Creation of Multisensor Precipitation Products from WSI NOWrad Reflectivity Data
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 5
Abstract
Radar and multisensor quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) have played a critical role in real-time hydrologic and weather predictions. The utility of this data set for hydrologic model calibration, however, is hampered by the limited data archive and the presence of data gaps. In the research reported in this paper, the use of a composite reflectivity data set is investigated, namely the Weather Services International (WSI) National Operational Weather radar (NOWrad) data set, to create an hourly QPE that would complement the National Weather Service (NWS) Stage III archive by filling in the latter’s gaps and potentially improving the latter’s accuracy. The paper starts from an inventory analysis of Stage III and NOWrad products, and through which it is found that as much as 17% of the Stage III data were missing for some of the regions, and some of these gaps can be filled using the NOWrad data. Then, the paper presents two experimental products, as follows: (1) NOWrad–Raw, based on variable relationship derived for each month using monthly Cooperative Observer Porgram (COOP) station totals; and (2) NOWrad–bias-corrected mosaic (BMO), derived by bias-correcting the NOWrad–Raw using hourly rain gauge products. Then the two products along with Stage III products against independent hourly gauge reports over two locations [(1) Charlotte–Mecklenburg metropolitan area in North Carolina, and (2) Lower Colorado River drainage in central Texas]. The analyses over the two test sites reveal the following: (1) NOWrad–Raw product suffers from a negative overall and conditional bias, while the Stage III is closer to bias-neutral; and (2) NOWrad–Raw product, at least over the Charlotte–Mecklenburg area, can outperform the Stage III in terms of correlation with gauge data and skill in detecting light rainfall. Further analyses of the Raw and bias-corrected NOWrad suggest that negative conditional bias may be substantially improved, but there is a tendency to overcorrect the bias for the summer months, possibly due to the presence of false detections. The results show that NOWrad can be a viable source of high-resolution quantitative precipitation information and it complements the current NWS archive in several respects. Possible mechanisms for further improving the accuracy of the NOWrad QPE are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The NOWrad reflectivity data used in the research reported in this paper were provided by the Mesoscale Meteorology Division of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, sponsored by the National Science Foundation. The assistance provided by David Ahijevych of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and information on NOWrad history provided by Carrie Gillespie and staff of WSI and The Weather Company, are gratefully acknowledged.
References
Baeck, M. L., and Smith, J. A. (1995). “Climatological analysis of manually digitized radar data for the United States east of the Rocky Mountains.” Water Resour. Res., 31(12), 3033–3049.
Fulton, R. A., Breidenbach, J. P., Seo, D. J., Miller, D. A., and O’Bannon, T. (1998). “The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm.” Weather Forecast., 13(2), 377–395.
Germann, U., and Zawadski, I. (2002). “Scale-dependence of the predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part I: Description of the methodology.” Mon. Weather Rev., 130(12), 2859–2873.
Habib, E., Qin, L., Seo, D. J., and Ciach, G. (2013). “Independent assessment of incremental complexity in the NWS multi-sensor precipitation estimator algorithms.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 143–155.
Hardegree, S. P., Van Vactor, S. S., Levinson, D. H., and Winstral, A. H. (2008). “Evaluation of NEXRAD radar precipitation products for natural resource applications.” Rangeland Ecol. Manage., 61(3), 346–353.
Kitzmiller, D., Miller, D., Fulton, R., and Ding, F. (2013). “Radar and multisensor precipitation estimation techniques in National Weather Service hydrologic operations.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 133–142.
Kondragunta, C. R., and Shrestha, K. (2006). “Automated real-time operational rain gauge quality-control tools in NWS hydrologic operations.” Proc., 20th Conf. on Hydrology, American Meteorological Society.
Lin, Y., and Mitchell, K. E. (2005). “The NCEP Stage II/IV hourly precipitation analyses: Development and applications.” Proc., 19th Conf. on Hydrology, American Meteorological Society.
Marchok, T., Rogers, R., and Tuleya, R. (2007). “Validation schemes for tropical cyclone quantitative precipitation forecasts: Evaluation of operational models for U.S. landfalling cases.” Weather Forecast., 22(4), 726–746.
NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research). (2014). “U.S. composite reflectivity (2 km by 2 km) from National Weather Service radars.” 〈http://locust.mmm.ucar.edu/imagearchive1/WSI/docs/GHRC_README.htm〉 (Jan. 29, 2014).
Reed, S., et al. (2004). “Overall distributed model intercomparison project results.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 27–60.
Seo, D. (1998). “Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gage data.” J. Hydrol., 208(1–2), 37–52.
Seo, D., and Breidenbach, J. P. (2002). “Real-time correction of spatially nonuniform bias in radar rainfall data using rain gauge measurements.” J. Hydrometeorol., 3(2), 93–111.
Seo, D., Breidenbach, J. P., and Johnson, E. R. (1999). “Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar rainfall data.” J. Hydrol., 223(3–4), 131–147.
Seo, D.-J., Seed, A., and Delrieu, G. (2010). “Radar and multisensor rainfall estimation for hydrologic applications.” Rainfall: State of the science, geophysical monograph series, F. Y. Testik and M. Gebremichael, eds., Vol. 191, AGU, Washington, DC, 79–104.
Smith, J. A., and Krajewski, W. F. (1991). “Estimation of mean field bias of radar rainfall estimates.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 30(4), 397–412.
Smith, M. B., et al. (2012). “Results of the DMIP 2 Oklahoma experiments.” J. Hydrol., 418–419(8), 17–48.
WSI (Weather Services International). (1995). Data services catalog, Billerica, MA.
Zhang, Y., Adams, T., and Bonta, J. V. (2007). “Subpixel-scale rainfall variability and the effects on separation of radar and gauge rainfall errors.” J. Hydrometeorol., 8(6), 1348–1363.
Zhang, Y., Reed, S., and Kitzmiller, D. (2011). “Effects of retrospective gauge-based readjustment of multisensor precipitation estimates on hydrologic simulations.” J. Hydrometeorol., 12(3), 429–443.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22 • Issue 5 • May 2017
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 26, 2014
Accepted: Feb 20, 2015
Published online: Apr 3, 2015
Discussion open until: Sep 3, 2015
Published in print: May 1, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.