Suitability of Global Circulation Model Downscaled BCCA Daily Precipitation for Local Hydrologic Applications
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 12
Abstract
Monthly precipitation hindcasts/projections for various climate change scenarios have been available for over a decade. More recently, daily precipitation hindcasts/projections using downscaled bias-corrected constructed analog (BCCA) have garnered wide usage for climate change investigations. Dry bias and drizzle effect reported in previous studies are among known limitations of downscaled BCCA precipitation hindcasts/projections which affect end-user applications. End users also require a reliable representation of precipitation sequence as well as physical consistency of precipitation series for climate change impact assessment applications. This study focuses on the evaluation of the daily sequence of downscaled BCCA precipitation hindcasts. Herein, direct use of BCCA daily precipitation hindcasts are further assessed to determine their suitability to study daily soil moisture dynamics at the field-scale for central Oklahoma climatic conditions. Three daily precipitation data sets were considered: (1) the 1961–1999 BCCA precipitation hindcasts for a 12 km grid in central Oklahoma, (2) the 1961–1999 spatially interpolated daily precipitation data used in the BCCA downscaling procedure, and (3) the 1961–1999 observed daily precipitation observations at the Weatherford COOP Weather Station located within the 12 km BCCA grid. The BCCA daily precipitation hindcasts showed a larger number of rainy days, lower rainfall amounts per rainy day, and longer sequences of consecutive rainy-day clusters than found in observations. These differences were large enough to suggest that BCCA daily precipitation hindcasts may not reflect the characteristics of actual precipitation observations at a point location, i.e., weather station. Additional analyses at Walnut Creek, Iowa and Moorhead, Mississippi confirmed the results are not location specific but numerically induced as a result of the downscaling process. The underlying cause for the noted differences was traced back to the differences in spatial scales of the BCCA outputs and observed daily precipitation at a station. Thus, caution is advised to end users using BCCA daily rainfall hindcasts/projections directly in local and field-scale water investigations, particularly for applications requiring reliable representation of precipitation sequence. Alternatively, a statistical downscaling method based on stochastic weather generation that includes wet-day dry-day transition probabilities would provide the desired temporal disaggregation and sequencing of daily rainfall events.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the modeling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP5 multimodel data set. Support of this data set is provided by the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy.
References
Amin, M. M., et al. (2015). “Climate change assessment of water resources in Sabah and Sarawak, Malaysia, based on dynamically-downscaled GCM projections using a regional hydroclimate model.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 05015015.
Bauer, P., Lopez, P., Salmond, D., Benedetti, A., Saarinen, S., and Moreau, E. (2006). “Implementation of 1D+4D-Var assimilation of precipitation-affected microwave radiances at ECMWF. II: 4D-Var.” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 2307–2332.
Brekke, L. D., et al. (2009). “Climate change and water resources management—A federal perspective.”, Reston, VA.
Fowler, H. J., and Ekström, M. (2009). “Multi-model ensemble estimates of climate change impacts on UK seasonal precipitation extremes.” Int. J. Climatol., 29(3), 385–416.
Gabriel, K. R., and Neumann, J. (1962). “A Markov chain model for daily rainfall occurrence at Tel Aviv.” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 88(375), 90–95.
Garbrecht, J., and Zhang, J. (2014). “Generating synthetic daily precipitation realizations for seasonal precipitation forecasts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 252–264.
Goyal, M., Ojha, C. S. P., and Burn, D. (2013). “Precipitation simulation based on k-nearest neighbor approach using gamma kernel.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 481–487.
Gutmann, E. T., et al. (2014). “An intercomparison of statistical downscaling methods used for water resource assessments in the United States.” Water Resour. Res., 50, 7167–7186.
Gyawali, R., Watkins, D. W., Griffis, V. W., and Lofgren, B. F. (2014). “Energy budget considerations for hydro-climatic impact assessment in Great Lakes watersheds.” J. Great Lakes Res., 40(4), 940–948.
Hanson, C. L., Cumming, K. A., Woolhiser, D. A., and Richardson, C. W. (1994). “Microcomputer program for daily weather simulation in the contiguous United States.”, U.S. DA-ARS, Washington, DC.
Harpham, C., and Wilby, R. L. (2005). “Multi-site downscaling of heavy daily precipitation occurrence and amounts.” J. Hydrol., 312, 1–21.
Hidalgo, H., Dettinger, M. D., and Cayan, D. R. (2008). “Downscaling with constructed analogues: Daily precipitation and temperature fields over the United States.”, California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA.
Iorio, J. P., Duffy, P. B., Govindasamy, B., Thompson, S. L., Khairoutdinov, M., and Randall, D. (2004). “Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States.” Clim. Dyn., 23, 243–258.
Jacob, D., et al. (2007). “An intercomparison of regional climate models for Europe: Model performance in present-day climate." Clim. Change, 81, 3152.
Johnson, G. L., Hanson, C. L., Hardegree, S. P., and Ballard, E. B. (1996). “Stochastic weather simulation: Overview and analysis of two commonly used models.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 35, 1878–1896.
Kerr, R. A., et al. (2011). “Vital details of global warming are eluding forecasters.” Science, 334(6053), 173–174.
LaBeau, M., Mayer, A., Griffis, V., Watkins, D., Robertson, D., and Gyawali, R. (2015). “The importance of considering shifts in seasonal changes in discharges when predicting future phosphorus loads in streams.” Biogeochemistry, 126(1–2), 153–172.
Lall, U., and Sharma, A. (1996). “A nearest neighbor bootstrap for resampling hydrologic time series.” Water Resour. Res., 32(3), 679–693.
Maraun, D., et al. (2010). “Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user.” Rev. Geophys., 48(3), RG3003.
Maurer, E. P., and Hidalgo, H. G. (2008). “Utility of daily vs. monthly large -scale climate data: An intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 551–563.
Maurer, E. P., Hidalgo, H. G., Das, T., Dettinger, M. D., and Cayan, D. R. (2010). “The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14(6), 1125–1138.
Maurer, E. P., Wood, A. W., Adam, J. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Nijssen, B. (2002). “A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States.” J. Clim., 15(22), 3237–3251.
McSweeney, C. F., et al. (2015). “Selecting CMIP5 GCMs fir downscaling over multiple regions.” Clim. Dyn., 44, 3237–3260.
Means, L. O., et al. (2009). “A regional climate change assessment program for North America.” EOS Trans., 90, 311.
Mearns, L. O., Giorgi, F., McDaniel, L., and Shield, C. (1995). “Analysis of daily variability or precipitation in a nested regional climate model: Comparison with observations and doubled CO2 results.” Global Plan. Change, 10, 55–78.
Meehl, G. A., et al. (2007). “The WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel dataset: A new era in climate change research.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88(9), 1383–1394.
Meehl, G. A., et al. (2014). “Climate model intercomparisons: Preparing for the next phase.” EOS Trans., AGU, 95(9), 77–78.
Mizukami, N., et al. (2016). “Implications of the methodological choices for hydrologic portrayals of climate change over the contiguous United States: Statistically downscaled forcing data and hydrologic models.” J. Hydrometeorol, 17, 73–98.
Nicks, A. D., and Gander, G. A. (1994). “CLIGEN: A weather generator for climate inputs to water resources and other models.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Computers in Agriculture, ASAE, Orlando, FL, 903–909.
Pielke, R. A., and Wilby, R. L. (2012). “Regional climate downscaling: What’s the point?” Eos Trans Am. Geophys. Union, 93(5), 52.
Pierce, D. W., and Cyan, D. R. (2015). “Downscaling humidity with localized constructed analogs (LOCA) over the conterminous United States.” Climate Dyn., 47(1), 411–431.
Rajagopalan, B., and Lall, U. (1999). “ A k-nearest-neighbor simulator for daily precipitation and other weather variables.” Water Resour. Res., 35(10), 3089–3101.
Reclamation. (2013). “Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate and hydrology projections: Release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs.” 〈http://gdo-dcp .ucllnl.org/downscaled_cmip_projections/〉 (Jul. 20, 2016).
Richardson, C. W. (1981). “Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation.” Water Resour. Res., 17(1), 182–190.
Richardson, C. W., and Wright, D. A. (1984). “WGEN: A model for generating daily weather variables.”, U.S. DA-ARS, Temple, TX.
Rojas, R., Kahunde, S., Peeters, L., Batelaan, O., Feyen, L., and Dassargues, A. (2010). “Application of a multimodel approach to account for conceptual model and scenario uncertainties in groundwater modelling.” J. Hydrol., 394, 416–435.
Salas, J. D., and Lee, T. S. (2010). “Nonparametric simulation of single-site seasonal streamflows.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 284–296.
Sharif, M., and Burn, D. H. (2006). “Simulating climate change scenarios using an improved K-nearest neighbor model.” J. Hydrol., 325(1-4), 179–196.
SYNTOR version 3.5 [Computer software]. Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK.
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A. (2012). “An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93(4), 485–498.
Van Vuuren, D. P., et al. (2011). “Representative concentration pathways: An overview.” Clim. Change, 109(1-2), 5–31.
Velázquez, J. A., Anctil, F., Ramos, M. H., and Perrin, C. (2011). “Can a multi-model approach improve hydrological ensemble forecasting? A study on 29 French catchments using 16 hydrological model structures.” Adv. Geosci., 29, 33–42.
Viganò, G., et al. (2015). “Effects of future climate change on a river habitat in an Italian alpine catchment.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04015063.
Wilby, R. L., and Fowler, H. J. (2010). “Regional climate downscaling.” Modelling the impact of climate change in water resources, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, U.K.
Wilks, D. S. (1989). “Conditioning stochastic daily precipitation models on total monthly precipitation.” Water Resour. Res., 25(6), 1429–1439.
Wood, A. W., Leung, L. R., Sridhar, V., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2004). “Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs.” Clim. Change, 62, 189–216.
Young, K. C. (1994). “A multivariate chain model for simulating climatic parameters with daily data.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 33(6), 661–671.
Zhang, X. C. (2005). “Spatial downscaling of global climate model output for site-specific assessment of crop production and soil erosion.” Agric. For. Meteorol., 135(1–4), 215–229.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21 • Issue 12 • December 2016
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 26, 2016
Accepted: Jun 29, 2016
Published online: Aug 12, 2016
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jan 12, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.