Impact of Calibration Objective on Hydrological Model Performance in Ungauged Watersheds
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 8
Abstract
Predictions in ungauged basins (PUBs) are an increasingly important question in the water resource and quality management fields, especially for small watersheds where the phenomenon of data scarcity is prevalent. The transfer of hydrological parameters on the basis of regionalization is a common approach for solving PUB problems, and plenty of research has been undertaken on how to transfer calibrated parameters from gauged to ungauged watersheds. However, hydrological parameters estimation is substantially influenced by calibration objectives, which may affect model performance on the recipient watershed as well. In this paper the influence of calibration objectives on the transfer of parameter sets from one watershed to another is discussed. The HSPF hydrological model and the PEST automatic calibration model with four calibration objectives (squared error of daily flow, squared error of monthly flow, squared error of exceedance flow time, and sum of these squared errors) were applied. One gauged watershed of the Lake Dianchi Basin with daily flow data from 1999 to 2010 was calibrated by the combined HSPF-PEST model to obtain the transferrable parameters. Then the entire parameter sets were transferred to another neighborhood watershed, and model performance was tested by conventional goodness-of-fit statistics. Results show that (1) parameters transferred from all four calibration objectives perform well on the target watershed; (2) selection of calibration objective has a significant impact on model performance for both donor and recipient watersheds; and (3) the differences among objectives are similar in the two watersheds, suggesting that the objectives’ features are transferrable. Therefore, the selection of calibration objective should be considered as a significant factor when transferring parameters to ungauged watersheds.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council, the China Water Pollution Control and Technology Program (2013ZX07102), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41222002). The authors are grateful to Dr. Feng Zhou, Yanjun Dong, and Juntai Peng for their assistance and direction in the HSPF model building, and to the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
References
Al-Abed, N. A., and Whiteley, H. R. (2002). “Calibration of the hydrological simulation program FORTRAN (HSPF) model using automatic calibration and geographical information systems.” Hydrol. Processes, 16(16), 3169–3188.
Bardossy, A. (2007). “Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(2), 703–710.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., and Kittle, J. L. (2001). Hydrological simulation program: FORTRAN—(HSPF): User’s manual for version 12, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
Brannan, K. M., Heatwole, C. D., Dillaha, T. A., Mostaghimi, S., and Yagow, E. R. (2000). “Assessing the accuracy of using calibrated HSPF data sets in ungauged watersheds.” ASAE Annual International MeetingMilwaukee, ASAE, St. Joseph.
Doherty, J. (2004). “PEST: Model-independent parameter estimation, User manual.” 5th Ed., Watermark Number Computation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Efstratiadis, A., and Koutsoyiannis, D. (2010). “One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: A review.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 55(1), 58–78.
Ferguson, I. M., and Maxwell, R. M. (2012). “Human impacts on terrestrial hydrology: Climate change versus pumping and irrigation.” Environ. Res. Lett., 7(4), 044022.
Gan, T. Y., Dlamini, E. M., and Biftu, G. F. (1997). “Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol., 192(1–4), 81–103.
Glavan, M., Pintar, M., and Volk, M. (2013). “Land use change in a 200-year period and its effect on blue and green water flow in two Slovenian Mediterranean catchments: Lessons for the future.” Hydrol. Processes, 27(26), 3964–3980.
Hrachowitz, M., et al. (2013). “A decade of predictions in ungauged basins (PUB): A review.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 58(6), 1198–1255.
Kim, S. M., Benham, B. L., Brannan, K. M., Zeckoski, R. W., and Doherty, J. (2007). “Comparison of hydrologic calibration of HSPF using automatic and manual methods.” Water Resour. Res., 43(1), W014S02.
Kokkonen, T. S., Jakeman, A. J., Young, P. C., and Koivusalo, H. J. (2003). “Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: Model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta hydrologic laboratory, North Carolina.” Hydrol. Processes, 17(11), 2219–2238.
Lamentowicz, M., et al. (2009). “Climate and human induced hydrological change since AD 800 in an ombrotrophic mire in Pomerania (N Poland) tracked by testate amoebae, macro-fossils, pollen and tree rings of pine.” Boreas, 38(2), 214–229.
Lee, S. B., Yoon, C. G., Jung, K. W., and Hwang, H. S. (2010). “Comparative evaluation of runoff and water quality using HSPF and SWMM.” Water Sci. Technol., 62(6), 1401–1409.
Lumb, A. M., Mccammon, R. B., and Kittle, J. L. (1994). Users manual for an expert system for calibration of the hydrological simulation program—Fortan, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Mohamoud, Y. M., and Prieto, L. M. (2012). “Effect of temporal and spatial rainfall resolution on HSPF predictive performance and parameter estimation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 377–388.
Post, D. A., and Jakeman, A. J. (1999). “Predicting the daily streamflow of ungauged catchments in SE Australia by regionalising the parameters of a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model.” Ecol. Modell., 123(2–3), 91–104.
Razavi, T., and Coulibaly, P. (2013). “Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: Review of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 958–975.
Said, A., Ross, M., Trout, K., and Zhang, J. (2007). “Simulation of surface water for un-gauged areas with storage-attenuation wetlands.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(2), 546–556.
Sivapalan, M. (2003). “Prediction in ungauged basins: A grand challenge for theoretical hydrology.” Hydrol. Processes, 17(15), 3163–3170.
Skahill, B. E. (2004). “Use of the hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN (HSPF) model for watershed studies.”, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS.
Tan, G., Xia, J., and Li, X. (2004). “Hydrological prediction in ungauged basins.” J. Glaciol. Geocryology, 26(2), 192–196 (in Chinese).
Vansteenkiste, T., Tavakoli, M., Ntegeka, V., Willems, P., De Smedt, F., and Batelaan, O. (2013). “Climate change impact on river flows and catchment hydrology: A comparison of two spatially distributed models.” Hydrol. Processes, 27(25), 3649–3662.
Vorosmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., and Lammers, R. B. (2000). “Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth.” Science, 289(5477), 284–288.
Yihdego, Y., and Webb, J. (2013). “An empirical water budget model as a tool to identify the impact of land-use change in stream flow in Southeastern Australia.” Water Resour. Manage, 27(14), 4941–4958.
Zhang, A. J., Zhang, C., Fu, G. B., Wang, B. D., Bao, Z. X., and Zheng, H. X. (2012). “Assessments of impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff with SWAT for the Huifa River basin, northeast China.” Water Resour. Manage., 26(8), 2199–2217.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20 • Issue 8 • August 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 31, 2014
Accepted: Oct 4, 2014
Published online: Nov 17, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 17, 2015
Published in print: Aug 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.