Improved Understanding of River Ice Processes Using Global Sensitivity Analysis Approaches
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 11
Abstract
The high impact of river ice phenomena on the hydrology of cold regions has led to the extensive use of numerical models in simulating and predicting river ice processes. Consequently, there is a need to utilize efficient and robust sensitivity analysis (SA) methods to characterize the role of different parameters on the functioning of these models. To gain greater insight into how the internal parameters affect a river ice model’s behavior, this paper presents a comparative performance investigation of the two global SA methods: (1) the recently proposed variogram analysis of response surfaces (VARS); and (2) the widely used regional sensitivity analysis (RSA). The methods were benchmarked on a one-dimensional hydrodynamic river ice model of the Lower Dauphin River, Manitoba, Canada. Furthermore, using a bootstrapping strategy, a procedure was developed to estimate confidence intervals on the resulting sensitivity indices and evaluate reliability of the inferred parameter rankings. Results show that (1) the water levels simulated by the river ice model are most sensitive to the ice cover characteristics (i.e., porosity and thickness at the ice cover front) and upstream discharge; (2) the hydraulic roughness parameters and slush ice properties (i.e., porosity and thickness of the slush pans) are medium- and low-sensitivity parameters, respectively; (3) the VARS and RSA methods provide contradictory assessments regarding the sensitivity of the model output to variations in the slush ice porosity and ice roughness parameters; and (4) the VARS method appears to be superior to RSA in terms of generating robust estimates of the parameter sensitivity rankings.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The first author was partially supported by the scholarship provided by the School of Environment and Sustainability through the Canada Excellence Research Chair in Water Security at the University of Saskatchewan. The authors would like to thank the Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) for the financial support of this project.
References
Aghaji Zare, S. G., Moore, S. A., Rennie, C. D., Seidou, O., Ahmari, H., and Malenchak, J. (2015). “Boundary shear stress in an ice-covered river during breakup.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 142(4), 04015065.
Beltaos, S. (1993). “Transport and mixing processes.” Environmental aspects of river ice, T. D. Prowse and N. C. Gridley, eds., National Hydrology Research Institute, Saskatoon, Canada, 31–42.
Beltaos, S., and Prowse, T. (2009). “River-ice hydrology in a shrinking cryosphere.” Hydrol. Processes, 23(1), 122–144.
Carson, R. W., et al. (2001). “Tests of river ice jam models.” Proc., 11th Workshop on River Ice, Canadian Committee on River Ice Processes and the Environment, CGU-HS, Ottawa, 39–55.
Chen, F., Shen, H., and Jayasundara, N. (2006). “A one-dimensional comprehensive river ice model.” Proc., 18th Int. Association of Hydraulic Research Symp. on Ice, IAHR, Vancouver, Canada, 61–68.
Cressie, N. A. C. (1993). Statistics for spatial data, Revised Ed., Wiley, New York.
EC (Environment Canada). (2013). “RIVICE model—User’s manual.” ⟨http://giws.usask.ca/rivice/Manual/RIVICE_Manual_2013-01-11.pdf⟩ (Nov. 20, 2016).
Efron, B. (1979). “Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife.” Ann. Stat., 7(1), 1–26.
Efron, B. (1982). The Jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans, SIAM, Philadelphia.
Ettema, R., and Daly, S. F. (2004). “Sediment transport under ice.”, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, NH.
Fraga, I., Cea, L., Puertas, J., Suárez, J., Jiménez, V., and Jácome, A. (2016). “Global sensitivity and GLUE-based uncertainty analysis of a 2D-1D dual urban drainage model.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04016004.
Fu, C., Popescu, I., Wang, C., Mynett, A. E., and Zhang, F. (2014). “Challenges in modelling river flow and ice regime on the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reach of the Yellow River, China.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18(3), 1225–1237.
Gupta, H., and Razavi, S. (2017). “Challenges and future outlook of sensitivity analysis.” Sensitivity analysis in earth observation modelling, G. Petropoulos and P. Srivastava, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 397–415.
Haghnegahdar, A., and Razavi, S. (2017). “Insights into sensitivity analysis of earth and environmental systems models: On the impact of parameter perturbation scale.” Environ. Modell. Software, 95, 115–131.
Hall, J., Boyce, S., Wang, Y., Dawson, R., Tarantola, S., and Saltelli, A. (2009). “Sensitivity analysis for hydraulic models.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 959–969.
Hicks, F. (2009). “An overview of river ice problems: CRIPE07 guest editorial.” Cold. Reg. Sci. Technol., 55(2), 175–185.
Hicks, F., Andrishak, R., and She, Y. (2006). “Modeling thermal and dynamic river ice processes.” Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Cold Regions Engineering, Davies, M. and Zufelt, J. E., eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–11.
Holtschlag, D., and Grewal, M. (1998). “Estimating ice-affected streamflow by extended Kalman filtering.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 174–181.
Hornberger, G., and Spear, R. (1981). “Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems.” J. Environ. Manage., 12, 7–18.
Lal, A., and Shen, H. (1991). “Mathematical model for river ice processes.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 851–867.
Lindenschmidt, K. E., and Chun, K. P. (2013). “Evaluating the impact of fluvial geomorphology on river ice cover formation based on a global sensitivity analysis of a river ice model.” Can. J. Civil. Eng., 40(7), 623–632.
Lindenschmidt, K. E., and Sereda, J. (2014). “The impact of macrophytes on winter flows along the Upper Qu’Appelle River.” Can. Water. Resour. J., 39(3), 342–355.
Lindenschmidt, K. E., Sydor, M., and Carson, R. (2012). “Modelling ice cover formation of a lake-river system with exceptionally high flows (Lake St. Martin and Dauphin River, Manitoba).” Cold. Reg. Sci. Technol., 82, 36–48.
Lindenschmidt, K. E., Sydor, M., Carson, R., and Harrison, R. (2011). “Ice jam modelling of the Red River in Winnipeg.” Proc., 16th CRIPE Workshop on the Hydraulics of Ice Covered Rivers, Winnipeg, Canada, 274–290.
Ohara, N., Jang, S., Kure, S., Richard Chen, Z. Q., and Kavvas, M. L. (2014). “Modeling of interannual snow and ice storage in high-altitude regions by dynamic equilibrium concept.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04014034.
Prowse, T. D. (2001). “River-ice ecology. II: Biological aspects.” J. Cold Reg. Eng., 17–33.
Razavi, S., and Gupta, H. V. (2015). “What do we mean by sensitivity analysis? The need for comprehensive characterization of “global” sensitivity in Earth and Environmental systems models.” Water. Resour. Res., 51(5), 3070–3092.
Razavi, S., and Gupta, H. V. (2016a). “A new framework for comprehensive, robust, and efficient global sensitivity analysis. 1: Theory.” Water. Resour. Res., 52(1), 423–439.
Razavi, S., and Gupta, H. V. (2016b). “A new framework for comprehensive, robust, and efficient global sensitivity analysis. 2: Application.” Water. Resour. Res., 52(1), 440–455.
Saltelli, A., and Annoni, P. (2010). “How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis.” Environ. Modell. Software, 25(12), 1508–1517.
Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., and Tarantola, S. (2010). “Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index.” Comput. Phys. Commun., 181(2), 259–270.
Sheikholeslami, R., and Razavi, S. (2017). “Progressive Latin hypercube sampling: An efficient approach for robust sampling-based analysis of environmental models.” Environ. Modell. Software, 93, 109–126.
Shen, H., Wang, D., and Lal, A. (1995). “Numerical simulation of river ice processes.” J. Cold Reg. Eng., 107–118.
Shen, H. T., Liu, L., and Chen, Y. C. (2001). “River ice dynamics and ice jam modeling.” Proc., IUTAM Symp. on Scaling Laws in Ice Mechanics and Ice Dynamics, J. P. Dempsey and H. H. Shen, eds., Springer, Dordrecht, 349–362.
Song, X., Zhang, J., Zhan, C., Xuan, Y., Ye, M., and Xu, C. (2015). “Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications.” J. Hydrol., 523, 739–757.
Stephens, M. A. (1992). “Introduction to Kolmogorov (1933) on the empirical determination of a distribution.” Breakthroughs in statistics. Springer series in statistics (perspectives in statistics), Kotz, G. and Johnson, N. L., eds., Springer, New York.
Tang, Y., Reed, P., Wagener, T., and Van Werkhoven, K. (2007). “Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(2), 793–817.
Vuyovich, C., Daly, S., Gagnon, J., Weyrick, P., and Zaitsoff, M. (2009). “Monitoring river ice conditions using web-based cameras.” J. Cold Reg. Eng., 1–17.
Xiong, F., and Xu, G. (2009). “Numerical investigation of river ice-bridge pier interaction.” Proc., 2009 Structures Congress: Don't Mess with Structural Engineers Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10.
Yang, J. (2011). “Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis.” Environ. Modell. Software, 26(4), 444–457.
Zufelt, J., and Walton, R. (2012). “A river ice management plan for the Gyeong-In Ara waterway.” Proc., Cold Regions Engineering 2012: Sustainable Infrastructure Development in a Changing Cold Environment, ASCE, Reston, VA, 264–274.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22 • Issue 11 • November 2017
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 26, 2016
Accepted: May 3, 2017
Published online: Aug 19, 2017
Published in print: Nov 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Jan 19, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.