Technical Papers
Feb 24, 2017

Streamflow Estimation in Ungauged Catchments Using Regional Flow Duration Curve: Comparative Study

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 7

Abstract

The study presents a comparative assessment of regionalization approaches for streamflow estimation at ungauged catchments that are independent of any hydrological models. Four regionalization techniques including area-index, inverse distance weighted (IDW), kriging, and stepwise regression were applied on 32 catchments in India to estimate daily streamflow. Each catchment was considered as ungauged in turn during regionalization. The area-index method was dependent upon the drainage area of the catchment, whereas stepwise regression method was based on the hydroclimatological and morphological attributes of the catchments. IDW and kriging were based on spatial distance between the donor and receiver catchments. The performance of each regional model was evaluated in terms of Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), root-mean square error (RMSE)–observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) and percent bias (PBIAS). The results obtained from IDW and kriging were found to be superior to other techniques. An average NSE value of 0.6 was found to be better for these two methods than other approaches. The area-index method performed the worst, maybe due to the fact that it considers only drainage area.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the IMD and CWC, India for providing the hydroclimatological data required for this study.

References

Abbaspour, K. C. (2015). “SWAT-CUP: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs—A user manual.” Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
Abbaspour, K. C., Rouholahnejad, E., Vaghefi, S., Srinivasan, R., Yang, H., and Kløve, B. (2015). “A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model.” J. Hydrol., 524, 733–752.
Bárdossy, A. (2007). “Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(2), 703–710.
Batjes, N. H. (2015). “World soil property estimates for broad-scale modelling (WISE30sec).”, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Besaw, L. E., Rizzo, D. M., Bierman, P. R., and Hackett, W. R. (2010). “Advances in ungauged streamflow prediction using artificial neural networks.” J. Hydrol., 386(1–4), 27–37.
Beven, K. J. (2000). “Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4(2), 203–213.
Blöschl, G., and Sivapalan, M. (1995). “Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review.” Hydrol. Process., 9(3–4), 251–290.
Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Wagener, T., Viglione, A., and Savenije, H. (2013). Runoff prediction in ungauged basins: Synthesis across processes, places and scales, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Boscarello, L., Ravazzani, G., Cislaghi, A., and Mancini, M. (2016). “Regionalization of flow-duration curves through catchment classification with streamflow signatures and physiographic-climate indices.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 21(3), .
Buttle, J. M., and Eimers, M. C. (2009). “Scaling and physiographic controls on streamflow behaviour on the Precambrian Shield, south-central Ontario.” J. Hydrol., 374(3–4), 360–372.
Castellarin, A., Galeati, G., Brandimarte, L., Montanari, A., and Brath, A. (2004). “Regional flow-duration curves: Reliability for ungauged basins.” Adv. Water Resour., 27(10), 953–965.
Chiang, S. M., Tsay, T. K., and Nix, S. J. (2002). “Hydrologic regionalization of watersheds. I: Methodology development.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 3–11.
Doulatyari, B., Betterle, A., Basso, S., Biswal, B., Schirmer, M., and Botter, G. (2015). “Predicting streamflow distributions and flow duration curves from landscape and climate.” Adv. Water Resour., 83, 285–298.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. (1986). “Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy.” Stat. Sci., 1(1) 54–75.
Fennessey, N., and Vogel, R. M. (1990). “Regional flow-duration curves for ungauged sites in Massachusetts.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 530–549.
Goswami, M., O’Connor, K. M., and Bhattarai, K. P. (2007). “Development of regionalisation procedures using a multi-model approach for flow simulation in an ungauged catchment.” J. Hydrol., 333(2–4), 517–531.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F. (2009). “Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling.” J. Hydrol., 377(1-2), 80–91.
Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O. (1999). “Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 135–143.
He, Y., Bárdossy, A., and Zehe, E. (2011). “A review of regionalisation for continuous streamflow simulation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(11), 3539–3553.
Ibrahim, B., Wisser, D., Barry, B., Fowe, T., and Aduna, A. (2015). “Hydrological predictions for small ungauged watersheds in the Sudanian zone of the Volta Basin in West Africa.” J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., 4, 386–397.
Isik, S., and Singh, V. P. (2008). “Hydrologic regionalization of watersheds in Turkey.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 824–834.
Ley, R., Casper, M. C., Hellebrand, H., and Merz, R. (2011). “Catchment classification by runoff behaviour with self-organizing maps (SOM).” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(9), 2947–2962.
Ley, R., Hellebrand, H., Casper, M. C., and Fenicia, F. (2015). “Comparing classical performance measures with signature indices derived from flow duration curves to assess model structures as tools for catchment classification.” Hydrol. Res., 47(1), 1–14.
Li, M., Shao, Q., Zhang, L., and Chiew, F. H. S. (2010). “A new regionalization approach and its application to predict flow duration curve in ungauged basins.” J. Hydrol., 389(1–2), 137–145.
Lima, C. H. R., and Lall, U. (2010). “Spatial scaling in a changing climate: A hierarchical Bayesian model for non-stationary multi-site annual maximum and monthly streamflow.” J. Hydrol., 383(3-4), 307–318.
Merz, R., and Blöschl, G. (2004). “Regionalisation of catchment model parameters.” J. Hydrol., 287(1–4), 95–123.
Mishra, A. K., and Coulibaly, P. (2009). “Developments in hydrometric network design: A review.” Rev. Geophys., 47(2), 1–24.
Mohamoud, Y. M. (2008). “Prediction of daily flow duration curves and streamflow for ungauged catchments using regional flow duration curves.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 53(4), 706–724.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Binger, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Müller, M. F., and Thompson, S. E. (2016). “Comparing statistical and process-based flow duration curve models in ungauged basins and changing rain regimes.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20(2), 669–683.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Nathan, R. J., and McMahon, T. A. (1990). “Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalisation.” J. Hydrol., 121(1–4), 217–238.
Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Le Moine, N. (2008). “Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 44(3), W03413.
Oudin, L., Kay, A., Andréassian, V., and Perrin, C. (2010). “Are seemingly physically similar catchments truly hydrologically similar?” Water Resour. Res., 46(11), W11558.
Parajka, J., Blöschl, G., and Merz, R. (2007). “Regional calibration of catchment models: Potential for ungauged catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 43(6), W06406.
Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G. (2005). “A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 2(2), 509–542.
Razavi, T., and Coulibaly, P. (2013). “Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: Review of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 958–975.
Samuel, J., Coulibaly, P., and Metcalfe, R. A. (2011). “Estimation of continuous streamflow in Ontario ungauged basins: Comparison of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 447–459.
Schnaidt, S., and Heinson, G. (2015). “Bootstrap resampling as a tool for uncertainty analysis in 2-D magnetotelluric inversion modelling.” Geophys. J. Int., 203(1), 92–106.
Shepard, D. (1968). “A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data.” 23rd ACM National Conf., Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 517–524.
Shu, C., and Ouarda, T. B. M. J. (2012). “Improved methods for daily streamflow estimates at ungauged sites.” Water Resour. Res., 48(2), W02523.
Sivapalan, M., et al. (2003). “IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(6), 857–880.
Stoll, S., and Weiler, M. (2010). “Explicit simulations of stream networks to guide hydrological modelling in ungauged basins.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14(8), 1435–1448.
Vandewiele, G. L., and Elias, A. (1995). “Monthly water balance of ungauged catchments obtained by geographical regionalization.” J. Hydrol., 170(1–4), 277–291.
Van Liew, M. W., Veith, T. L., Bosch, D. D., and Arnold, J. G. (2007). “Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessment project: Comparison on USDA agricultural research service watersheds.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 173–189.
Visessri, S., and McIntyre, N. (2015). “Regionalisation of hydrological responses under land use change and variable data quality.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 61(2), 302–320.
Vogel, R. M., and Kroll, C. N. (1992). “Regional geohydrologic-geomorphic relationships for the estimation of low-flow statistics.” Water Resour. Res., 28(9), 2451–2458.
Waseem, M., Ajmal, M., and Kim, T. (2015). “Ensemble hydrological prediction of streamflow percentile at ungauged basins in Pakistan.” J. Hydrol., 525, 130–137.
Westerberg, I. K., et al. (2014). “Regional water balance modelling using flow-duration curves with observational uncertainties.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18(8), 2993–3013.
Yadav, M., Wagener, T., and Gupta, H. (2007). “Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(8), 1756–1774.
Yaşar, M. (2013). “Prediction of flow duration curves for ungauged basins with quasi-Newton method.” J. Water Resour. Prot., 5(1), 97–110.
Young, A. R. (2006). “Stream flow simulation within UK ungauged catchments using a daily rainfall-runoff model.” J. Hydrol., 320(1–2), 155–172.
Yu, P., and Yang, T. (1996). “Synthetic regional flow duration curve for southern Taiwan.” Hydrol. Process., 10(3), 373–391.
Yu, P. S., Yang, T. C., and Wang, Y. C. (2002). “Uncertainty analysis of regional flow duration curves.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 424–430.
Zhang, Y., Vaze, J., Chiew, F. H. S., and Li, M. (2015). “Comparing flow duration curve and rainfall-runoff modelling for predicting daily runoff in ungauged catchments.” J. Hydrol., 525, 72–86.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22Issue 7July 2017

History

Received: Sep 17, 2016
Accepted: Dec 1, 2016
Published online: Feb 24, 2017
Published in print: Jul 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Jul 24, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Janaki Ballav Swain [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, NIT Rourkela, Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Kanhu Charan Patra [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, NIT Rourkela, Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share