strategies.” Ecol. Modell., 200(13), 1724–1734.
RGIS. (2014). “New Mexico resource geographic information system.” Earth Data Analysis Center, Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.
Rokus, D. (2007). GIS analysis of potential storm water infiltration and runoff modeling for BMP construction in Hadley Valley Watershed, Rochester, Minnesota, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota Central Services Press, Winona, MN.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.” J. Math. Psychol., 15(3), 57–68.
Schertz, D. L. (1983). “The basis for soil loss tolerance.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 38(1), 10–14.
Soil Data Viewer version 6.2 [Computer software]. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
Tarboton, D. (2015). “Terrain analysis using digital elevation models TauDem v.5.3.” ⟨http://hydrology.usu.edu/taudem/taudem5/downloads.html⟩ (May 8, 2015).
TauDEM version 5.3 [Computer software]. Utah State Univ., Logan, UT.
USDA. (2001). “Revised universal soil loss equation V. 2 (RUSLE2) handbook.” ⟨https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs144p2_025079.pdf⟩ (Aug. 3, 2015).
USDA. (2007). Hydrology national engineering handbook, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
USEPA. (2012). The economic benefits of protecting healthy watersheds, Washington, DC.
USGS. (2014). “National map viewer.” ⟨⟩ (Feb. 7, 2018).
Vahidnia, M. H., Alesheikh, A., Alimohammadi, A., and Bassiri, A. (2008). “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process in GIS application.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., 37(B2), 593–596.
Wang, Y., Li, Z., Tang, Z., and Zeng, G. (2011). “A GIS-based spatial multi-criteria approach for flood risk assessment in the Dongting Lake region, Hunan, Central China.” Water Resour Manage, 25(13), 3465–3484.
Weissa, J. L., Gutzlera, D. S., Allred Coonrod, J. E., and Dahmd, C. N. (2004). “Long-term vegetation monitoring with NDVI in a diverse semi-arid setting, central New Mexico, USA.” J. Arid Environ., 58, 248–271.
Xiang, L., Jianzhi, N., and Baoyuan, X. (2014). “The effect of leaf litter cover on surface runoff and soil erosion in Northern China.” PLoS One, 9(9), e107789.
Young, K. D., Tamim, Y., Randel, D. L., David, K. F., and David, L. H. (2010). “Application of the analytic hierarchy process for selecting and modeling stormwater best management practices.” J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ., 146(1), 50–63.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23Issue 5May 2018

History

Received: Jan 30, 2017
Accepted: Oct 13, 2017
Published online: Feb 16, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 16, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

C. P. Richardson [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Mexico Tech, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
K. Amankwatia [email protected]
Application Systems Analyst, City of Eugene, 100 W 10th Ave., #450 Eugene, OR 97401. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share