Basin-Scale Assessment of Operational Base Flow Separation Methods
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 5
Abstract
Base flow recession analysis is required to estimate the long-term, reliable component of the hydrograph and water cycle, and for drought management, inflow design and analysis, and contaminant and nutrient transport. Operationally, recursive digital filtering (RDF) techniques are commonly applied; however, questions have been raised about the reliability and parameterization of these methods. A comparison of three base flow separation methods, including two popular RDFs and one hydrologic model, is performed in two base flow-dominant subbasins of the Grand River Basin in southern Ontario, Canada. The Eramosa River and Whiteman’s Creek subbasins are similar in size (236 and , respectively) and have similar annual runoff distributions yet significantly different physiography governing runoff generation. Subbasin physiographic characteristics are found to result in significant differences in annual base flow distributions, which are well captured by the hydrologic model but not by the RDFs. Stable water isotopes (SWIs) are applied for verification of base flow separations using two-component mixing model separations and show better visual agreement with a base flow derived from the hydrologic model over the RDF methods. Limitations include insufficient isotope data to quantify a statistically significant model fit and results that are tied to subbasin physiography and basin-specific processes. Results support the application of SWIs for regional hydrograph separation and highlight the need for more efficient, yet physically based base flow separation in regions with complex physiography.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Laboratory for Stable Isotope Science (LSIS) at the University of Western Ontario for analyzing the Grand River isotope samples and all those who were involved with sample collection. We thank our reviewers for greatly improving this manuscript. We would like to thank Dr. Andrew Piggott, Environment Canada, for assistance with coordination of the water sampling. We would also like to thank the Grand River Conservation Authority for initiating the study and Drs. Kouwen and Edwards, who supported the WATFLOOD tracer module development. This is LSIS contribution #310.
References
Ahiablame, L., Chaubey, I., Engel, B., Cherkauer, K., and Merwade, V. (2013). “Estimation of annual baseflow at ungauged sites in Indiana USA.” J. Hydrol., 476, 13–27.
Arnold, J. G., and Allen, P. M. (1999). “Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 35(2), 411–424.
Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M., Muttiah, R., and Bernhardt, G. (1995). “Automated base-flow separation and recession analysis techniques.” Ground Water, 33(6), 1010–1018.
Beven, K., and Binley, A. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Processes, 6(3), 279–298.
Brassard, P., Waddington, J. M., Hill, A. R., and Roulet, N. T. (2000). “Modelling groundwater and surface water mixing in a headwater wetland: Implications for hydrograph separation.” Hydrol. Processes, 14(15), 2697–2710.
Canadian Council on Geomatics. (2014). “Geobase geospatial data.” 〈http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/index.html〉 (Sep. 2, 2014).
Carey, S. K., Boucher, J. L., and Duarte, C. M. (2013). “Inferring groundwater contributions and pathways to streamflow during snowmelt over multiple years in a discontinuous permafrost subarctic environment (Yukon, Canada).” Hydrogeol. J., 21(1), 67–77.
Chapman, T. (1999). “A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation.” Hydrol. Processes, 13(5), 701–714.
Collischonn, W., and Fan, F. M. (2013). “Defining parameters for Eckhardt’s digital baseflow filter.” Hydrol. Processes, 27(18), 2614–2622.
Corzo, G., and Solomatine, D. (2007). “Baseflow separation techniques for modular artificial neural network modelling in flow forecasting.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 52(3), 491–507.
Eckhardt, K. (2005). “How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(2), 507–515.
Eckhardt, K. (2008). “A comparison of baseflow indices, which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods.” J. Hydrol., 352(1–2), 168–173.
Environment Canada. (2004). Canadian Climate Normals (1971–2000), 〈http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_e.html〉 (Apr. 15, 2008).
Fan, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., and Li, W. (2013). “Variation of baseflows in the headstreams of the Tarim River basin during 1960–2007.” J. Hydrol., 487, 98–108.
Ferket, B. V. A., Samain, B., and Pauwels, V. R. N. (2010). “Internal validation of conceptual rainfall-runoff models using baseflow separation.” J. Hydrol., 381(1–2), 158–173.
Fiorotto, V., and Caroni, E. (2013). “A new approach to master recession curve analysis.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 58(5), 966–975.
Furey, P. R., and Gupta, V. K. (2001). “A physically based filter for separating base flow from stream time series.” Water Resour. Res., 37(11), 2709–2722.
Genereux, D. P. (1998). “Quantifying uncertainty in tracer-based hydrograph separations.” Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 915–919.
Gonzales, A. L., Nonner, J., Heijkers, J., and Uhlenbrook, S. (2009). “Comparison of different base flow separation methods in a lowland catchment.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13(11), 2055–2068.
Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA). (2013a). “GRCA GIS download tool.” 〈http://grims.grandriver.ca/imf/imf.jsp?site=grca_datadis&ddsid=925285〉 (Nov. 5, 2013).
Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA). (2013b). “Long Point region approved updated assessment report.” 〈www.sourcewater.ca〉 (Nov. 6, 2013).
Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA). (2013c). “Welcome to the Grand River Watershed, Grand River Conservation Authority.” 〈http://www.grandriver.ca/index.cfm〉 (Nov. 6, 2013).
Hofmann, H. (2013). “Investigating the spatio-temporal variability in groundwater and surface water interactions: A multi-technique approach.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17(9), 3437–3453.
Hubbart, J. A., and Zell, C. (2013). “Considering streamflow trend analyses uncertainty in urbanizing watersheds: A baseflow case study in the central United States.” Earth Interact., 17(5), 1–28.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2012). “Monitoring isotopes in rivers: Creation of the global network for isotopes in rivers (GNIR).”, Vienna, Austria, 253.
Ivey, J. (2002). “Grand River watershed characterisation report.” Univ. of Guelph, Guelph Water Management Group, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jeelani, J. H., Kumar, U. S., and Kumar, B. (2013). “Variation of δ18O and δD in precipitation and stream waters across the Kashmir Himalaya (India) to distinguish and estimate the seasonal sources of stream flow.” J. Hydrol., 481, 157–165.
Kendall, C., and Coplen, T. B. (2001). “Distribution of oxygen-18 and deuterium in river waters across the United States.” Hydrol. Processes, 15(7), 1363–1393.
Kolka, R. K., Giardina, C. P., McClure, J. D., Mayer, A., and Jurgensen, M. F. (2010). “Partitioning hydrologic contributions to an ‘old-growth’ riparian area in the Huron Mountains of Michigan, USA.” Ecohydraulics, 3(3), 315–324.
Kouwen, N. (2012). WATFLOOD/WATROUTE hydrological model routing & flood forecasting system: User’s manual, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Li, L., Maier, H. R., Lambert, M. F., Simmons, C. T., and Partington, D. (2013). “Framework for assessing and improving the performance of recursive digital filters for baseflow estimation with application to the Lyne and Hollick filter.” Environ. Modell. Software, 41, 163–175.
Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. (1982). Hydrology for engineers, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Longobardi, A., and Villani, P. (2008). “Baseflow index regionalization analysis in a Mediterranean area and data scarcity context: Role of the catchment permeability index.” J. Hydrol., 355(1–4), 63–75.
Munyaneza, O., Wenninger, J., and Uhlenbrook, S. (2012). “Identification of runoff generation processes using hydrometric and tracer methods in a meso-scale catchment in Rwanda.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16(7), 1991–2004.
Nathan, R. J., and McMahon, T. A. (1990). “Evaluation of automated techniques for baseflow and recession analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 26(7), 1465–1473.
Nejadhashemi, A. P., Shirmohammadi, A., and Montas, H. J. (2003). “Evaluation of streamflow partitioning methods.” ASAE Paper No. 032183, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
Nejadhashemi, A. P., Shirmohammadi, A., Montas, H. J., Sheridan, J. M., and Bosch, D. D. (2008). “Watershed physical and hydrological effects on baseflow separation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 971–980.
O’Brien, R. J., Misstear, B. D., Gill, L. W., Deakin, J. L., and O’Brien, R. F. (2013). “Developing an integrated hydrograph separation and lumped modelling approach to quantifying hydrological pathways in Irish river catchments.” J. Hydrol., 486, 259–270.
Pettyjohn, W. A., and Henning, R. (1979). “Preliminary estimate of ground-water recharge rates, related streamflow and water quality in Ohio.” Center Project Completion Rep. No. 552, Ohio State Univ., Water Resources, Columbus, OH, 323.
Ribolzi, O., Andrieux, P., Valles, V., Bouzigues, R., Bariac, T., and Voltz, M. (2000). “Contribution of groundwater and overland flows to storm flow generation in a cultivated Mediterranean catchment. quantification by natural chemical tracing.” J. Hydrol., 233(1–4), 241–257.
Romanowicz, R. (2010). “An application of a log-transformed low-flow (LTLF) model to baseflow separation.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 55(6), 952–964.
Samuel, J., Coulibaly, P., and Metcalfe, R. A. (2012). “Identification of rainfall-runoff model for improved baseflow estimation in ungauged basins.” Hydrol. Processes, 26(3), 356–366.
Sklash, M. G., and Farvolden, R. N. (1979). “The role of groundwater in storm runoff.” J. Hydrol., 43(1–4), 45–65.
Sloto, R. A., and Crouse, M. Y. (1996). “HYSEP: A computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis.” Water Resource Investigations No. 96-4040, USGS, Lemoyne, PA.
Smith, A., Delavau, C., and Stadnyk, T. (2014). “Hydrologic assessment of the lower Nelson River basin using stable isotope distribution.” CWRJ, #1083, in press.
Stadnyk, T. A., Delavau, C., Kouwen, N., and Edwards, T. W. D. (2013). “Towards hydrological model calibration and validation: Simulation of stable water isotopes using the isoWATFLOOD model.” Hydrol. Processes, 27(25), 3791–3810.
Stadnyk, T. A., St. Amour, N. A., Kouwen, N., Edwards, T. W. D., Pietroniro, A., and Gibson, J. J. (2005). “A groundwater separation study in boreal wetland terrain: The WATFLOOD hydrological model compared with stable isotope tracers.” Isot. Environ. Health Stud., 41(1), 49–68.
Stadnyk-Falcone, T. A. (2008). “Mesoscale hydrological model validation and verification using stable water isotopes: The isoWATFLOOD model.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, ON, Canada, 385.
St. Amour, N. A., Gibson, J. J., Edwards, T. W. D., Prowse, T. D., and Pietroniro, A. (2005). “Isotopic time-series partitioning of streamflow components in wetland-dominated catchments, lower Liard River basin, northwest territories, Canada.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(17), 3357–3381.
Sudicky, E. D., Jones, J. P., Park, Y. J., and Brookfield, A. (2008). “Simulating complex flow and transport dynamics in an integrated surface-subsurface modeling framework.” Geosci. J., 12(2), 107–122.
Tetzlaff, D., and Soulsby, C. (2009). “Sources of baseflow in larger catchments: Using tracers to develop a holistic understanding of runoff generation.” J. Hydrol., 359, 287–302.
Unland, N. P., et al. (2013). “Investigating the spatio-temporal variability in groundwater and surface water interactions: A multi-technique approach.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17(9), 3437–3453.
Yi, Y., et al. (2012). “Isotopic signals (18O, 2H, 3H) of six major rivers draining the pan-Arctic watershed.” Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 26(1), GB1027.
Zhang, R., Li, Q., Chow, L. T., Li, S., and Danielescu, S. (2013). “Baseflow separation in a small watershed in New Brunswick, Canada, using a recursive digital filter calibrated with the conductivity mass balance method.” Hydrol. Processes, 27(18), 2659–2665.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 8, 2013
Accepted: Aug 27, 2014
Published online: Oct 6, 2014
Discussion open until: Mar 6, 2015
Published in print: May 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.