Cauchy Solution of the Kinematic Wave Shallow-Water Equations Using Square-Grid Finite-Element Method
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 12
Abstract
The kinematic wave system of shallow-water equations is posed as an initial value problem, or Cauchy problem, to investigate error analysis using the square-grid finite-element method. The consistent, lumped, and upwind models of the square finite-element method are analyzed using the Fourier (or von Neumann) stability method as separate initial value problems for two-dimensional shallow-water equations. The small difference between the Cauchy solution and integer (or half) multiples of the eigenvalue solution of amplification factors using the eigenvalue method indicates that the Cauchy solution is a possible stable numerical solution of the kinematic wave shallow-water equations within the reasonable limits of solution accuracy. The nodal amplification factors are less than or equal to unity for implicit finite-element schemes for all of the three formulations—consistent, lumped, and upwind for all of the wave numbers, implying unconditional stability. For explicit and semi-implicit finite-element schemes, at least one of the four nodal amplification factors exceeded unity for all wave numbers, thus implying that the explicit and semi-implicit schemes are unconditionally unstable (except for semi-implicit, upwind). Although element-level amplification factors may be useful in obtaining stable solutions for the interior part of the solution domain, amplification factors exceeding 1.0 might be encountered with associated errors and oscillations. Therefore, an understanding of nodal amplification factors is necessary for better solution accuracy and solution stability. The current research bridges the knowledge gap between the Cauchy and eigenvalue solutions, brings closer the accurate large-scale numerical modeling of watersheds, and delineates directions to be followed in the future for the hydrologic modeling community.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a USGS grant through the Indiana Water Resources Center and Department of Science and Technology (DST; Government of India) grant (SR/S3/MERC-0001/2011) of the project titled “Fourier Analysis and Development of Two-Dimensional Finite Element Schemes for Shallow-Water Equations and Transport related Systems.”
References
Aizinger, V., and Dawson, C. (2002). “A discontinuous Galerkin method for two-dimensional flow and transport in shallow water.” Adv. Water Resour., 25(1), 67–84.
Anmala, J., and Mohtar, R. H. (2011). “Fourier (von Neumann) stability analysis of two-dimensional finite element schemes for shallow water equations.” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 25(2), 75–94.
Anmala, J., and Mohtar, R. H. (2014). “Analytical evaluation of amplification factors, stability, error analysis of square finite element (FE) solution for the kinematic wave shallow water equations (KWSWE).” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04014013.
Chaudhry, M. F. (1993). Open-channel flow, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., and Lewy, H. (1956). On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics, New York Univ., Institute of Mathematics, New York.
Davis, C. (1962). “The norm of the Schur product operation.” Numerische Mathematik, 4, 343–344.
Garcia, R., and Kahawita, R. A. (1986). “Numerical solution of the St.-Venant equations with the MacCormack finite difference scheme.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 6(5), 259–274.
Giraldo, F. X. (2001). “A spectral element shallow water model on spherical geodesic grids.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 35(8), 869–901.
Hirsch, C. (2007). Numerical computation of internal and external flows: The fundamentals of computational fluid dynamics, 2nd Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA.
Jaber, F. H., and Mohtar, R. H. (2002a). “Dynamic time step for the one-dimensional overland flow kinematic wave solution.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 3–11.
Jaber, F. H., and Mohtar, R. H. (2002b). “Stability and accuracy of finite element schemes for the one-dimensional kinematic wave solution.” Adv. Water Resour., 25(4), 427–438.
Jaber, F. H., and Mohtar, R. H. (2003). “Stability and accuracy of two-dimensional kinematic wave overland flow modeling.” Adv. Water Resour., 26(11), 1189–1198.
LeVeque, R. J. (1992). Numerical methods for conservation laws, Birkhauser, Basel.
Morton, K. W., and Mayers, D. F. (1994). Numerical solution of partial differential equations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. (1992). Numerical recipes in Fortran: The art of scientific computing, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.
Reddy, J. N. (1993). An introduction to finite element method, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Scobelev, B. Y., and Vorozhtsov, E. V. (2000). “Sufficient stability criteria and uniform stability of difference schemes.” J. Comput. Phys., 165(2), 717–751.
Zhao, D. H., et al. (1996). “Approximate Riemann solvers in FVM for 2D hydraulic shock wave modeling.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 692–702.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 23, 2013
Accepted: Apr 8, 2015
Published online: Jun 5, 2015
Discussion open until: Nov 5, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.