Abstract

This paper presents a global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a dual drainage model applied to a 0.049km2 (4.9-ha) urban catchment based on generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE). The model solves the nonlinear bidimensional (2D) and one-dimensional (1D) Saint-Venant equations to compute respectively the surface runoff and the flow in the sewer network. The sensitivity of the outlet hydrograph to the input parameters of the model was determined by using variance-based Sobol sensitivity indices. These indices highlight the great effect of the overland flow parameters on the model output, in contrast with the limited effect of the sewer-network parameters. The Manning coefficient of the impervious terrains was identified as the most influential model parameter. The effect on model calibration of two subjective factors of the GLUE methodology (the acceptability threshold and the shaping factor of the likelihood function) was analyzed. From this analysis, a NSE acceptability threshold of 0.6 and a shaping factor of 1 were adopted for model calibration. Greater values of these parameters resulted in very narrow uncertainty bounds and therefore in low coverage ratios. The results obtained after calibration and validation show a satisfactory performance of the model, with NSE values within 0.78 and 0.98 and coverage ratios of the 95% confidence intervals in the range 66–91%. The worst performances are obtained in the events with lowest rainfall depths, since in those cases the overland flow in the whole catchment is extremely shallow and the runoff propagation is not well captured by the model.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aragón-Hernández, J. L. (2013). “Modelación numérica integrada de los procesos hidráulicos en el drenaje urbano.” Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K. (2012). “Quantification of climate change effects on extreme precipitation used for high resolution hydrologic design.” Urban Water J., 9(2), 57–65.
Beven, K., and Binley, A. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Process., 6(3), 279–298.
Beven, K., and Binley, A. (2013). “GLUE: 20 years on.” Hydrol. Process., 28(24), 5897–5918.
Beven, K., and Freer, J. (2001). “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 249(1), 11–29.
Beven, K., Smith, P. J., and Freer, J. E. (2008). “So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent?” J. Hydrol., 354(1), 15–32.
Blasone, R. S., Vrugt, J. A., Madsen, H., Rosbjerg, D., Robinson, B. A., and Zyvoloski, G. A. (2008). “Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling.” Adv. Water Resour., 31(4), 630–648.
Butler, D., and Davies, J. (2004). Urban drainage, CRC Press, Boca Ratón, FL.
Cea, L., Bermúdez, M., and Puertas, J. (2011). “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a depth-averaged water quality model for evaluation of Escherichia Coli concentration in shallow estuaries.” Environ. Modell. Software, 26(12), 1526–1539.
Cea, L., and Blade, E. (2015). “A simple and efficient unstructured finite volume scheme for solving the shallow water equations in overland flow applications.” Water Resour. Res., 51(7), 5464–5486.
Cea, L., and French, J. R. (2012). “Bathymetric error estimation for the calibration and validation of estuarine hydrodynamic models.” Estuar., Coast. Shelf Sci., 100, 124–132.
Cea, L., Garrido, M., and Puertas, J. (2010a). “Experimental validation of two-dimensional depth-averaged models for forecasting rainfall–runoff from precipitation data in urban areas.” J. Hydrol., 382(1), 88–102.
Cea, L., Garrido, M., Puertas, J., Jácome, A., del Río, H., and Suárez, J. (2010b). “Overland flow computations in urban and industrial catchments from direct precipitation data using a two-dimensional shallow water model.” Water Sci. Technol., 62(9), 1998–2008.
Chen, A. S., Djordjevic, S., Leandro, J., and Savic, D. (2007). “The urban inundation model with bidirectional flow interaction between 2D overland surface and 1D sewer networks.” Proc., NOVATECH 2007-6th Int. Conf. on Sustainable Techniques and Strategies in Urban Water Management, Rhône-Alpes Research Group on Water Infrastructure, France, 465–472.
Chow, V. T. (1973). Open channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cronshey, R. (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division, Washington, DC.
Deletic, A., et al. (2012). “Assessing uncertainties in urban drainage models.” Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C, 42, 3–10.
Djordjevic, S., Prodanovic, D., Ivetic, M., and Savic, D. (2005). “SIPSON-simulation of interaction between pipe flow and surface overland flow in networks.” Water Sci. Technol., 52(5), 275–283.
Djordjevic, S., Prodanovic, D., and Maksimovic, C. (1999). “An approach to simulation of dual drainage.” Water Sci. Technol., 39(9), 95–103.
Dotto, C. B. S., et. al. (2012). “Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modeling.” Water Res., 46(8), 2545–2558.
Dotto, C. B. S., Kleidorfer, M., Deletic, A., Rauch, W., McCarthy, D. T., and Fletcher, T. D. (2011). “Performance and sensitivity analysis of stormwater models using a Bayesian approach and long-term high resolution data.” Environ. Modell. Software, 26(10), 1225–1239.
Feldman, A. D. (2000). “Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS: Technical reference manual.” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
Fontanazza, C. M., Freni, G., and Notaro, V. (2012). “Bayesian inference analysis of the uncertainty linked to the evaluation of potential flood damage in urban areas.” Water Sci. Technol., 66(8), 1669–1677.
Fraga, I., Cea, L., and Puertas, J. (2013). “Experimental study of the water depth and rainfall intensity effects on the bed roughness coefficient used in distributed urban drainage models.” J. Hydrol., 505, 266–275.
Fraga, I., Cea, L., and Puertas, J. (2015). “Validation of a 1D-2D dual drainage model under unsteady part-full and pressure flow conditions.” Urban Water J., in press.
Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2008). “Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: The effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology.” Water Res., 42(8), 2061–2072.
Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2009). “Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: The influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology.” Sci. Total Environ., 408(1), 138–145.
Gao, B., et al. (2005). “Investigating raindrop effects on transport of sediment and non-sorbed chemicals from soil to surface runoff.” J. Hydrol., 308(1), 313–320.
Iman, R. L., Helton, J. C., and Campbell, J. E. (1981). “An approach to sensitivity analysis of computer models. Part 1: Introduction, input variable selection and preliminary variable assessment.” J. Qual. Technol., 13, 174–183.
Jacobson, C. R. (2011). “Identification and quantification of the hydrological impacts of imperviousness in urban catchments: A review.” J. Environ. Manage., 92(6), 1438–1448.
Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., and Franks, S. W. (2006). “Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling. 1: Theory.” Water Resour. Res., 42(3), 1–9.
Kim, D., et al. (2014). “Parameter sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a stormwater runoff model.” Inst. Chem. E, 54(13), 3523–3533.
Kivva, S. L., and Zheleznyak, M. J. (2005). “Two-dimensional modelling of rainfall runoff and sediment transport in small catchments areas.” Int. J. Fluid Mech. Res., 32(6), 703–717.
Kucherenko, S., Feil, B., Shah, N., and Mauntz, W. (2011). “The identification of model effective dimensions using global sensitivity analysis.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96(4), 440–449.
Leandro, J., Chen, A. S., Djordjević, S., and Savić, D. A. (2009). “Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D coupled (sewer/surface) hydraulic models for urban flood simulation.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 495–504.
Li, L., Xia, J., Xu, C. Y., and Singh, V. P. (2010). “Evaluation of the subjective factors of the GLUE method and comparison with the formal Bayesian method in uncertainty assessment of hydrological models.” J. Hydrol., 390(3–4), 210–221.
Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2010). “An urban drainage stormwater quality model: Model development and uncertainty quantification.” J. Hydrol., 381(3), 248–265.
Mantovan, P., and Todini, E. (2006). “Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 330(1), 368–381.
Mark, O., Weesakul, S., Apirumanekul, C., Aroonnet, S. B., and Djordjević, S. (2004). “Potential and limitations of 1D modelling of urban flooding.” J. Hydrol., 299(3), 284–299.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Muleta, M. K., McMillan, J., Amenu, G. G., and Burian, S. J. (2012). “Bayesian approach for uncertainty analysis of an urban storm water model and its application to a heavily urbanized watershed.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1360–1371.
Nania, L. S., Leon, A. S., and Garcia, M. H. (2015). “Hydrologic-hydraulic model for simulating dual drainage and flooding in urban areas: Application to a catchment in the metropolitan area of Chicago.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04014071.
Nash, J., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Ratto, M. (2009). “Sensitivity analysis toolbox for DYNARE.” European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
Ratto, M., Pagano, A., and Young, P. (2007). “State dependent parameter meta-modelling and sensitivity analysis.” Comput. Phys. Commun., 177(11), 863–876.
Rossman, L. A. (2010). “Storm water management model user’s manual, version 5.0.” National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati.
Saltelli, A., et al. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis: The primer, Wiley, New York.
Sanders, B. F., and Bradford, S. F. (2010). “Network implementation of the two-component pressure approach for transient flow in storm sewers.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 158–172.
Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., Lee, S. U., and Batchelder, R. (2008). “Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method.” Water Resour. Res., 44(12), 1–17.
Suárez, J., et al. (2013). “Design of a sand filter for highway runoff in the north of Spain.” Proc. ICE-Municipal Eng., 166(2), 121–129.
Sun, S., and Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L. (2013). “Separately accounting for uncertainties in rainfall and runoff: Calibration of event-based conceptual hydrological models in small urban catchments using Bayesian method.” Water Resour. Res., 49(9), 5381–5394.
Thorndahl, S., Beven, K. J., Jensen, J. B., and Schaarup-Jensen, K. (2008). “Event based uncertainty assessment in urban drainage modelling, applying the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 357(3), 421–437.
Vasconcelos, J. G., Wright, S. J., and Roe, P. L. (2006). “Improved simulation of flow regime transition in sewers: Two-component pressure approach.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 553–562.
Viola, F., Noto, L. V., Cannarozzo, M., and La Loggia, G. (2009). “Daily streamflow prediction with uncertainty in ephemeral catchments using the GLUE methodology.” Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C, 34(10), 701–706.
Vrugt, J. A., Ter Braak, C. J., Gupta, H. V., and Robinson, B. A. (2009). “Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk A, 23(7), 1011–1026.
Wu, X., Yu, D., Chen, Z., and Wilby, R. L. (2012). “An evaluation of the impacts of land surface modification, storm sewer development, and rainfall variation on water logging risk in Shanghai.” Nat. Hazards, 63(2), 305–323.
Zhao, D., Chen, J., Wang, H., and Tong, Q. (2012). “Application of a sampling based on the combined objectives of parameter identification and uncertainty analysis of an urban rainfall-runoff model.” J. Irrig. Drain. E, 66–74.
Zoppou, C. (2001). “Review of urban storm water models.” Environ. Modell. Software, 16(3), 195–231.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21Issue 5May 2016

History

Received: May 7, 2015
Accepted: Oct 30, 2015
Published online: Jan 28, 2016
Published in print: May 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 28, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ignacio Fraga, Ph.D. [email protected]
Environmental and Water Engineering Group, Departamento de Métodos Matemáticos y de Representación, E.T.S Caminos, Universidade da Coruña, Campus Elviña s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Luis Cea, Ph.D. [email protected]
Environmental and Water Engineering Group, Departamento de Métodos Matemáticos y de Representación, Universidade da Coruña, Campus Elviña s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Jerónimo Puertas, Ph.D. [email protected]
Environmental and Water Engineering Group, Departamento de Métodos Matemáticos y de Representación, Universidade da Coruña, Campus Elviña s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Joaquín Suárez, Ph.D. [email protected]
Environmental and Water Engineering Group, Departamento de Métodos Matemáticos y de Representación, Universidade da Coruña, Campus Elviña s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Vicente Jiménez, Ph.D. [email protected]
Environmental and Water Engineering Group, Departamento de Métodos Matemáticos y de Representación, Universidade da Coruña, Campus Elviña s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Alfredo Jácome, Ph.D. [email protected]
Environmental and Water Engineering Group, Departamento de Métodos Matemáticos y de Representación, Universidade da Coruña, Campus Elviña s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share