Technical Notes
Jul 12, 2016

Effect of Spatial Resolution in Modeling Stormwater Runoff for an Urban Block

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 11

Abstract

This study assesses the role of spatial resolution in hydrologic and hydraulic models by means of two models developed at different resolutions for an urban block using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s stormwater management model (SWMM). The first is a high-resolution model, in which distinct elements are represented as individual hydrologic response units (HRU). The second is a low-resolution model, in which the entire block is represented as a single HRU. Flow observations during five storms were used to calibrate the models, while a separate set of six storms was used to assess their performance. The high-resolution model was found to systematically underestimate peak flows, whereas the performance of the low-resolution model was found to be dependent on the type of storm. Overall, the two models displayed similar accuracy according to most metrics, thus justifying modeling at high resolution only in those cases where a detailed representation is necessary.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Omar Khader and Kim DiGiovanni for conducting the initial site visits, collecting all the observed data and devising a preliminary model. Much gratitude is given to Hugh Gordon who assisted with the program code. The authors also would like to extend special thanks to New York State Office of the Attorney General for funding the research and the following co-collaborators: Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice, NYC Department of Environmental Protection, NYC Department of Parks and Recreation and HydroQual, Inc.

References

Cantone, J. P., and Schmidt, A. R. (2009). “Potential dangers of simplifying combined sewer hydrologic/hydraulic models.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 596–605.
Elliott, A. H., Trowsdale, S. A., and Wadhwa, S. (2009). “Effect of aggregation of on-site storm-water control devices in an urban catchment model.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 975–983.
Fenicia, F., Savenije, H. H. G., Matgen, P., and Pfister, L. (2007). “A comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modeling.” Water Resour. Res., 43(3), W03434.
Ghosh, I., and Hellweger, F. L. (2012). “Effects of spatial resolution in urban hydrologic simulations.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 129–137.
Kertesz, R., Heaney, J., and Sansalone, J. (2007). “Disaggregated modeling for urban hydrologic controls.” World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–11.
Khu, S. T., and Madsen, H. (2005). “Multiobjective calibration with Pareto preference ordering: An application to rainfall-runoff model calibration.” Water Resour. Res., 41(3), in press.
Krebs, G., Kokkonen, T., Valtanen, M., Koivusalo, H., and Setälä, H. (2013). “A high resolution application of a stormwater management model (SWMM) using genetic parameter optimization.” Urban Water J., 10(6), 394–410.
Krebs, G., Kokkonen, T., Valtanen, M., Setälä, H., and Koivusalo, H. (2014). “Spatial resolution considerations for urban hydrological modelling.” J. Hydrol., 10(6), 482–497.
Loague, K. M., and Freeze, R. A. (1985). “A comparison of rainfall runoff modeling techniques on small upland catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 21(2), 229–248.
Park, S. Y., Lee, K. W., Park, I. H., and Ha, S. R. (2008). “Effect of the aggregation level of surface runoff fields and sewer network for a SWMM simulation.” Desalination, 226(1–3), 328–337.
Singh, J., Knapp, H. V., and Demissie, M. (2004). “Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT.”, Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL.
U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2006). “BMP modeling concepts and simulation.” EPA-600-R-06-033, Washington, DC.
van Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Tang, Y. (2009). “Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models.” Adv. Water Resour., 32(8), 1154–1169.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21Issue 11November 2016

History

Received: Jul 17, 2015
Accepted: Dec 30, 2015
Published online: Jul 12, 2016
Published in print: Nov 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Dec 12, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alisha Goldstein [email protected]
P.E.
Environmental Engineer, DC Dept. of Energy and Environment, 1200 First St., NE 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20002; formerly, Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Drexel Univ., 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: [email protected]
Romano Foti, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Scientist, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Drexel Univ., 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: [email protected]
Franco Montalto, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Drexel Univ., Curtis Hall Room 251, 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104; Scholar-in-Residence, United States Forest Service, New York City Urban Field Station (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share