Technical Papers
Jul 17, 2017

Watershed Classification Using Isomap Technique and Hydrometeorological Attributes

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 10

Abstract

Classification of watersheds into hydrologically similar groups prior to regionalization is essential for predicting streamflow in ungauged basins. The objective of this study was to improve the efficiency of classification for finding hydrologically similar watersheds by applying dimensionality reduction techniques. A new nonlinear dimensionality reduction technique called Isomap is applied for the first time along with nonlinear principal component analysis (NLPCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) to improve the efficiency of watershed classification. The dimensionality reduction techniques were applied to the selected attributes of 68 watersheds of the Arkansas-White-Red River basins and the Lower Mississippi River in the United States. The resulting reduced dimensions were used to classify the 68 watersheds into five homogenous groups, using a threshold of 90% accounted variance of the original data by K-means cluster analysis (KCA). In order to validate the results of classification, reference groups of watersheds identified using the runoff signatures of the 68 watersheds were compared with the classification results obtained using Isomap, NLPCA, and PCA employing a modified method of calculating the similarity index. Statistics of the sample distribution of the similarity index were used to analyze the efficiency of each technique. It was observed that the Isomap technique performed better than NLPCA or PCA for classification of watersheds, finding with the most hydrologically homogenous watersheds in each classification group. This study shows that the Isomap technique can be effectively used to extract and preserve the underlying essential structure of the watershed data that are relevant for hydrological processes to obtain more accurate watershed classification.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The first author sincerely acknowledges the contributions of Dr. Deepashree Raje for this work. The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their constructive comments, which improved the manuscript.

References

ArcGIS [Computer software]. ESRI, Redlands, CA.
ARCmap [Computer software]. ESRI, Redlands, CA.
Bloschl, G., and Sivapalan, M. (1995). “Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review.” Hydrol. Processes, 9(3–4), 251–290.
Borg, I., and Groenen, P. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling. Theory and applications, Springer, New York.
Boscarello, L., Ravazzani, G., Cislaghi, A., and Mancini, M. (2015). “Regionalization of flow-duration curves through catchment classification with streamflow signatures and physiographic–climate indices.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 05015027.
Böttcher, S., Merz, C., Lischeid, G., and Dannowski, R. (2014). “Using Isomap to differentiate between anthropogenic and natural effects on groundwater dynamics in a complex geological setting.” J. Hydrol., 519(B), 1634–1641.
Burn, D. H., and Boorman, D. B. (1993). “Estimation of hydrological parameters at ungauged catchments.” J. Hydrol., 143(3–4), 429–454.
Chiang, S. M., Tsay, T. K., and Nix, S. J. (2002a). “Hydrologic regionalization of watersheds. I: Methodology development.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 3–11.
Chiang, S. M., Tsay, T. K., and Nix, S. J. (2002b). “Hydrologic regionalization of watersheds. II: Applications.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 12–20.
Cybenko, G. (1989). “Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoid function.” Math. Control Signal Syst., 2(4), 303–314.
Davies, D. L., and Bouldin, D. W. (1979). “A cluster separation measure.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1(2), 224–227.
Di Prinzio, M., Castellarin, A., and Toth, E. (2011). “Data-driven catchment classification: Application to the PUB problem.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(6), 1921–1935.
Farsadnia, F., et al. (2014). “Identification of homogeneous regions for regionalization of watersheds by two-level self-organizing feature maps.” J. Hydrol., 509, 387–397.
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., and Jarvis, A. (2005). “Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas.” Int. J. Climatol., 25(15), 1965–1978.
Hosking, J., and Wallis, J. (1997). Regional frequency analysis: An approach based on L-moments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Hsieh, W. W. (2001). “Nonlinear principal component analysis by neural networks.” J. Tellus A Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 53(5), 599–615.
Hsieh, W. W. (2007). “Nonlinear principal component analysis of noisy data.” Neural Networks, 20(4), 434–443.
Kahya, E., Demirel, M. C., and Bég, O. A. (2008). “Hydrologic homogeneous regions using monthly streamflow in Turkey.” Earth Sci. Res. J., 12(2), 181–193.
Kokkonen, T. S., Jakeman, A. J., Young, P. C., and Koivusalo, H. J. (2003). “Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: Model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina.” Hydrol. Processes, 17(11), 2219–2238.
Kramer, M. A. (1991). “Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks.” AIChE J., 37(2), 233–243.
Merz, R., and Blöschl, G. (2004). “Regionalisation of catchment model parameters.” J. Hydrol., 287(1–4), 95–123.
Monahan, A. H. (2000). “Nonlinear principal component analysis by neural networks: Theory and application to the Lorenz system.” J. Clim., 13(4), 821–835.
Nathan, R. J., and McMahon, T. A. (1990). “Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalisation.” J. Hydrol., 121(1), 217–238.
Olden, J. D., and Poff, N. L. (2003). “Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes.” River Res. Appl., 19(2), 101–121.
Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G. (2005). “A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 2(2), 509–542.
Rao, A. R., and Srinivas, V. V. (2006). “Regionalization of watersheds by hybrid-cluster analysis.” J. Hydrol., 318(1–4), 37–56.
Razavi, T., and Coulibaly, P. (2013a). “Classification of Ontario watersheds based on physical attributes and streamflow series.” J. Hydrol., 493, 81–94.
Razavi, T., and Coulibaly, P. (2013b). “Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: Review of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 958–975.
Razavi, T., and Coulibaly, P. (2017). “An evaluation of regionalization and watershed classification schemes for continuous daily streamflow prediction in ungauged watersheds.” Can. Water Resour. J., 42(1), 2–20.
Samuel, J., Coulibaly, P., and Metcalfe, R. A. (2011). “Estimation of continuous streamflow in Ontario ungauged basins: Comparison of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 447–459.
Sankarasubramanian, A., Vogel, R. M., and Limbrunner, J. M. (2001). “Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States.” Water Resour. Res., 37(6), 1771–1781.
Satyanarayana, P., and Srinivas, V. V. (2008). “Regional frequency analysis of precipitation using large-scale atmospheric variables.” J. Geophys. Res., 113(D24), D24110.
Sawicz, K., Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., and Carrillo, G. (2011). “Catchment classification: Empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8(3), 4495–4534.
Sivapalan, M., et al. (2003). “IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(6), 857–880.
Ssegane, H., Tollner, E. W., Mohamoud, Y. M., Rasmussen, T. C., and Dowd, J. F. (2012). “Advances in variable selection methods. I: Causal selection methods versus stepwise regression and principal component analysis on data of known and unknown functional relationships.” J. Hydrol., 438, 16–25.
Tenenbaum, J. B., De Silva, V., and Langford, J. B. (2000). “A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction.” Science, 290(5500), 2319–2323.
Trabucco, A., and Zomer, R. J. (2009). “Global aridity index (global-aridity) and global potential evapo-transpiration (Global-PET) geospatial database.” ⟨http://www.csi.cgiar.org⟩ (Jul. 12, 2013).
Viglione, A. (2009). “Software for regional frequency analysis: The R package nsRFA.” Proc., EGU General Assembly Conf., Toulouse, France.
Vogel, R. M., and Fennessey, N. M. (1994). “Flow-duration curves. I: New interpretation and confidence intervals.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 485–504.
Vogel, R. M., and Fennessey, N. M. (1995). “Flow duration curves. II: A review of applications in water resources planning.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 31(6), 1029–1039.
Weyer, C., Peiffer, S., Schulze, K., Borken, W., and Lischeid, G. (2014). “Catchments as heterogeneous and multi-species reactors: An integral approach for identifying biogeochemical hot-spots at the catchment scale.” J. Hydrol., 519, 1560–1571.
Yadav, M., Wagener, T., and Gupta, H. (2007). “Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(8), 1756–1774.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22Issue 10October 2017

History

Received: May 31, 2016
Accepted: Apr 11, 2017
Published online: Jul 17, 2017
Published in print: Oct 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Dec 17, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ganvir Kanishka [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India. E-mail: [email protected]
T. I. Eldho [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share