Technical Papers
Apr 11, 2017

Establishing a Numerical Modeling Framework for Hydrologic Engineering Analyses of Extreme Storm Events

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 8

Abstract

In this study, a numerical modeling framework for simulating extreme storm events was established using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Such a framework is necessary for the derivation of engineering parameters such as probable maximum precipitation that are the cornerstone of large water-management infrastructure design. Here, this framework was built based on a heavy storm that occurred in Nashville, Tennessee (U.S.), in 2010, and verified using two other extreme storms. To achieve the optimal setup, several combinations of model resolutions, initial/boundary conditions (IC/BC), cloud microphysics, and cumulus parameterization schemes were evaluated using multiple metrics of precipitation characteristics. The evaluation suggests that WRF is most sensitive to the IC/BC option. Simulation generally benefits from finer resolutions up to 5 km. At the 15 km level, NCEP2 IC/BC produces better results, whereas NAM IC/BC performs best at the 5 km level. The recommended model configuration from this study is: NAM or NCEP2 IC/BC (depending on data availability), 15 km or 15–5 km nested grids, Morrison microphysics, and Kain-Fritsch cumulus schemes. Validation of the optimal framework suggests that these options are good starting choices for modeling extreme events similar to the test cases. This optimal framework is proposed in response to emerging engineering demands of extreme storm event forecasting and analyses for design, operations, and risk assessment of large water infrastructures.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study is motivated by an ASCE Task Committee on “Infrastructure Impacts of Landscape-Driven Weather Change” chaired by the second author. Therein, model-based PMPs are currently being explored for modernizing current engineering practice of PMPs based on storms many decades old. The first author was supported by NASA grant NNAX15AC63G. Dr. Ruby Leung acknowledges the support from the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research as part of the Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract DE-AC05-76RLO1830.

References

Abbs, D. J. (1999). “A numerical modeling study to investigate the assumptions used in the calculation of probable maximum precipitation.” Water Resour. Res., 35(3), 785–796.
Bennett, N. D., et al. (2013). “Characterising performance of environmental models.” Environ. Modell. Software, 40, 1–20.
Casagli, N., Dapporto, S., Ibsen, M. L., Tofani, V., and Vannocci, P. (2006). “Analysis of the landslide triggering mechanism during the storm of 20th–21st November 2000, in northern Tuscany.” Landslides, 3(1), 13–21.
Chang, H. I., Kumar, A., Niyogi, D., Mohanty, U. C., Chen, F., and Dudhia, J. (2009). “The role of land surface processes on the mesoscale simulation of the July 26, 2005 heavy rain event over Mumbai, India.” Global Planetary Change, 67(1), 87–103.
Chen, X., and Hossain, F. (2016). “Revisiting extreme storms of the past 100 years for future safety of large water management infrastructures.” Earth’s Future, 4(7), 306–322.
Cong, X., Ni, G., Hui, S., Tian, F., and Zhang, T. (2006). “Simulative analysis on storm flood in typical urban region of Beijing based on SWMM.” Water Resour. Hydropower Eng., 37(4), 64–67.
Del Genio, A. D., Kovari, W., Yao, M. S., and Jonas, J. (2005). “Cumulus microphysics and climate sensitivity.” J. Clim., 18(13), 2376–2387.
Durkee, J. D., et al. (2012). “A synoptic perspective of the record 1–2 May 2010 mid-south heavy precipitation event.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93(5), 611–620.
Evans, J. E., Mackey, S. D., Gottgens, J. F., and Gill, W. M. (2000). “Lessons from a dam failure.” Ohio J. Sci., 100(5), 121–131.
Giannaros, T. M., Kotroni, V., and Lagouvardos, K. (2016). “WRF-LTNGDA: A lightning data assimilation technique implemented in the WRF model for improving precipitation forecasts.” Environ. Modell. Software, 76, 54–68.
Grell, G. A., and Freitas, S. R. (2014). “A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling.” Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14(10), 5233–5250.
Hershfield, D. M. (1965). “Method for estimating probable maximum rainfall.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 57(8), 965–972.
Huschke, R. E. (1959). Glossary of meteorology, American Meteorological Society, Boston.
Kumar, A., Dudhia, J., Rotunno, R., Niyogi, D., and Mohanty, U. C. (2008). “Analysis of the 26 July 2005 heavy rain event over Mumbai, India using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model.” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 134(636), 1897–1910.
Kunkel, K. E., et al. (2013). “Probable maximum precipitation and climate change.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 40(7), 1402–1408.
Laprise, R. (1992). “The Euler equations of motion with hydrostatic pressure as an independent variable.” Monthly Weather Rev., 120(1), 197–207.
Liu, J., Bray, M., and Han, D. (2012). “Sensitivity of the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model to downscaling ratios and storm types in rainfall simulation.” Hydrol. Process., 26(20), 3012–3031.
Livneh, B., et al. (2013). “A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States: Update and extensions.” J. Clim., 26(23), 9384–9392.
Mahoney, K. (2013). “The impact of model physics and upstream moisture sources on the May 2010 Tennessee flooding event: An examination of precipitation and surface hydrology.” ⟨http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/workshops/WS2013/posters/p90.pdf⟩ (Apr. 3, 2016).
Moore, B. J., Neiman, P. J., Ralph, F. M., and Barthold, F. E. (2012). “Physical processes associated with heavy flooding rainfall in Nashville, Tennessee, and vicinity during 1–2 May 2010: The role of an atmospheric river and mesoscale convective systems.” Monthly Weather Rev., 140(2), 358–378.
Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V. (2009). “Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes.” Monthly Weather Rev., 137(3), 991–1007.
NWSWFO (National Weather Service and Weather Forecast Office). (2010). “May 2010 flood.” ⟨https://www.weather.gov/ohx/may2010flood⟩ (Apr. 3, 2015).
Pennelly, C., Reuter, G., and Flesch, T. (2014). “Verification of the WRF model for simulating heavy precipitation in Alberta.” Atmos. Res., 135–136, 172–192.
Rajeevan, M., Kesarkar, A., Thampi, S. B., Rao, T. N., Radhakrishna, B., and Rajasekhar, M. (2010). “Sensitivity of WRF cloud microphysics to simulations of a severe thunderstorm event over southeast India.” Ann. Geophys., 28(2), 603–619.
Rao, Y. V. R., Hatwar, H. R., Salah, A. K., and Sudhakar, Y. (2007). “An experiment using the high resolution ETA and WRF models to forecast heavy precipitation over India.” Pure Appl. Geophys., 164(8–9), 1593–1615.
Schreiner, L. C., and Riedel, J. T. (1978). “Probable maximum precipitation estimates, United States east of the 105th meridian.” Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC.
Sikder, S., and Hossain, F. (2016). “Assessment of the weather research and forecasting model generalized parameterization schemes for advancement of precipitation forecasting in monsoon-driven river basins.” J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 8(3), 1210–1228.
Skamarock, W. C., et al. (2008). “A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR technical note.”, Boulder, CO.
Stensrud, D. J. (2009). Parameterization schemes: Keys to understanding numerical weather prediction models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Stratz, S. A., and Hossain, F. (2014). “Probable maximum precipitation in a changing climate: Implications for dam design.” J. Hydrol. Eng., .
Tan, E. (2010). “Development of a methodology for probable maximum precipitation estimation over the American River watershed using the WRF model.” Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Vaidya, S. S., and Kulkarni, J. R. (2007). “Simulation of heavy precipitation over Santacruz, Mumbai on 26 July 2005, using mesoscale model.” Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 98(1-2), 55–66.
Winters, A. C., and Martin, J. E. (2014). “The role of a polar/subtropical jet superposition in the May 2010 Nashville flood.” Weather Forecasting, 29(4), 954–974.
WMO (World Meteorological Organization). (1986). “Manual for estimation of probable maximum precipitation.”, Geneva.
Zhang, G. J., and McFarlane, N. A. (1995). “Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian climate centre general circulation model.” Atmos.-Ocean, 33(3), 407–446.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22Issue 8August 2017

History

Received: Jun 4, 2016
Accepted: Jan 19, 2017
Published online: Apr 11, 2017
Published in print: Aug 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Sep 11, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xiaodong Chen, S.M.ASCE
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, More Hall 201, Seattle, WA 98195.
Faisal Hossain, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, More Hall 201, Seattle, WA 98195 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
L. Ruby Leung
Laboratory Fellow, Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Blvd., Richland, WA 99352.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share