Effects of Watershed Subdivision on Peak Discharge in Rainfall-Runoff Modeling in the WinTR-20 Model
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 10
Abstract
The rainfall-runoff model, WinTR-20, uses subdivision to simulate runoff behavior for complex watersheds exhibiting heterogeneous conditions or storage. It has been shown by others that subdivision generally causes the predicted peak discharge to increase, though the underlying processes are often obscured by watershed complexity. This study instead focuses on a simplified, theoretical watershed, systematically comparing the unsubdivided watershed with a two-subbasin model in order to determine the most sensitive factors. Peak discharge sensitivity is evaluated with respect to (1) series subdivision with varying total area, (2) parallel subdivision with varying proportional area, (3) parallel subdivision with varying curve number, and (4) parallel subdivision with simultaneously varying area and curve numbers. Peak discharge is most sensitive to differences in curve number, which controls both the runoff volume and peak timing. Serial subdivision was found to produce a significant high peak discharge, regardless of relative area, while parallel subdivision produced a smaller and more variable effect, either increasing or decreasing peak flow based on the area ratio. Using these subdivision sensitivities, general guidelines are presented for the rational subdivision in rainfall-runoff modeling. For example, subdivision is recommended when subarea curve numbers differ by more than five and the relative sizes of subareas influence the effects of discretization.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Arnold, J. G., Engel, B. A., and Srinivasan, R. (1993). “A continuous time, grid cell watershed model.” Proc., Application of Advanced Information Technologies: Effective Management Natural Resources Conf., ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, 267–278.
Bingner, R. L., Garbrecht, J., Arnold, J. G., and Srinivasan, R. (1997). “Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation runoff and fine sediment yield.” Trans. ASAE, 40(5), 1329–1335.
Casey, M. J. (1999). “The effect of watershed sudivision on simulated hydrologic response using the NRCS TR-20 model.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Chen, E., and Mackay, D. S. (2004). “Effects of distribution-based parameter aggregation on a spatially distributed agricultural nonpoint source pollution model.” J. Hydrol., 295(1–4), 211–224.
Cho, H., and Olivera, F. (2009). “Effect of the spatial variability of land use, soil type, and precipitation on streamflows in small watersheds.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(3), 673–686.
Cho, J., Lowrance, R. R., Bosch, D. D., Strickland, T. C., Her, Y., and Vellidis, G. (2010). “Effect of watershed subdivision and filter width on SWAT simulation of a coastal plain watershed.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 46(3), 586–602.
Cunge, J. A. (1969). “On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method).” J. Hydraul. Res., 7(2), 205–230.
Cydzik, K., and Hogue, T. S. (2009). “Modeling postfire response and recovery using the hydrologic engineering center hydrologic modeling system (HEC-HMS).” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(3), 702–714.
Dunne, T., and Leopold, L. B. (1978). Water in environmental planning, W.H. Freeman, New York, 818.
Fitzhugh, T. W., and Mackay, D. S. (2000). “Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model.” J. Hydrol., 236(1–2), 35–53.
Ghosh, I., and Hellweger, F. L. (2012). “Effects of spatial resolution in urban hydrologic simulations.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 129–137.
Goodrich, D. C., Woolhiser, D. A., and Sorooshian, S. (1988). “Model complexity required to maintain hydrologic response.” Hydraulic engineering, S. A. Abt and J. Gessler, eds., ASCE, New York, 431–436.
Han, J.-C., Huang, G.-H., Zhang, H., Li, Z., and Li, Y.-P. (2013). “Effects of watershed subdivision level on semi-distributed hydrological simulations: Case study of the SLURP model applied to the Xiangxi River watershed, China.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 59(1), 108–125.
Jha, M., Gassman, P. W., Secchi, S., Gu, R., and Arnold, J. (2004). “Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 40(3), 811–825.
Kalin, L., Govindaraju, R. S., and Hantush, M. M. (2003). “Effect of geomorphologic resolution on modeling of runoff hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 276(1–4), 89–111.
Migliaccio, K. W., and Chaubrey, I. (2008). “Spatial distributions and stochastic parameter influences on SWAT flow and sediment predictions.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 258–269.
Norris, G., and Haan, C. T. (1993). “Impact of subdividing watersheds on estimated hydrographs.” Appl. Eng. Agric., 9(5), 443–445.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). (1998). National engineering handbook. Part 630—Hydrology, Washington, DC.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2008). “Win TR-20 tutorial.” 〈www.wsi.nrcs.usda.gov/products/w2q/H…/WinTR20/WinTR20Tutorial.ppt〉 (Jul. 3, 2011).
Rojas, R., Velleux, M., Julien, P. Y., and Johnson, B. E. (2008). “Grid scale effects on watershed soil erosion models.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 793–802.
SCS (Soil Conservation Service). (1973). “A method for estimating volume and rate of runoff in small watersheds.”, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
Stephenson, D. (1989). “Selection of stormwater model parameters.” J. Environ. Eng., 210–220.
Thompson, D. B., and Cleveland, T. G. (2009). “Subdivision of Texas watersheds for hydrologic modeling.”, Texas Dept. of Transportation Research and Technology, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX.
Tripathi, M. P., Raghuwanshi, N. S., and Rao, G. P. (2006). “Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation of water balance components.” Hydrol. Process., 20(5), 1137–1156.
Warwick, J. J., and Litchfield, J. (1993). “Impact of spatial and temporal data limitations on the modeling of runoff quantity and quality.” Water management in the ‘90’s: A time for innovation, K. Hon, ed., ASCE, New York, 862–865.
Zaghloul, N. A. (1981). “Sensitivity analysis of the SWMM runoff-transport parameters and the effects of catchment discretisation.” Adv. Water Resour., 6(4), 214–223.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20 • Issue 10 • October 2015
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 21, 2014
Accepted: Jan 15, 2015
Published online: Feb 26, 2015
Discussion open until: Jul 26, 2015
Published in print: Oct 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.