Technical Papers
Jul 10, 2015

Quantifying Extreme Rainfall Events and Their Hydrologic Response in Southeastern Arizona

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 1

Abstract

Hydrologists are concerned with high-intensity rainfall and peak runoff rates for stormwater infrastructure designs, post-event assessments, and mitigation of environmental impacts. In the southwestern United States the need for accurate information about these rates is increasingly important as population growth and associated development are projected to exceed national averages. Design storm totals for various durations and return period frequencies are routinely derived from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 and are commonly used as input to hydrologic models to estimate peak runoff rates and runoff volumes. For the southwestern United States during the North American Monsoon, NOAA relies on sparse rain gauge networks to measure rainfall from limited area convective storms primarily at daily time steps and estimates of subdaily event intensities are derived by temporal downscaling from a few point locations. The USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Southwest Watershed Research Center (SWRC) operates the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) in the vicinity of Tombstone, Arizona. SWRC maintains a database of 60 years of subdaily, high temporal-precision rainfall intensities and runoff rates for WGEW. Updated, temporally extended, rainfall intensity-duration-frequency relations for WGEW are presented. The current analysis includes intensity-duration-frequency relations for July, August, and September for 53 years, 1961–2013, for durations of 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min and return periods of 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 1,000 years. The 149km2 WGEW is large enough to select groups of four rain gauges whose event totals are independent. This allows combining of the four independent gauges’ 53-year time series into a longer time series of 212 years. A comparison of WGEW-generated intensity-duration-frequency curves to those of NOAA Atlas 14 indicated good agreement. However, across the range of durations, many observed events on WGEW from gauges not used in the frequency analysis are much greater than the estimated 100-year event. The dense gauge network appears to capture a substantially greater number of low-frequency, extreme rainfall events not typically observed in sparse networks. To assess the hydrologic consequences of these extreme events they were used as input to a well-tested watershed model for a small gauged watershed that did not experience events of similar magnitude. Simulated runoff volumes and peak discharge rates were up to four times as large as the largest observed runoff event of record. These analyses offer insights into the benefit of long-term watershed research with spatially dense and high temporal resolution observations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bonnin, G. M., Martin, D., Lin, B., Parzybok, T., Yekta, M., and Riley, D. (2011). “NOAA atlas 14 precipitation-frequency atlas of the United States volume 1 version 5.0: Semiarid southwest (southeast California, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Nevada).” 〈http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/currentpf.htm〉 (May 14, 2015).
Cheng, K.-S., Hueter, I., Hsu, E.-C., and Yeh, H.-C. (2001). “A scale invariant Gauss-Markov model for design storm hyetographs.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(3), 723–735.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Faures, J- M., Goodrich, D. C., Woolhiser, D. A., and Sorooshian, S. (1995). “Impact of small-scale spatial rainfall variability on runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol., 173(1–4), 309–326.
Goodrich, D. C., et al. (2008a). “Event to multidecadal persistence in rainfall and runoff in southeast Arizona.” Water Resour. Res., 44(5), W05S14.
Goodrich, D. C., et al. (2008b). “Long-term precipitation database, Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed, Arizona, United States.” Water Resour. Res., 44(5), W05S04.
Goodrich, D. C., et al. (2012). “KINEROS2/AGWA: Model use, calibration, and validation.” Trans. ASABE, 55(4), 1561–1574.
Goodrich, D. C., Lane, L. J., Shillito, R. A., Miller, S. N., Syed, K. H., and Woolhiser, D. A. (1997). “Linearity of basin response as a function of scale in a semi-arid watershed.” Water Resour. Res., 33(12), 2951–2965.
Goodrich, D. C., Stone, J. J., and Van der Zweep, R. (1993). “Validation strategies based on model application objectives.” Proc., Federal Interagency Workshop on Hydrologic Modeling Demands for the 90’s, USGS, Denver, 8-1–8-8.
Hafstad, K. G. (1942). “Reliability of the station-year rainfall frequency determinations.” Trans. ASCE, 107(1), 633–683.
Keefer, T. O., Unkrich, C. L., Smith, J. R., Goodrich, D. C., Moran, M. S., and Simanton, J. R. (2008). “An event-based comparison of two types of automated-recording, weighing bucket rain gauges.” Water Resour. Res., 44(5), W05S12.
Kennedy, J., Goodrich, D., and Unkrich, C. (2013). “Using the KINEROS2 modeling framework to evaluate the increase in storm runoff from residential development in a semi-arid environment.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 698–706.
Kimoto, A., Canfield, H. E., and Stewart, D. (2011). “Comparison of synthetic design storms with observed storms in southern Arizona.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 935–941.
Lee, K. T., and Ho, J.-Y. (2008). “Design hyetograph for typhoon rainstorms in Taiwan.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 647–651.
Mendez, A., Goodrich, D. C., and Osborn, H. B. (2003). “Rainfall point intensities in an air mass thunderstorm environment: Walnut Gulch, Arizona.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(3), 611–621.
Miller, J. F., Frederick, R. H., and Tracey, R. J. (1973). “Precipitation-frequency atlas of the western United States, vols I-XI, NOAA atlas 2.” National Weather Service, NOAA, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Moran, M. S., et al. (2008). “Preface to special section on fifty years of research and data collection: U.S. Department of Agriculture Walnut Gulch experimental watershed.” Water Resour. Res., 44(5), W05S01.
Morin, E., Krajewski, W. F., Goodrich, D. C., Gao, X., and Sorooshian, S. (2003). “Estimating rainfall intensities from weather radar data: The scale-dependency problem.” J. Hydrometeorol., 4(5), 782–797.
Osborn, H. B., and Lane, L. J. (1969). “Prediction-runoff relation for very small semiarid rangeland watersheds.” Water Resour. Res., 5(2), 419–425.
Osborn, H. B., Lane, L. J., and Myers, V. A. (1980). “Rainfall/watershed relationships for southwestern thunderstorms.” Trans. ASAE, 23(1), 82–87.
Osborn, H. B., and Laursen, E. M. (1973). “Thunderstorm runoff in southeastern Arizona.” J. Hydraul. Div., 99(HY7), 1129–1145.
Osborn, H. B., and Renard, K. G. (1988). “Rainfall intensities for southeastern Arizona.” J. Irrig. Drain. Div., 195–199.
Osborn, H. B., Renard, K. G., and Simanton, J. R. (1979). “Dense networks to measure convective rainfall in the southwestern United States.” Water Resour. Res., 15(6), 1701–1711.
“Rainlog.org.” (2014). 〈http://rainlog.org/usprn/html/main/maps.jsp〉 (May 15, 2014).
Reich, B. M., and Osborn, H. B. (1982). “Improving point rainfall prediction with experimental watershed data.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Rainfall/Runoff Modeling, Statistical Analysis of Rainfall and Runoff, Mississippi State Univ., MS, 41–54.
Renard, K. G. (1993). “Agricultural impacts in an arid environment: Walnut Gulch case study.” Hydrol. Sci. Tech., 9(1–4), 145–190.
Smith, R. E., Goodrich, D. C., Woolhiser, D. A., and Unkrich, C. L. (1995). “KINEROS—A kinematic runoff and erosion model.” Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, CO, 697–732.
SWRC (Southwest Watershed Research Center). (2015). “Online data access.” 〈http://www.tucson.ars.ag.gov/dap/〉 (May 15, 2015).
USGS. (1982). “Guideline for determining flood flow frequency.” 〈http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ssp/〉 (Apr. 7, 2014).
von Storch, H., and Zwiers, F. W. (1999). Statistical analysis in climate research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Zehr, R. M., and Myers, V. A. (1984). “Depth-area ratios in the semi-arid southwest United States.”, Office of Hydrology, National Weather Service, NOAA, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 21Issue 1January 2016

History

Received: Jun 23, 2014
Accepted: May 19, 2015
Published online: Jul 10, 2015
Discussion open until: Dec 10, 2015
Published in print: Jan 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Timothy O. Keefer [email protected]
Hydrologist, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Southwest Watershed Research Center, 2000 E. Allen Rd., Tucson, AZ 85719 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Kenneth G. Renard, F.ASCE
Retired, Research Hydraulic Engineer, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Southwest Watershed Research Center, 2000 E. Allen Rd., Tucson, AZ 85719.
David C. Goodrich, M.ASCE
Research Hydraulic Engineer, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Southwest Watershed Research Center, 2000 E. Allen Rd., Tucson, AZ 85719.
Philip Heilman
Research Biologist, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Southwest Watershed Research Center, 2000 E. Allen Rd., Tucson, AZ 85719.
Carl Unkrich
Hydrologist, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Southwest Watershed Research Center, 2000 E. Allen Rd., Tucson, AZ 85719.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share