Technical Notes
May 18, 2015

Long-Range Hydrologic Forecasting in El Niño Southern Oscillation-Affected Coastal Watersheds: Comparison of Climate Model and Weather Generator Approach

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 12

Abstract

Streamflow forecasting is essential for the proper management of water resources, especially when severe droughts cause water resource scarcity. Streamflow forecasting using physically based or conceptual hydrologic models is a common approach. However, these models rely on the predicted climate data, which are at times unrealistic and depart significantly from actual observed data, resulting in an unreliable forecast. Because the sea surface temperature (SST) in the Niño 3.4 region has a potential teleconnection with streamflow in the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-affected regions, the streamflow forecasting ability of a model can be enhanced by using SST in data-driven models. In fact, conceptual models cannot incorporate SST data as input. Therefore, in this study, an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) was used to infuse SST data (from the equatorial Pacific) with predicted precipitation and temperature for streamflow forecasting with one-to-three months’ lead time. For the forecasted climate data, two methods were used: (1) ENSO-conditioned weather sequences, and (2) climate data from the Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2) model. The forecasted streamflow, after systematic error correction, was postvalidated with observed streamflow from 1982 to 1988. The streamflow forecasting at one-month lead time was found to be better than that of the three-month lead time. The root-mean square error and percentage bias for one-month lead time forecast using CFSv2 were 3.8m3/s and 7%, whereas these statics using ENSO-conditioned weather-sequence data were 4.4m3/s and 10.5%, respectively. This research concludes that the climate model approach is a better choice for moderately sized watersheds for streamflow forecast with a one-month lead time. Conversely, the weather-generator approach is more suitable for streamflow forecasting with a three-month lead time, especially for low-flow conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alabama Department of Environmental Management. (1997). A survey of the Chickasaw Creek watershed, 1–95.
Araghinejad, S., Burn, D. H., and Karamouz, M. (2006). “Long-lead probabilistic forecasting of streamflow using ocean-atmospheric and hydrological predictors.” Water Resour. Res., 42(3), W03431.
Baigorria, G. A., and Jones, J. W. (2010). “GiST: A stochastic model for generating spatially and temporally correlated daily rainfall data.” J. Clim., 23(22), 5990–6008.
Clark, M. P., et al. (2004). “A resampling procedure for generating conditioned daily weather sequences.” Water Resour. Res., 40(2), W04304.
Eldaw, A. K., Salas, J. D., and Garcia, L. A. (2003). “Long-range forecasting of the Nile River flows using climatic forcing.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 42(7), 890–904.
Gįmiz-Fortis, S., Esteban-Parra, M., Trigo, R., and Castro-Dķez, Y. (2010). “Potential predictability of an Iberian river flow based on its relationship with previous winter global SST.” J. Hydrol., 385(1–4), 143–149.
Gutierrez, F., and Dracup, J. (2001). “An analysis of the feasibility of long-range streamflow forecasting for Colombia using El Niño-southern oscillation indicators.” J. Hydrol., 246(1–4), 181–196.
Haith, D. A., and Shoenaker, L. L. (1987). “Generalized watershed loading functions for streamflow nutrients.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 23(3), 471–478.
Hamlet, A. F., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (1999). “Columbia River streamflow forecasting based on ENSO and PDO climate signals.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 333–341.
Hashino, T., Bradley, A., and Schwartz, S. (2006). “Evaluation of bias-correction methods for ensemble streamflow volume forecasts.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 3(2), 561–594.
Hsieh, W. W., Li, J., Shabbar, A., and Smith, S. (2003). “Seasonal prediction with error estimation of Columbia River streamflow in British Columbia.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 146–149.
Jang, J. S. R. (1993). “ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system.” Syst. Man Cyber., 23(3), 665–685.
Kalra, A., and Ahmad, S. (2009). “Using oceanic-atmospheric oscillations for long lead time streamflow forecasting.” Water Resour. Res., 45(3), W03413.
Keener, V., Feyereisen, G., Lall, U., Jones, J., Bosch, D., and Lowrance, R. (2010). “El-Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) influences on monthly NO3 load and concentration, streamflow and precipitation in the Little River Watershed, Tifton, Georgia (GA).” J. Hydrol., 381(3–4), 352–363.
Krstanovic, P., and Singh, V. (1991). “A univariate model for long-term streamflow forecasting.” Stochastic Hydrol. Hydraul., 5(3), 189–205.
Liang, X., Wood, E. F., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (1996). “Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: Evaluation and modification.” Global Planetary Change, 13(1), 195–206.
Martina, M., Todini, E., and Libralon, A. (2006). “A Bayesian decision approach to rainfall thresholds based flood warning.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10(3), 413–426.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Mukerji, A., Chatterjee, C., and Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2009). “Flood forecasting using ANN, neuro-fuzzy, and neuro-GA Models.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 647–652.
Pramanik, N., and Panda, R. K. (2009). “Application of neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems for river flow prediction.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 54(2), 247–260.
Rajagopalan, B., and Lall, U. (1999). “A k-nearest-neighbor simulator for daily precipitation and other weather variables.” Water Resour. Res., 35(10), 3089–3101.
Richardson, C. W. (1981). “Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation.” Water Resour. Res., 17(1), 182–190.
Richardson, C. W., and Wright, D. A. (1984). WGEN: A model for generating daily weather variables, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC, 88.
Rogers, J. C., and Coleman, J. S. M. (2003). “Interactions between the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation, El Niño/La Niña, and the PNA in winter Mississippi valley streamflow.” Geophys. Res. Lett, 30(10).
Saha, S., et al. (2006). “The NCEP climate forecast system.” J. Clim., 19(15), 3483–3517.
Saha, S., et al. (2010). “The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91(8), 1015–1057.
Schoof, J. (2008). “Application of the multivariate spectral weather generator to the contiguous United States.” Agric. Forest Meteorol., 148(3), 517–521.
Sharma, S., Srivastava, P., Fang, X., and Kalin, L. (2014a). “Hydrologic simulation approach for El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-affected watershed with limited rain gauge stations.” Hydrol. Sci. J., in press.
Sharma, S., Srivastava, P., Fang, X., and Kalin, L. (2015). “Performance comparison of adoptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with Loading Simulation Program C++ (LSPC) model for streamflow simulation in El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-affected watershed.” Expert Syst. Appl., 42(4), 2213–2223.
Sharma, S., Srivastava, P., Kalin, L., Fang, X., and Elias, E. (2014b). “Predicting total organic carbon load with El Nino southern oscillation phase using hybrid and fuzzy logic approaches.” Trans. ASABE, 57(4), 1071–1085.
Sheridan, J. (2002). “Peak flow estimates for coastal plain watersheds.” Trans. ASAE, 45(5), 1319–1326.
Tetra Tech. (2007). User’s manual for meteorological data analysis and preparation tool (Metadapt), Fairfax, VA.
Wang, G., and Eltahir, E. A. B. (1999). “Use of ENSO information in medium-and long-range forecasting of the Nile floods.” J. Clim., 12(6), 1726–1737.
Wang, W., Chen, M., and Kumar, A. (2010). “An assessment of the CFS real-time seasonal forecasts.” Weather Forecasting, 25(3), 950–969.
Wilks, D. S., and Wilby, R. L. (1999). “The weather generation game: A review of stochastic weather models.” Progress Phys. Geogr., 23(3), 329–357.
Wood, A. W., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2006). “A test bed for new seasonal hydrologic forecasting approaches in the western United States.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87(12), 1699–1712.
Wood, A. W., Maurer, E. P., Kumar, A., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2002). “Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States.” J. Geophys. Res, 107(D20), 4429.
Wood, A. W., and Schaake, J. C. (2008). “Correcting errors in streamflow forecast ensemble mean and spread.” J. Hydrometeorol., 9(1), 132–148.
Yan, H., Zou, Z., and Wang, H. (2010). “Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for classification of water quality status.” J. Environ. Sci., 22(12), 1891–1896.
Young, K. C. (1994). “A multivariate chain model for simulating climatic parameters from daily data.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 33(6), 661–671.
Yuan, X., Wood, E. F., Luo, L., and Pan, M. (2011). “A first look at Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2) for hydrological seasonal prediction.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 38(13), L13402.
Yuan, X., Wood, E. F., Roundy, J. K., and Pan, M. (2013). “CFSv2-based seasonal hydroclimatic forecasts over the conterminous United States.” J. Clim., 26(13), 4828–4847.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20Issue 12December 2015

History

Received: Mar 25, 2014
Accepted: Feb 3, 2015
Published online: May 18, 2015
Discussion open until: Oct 18, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Suresh Sharma, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Youngstown State Univ., One University Plaza, OH 44555 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Puneet Srivastava [email protected]
Professor, Biosystems Engineering Dept., Auburn Univ., Tom E. Corley Bldg., Auburn, AL 36849. E-mail: [email protected]
Xing Fang, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., Auburn Univ., 229 Harbert Engineering Center Auburn, AL 36849. E-mail: [email protected]
Latif Kalin, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Forestry and Wildlife Bldg., Auburn, AL 36849. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share