Case Studies
Dec 8, 2017

Urban Runoff in the U.S. Southwest: Importance of Impervious Surfaces for Small-Storm Hydrology

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 2

Abstract

Impervious surfaces have long been recognized as one of the critical factors influencing the rainfall-runoff relationship in urban areas. Published guidance on how to treat urban imperviousness in hydrologic simulations varies, and few studies exist for the southwestern United States. In recent years, small-storm hydrology has become increasingly important to support water quality evaluations. Methods developed for large, infrequent storms are often applied to simulate runoff from smaller rain events, with questionable results. To test the impact of imperviousness on small-storm runoff, impervious cover in a 1.5-km2 urban basin in central New Mexico was mapped and differentiated into directly connected impervious areas (DCIAs) and unconnected impervious areas (UIAs) that are separated from the drainage system by a pervious buffer. Measured runoff from 25 small-magnitude storms was compared to model scenarios with varying treatment of imperviousness. Simulation results revealed that during small rain events, all runoff originated from DCIAs, while UIAs contributed no flow. For this particular basin with 28% DCIAs and 16% UIAs, losses from UIAs approached a constant value of approximately 4 mm. Findings were applied to a 142-km2 watershed to assess model performance for larger storms. The impact of losses from UIAs on the runoff response decreased with increasing storm magnitude. This study presents a modeling approach for DCIAs and UIAs that increased accuracy for small runoff events in urban areas without negatively affecting model performance for larger storms. Use of this method can improve model predictions, particularly when hydrologic simulations built with flood control in mind are used to assess the impact of more frequent storm events.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Charles Thomas, Andrés Sanchez, and James Service, as well as two anonymous reviewers, for their review and thoughtful comments.

References

Anderson, C. E., Ward, T. J., and Kelly, T. (2005). “Rainfall-runoff in the Albuquerque, New Mexico, area: Measurements, analyses and comparisons.” Proc., EWRI/ASCE 2005 Watershed Management Conf., Managing Watersheds for Human and Natural Impacts: Engineering, Ecological, and Economic Challenges, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10.
ArcGIS [Computer software]. ESRI, Redlands, CA.
Arnaud, P., Lavabre, J., Fouchier, C., Diss, S., and Javelle, P. (2011). “Sensitivity of hydrological models to uncertainty of rainfall input.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 56(3), 397–410.
Arnold, C. L., Jr., and Gibbons, C. J. (1996). “Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator.” J. Am. Plan. Assoc., 62(2), 243–258.
Banasik, K., Krajewski, A., Sikorska, A., and Hejduk, L. (2014). “Curve number estimation for a small urban catchment from recorded rainfall-runoff events.” Arch. Environ. Prot., 40(3), 75–86.
Boyd, M. J., Bufill, M. C., and Knee, R. M. (1993). “Pervious and impervious runoff in urban catchments.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 38(6), 463–478.
Bradley, A. A., Peters-Lidard, C., Nelson, B. R., Smith, J. A., and Young, C. B. (2002). “Raingage network design using NEXRAD precipitation estimates.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38(5), 1393–1407.
Castillo, V. M., Gómez-Plaza, A., and Martínez-Mena, M. (2003). “The role of antecedent soil water content in the runoff response of semiarid catchments: A simulation approach.” J. Hydrol., 284(1–4), 114–130.
Chen, C. (1982). “Closure to ‘Infiltration formulas by curve number procedure’ by Cheng-Iung Chen.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 347–352.
Clark County Regional Flood Control District. (1999). “Hydrologic criteria and drainage design manual.” Las Vegas.
CoRR (City of Rio Rancho). (2009). Development manual. Volume II: Design criteria, Rio Rancho, NM.
Cronshey, R., McCuen, R. H., Miller, N., Rawls, W., Robbins, S., and Woodward, D. (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.”, USDA, Washington, DC.
D’Asaro, F., and Grillone, G. (2012). “Empirical investigation of curve number method parameters in the Mediterranean area.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1141–1152.
Dortignac, E. J. (1956). “Watershed resources and problems of the upper Rio Grande Basin.” Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
Fan, F., Deng, Y., Hu, X., and Weng, Q. (2013). “Estimating composite curve number using an improved SCS-CN method with remotely sensed variables in Guangzhou, China.” Remote Sens., 5(3), 1425–1438.
Fennessey, L. A. J., Miller, A. C., and Hamlett, J. M. (2001). “Accuracy and precision of NRCS models for small watersheds.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(4), 899–911.
Fitzjohn, C., Ternan, J. L., and Williams, A. G. (1998). “Soil moisture variability in a semi-arid gully catchment: Implications for runoff and erosion control.” Catena, 32(1), 55–70.
FLO-2D [Computer software]. FLO-2D Software, Inc., Nutrioso, AZ.
GAGEINTERP [Computer software]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
Garen, D. C., and Moore, D. S. (2005). “Curve number hydrology in water quality modeling: Uses, abuses, and future directions.” J. Am. Water Resour. Asssoc., 41(2), 377–388.
Golding, B. L. (1997). “Discussions and closure: Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?” J. Hydrol. Eng., 145–148.
Hagen, V. K. (1995). “Small urban watershed use of hydrologic procedures.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1471, 47–53.
HEC-1 [Computer software]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
HEC-GeoHMS [Computer software]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
HEC-HMS version 4.0 [Computer software]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
HEC-RAS version 4.1 [Computer software]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
Heggen, R. J. (1987). “Split ring infiltration basic data collection and interpretation.” Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority, Albuquerque, NM.
Hjalmarson, H. W., and Phillips, J. V. (1997). “Potential effects of translatory waves on estimation of peak flows.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 571–575.
Hjelmfelt, A. T. (1991). “Investigation of curve number procedure.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 725–737.
Jayakrishnan, R., Srinivasan, R., and Arnold, J. G. (2004). “Comparison of raingage and WSR 88D stage III precipitation data of over Texas Gulf basin.” J. Hydrol., 292(1), 135–152.
Ladson, A. R., Walsh, C. J., and Fletcher, T. D. (2006). “Improving stream health in urban areas by reducing runoff frequency from impervious surfaces.” Aust. J. Water Resour., 10(1), 23–33.
Lee, J. G., and Heaney, J. P. (2003). “Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impact on storm water systems.” J. Water Res., 419–426.
Mishra, S. K., and Kansal, A. K. (2014). “A procedure for determination of design runoff curve number for a watershed.” J. Indian Water Resour. Soc., 34(3), 46–56.
Mishra, S. K., Pandey, A., and Singh, V. P. (2012). “Special issue on soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1157.
Mishra, S. K., and Singh, V. P. (2004). “Validity and extension of the SCS-CN method for computing infiltration and rainfall-excess rates.” Hydrol. Process., 18(17), 3323–3345.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
NDOT (Nevada Department of Transportation). (2006). Drainage manual, Carson City, NV.
Neary, V. S., Habib, E., and Fleming, M. (2004). “Hydrologic modeling with NEXRAD precipitation in middle Tennessee.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 339–349.
NJDEP (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection). (2004). “New Jersey stormwater best management practices manual.” Trenton, NJ.
NMDOT (New Mexico Department of Transportation). (1995). “Drainage manual. Volume 1: Hydrology.” Santa Fe, NM.
NMOSE (New Mexico Office of the State Engineer). (2008). “Hydrologic analysis for dams.” ⟨http://www.ose.state.nm.us/DS/dsReferences.php⟩ (Jun. 16, 2016).
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2016a). “NEXRAD data archive, inventory and access.” National Centers for Environmental Information, ⟨https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/nexradinv/index.jsp⟩ (Dec. 20, 2016).
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2016b). “NOAA atlas 14 point precipitation frequency estimates: NM.” ⟨http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=nm⟩ (Oct. 3, 2016).
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2016c). “U.S. annual climatological summaries.” ⟨https://data.noaa.gov/dataset/u-s-annual-climatological-summaries⟩ (Sep. 20, 2016).
Obled, C., Wendling, J., and Beven, K. (1994). “The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns: An evaluation using observed data.” J. Hydrol., 159(1–4), 305–333.
Oliveira, P. T. S., et al. (2016). “Curve number estimation from Brazilian Cerrado rainfall and runoff data.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 71(5), 420–429.
Pitt, R. E. (1999). “Small storm hydrology and why it is important for the design of stormwater control practices.” J. Water Manage. Model., 7, 61–91.
Ponce, V., and Hawkins, R. (1996). “Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?” J. Hydrol. Eng., 11–19.
Royem, A. A., Mui, C. K., Fuka, D. R., and Walter, M. T. (2012). “Proposing a low-tech, affordable, accurate stream stage monitoring system.” Trans. ASABE, 55(6), 1–6.
Sabol, G. V., Ward, T. J., and Seiger, A. D. (1982). “Comparison of infiltration characteristics for selected soils in the Albuquerque, New Mexico area.” Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority, Albuquerque, NM.
Schoener, G. (2016). “Quantifying transmission losses in a New Mexico ephemeral stream: A losing proposition.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 05016038.
Schueler, T. R. (1994). “The importance of imperviousness.” Watershed Protect. Tech., 1(3), 100–111.
Schueler, T. R., Fraley-McNeal, L., and Cappiella, K. (2008). “Is impervious cover still important? Review of recent research.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 309–315.
Shuster, W., Bonta, J., Thurston, H., Warnemuende, E., and Smith, D. R. (2005). “Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review.” Urban Water J., 2(4), 263–275.
SWMM [Computer software]. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Tramblay, Y., Bouvier, C., Martin, C., Didon-Lescot, J., Todorovik, D., and Domergue, J. (2010). “Assessment of initial soil moisture conditions for event-based rainfall-runoff modelling.” J. Hydrol., 387(3–4), 176–187.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). (2000). “Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS technical reference manual.” Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). (2013). “Hydrologic Modeling System user’s manual version 4.0.” Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
USDA. (1954). National engineering handbook, Section 4, hydrology, Washington, DC.
USDA. (1985). National engineering handbook, Section 4, hydrology, Washington, DC.
USDA. (2004). “Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall.” Chapter 10, Part 630, National engineering handbook, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
USDA. (2016). “Web soil survey.” ⟨http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/⟩ (Oct. 3, 2016).
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2016). “Summary of state post construction stormwater standards.” ⟨https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016…/swstdsummary_7-13-16_508.pdf⟩ (May 29, 2017).
Ward, T. J., and Bolton, S. M. (2010). “Of rainfall simulators, infiltration rates, and curve numbers: A southwest experience.” Proc., ASCE 2010 Watershed Management Conf., Innovations in Watershed Management under Land Use and Climate Change, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1362–1373.
WinTR-20 [Computer software]. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
Young, C. B., Bradley, A., Krajewski, W., Kruger, A., and Morrissey, M. (2000). “Evaluating NEXRAD multisensor precipitation estimates for operational hydrologic forecasting.” J. Hydrometeorol., 1(3), 241–254.
Zhou, S. M., Warrington, D. N., Lei, T. W., and Lei, Q. X. (2015). “Modified CN method for small watershed infiltration simulation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04014095.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23Issue 2February 2018

History

Received: Nov 10, 2016
Accepted: Jul 31, 2017
Published online: Dec 8, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 8, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Hydrologist, Southern Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority, 1041 Commercial Dr. SE, Rio Rancho, NM 87124. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1183-0419. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share